Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of gross total resection and permanent I-125 brachytherapy followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.Methods and Materials: From April 1999 to May 2002,21 patients with glioblastoma multiforme were enrolled on a Phase I protocol investigating planned gross total resection and immediate placement of permanent I-125 seeds, followed by postoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy to a dose of 60 Gy at 100 cGy b.i.d., 5 days per week. Median age and Karnofsky performance status were 50 years (range, 32-65 years) and 90 (range, 70-100), respectively. Toxicity was assessed according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria.Results: Eighteen patients completed treatment according to protocol. The median preoperative tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging was 18.6 cm(3) (range, 4.4-41.2 cm(3)). The median brachytherapy dose measured 5 mm radially outward from the resection cavity was 400 Gy (range, 200-600 Gy). Ten patients underwent 12 reoperations, with 11 of 12 reoperations demonstrating necrosis without evidence of tumor. Because of high toxicity, the study was terminated early. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 57 and 114 weeks, respectively, but not significantly improved compared with historical patients treated at University of California, San Francisco, with gross total resection and radiotherapy without brachytherapy.Conclusions: Treatment with gross total resection and permanent I-125 brachytherapy followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy as performed in this study results in high toxicity and reoperation rates, without demonstrated improvement in survival. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc.

The purpose of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib and characterize its pharmaco-kinetics and safety profile, alone and with temozolomide, with and without enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs), in patients with malignant gliomas. Patients with stable or progressive malignant primary glioma received erlotinib alone or combined with temozolomide in this dose-escalation study. In each treatment group, patients were stratified by coadministration of EIAEDs. Erlotinib was started at 100 mg orally once daily as a 28-day treatment cycle, with dose escalation by 50 mg/day up to 500 mg/day. Temozolomide was administered at 150 mg/m2 for five consecutive days every 28 days, with dose escalation up to 200 mg/m2 at the second cycle. Eightythree patients were evaluated. Rash, fatigue, and diarrhea were the most common adverse events and were generally mild to moderate. The recommended phase 2 dose of erlotinib is 200 mg/day for patients with glioblastoma multiforme who are not receiving an EIAED, 450 mg/day for those receiving temozolomide plus erlotinib with an EIAED, and at least 500 mg/day for those receiving erlotinib alone with an EIAED. Of the 57 patients evaluable for response, eight had a partial response (PR). Six of the 57 patients had a progression-free survival of longer than six months, including four patients with a PR. Coadministration of EIAEDs reduced exposure to erlotinib as compared with administration of erlotinib alone (33%-71% reduction). There was a modest pharmacokinetic interaction between erlotinib and temozolomide. The favorable tolerability profile and evidence of antitumor activity indicate that further investigation of erlotinib is warranted.

BACKGROUND The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib (also known as Tarceva or OSI-774) has shown promising response rates in malignant gliomas. We investigated the association between expression of EGFR and downstream signaling components and the response of malignant gliomas to erlotinib in a phase I trial of erlotinib administered either alone or with the alkylating agent temozolomide. METHODS Expression of EGFR and ligand-independent EGFRvIII mutant proteins and of phosphorylated protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt in specimens from glioma patients were assessed by immunohistochemistry. EGFR gene amplification was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mutations in PTEN and EGFR were assessed by polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing. Response was evaluated by sequential magnetic resonance imaging every 2 months. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenzel test was used to assess associations between biomarker status and response. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Of 41 glioma patients, eight responded to treatment. Response to erlotinib was associated with EGFR expression (P = .07) and EGFR amplification (P = .08). These associations were stronger and statistically significant among the 29 patients initially diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). Among six responders with sufficient tumor tissue, none had EGFRvIII mutations. None of the 22 tumors with high levels of phosphorylated PKB/Akt responded to erlotinib treatment, whereas eight of the 18 tumors with low levels of phosphorylated PKB/Akt responded to erlotinib treatment (P < .001). The level of phosphorylated PKB/Akt was also associated with time to progression (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Among glioma patients, those with glioblastoma multiforme tumors who have high levels of EGFR expression and low levels of phosphorylated PKB/Akt had better response to erlotinib treatment than those with low levels of EGFR expression and high levels of phosphorylated PKB/Akt.

1This clinical research has been funded by NIH P01-NS42927; NIH P50-CA097257; General Clinical Research Center at University of California, San Francisco, M01-RR00079, and Genentech, Inc. Some data from this study have been presented at the 12th European Cancer Conference (Prados et al. 2003a) and at the American Society for Clinical Oncology 2003 Annual Meeting (Prados et al. 2003b). Dong Xie holds Genentech stock. Sean K. Kelley holds Genentech common stock and nonqualified stock options.

Thirty-two patients with recurrent glioma who had previously received radiation therapy and chemotherapy with nitrosoureas were treated with intravenous carboplatin every 3 weeks, starting at a dose of 350 mg/m2, with a dose escalation of 25 mg/m2 every 6 weeks until a level 4 hematologic toxicity was reached. Of the 28 patients who could be evaluated for a response, 50% demonstrated a response or had stabilization of their disease after two infusions of carboplatin. Their median time to tumor progression and median duration of survival were 19 weeks and 38 weeks. Thrombocytopenia was the major toxicity and was severe in one-third of the patients. No neurologic or renal toxicities were noted. Carboplatin has demonstrated activity against recurrent gliomas in patients who have already had extensive chemotherapy. Increasing the dose of carboplatin may improve the rate of response and the duration of progression-free survival in patients with recurrent glioma.

PURPOSE:This Phase II study was designed to determine the median survival time of adults with supratentorial glioblastoma treated with a combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and 13-cis-retinoic acid (cRA) given daily with conventional radiation therapy (XRT).METHODS AND MATERIALS:This was a single arm, open-labeled, Phase II study. Patients were treated with XRT in conjunction with cRA and TMZ. Both drugs were administered starting on Day 1 of XRT, and chemotherapy cycles continued after the completion of XRT to a maximum of 1 year.RESULTS:Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Time to progression was known for 55 patients and 6 were censored. The estimated 6-month progression-free survival was 38% and the estimated 1-year progression-free survival was 15%. Median time to progression was estimated as 21 weeks. The estimated 1-year survival was 57%. The median survival was 57 weeks.CONCLUSIONS:The combined therapy was relatively well tolerated, but there was no survival advantage compared with historical studies using XRT either with adjuvant nitrosourea chemotherapy, with TMZ alone, or with the combination of TMZ and thalidomide. Based on this study, cRA does not seem to add a significant synergistic effect to TMZ and XRT.

Inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), both small molecule pharmacologic agents and monoclonal antibodies, have entered the treatment of a myriad of human malignancies. Nevertheless, no study to-date has established a correlation between response to anti-EGFR treatment and expression of EGFR. We sought to assess whether expression of EGFR predicts tumor response to erlotinib (OSI-774), an EGFR inhibitor that has shown promise in the treatment of gliomas. Patients with stable or progressive malignant gliomas were treated in a dose-escalating phase I trial of erlotinib administered either alone or with temozolomide. Although the primary endpoint was toxicity, patients treated at progression were evaluated for response with MRIs every two months. There were 8 responders, 6 treated with erlotinib alone, and 2 with erlotinib plus temozolomide. We acquired tissue from 39 of the 52 patients enrolled in this trial who were evaluable for response. EGFR expression level was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and EGFR gene amplification was evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). A strong association was noted between diffusely positive protein expression as measured by IHC and EGFR gene amplification. Table 1 delineates the relationship between radiographic tumor responses to treatment and EGFR protein expression as assesses by IHC. Despite the fact that patients were treated at various dose levels, preliminary analyses, shown in Table 1, reveal a significant association between expression levels of EGFR as measured by IHC and response to treatment (p = 0.04, Wilcoxon rank sum test). FISH analyses, although completed on only 18 patients to-date, suggest a trend towards an association between EGFR gene amplification and response to treatment (p = 0.18, Fisher exact one-sided test). In a Phase I trial of the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib (OSI-774) alone or with temozolomide for patients with recurrent malignant gliomas, preliminary evidence suggests that the expression levels of EGFR as assessed by IHC correlates with response to treatment. Evaluations of EGFR gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridizations (FISH) are ongoing, as are analyses of additional patients enrolled in this trial in the hope that characterizing the signaling profile of each individual tumor may predict its response to erlotinib.

Background: Salvage chemotherapy regimens for patients with recurrent glioma are limited in their efficacy. Reports of antitumor activity of the oral agents etoposide (VP-16®, Immunex Corporation) and high-dose tamoxifen (Nolvadex®, AstraZeneca) prompted this Phase II study. Tamoxifen and etoposide may be synergistic in their antitumor effects. Both agents are administered orally, are well tolerated individually and do not have overlapping toxicities. We report the results of a Phase II study of this combination as salvage therapy for patients with recurrent glioma. Methods: Patients received tamoxifen at an escalating dose from 120 mg/day to 240 mg/day over a 1-week period, after which time etoposide 50 mg/m2/day for 3 weeks was added to the regimen. Patients remained on tamoxifen continuously and the etoposide was repeated after a 2-week break. This 10-week cycle was repeated until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Response assessments using neuroradiographic imaging and clinical eval...

Purpose: The chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide (TMZ) and the antiangiogenic agent thalidomide have both demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. The objectives of this study were to determine if the combined strategy of these oral agents with radiation therapy (RT) is associated with an improved median survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme and to evaluate toxicity.Methods and Materials: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled in this trial. Radiotherapy parameters were a total dose of 60 Gy delivered in 2 Gy fractions over 6 weeks. Temozolomide was administered starting the first day of RT at 150 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks for the first cycle and escalated to a maximum dose of 200 mg/m(2). Thalidomide was started on Day 7 of RT at 200 mg and escalated by 100-200 mg every 1-2 weeks depending on patient tolerance, to a maximum of 1,200 mg daily.Results: Sixty-one patients have progressed, with a median time to progression of 22 weeks. Fifty-six patients have died, and the median survival was 73 weeks.Conclusions: This strategy of combination TMZ, thalid and RT was relatively well tolerated with favorable survival outcome for patients with GM when compared to patients not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and similar to those who have received nitrosourea adjuvant chemotherapy. It is unclear the added advantage thalid has in combination with TMZ for this patient population. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.

Purpose: To report the results of a prospective Phase III trial for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), treated with either accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation with or without difluromethylornithine (DFMO) or standard fractionated irradiation with or without DFMO.Methods and Materials: Adult patients with newly diagnosed GEM were registered and randomized following surgery to one of 4 treatment arms: Arm A, accelerated hyperfractionation alone using 2 fractions a day of 1.6 Gy to a total dose of 70.4 Gy in 44 fractions; Arm B, accelerated hyperfractionation as above plus DFMO 1.8 gm/m2 by mouth every 8 h beginning one week before radiation until the last fraction was given; Arm C, single-fraction irradiation of 1.8 Gy/day to 59.4 Gy; Arm D, single-fraction irradiation as in Arm C plus DEMO given as in Arm B, Patients were followed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), as well as for toxicity. Eligibility required histologically proven GEM, age greater than or equal to 18, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) greater than or equal to 60, and no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was not used in this protocol.Results: A total of 231 eligible patients were enrolled, There were 95 men and 136 women with a median age of 57 years, and median KPS of 90, Extent of resection was total in 23, subtotal in 152, and biopsy only in 56 patients. The 4 arms were balanced with respect to age, KPS, and extent of resection, Times to event measurements are from date of diagnosis. Median OS and PFS were 40 and 19 weeks for Arm A; 42 and 22 weeks for Arm B; 37 and 16 weeks for Arm C; and 34 and 19 weeks for Arm D (p = 0.48 for survival; p = 0.32 for PFS), Comparison of the 2 arms treated with DFMO to the 2 arms without DFMO revealed no difference in OS (37 weeks vs. 42 weeks, p = 0.12) or PFS and thus no benefit to the use of DEMO, Comparison of the 2 standard fractionation arms to the 2 accelerated hyperfractionation arms also resulted in no difference in OS (42 weeks vs. 41 weeks, p = 0.75) or PFS, showing no benefit to accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation.Conclusions: In this prospective Phase III study, no survival or PFS benefit was seen with accelerated hyperfractionated irradiation to 70.4 Gy, nor was any benefit seen with DEMO as a radiosensitizer. Standard fractionated irradiation to 59.4 Gy remains the treatment of choice for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme, (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.

We conducted a single-arm phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy combined with 6-thioguanine, procarbazine, dibromodulcitol, lomustine, and vincristine (TPDCV) chemotherapy for treating malignant astrocytoma in children and anaplastic ependymoma in patients of all ages. Between 1984 and 1992, 42 patients who had malignant astrocytomas (glioblastomas multiforme, anaplastic astrocytomas, or mixed anaplastic oligoastrocytomas) were treated with TPDCV chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Of these patients, 40 were younger than 18 years, but 2 were older (22 and 23 years) when treated. Cranial radiation averaged 58 Gy. TPDCV chemotherapy was given for 1 year or until progression. Between 1989 and 1991, 17 patients with malignant ependymoma were treated with TPDCV chemotherapy and craniospinal radiation. Radiation was given at an average dose of 54 Gy to the tumor, 28 Gy to the whole brain, and 31 Gy to the spinal axis. TPDCV chemotherapy was given for 1 year or until tumor progressed. Of the patients with glioblastoma multiforme, 13 of 17 died; the median time to progression was 49 weeks, and median survival was 85 weeks. The four patients surviving at this writing were followed a median 537 weeks (range 364-635 weeks). Of the patients with nonglioblastoma malignant astrocytoma, 14 of 25 died; the median time to progression was 224 weeks. Median survival was not reached in this group. The median follow-up for those surviving was 494 weeks. For the patients with ependymoma, 11 of 17 died with a median time to progression of 141 weeks. The median follow-up for the eight who survive was 469 weeks. Nine patients died with a median survival of 183 weeks. The combination of TPDCV and radiotherapy has activity against childhood anaplastic astrocytoma, glioblastoma multiforme, and anaplastic ependymoma. The results of this study for children with glioblastoma were comparable to results in the literature, while the results for children with anaplastic astrocytoma appeared better than most reports. The combination of TPDCV chemotherapy and radiation therapy for anaplastic ependymomas appears to be active and at least as good as published reports using radiation therapy alone.

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate a combined modality treatment for malignant gliomas using radiation therapy with a radiosensitizer and an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen designed to modify resistance to BNCU.Methods and Materials: Patients were eligible if they were 15 years of age or older, and had newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), or anaplastic glioma (AG). Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy given to a dose of 60 Gy using a single daily fraction Monday to Friday. Concurrent hydroxyurea at a dose of 300 mg/m2 every 6 h every other day was given during radiation. Following radiotherapy, patients were then treated with BCNU and 6-Thioguanine (6TG). The 6-TG was given by mouth every 6 h for 12 doses prior to BCNU. Patients were initially treated with 60 mg/m2/dose of 6TG, with escalation to a maximum dose of 100 mg/m2/dose. The primary study end points were time to tumor progression and survival.Results: A total of 245 eligible patients were enrolled from 1/18/88 to 12/26/91. The histologic subtypes included 135 GBM, and 110 with AG (103 with anaplastic astrocytoma, 7 with high-grade mixed oligoastrocytoma). For the GBM group, the median time to tumor progression (TTP) and median survival were 33 (95% CI 26, 39) and 56 (95% CI 49, 69) weeks, respectively. For the AG group the median TTP was 282 weeks (95% lower confidence bound = 155 weeks). Median survival for this group has not been reached (95% lower confidence bound = 284 weeks) with a median follow-up for surviving patients of 298 weeks. A proportional hazards model was used to look at potential prognostic factors for survival, including initial Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), age, and extent of surgery, as well as dose of 6TG. Higher KPS, and lower age, predicted for longer survival (p < 0.01, < 0.001) in GBM patients; lower age was significant (p = 0.05) for AG cases. A higher (greater than 95 mg/m2) or lower dose of 6TG was not statistically significant in this model.Conclusions: This therapy was no more effective in patients with GBM than other reported series. In patients with malignant gliomas other than GBM, prolonged progression-free and overall survival is noted, without a median survival reached at the time of this report. In this subset of AG patients, survival is comparable to recent studies using halogenated prymidines during radiation and Procarbazine, CCNU, and Vincristine (PCV) as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Purpose: To determine if adjuvant interstitial hyperthermia (HT) significantly improves survival of patients with glioblastoma undergoing brachytherapy boost after conventional radiotherapy.Methods and Materials: Adults with newly-diagnosed, focal, supratentorial glioblastoma less than or equal to 5 cm in diameter were registered postoperatively on a Phase II/III randomized trial and treated with partial brain radiotherapy to 59.4 Gy with oral hydroxyurea. Those patients whose tumor was still implantable after teletherapy were randomized to brachytherapy boost (60 Gy at 0.40-0.60 Gy/h) +/- HT for 30 min immediately before and after brachytherapy. Time to progression (TTP) and survival from date of diagnosis were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results: From 1990 to 1995, 112 eligible patients were entered in the trial. Patient ages ranged from 21-78 years (median, 54 years) and KPS ranged from 70-100 (median, 90). Most commonly due to tumor progression or patient refusal, 33 patients were never randomized. Of the patients, 39 were randomized to brachytherapy ("no heat") and 40 to brachytherapy + HT ("heat"). By intent to treat, TTP and survival were significantly longer for "heat" than "no heat" (p = 0.04 and p = 0.04). For the 33 "no heat" patients and 35 "heat" patients who underwent brachytherapy boost, TTP and survival were significantly longer for "heat" than "no heat" (p 0.045 and p = 0.02, respectively; median survival 85 weeks vs. 76 weeks; 2-year survival 31% vs. 15%). A multivariate analysis for these 68 patients adjusting for age and KPS showed that improved survival was significantly associated with randomization to "heat" (p = 0.008; hazard ratio 0.51). There were no Grade 5 toxicities, 2 Grade 4 toxicities (1 on each arm), and 7 Grade 3 toxicities (1 on "no heat" and 6 on the "heat" arm).Conclusion: Adjuvant interstitial brain HT, given before and after brachytherapy boost, after conventional radiotherapy significantly improves survival of patients with focal glioblastoma, with acceptable toxicity. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.

Purpose: To evaluate brachytherapy dose-response relationships in adults with glioblastoma undergoing temporary I-125 implant boost after external beam radiotherapy.Methods and Materials: Since June 1987, orthogonal radiographs using a fiducial marker box have been used to verify brain implant source positions and generate dose-volume histograms at the University of California, San Francisco. For adults who underwent brachytherapy boost for glioblastoma from June 1987 through December 1992, tumor volumes were reoutlined to ensure consistency and dose-volume histograms were recalculated. Univariate and multivariate analyses of various patient and treatment parameters were performed evaluating for influence of dose on freedom from local failure (FFLF) and actuarial survival. Results: Of 102 implant boosts, 5 were excluded because computer plans were unavailable. For the remaining 97 patients, analyses with adjustment for known prognostic factors (age, KPS, extent of initial surgical resection) and prognostic factors identified on univariate testing (adjuvant chemotherapy) showed that higher minimum brachytherapy tumor dose was strongly associated with improved FFLF (p = 0.001). A quadratic relationship was found between total biological effective dose and survival, with a trend toward optimal survival probability at 47 Gy minimum brachytherapy tumor dose (corresponding to about 65 Gy to 95% of the tumor volume); survival decreased with lower or higher doses. Two patients expired and one requires hospice care because of brain necrosis after brachytherapy doses > 63 Gy to 95% of the tumor volume with 60 Gy to > 18 cm(3) of normal brain.Conclusion: Although higher minimum brachytherapy tumor dose was strongly associated with better local control, a brachytherapy boost dose > 50-60 Gy may result in life-threatening necrosis. We recommend careful conformation of the prescription isodose line to the contrast enhancing tumor volume, delivery of a minimum brachytherapy boost dose of 45-50 Gy in conjunction with conventional external beam radiotherapy, and reoperation for symptomatic necrosis.

In a Phase II trial, 63 evaluable patients with recurrent glioma received i.v. infusions of carboplatin every 3 weeks beginning at a dose of 400 mg/m2. The dose was increased by 50 mg/m2 at each subsequent infusion until the maximum tolerated dose reached, as defined by a platelet count < 25,000/mm3 or an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 500/mm3. Treatment was then resumed at the previous dose level and continued until tumor progression occurred. There were 43 men and 20 women studied (mean age, 41 years; range, 6 months to 70.6 years). The combined response and stabilization rate was 29% for 31 patients with glioblastoma and 71.9% for 32 patients with other tumors; median time to tumor progression was 8.2 and 20.3 weeks and median survival was 25.9 and 58.3 weeks, respectively. Twenty patients had level 4 platelet toxicity and nine had level 4 ANC toxicity. Most tumors progressed before the maximum tolerated dose was reached. These results were not better than those from a previous trial of carboplatin at an initial dose of 350 mg/m2, which was escalated by 25 mg/ m2 after every two infusions. Therefore, an optimal dosing schedule was not achieved in this trial.

The determine the value of radiographically assessed response to radiation therapy as a predictor of survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the authors studied a cohort of 301 patients who were initially treated according to uniform clinical protocols. All patients had newly diagnosed supratentorial GBM and underwent the maximum safe resection followed by external- beam radiation treatment (60 Gy in standard daily fractions or 70.4 Gy in twice-daily fractions of 160 cGy). The radiation response and survival rates were assessable in 222 patients. The extent of resection and the immediate response to radiation therapy were highly correlated with survival, both in a univariate analysis and after correction for age and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score in a multivariate Cox model (p< 0.001 for radiation response and p=0.04 for extent of resection). A subgroup analysis suggested that neuroimaging obtained within 3 days after surgery served as a better baseline for assessment of radiation response than images obtained later. Imaging obtained within 3 days after completion of a course of radiation therapy also provided valid radiation response scores. The impact of the radiographically assessed radiation response on survival time was comparable to that of age or KPS score. This information is easily obtained early in the course of the disease, may be of value for individual patients, and may also have implications for the design and analysis of trials of adjuvant therapy for GBM, including volume-dependent therapies such as radiosurgery or brachytherapy.

A retrospective review including long-term follow-up (4.6-12.0 years) was performed of all 28 pediatric patients who underwent high-activity 125I brachytherapy at the University of California, San Francisco, for primary or recurrent brain tumors from 1980 until 1991. There were 4 glioblastomas, 11 high-grade nonglioblastoma multiforme (NGM) malignant gliomas, 10 contrast-enhancing low-grade NGM, 2 choroid plexus carcinomas, and 1 rhabdomyosarcoma. The 13 survivors included 7 of 8 patients with primary high-grade NGM, 2 of 3 patients with primary low-grade NGM, and 3 of 7 patients with recurrent low-grade NGM. Necrosis (with or without tumor) was identified in 17 of 22 reoperated patients. The mean Karnofsky performance status was 88 +/- 9 at the time of brachytherapy, 87 +/- 7 at 3 years, and 87 +/- 9 in 11 patients alive at 6-12 years. Brachytherapy is a useful modality for treating selected pediatric brain tumors, and although focal necrosis is a common sequela, it does not tend to have a major impact on the Karnofsky performance status, if the implant site is amenable to reoperation.