Bacteriorhodopsin (BR) is a light-driven proton pump of halophilic Archaea, and BR-like proton-pumping rhodopsins have been discovered in Bacteria and Eucarya as well. Leptosphaeria rhodopsin (LR) and Phaeosphaeria Rhodopsin 2 (PhaeoRD2) are both fungal rhodopsins in such a functional class, even though they belong to different branches of the phylogenetic tree. In this study, we compared light-induced structural changes in the K, L, and M photointermediates for PhaeoRD2, LR, and BR using low-temperature Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. We observed a strongly hydrogen-bonded water molecule in PhaeoRD2 (water O-D stretch in D2O at 2258 cm(-1)) as well as in LR and BR. This observation provided additional experimental evidence to the concept that strongly hydrogen-bonded water molecule is the functional determinant of light-driven proton pumping. The difference FTIR spectra for all the K, L, and M states are surprisingly similar between PhaeoRD2 and LR, but not for BR. PhaeoRD2 is more homologous to LR than to BR, but the difference is small. The amino acid identities between PhaeoRD2 and LR, and between PhaeoRD2 and BR are 34.5% and 30.2%, respectively. In addition, the amino acids uniquely identical for the fungal rhodopsins are located rather far from the retinal chromophore. In fact, the amino acid identities within 4 A from retinal are the same among PhaeoRD2, LR, and BR For more than 100 amino acids located within 12 A from retinal, the identities are 48.7% between PhaeoRD2 and LR, 46.0% between PhaeoRD2 and BR, and 47.8% between LR and BR These results suggest that protein core structures are equally different among the three rhodopsins. Thus, the identical FTIR spectra between PhaeoRD2 and LR (but not BR), even for the K state, indicate that fungal rhodopsins possess some common structural motif and dynamics not obvious from the amino acid sequences.

Many fungal rhodopsins, eukaryotic structural homologues of the archaeal light-driven proton pump bacteriorhodopsin, have been discovered in the course of genome sequencing projects. Recently, two fungal rhodopsins were characterized in vitro and exhibited very different photochemical behavior. Neurospora rhodopsin possesses a slow photocycle and shows no ion transport, reminiscent of sensory rhodopsins, while Leptosphaeria rhodopsin has a fast bacteriorhodopsin-like photocycle and pumps protons light-dependently. Such a dramatic difference is surprising considering the very high degree of sequence homology of the two proteins. In this paper, we investigate whether the chemical structure of a cytoplasmic carboxylic acid, the homologue of Asp-96 of bacteriorhodopsin serving as a proton donor for the retinal Schiff base, can define the photochemical properties of fungal rhodopsins. We studied mutants of Leptosphaeria rhodopsin in which this aspartic acid was replaced with Glu or Asn using spectroscopy in the infrared and visible ranges. We show that Glu at this position is inefficient as a proton donor similar to a nonprotonatable Asn. Moreover, this replacement induces long-range structural perturbations of the retinal environment, as evidenced by changes in the vibrational bands of retinal (especially, hydrogen-out-of-plane modes) and neighboring aspartic acids and water molecules. The conformational coupling of the mutation site to the retinal may be mediated by helical rearrangements as suggested by the changes in amide and proline vibrational bands. We conclude that the difference in the photochemical behavior of fungal rhodopsins from Leptosphaeria and Neurospora may be ascribed, to some extent, to the replacement of the cytoplasmic proton donor Asp with Glu.

Leptosphaeria rhodopsin (LR) is an archaeal-type rhodopsin found in fungi, and is the first light-driven proton-pumping retinal protein from eukaryotes. LR pumps protons in a manner similar to that of bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump of haloarchaea. The amino acid sequence of LR is more homologous to that of Neurospora rhodopsin (NR) than BR, whereas NR has no proton-pumping activity. These facts raise the question of how the proton-pumping function is achieved. In this paper, we studied structural changes of LR following the retinal photoisomerization by means of low-temperature Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and compared the obtained spectra with those for BR and NR. While the light-induced photoisomerization from the all-trans to 13-cis form was commonly observed among LR, BR, and NR, we found that the structural changes of LR are closer to those of BR than to those of NR in terms of detailed vibrational bands of retinal and protein. The most prominent difference was seen for the water O-D stretching vibrations (measured in D2O). LR exhibits an O-D stretch of water at 2257 cm(-1), indicating the presence of a strongly hydrogen-bonded water molecule. Such strongly hydrogen-bonded water molecules (O-D stretch at <2400 cm(-1)) were observed for BR, but not for NR. Comprehensive studies of BR mutants and archaeal rhodopsins have revealed that strongly hydrogen-bonded water molecules are found only in the proteins exhibiting proton-pumping activity, suggesting that strongly hydrogen-bonded water molecules and transient weakening of their binding are essential for the proton-pumping function of rhodopsins. This observation for LR provided additional experimental evidence of the correlation between strongly hydrogen-bonded water molecules and proton-pumping activity of archaeal rhodopsins.

Neurospora rhodopsin (NR, also known as NOP-1) is the first rhodopsin of the haloarchaeal type found in eucaryotes. NR demonstrates a very high degree of conservation of the amino acids that constitute the proton-conducting pathway in bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump of archaea. Nevertheless, NR does not appear to pump protons, suggesting the absence of the reprotonation switch that is necessary for the active transport. The photocycle of NR is much slower than that of BR, similar to the case of pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR), an archaeal photosensory protein. The functional and photochemical differences between NR and BR should be explained in the structural context. In this paper, we studied the structural changes of NR following retinal photoisomerization by means of low-temperature Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and compared the obtained spectra with those for BR. For the spectroscopic analysis, we established the light-adaptation procedure for NR reconstituted into 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero- 3-phosphocholine/1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (DMPC/DMPA) liposomes, which takes approximately 2 orders of magnitudes longer than in BR. The structure of the retinal chromophore and the hydrogen-bonding strength of the Schiff base in NR are similar to those in BR. Unique spectral features are observed for the S-H stretching vibrations of cysteine and amide-I vibrations for NR before and after retinal isomerization. In NR, there are no spectral changes assignable to the amide bands of alpha helices. The most prominent difference between NR and BR was seen for the water O-D stretching vibrations (measured in D(2)O). Unlike for haloarchaeal rhodopsins such as BR and ppR, no O-D stretches of water under strong hydrogen-bonded conditions (<2400 cm(-1)) were observed in the NR(K) minus NR difference spectra. This suggests a unique hydrogen-bonded network of the Schiff base region, which may be responsible for the lack of the reprotonation switch in NR.