OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to describe the long-term effectiveness and treatment persistence of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) in migraine and to identify baseline factors associated with 2-year treatment continuation. METHODS:A prospective observational multicenter registry-based study of anti-CGRP MAbs was conducted. We analyzed changes in monthly headache days (MHDs) at 24 months (M24) compared with baseline in those who reached M24 (ON-group). We analyzed patterns of response at 4 time points (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). We defined sustained response (SR) as a ≥50% reduction in MHDs at ≥3 of 4 time points. We compared baseline characteristics of the ON-group with those of the discontinuation group because of lack of effectiveness (OFF-group). RESULTS:A total of 1,340 individuals reached M24 (ON-group: median age 48.0 [41.0-55.0] years; 81.7% female). The median MHD at baseline was 20.0 (13.0-28.0) days. At M24, 60.4% of patients demonstrated ≥50% reduction in MHDs (809/1,340). The proportion of participants achieving SR at M24 was 53.8% (142/264). When compared with the ON-group (n = 1,340), the OFF-group (n = 1,057) showed statistically significant higher baseline MHDs (ON: 20.0 [13.0-28.0] vs OFF: 25.0 [16.0-28.0]) and a greater proportion of patients with aura (ON: 16.2% vs OFF: 22.9%), depression (ON: 22.8% vs OFF: 37.9%), and obesity (ON: 7.2% vs OFF: 19.1%) (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION:Sustained reductions in MHDs to anti-CGRP treatment at 2 years was observed. Delayed treatment onset, migraine with aura, depression, and obesity may negatively affect treatment persistence. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class IV evidence that, in patients with migraine, treatment with anti-CGRP MAbs is associated with sustained reductions in MHDs over a 24-month period.

BackgroundThe International Headache Society has proposed new treatment goals for migraine prevention in real world, as a way to set higher standards of care. This study provides the first assessment of the proportion of individuals achieving them after 6 months of migraine-specific treatment with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs).MethodsThis was a prospective, real-world, European multicenter study, including adults with migraine treated with anti-CGRP MAbs (EUREkA cohort). We assessed the proportions of individuals in each treatment goal category-migraine freedom (no monthly migraine days [MMD]); optimal control (< 4 MMD), modest control (4-6 MMD); insufficient control (>6 MMD)-after 6 months of treatment. We also assessed the proportion of individuals with ≥50% reduction in MMD in the insufficient control group.ResultsOf the 5818 individuals in the EUREkA cohort, 4963 had 6 months data. Of these, 82.3% (4086/4963) were females and the median age was 48.0 [40.0-55.0] years. At baseline, the median monthly headache days [MHD] and MMD were 20.0 [13.3-28.0] and 15.0 [10.0-20.0], respectively. All participants were classified as having insufficient headache control (>6 MMD) at baseline. At month 6, 6.9% (342/4963) had migraine freedom, 22.9% (1137/4963) optimal control, 24.6% (1223/4963) modest control and 45.6% (2261/4963) insufficient control. In the insufficient control group, 27.1% (613/2261) had ≥50% reduction in MMD.ConclusionsHigh standards of care, defined as optimal disease control or even migraine freedom, are achieved in real-world settings with anti-CGRP MAbs in approximately 30% of individuals with a high migraine burden. These findings highlight the need to expand global access to these treatments. Future studies should explore whether initiating migraine-specific preventive treatments earlier could further reduce residual migraine days in responders, enabling a larger proportion of patients to achieve optimal disease control.

Real-world evidence on atogepant remains limited. GIANT2 explores the 24-week real-life effectiveness of atogepant in patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) under routine clinical conditions. GIANT2 is a 24-week, prospective, multicenter, real-world, study including consecutive patients with HFEM or CM with ≥3 preventive treatment failures, treated with atogepant 60 mg once daily. Co-primary endpoints: proportions achieving ≥50

Atogepant, the first oral CGRP receptor antagonist approved for migraine prevention, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in randomized clinical trials (RCT). However, prospective real-world data are lacking. To explore the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of atogepant 60 mg at week 12 in patients with high-frequency episodic (HFEM: 8-14 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM) with multiple therapeutic failures. This ongoing, multicenter (n = 16), prospective real-world study included consecutive adults with HFEM or CM who had failed ≥3 prior preventive treatments, according to AIFA criteria. Participants received atogepant 60 mg daily, with treatment planned for up to 12 months. Primary endpoint: change from baseline to week 12 in monthly migraine days (MMD) for HFEM and monthly headache days (MHD) for CM. Secondary endpoints: changes in monthly analgesic intake (MAI), pain intensity (NRS), disability (HIT-6, MIDAS), interictal burden (MIBS-4), treatment satisfaction (PGIC), responder rates (≥ 50

Although migraine attacks have been precisely characterized over the years − with significant advances in pathophysiology and treatment − the comprehensive identity of the migraine patient remains poorly defined. Real-world data capturing the full sociodemographic and clinical spectrum of individuals with migraine is still limited. The Italian National Migraine Registry (I-GRAINE) was established to address this gap by systematically collecting data on individuals with migraine across Italy’s public healthcare system. I-GRAINE is an ongoing, nationwide, multicenter, prospective registry involving 43 publicly funded headache centers. Since 19/04/2021, patients diagnosed with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM) have been systematically enrolled. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews conducted by trained neurologists using a dedicated electronic platform. Information included sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, comorbidities, and detailed clinical characteristics. We aimed to define the patient profile, explore the broad clinical phenotype, and compare EM and CM subgroups. As of 02/05/2025, 1,630 patients had been enrolled (81.7

Long-term (1-year) fremanezumab treatment proved to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in individuals with migraine and < 2 medication clusters in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We aimed to assess real-world evidence (RWE), long-term effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of fremanezumab in people with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) with > 3 treatment failures and various comorbidities. A 48-week, prospective, multicenter (n = 26), cohort study assessed fremanezumab’s effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in consecutive adults with HFEM or CM with > 3 treatment failures. Primary endpoint was variation from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) in HFEM and monthly headache days (MHD) in CM at weeks 45–48. Secondary endpoints were changes in monthly analgesic medications, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores and ≥ 50

Objective Nearly 60% of migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway experience a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at 12 weeks compared to baseline (responders) . However, approximately half of the patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 12 weeks do respond ≤ 24 weeks ( late responders) . We assessed frequency and characteristics of patients responding to anti-CGRP mAbs only > 24 weeks ( ultra-late responders ). Methods In this multicenter ( n = 16), prospective, observational, real-life study, we enrolled all consecutive adults affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM: ≥ 8 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM), with ≥ 3 prior therapeutic failures, treated with any anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥ 48 weeks. We defined responders patients with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 12 weeks, late responders those with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 24 weeks, and ultra-late responders those achieving a ≥ 50% response only > 24 weeks. Results A total of 572 migraine patients completed ≥ 48 weeks of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. Responders accounted for 60.5% (346/572), late responders for 15% (86/572), and ultra-late responders for 15.7% (90/572). Among ultra-late responders , 7.3% (42/572) maintained the ≥ 50% response rate across all subsequent time intervals (weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48) and were considered persistent ultra-late responders , while 8.4% (48/572) missed the ≥ 50% response rate at ≥ 1 subsequent time interval and were classified as fluctuating ultra-late responders . Fifty patients (8.7%) did not respond at any time interval ≤ 48 weeks. Ultra-late responders differed from responders for higher BMI ( p = 0.033), longer duration of medication overuse ( p < 0.001), lower NRS ( p = 0.017) and HIT-6 scores ( p = 0.002), higher frequency of dopaminergic symptoms ( p = 0.002), less common unilateral pain—either alone ( p = 0.010) or in combination with UAS ( p = 0.023), allodynia ( p = 0.043), or UAS and allodynia ( p = 0.012)—a higher number of comorbidities ( p = 0.012), psychiatric comorbidities ( p = 0.010) and a higher proportion of patients with ≥ 1 comorbidity ( p = 0.020). Conclusion Two-thirds of patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 24 weeks do respond later, while non-responders ≤ 48 weeks are quite rare (8.7%). These findings suggest to rethink the duration of migraine prophylaxis and the definition of resistant and refractory migraine, currently based on the response after 2–3 months of treatment.

Background and objectives The identification of predictors of response to antiCGRP mAbs could favor tailored therapies and personalized treatment plans. This study is aimed at investigating predictors of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% response at 24 weeks in patients with high-frequency episodic (HFEM: 8–14 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM). Methods This is a large, multicenter, cohort, real-life study. We considered all consecutive adult patients affected by HFEM or CM who were prescribed antiCGRP mAbs for ≥ 24 weeks in 20 headache centers. Patients were interviewed face-to-face using a shared semi-structured questionnaire carefully exploring socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Patients received subcutaneous erenumab (70 mg or140 mg, monthly), galcanezumab (120 mg monthly, following a 240 mg loading dose), or fremanezumab (225 mg, monthly or 675 mg, quarterly) according to drug market availability, physician’s choice, or patient’s preference. The primary endpoint of the study was the assessment of ≥ 50% response predictors at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included ≥ 75% and 100% response predictors at 24 weeks. Results Eight hundred sixty-four migraine patients had been treated with antiCGRP mAbs for ≥ 24 weeks (erenumab: 639 pts; galcanezumab: 173 pts; fremanezumab: 55 pts). The ≥50% response (primary endpoint) in HFEM was positively associated with unilateral pain (UP) + unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms (UAs) (OR:4.23, 95%CI:1.57–11.4; p = 0.004), while in CM was positively associated with UAs (OR:1.49, 95%CI:1.05–2.11; p = 0.026), UP + UAs (OR:1.90, 95%CI:1.15–3.16; p = 0.012), UP + allodynia (OR:1.71, 95%CI:1.04–2.83; p = 0.034), and negatively associated with obesity (OR:0.21, 95%CI:0.07–0.64; p = 0.006). The 75% response (secondary endpoint) was positively associated with UP + UAs in HFEM (OR:3.44, 95%CI:1.42–8.31; p = 0.006) and with UP + UAs (OR:1.78, 95%CI:1.14–2.80; p = 0.012) and UP + allodynia (OR:1.92, 95%CI:1.22–3.06; p = 0.005) in CM. No predictor of 100% response emerged in patients with HFEM or CM. Conclusions A critical evaluation of headache characteristics indicating peripheral or central sensitization may help in predicting responsiveness to antiCGRP mAbs in HFEM and CM. A more precise pain profiling may represent a steppingstone for a mechanism-based approach and personalized treatment of migraine with compounds targeting specific molecular mechanisms.

Abstract Background Fremanezumab has demonstrated to be effective, safe, and tolerated in the prevention of episodic or chronic migraine (CM) in randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs). Real-life studies are needed to explore drug effects in unselected patients in routine circumstances and to provide higher generalizability results. This study explores the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of fremanezumab in a real-life population of individuals affected by high-frequency episodic (HFEM: 8–14 days/month) or CM. Methods This is a 12-week multicenter, prospective, cohort, real-life study. We considered all consecutive patients affected by HFEM or CM visited at 9 Italian headache centers from 28/07/2020 to 11/11/2020. Eligible patients were given subcutaneous fremanezumab at the doses of 225 mg monthly or 675 mg quarterly, according to their preference. Primary study endpoints were the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) in HFEM and monthly headache days (MHDs) in CM patients at weeks 9–12 compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints encompassed variation in monthly analgesic intake (MAI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), HIT-6 and MIDAS scores, and ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% responder rates at the same time intervals. Results Sixty-seventh number migraine patients had received ≥ 1 subcutaneous fremanezumab dose and were considered for safety analysis, while 53 patients completed 12 weeks of treatment and were included also in the effectiveness analysis. Fremanezumab was effective in both HFEM and CM, inducing at week 12 a significant reduction in MMDs (-4.6, p < 0.05), MHDs (-9.4, p < 0.001), MAI (-5.7, p < 0.05; -11.1, p < 0.001), NRS (-3.1, p < 0.001; -2.5, p < 0.001), and MIDAS scores (-58.3, p < 0.05; -43.7; p < 0.001). HIT-6 was significantly reduced only in HFEM patients (-18.1, p < 0.001). Remission from CM to episodic migraine and from MO to no-MO occurred in 75% and 67.7% of the patients. The ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% responder rates at week 12 were 76.5%, 29.4% and 9.9% in HFEM and 58.3%, 25% and 0% in CM. Younger age emerged as a positive response predictor (OR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.85–0.98, p = 0.013). Treatment-emergent adverse events were uncommon (5.7%) and mild. No patient discontinued fremanezumab for any reason. Conclusions Fremanezumab seems more effective in real-life than in RCTs. Younger age emerges as a potential response predictor.

Erenumab proved to be safe and well tolerated in a 5-year continuation of a 1-year double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Aim: to assess >48-week erenumab tolerability and safety in a real-world setting.