Endocrine organs release their products, hormones, into peripheral blood to travel great distances to exert their biological effects. The brain is also an endocrine organ which releases some of its hormones to travel great distances to elicit their actions. The brain also secretes other hormones into a microscopic circulatory system which transports them very short distances to the pituitary gland where they exert their biological effects. That is, they regulate the synthesis and secretion of hormones from the pituitary gland. This chapter will describe the regulation of the pituitary gland by the hormones found in the brain.

In female rats, stimulation of the uterine cervix during mating induces two daily surges of prolactin. Inhibition of hypothalamic dopamine release and stimulation of oxytocin neurons in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) are required for prolactin secretion. We aim to better understand how stimulation of the uterine cervix is translated into two daily prolactin surges. We hypothesize that noradrenergic neurons in the A1, A2, and locus coeruleus (LC) are responsible for conveying the peripheral stimulus to the PVN. In order to determine whether projections from these neurons to the PVN are activated by cervical stimulation (CS), we injected a retrograde tracer, Fluoro-Gold (FG), into the PVN of ovariectomized rats. Fourteen days after injection, animals were submitted to artificial CS or handling and perfused with a fixative solution. Brains were removed and sectioned from the A1, A2, and LC for c-Fos, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and FG triple-labeling using immunohistochemistry. CS increased the percentage of TH/FG+ double-labeled neurons expressing c-Fos in the A1 and LC. CS also increased the percentage of TH+ neurons expressing c-Fos within the A1 and A2, independent of their projections to the PVN. Our data reinforce the significant contributions of the A1 and A2 to carry sensory information during mating, and provide evidence of a functional pathway in which CS activates A1 and LC neurons projecting to the PVN, which is potentially involved in the translation of CS into two daily prolactin surges.

We have shown previously that an intravenous injection of oxytocin (OT) in ovariectomized (OVX) rats initiates a circadian rhythm of prolactin (PRL) secretion similar to that observed after cervical stimulation (CS). In this study, we investigated the pathway through which OT triggers the PRL rhythm. We first tested whether an intracerebroventricular injection of OT could trigger the PRL secretory rhythm. As it did not, we injected OT intravenously while an OT receptor antagonist was infused intravenously. This antagonist completely abolished the PRL surges, suggesting that a peripheral target of OT is necessary for triggering the PRL rhythm. We hypothesized that OT may induce PRL release, which would be transported into the brain and trigger the rhythm. In agreement with this, OT injection increased circulating PRL by 5 min. To test whether this acute increase in PRL release would induce the PRL rhythm, we compared the effect of intravenously administered thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and OT. Although TRH injection also increased PRL to a comparable level after 5 min, only OT-injected animals expressed the PRL secretory rhythm. Motivated by prior findings that bilateral resection of the pelvic nerve blocks CS-induced pseudopregnancy and OT-induced facilitation of lordosis, we then hypothesized that the OT signal may be transmitted through the pelvic nerve. In fact, OT injection failed to induce a PRL secretory rhythm in pelvic-neurectomized animals, suggesting that the integrity of the pelvic nerve is necessary for the systemic OT induction of the PRL secretory rhythm in OVX rats.

Prolactin and oxytocin are important reproductive hormones implicated in several common adaptive functions during pregnancy, pseudopregnancy and lactation. Recently, extracellular recordings of supraoptic neurones have shown that prolactin may modulate the electrical activity of oxytocinergic neurones. However, no study has been conducted aiming to establish whether prolactin directly influences this activity in oxytocinergic paraventricular neurones. In the present study, we addressed this question by studying the effects of prolactin on the electrical activity and voltage-current relationship of identified paraventricular neurones in rat brain slices. Whole-cell recordings were obtained and neurones were classified on the basis of their morphological and electrophysiological fingerprint (i.e. magnocellular or parvicellular) and neuropeptide phenotype (i.e. oxytocinergic or non-oxytocinergic). We report that prolactin elicited a hyperpolarising current in 37% of the neurones in this nucleus, of which the majority (67%) were identified as putative magnocellular oxytocin neurones and the reminder (33%) were regarded as oxytocin-negative, parvicellular neuroendocrine neurones. Our results suggest that, in addition to the well-established negative feedback loop between prolactin-secreting lactotrophs and dopaminergic neurones in the arcuate nucleus, an inhibitory feedback loop also exists between lactotrophs and oxytocinergic paraventricular neurones.

Background/Aims: Cervical stimulation induces a circadian rhythm of prolactin secretion and antiphase dopamine release. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) controls this rhythm, and we propose that it does so through clock gene expression within the SCN. Methods: To test this hypothesis, serial blood samples were taken from animals injected with an antisense deoxyoligonucleotide cocktail for clock genes (generated against the 5′ transcription start site and 3′ cap site of per1, per2, and clock mRNA) or with a random-sequence deoxyoligonucleotide in the SCN. To determine whether disruption of clock genes in the SCN compromises the neural mechanism controlling prolactin secretion, we sacrificed another group of rats (under the same treatments) at 12.00 or 17.00 h. Dopamine and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) were measured using HPLC/electrochemical detection in the median eminence as well as the intermediate and the neural lobe of the pituitary gland, and the DOPAC:dopamine ratio was used as an index of dopamine activity. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) content was determined in tissue punches of the SCN and paraventricular nucleus (PVN), an SCN efferent. Results: Treatment with clock gene antisense deoxyoligonucleotide cocktail abolished both the diurnal and nocturnal prolactin surges induced by cervical stimulation. This treatment abolished the antiphase relationship established by cervical stimulation between dopamine neuronal activity and prolactin secretion. Also, VIP content increased in the SCN and decreased in the PVN. Conclusion: These results suggest that the SCN clock determines the circadian rhythm of prolactin secretion in cervically stimulated rats by regulating dopamine neuronal activity and VIP inputs to the PVN.

Although removal of dopamine inhibition is established as a major factor in prolactin (PRL) release, a large body of evidence suggests that hypothalamic oxytocin (OT) may serve as a PRL-releasing hormone in the rat. PRL release is modulated by estradiol (E2), which rises between diestrus and proestrus of the estrous cycle, causing a PRL surge in the afternoon of proestrus. Given that E2 strongly modulates OT actions in both central and peripheral tissues, OT action on lactotrophs might also be modulated by the stage of the estrous cycle. To test this hypothesis, we have monitored PRL release and intracellular calcium levels ([Ca2+]i) induced by OT in pituitary lactotrophs obtained from female rats in either diestrus 1 or proestrus. We found that both secretory and [Ca2+]i responses to OT are significantly increased in lactotrophs obtained on proestrus. Moreover, we show that these differences are due to an increase in both the number of OT-responding lactotrophs and the magnitude of their individual [Ca2+]i responses. Both secretory and [Ca2+]i responses were abolished by a specific OT antagonist. Finally, dose-dependent studies show that the increased PRL-releasing effect of OT on proestrus is significant over a wide range of concentrations, particularly those observed in hypophyseal portal plasma. These results suggest that the rising E2 titers that culminate on proestrus facilitate the stimulatory action of OT on lactotrophs and support the notion that OT is a PRL-releasing hormone with an important role in the production of the proestrous surge of PRL.

Hormone secretion often occurs in a pulsatile manner. In this review, we discuss two rhythms of in vivo prolactin release in female rats and the ongoing research that we and others have performed aiming to understand the mechanisms underlying them. The peptide hormone oxytocin appears to play an important role in both rhythms. One rhythm occurs during the first half of pregnancy, but can also be induced in ovariectomised rats. This is characterised by a circadian pattern with two prolactin surges per day. Two methods for triggering this rhythm are discussed, each utilising a unique physiological pathway that includes oxytocin action, presumably on pituitary lactotrophs. The second rhythm occurs during the oestrous cycle and is characterised by a surge of prolactin on the afternoon of pro‐oestrus. We discuss recent findings that oxytocin is more effective at stimulating prolactin release from lactotrophs taken from animals on the afternoon of pro‐oestrus than from those of animals on the morning of dioestrus 1, raising the possibility that this hormone plays a physiological role in the regulation of prolactin secretion during the oestrous cycle.

In female rats, estradiol (E(2)) and suckling induce prolactin (PRL) secretion. This involves inhibition of hypothalamic dopaminergic tone and stimulation by a PRL-releasing hormone, possibly oxytocin (OT). Infusing an OT antagonist (OTA) i.v., we evaluated the role of OT on suckling- and E(2)-induced PRL secretion. Three days after parturition at 0900 h, lactating dams were fitted with 24-h osmotic minipumps filled with saline or OTA. On d 5 of lactation, pups were separated from their dams for 6 h. Immediately or 20 min after the resumption of suckling, dam trunk blood was collected. Also, ovariectomized (OVX) rats were treated with E(2) (OVE) and OTA at 1000 h on d 1. Blood samples were obtained from 1300 to 2100 h on d 2 for PRL measurements. Additionally, OVX rats were evaluated on d 2 after receiving progesterone (P(4)). OTA blocked suckling and E(2)-induced release of PRL but not that induced by E(2)+P(4). Pups from treated dams failed to gain weight when allowed to nurse for 20 min on d 5 but gained more than 7 g when nursed on d 7 of lactation, indicating that the OTA was active 48 h later. Western blot analysis showed that E(2) treatment increased OT receptors in the anterior pituitary when compared with OVX animals. No further increase was observed in response to the P(4), suggesting that the enhancing effect of P(4) on E(2)-induced PRL release may act through mechanisms independent of OT. These data demonstrate the role of OT in the control of suckling and steroid-induced PRL secretion.

Artificial copulomimetic cervical stimulation (CS) induces an immediate release of oxytocin (OT) and prolactin (PRL) followed by a daily PRL rhythm characterized by nocturnal and diurnal surges. Although we have shown that the initial release of PRL is induced by the immediate release of OT, we tested whether the PRL that is released in response to CS is responsible for the initiation and maintenance of the subsequent PRL surges. Thus, we injected OVX rats centrally or peripherally with ovine PRL (oPRL) at 2200 h. Central oPRL induced PRL surges in OVX rats that were similar in size and timing to those of CS rats, whereas peripheral oPRL induced surges that were of smaller amplitude and delayed. We then infused a PRL antagonist (S179D, 0.1 ng/h) centrally into OVX and OVX-CS rats and measured the release of endogenous PRL and the activity of neuroendocrine dopaminergic neurons. Central infusion of S179D did not influence basal PRL secretion in OVX rats but prevented the expression of the CS-induced PRL surges and the accompanying noontime increase of CS-induced dopaminergic activity when continued for 3 d. However, central infusion of S179D only on the day of CS did not prevent the daily rhythm of PRL surges. These results demonstrate that PRL acts centrally to induce the PRL rhythm and that PRL in the brain is essential for the maintenance but not for the initiation of the CS-induced rhythmic PRL surges.

93 Abstracts of the 6th Annual ENETS Conference Granada, Spain, March 5–7, 2009 147 ENETS Newsletter

Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) is processed to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and β-lipotropin in corticotropes of the anterior lobe, and to α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) and β-endorphin in melanotropes of the intermediate lobe (IL) of the pituitary gland. While ACTH secretion is predominantly under the stimulatory influence of the hypothalamic factors, hormone secretion of the IL is tonically inhibited by neuroendocrine dopamine (NEDA) neurons. Lobe-specific POMC processing is not absolute. For example, D2 type DA receptor (D2R)-deficient mice have elevated plasma ACTH levels, although it is known that corticotropes do not express D2R(s). Moreover, observations that suckling does not influence α-MSH release, while it induces an increase in plasma ACTH is unexplained. The aim of the present study was to investigate the involvement of the NEDA system in the regulation of ACTH secretion and the participation of the IL in ACTH production in lactating rats. Untreated and estradiol (E2)-substituted ovariectomized (OVX) females were also studied. The concentration of ACTH in the IL was higher in lactating rats than in OVX rats, while the opposite change in α-MSH level of the IL was observed. DA levels in the IL and the neural lobe were lower in lactating rats than in OVX rats. Suckling-induced ACTH response was eliminated by pretreatment with the DA receptor agonist, bromocriptine (BRC). Inhibition of DA biosynthesis by α-methyl-p-tyrosine (αMpT) and blockade of D2R by domperidone (DOM) elevated plasma ACTH levels, but did not influence plasma α-MSH levels in lactating rats. The same drugs had opposite effects in OVX and OVX + E2 animals. In lactating mothers, BRC was able to block ACTH responses induced by both αMpT and DOM. Surgical denervation of the IL elevated basal plasma levels of ACTH. Taken together, these data indicate that melanotropes synthesize ACTH during lactation and its release from these cells is regulated by NEDA neurons.

Models of bursting in single cells typically include two subsystems with different timescales. Variations in one or more slow variables switch the system between a silent and a spiking state. We have developed a model for bursting in the pituitary lactotroph that does not include any slow variable. The model incorporates fast, noninactivating calcium and potassium currents (the spike-generating mechanism), as well as the fast, inactivating A-type potassium current (I(A)). I(A) is active only briefly at the beginning of a burst, but this brief impulse of I(A) acts as a burst trigger, injecting the spike trajectory close to an unstable steady state. The spiraling of the trajectory away from the steady state produces a period of low-amplitude spiking typical of lactotrophs. Increasing the conductance of A-type potassium current brings the trajectory closer to the unstable steady state, increasing burst duration. However, this also increases interburst interval, and for larger conductance values, all activity stops. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a physiologically based, single-compartmental model of bursting with no slow subsystem.

Mathematical model describes a likely mechanism for the circadian prolactin (PRL) rhythm induced by cervical stimulation (CS). This is a mean field model that uses a single variable to describe the activity level of each cell population. With this model, the circadian PRL rhythm is due to the interactions between four cell populations. Lactotroph cells reside in the pituitary gland and their activity level is denoted by PRL. The other cell populations are located in the hypothalamus. Dopaminergic neurons, with activity level dopamine (DA), are located in the arcuate and periventricular nuclei. These release DA into portal blood vessels at the median eminence, from where it travels down to the pituitary and affects lactotrophs. DA is known to bind to D2 receptors on the lactotroph plasma membrane, leading to inhibition of lactotroph activity and secretion. The inhibitory influence is denoted with an open arrow from DA to PRL. PRL from lactotrophs also feeds back onto DA neurons, in a stimulatory manner. The stimulatory effects of PRL are due to increased gene expression and upregulation of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) activity, which synthesizes l-DOPA from tyrosine. The delay in the PRL effect due to gene expression is expected to be several hours, while the delay due to TH upregulation is as short as an hour. The use of mathematical modeling is reflective of the potential use of modeling in the study of the parental brain. In particular, modeling can be used to interpret complex biological data, and to suggest new experiments. The successful use of modeling as a research tool in the study of the parental brain requires some knowledge of the neural circuitry and hormonal pathways involved in the behavior under investigation, and there should be a relatively high degree of quantification in the data.

In female rats, estradiol is responsible for a circadian secretory prolactin (PRL) pattern which requires an intact suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). SCN outputs involved in this secretory profile remain elusive. Because oxytocin has been proposed to stimulate PRL secretion, we investigated whether the projections of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) from the SCN to neurons producing oxytocin in the paraventricular and periventricular nuclei (PVN and PeVN, respectively) are responsible for timing PRL surges induced by estradiol (E(2)). E(2)-treated ovariectomized rats received an injection of antisense or random-sequence oligodeoxynucleotide for VIP in the SCN and blood samples were taken for PRL measurements by radioimmunoassay. Additionally, the percentage of oxytocin-positive neurons immunoreactive to FOS-related antigens was determined in the PVN and PeVN, as an index of neuronal activity. In the PVN, oxytocinergic neuronal activity increased in the early evening regardless of E(2) treatment, whereas E(2) induced an increase of activity in the PeVN. VIP antisense attenuated this increase observed in both neuronal populations. Additionally, in the PeVN, VIP antisense advanced this increase by 2 h (from 19:00 h to 17:00 h). This same effect was observed in the PRL surge that occurred at 17:00 h in the VIP antisense injected animals. Thus, the SCN influences the precise timing of the E(2)-induced PRL surge via VIP projections to oxytocinergic neurons of the PVN and PeVN.

The hypothalamus is part of the limbic portion of the brain in vertebrates, which regulates the internal milieu of the cells within narrow limits as it compensates for changing external conditions, such as variations in temperature, energy, or defensive requirements. The constancy of the internal environment resulting from these fine adjustments made by the hypothalamus is known as homeostasis. The hypothalamus maintains homeostasis by exerting control over the two regulatory systems of the organism: the nervous system and the endocrine system.

Cervical stimulation induces two daily rhythmic prolactin surges, nocturnal and diurnal, which persist for several days. We have shown that a bolus injection of oxytocin initiates a similar prolactin rhythm, which persists despite low levels of oxytocin after injection. This suggests that oxytocin may trigger the cervical stimulation-induced rhythmic prolactin surges. To investigate this hypothesis, we infused an oxytocin antagonist that does not cross the blood-brain barrier for 24 h before and after cervical stimulation and measured serum prolactin. We also measured dopaminergic neuronal activity because mathematical modeling predicted that this activity would be low in the presence of the oxytocin antagonist. We thus tested this hypothesis by measuring dopaminergic neuronal activity in the tuberoinfundibular, periventricular hypophyseal, and tuberohypophyseal dopaminergic neurons. Infusion of oxytocin antagonist before cervical stimulation abolished prolactin surges, and infusion of oxytocin antagonist after cervical stimulation abolished the diurnal and significantly decreased the nocturnal surges of prolactin. The rhythmic prolactin surges returned after the clearance of the oxytocin antagonist. Hypothalamic dopaminergic activity was elevated in antiphase with prolactin surges, and the antiphase elevation was abolished by the oxytocin antagonist in the tuberoinfundibular and tuberohypophyseal dopaminergic neurons, consistent with the mathematical model. These findings suggest that oxytocin is a physiologically relevant prolactin-releasing factor. However, the cervical stimulation-induced prolactin surges are maintained even in the absence of oxytocin actions at the lactotroph, which strongly suggests the maintenance of prolactin surges are not dependent upon oxytocin actions at the pituitary gland.

The nature of the circadian signal from the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) required for prolactin (PRL) surges is unknown. Because the SCN neuronal circadian rhythm is determined by a feedback loop of Period (Per) 1, Per2, and circadian locomotor output cycles kaput ( Clock) gene expressions, we investigated the effect of SCN rhythmicity on PRL surges by disrupting this loop. Because lesion of the locus coeruleus (LC) abolishes PRL surges and these neurons receive SCN projections, we investigated the role of SCN rhythmicity in the LC neuronal circadian rhythm as a possible component of the circadian mechanism regulating PRL surges. Cycling rats on proestrous day and estradiol-treated ovariectomized rats received injections of antisense or random-sequence deoxyoligonucleotide cocktails for clock genes ( Per1, Per2, and Clock) in the SCN, and blood samples were taken for PRL measurements. The percentage of tyrosine hydroxylase-positive neurons immunoreactive to Fos-related antigen (FRA) was determined in ovariectomized rats submitted to the cocktail injections and in a 12:12-h light:dark (LD) or constant dark (DD) environment. The antisense cocktail abolished both the proestrous and the estradiol-induced PRL surges observed in the afternoon and the increase of FRA expression in the LC neurons at Zeitgeber time 14 in LD and at circadian time 14 in DD. Because SCN afferents and efferents were probably preserved, the SCN rhythmicity is essential for the magnitude of daily PRL surges in female rats as well as for LC neuronal circadian rhythm. SCN neurons therefore determine PRL secretory surges, possibly by modulating LC circadian neuronal activity.