Summary Over the last few years, novel synthetic nematicides, such as Salibro™ nematicide (a.s. fluazaindolizine - Reklemel™ active), Velum Prime® (a.s. fluopyram) or Nimitz® (a.s. fluensulfone), have been commercialised in various regions around the world. Whilst considerable scientific information exists on their field efficacy against plant-parasitic nematodes, very little has been published on their bio-compatibility with beneficial soil fungi. In this paper in vitro studies are presented with various nematophagous (Athrobotrys, Monacrosporium, Harposporium, Purpureocillium), entomoparasitic (Beauveria, Isaria) and disease-suppressive (Trichoderma) fungi that were exposed to these nematicides under laboratory conditions. Assessments were made on their impact on radial growth and sporulation of those fungi. Clear differences in sensitivity to the nematicides were seen between the different fungi. Intrinsically, fluopyram showed the strongest adverse effects on the tested fungi that often became already visible at a concentration of 5 ppm (a.s.). Negative effects were significant at higher concentrations of 50 ppm. Fluensulfone showed limited adverse impacts on the tested fungi at 5 ppm (a.s.) but clearly inhibited most of the fungi at 50 ppm (a.s.). Fluazaindolizine had the least impact of the novel nematicides, with no adverse effects recorded on any species at 5 ppm (a.s.), and very minor growth reductions at 50 ppm (a.s.). Even when tested at 250 ppm (a.s.) fluazaindolizine still showed no impact on Purpureocillium lilacinum, as well as only a weak impact on some Trichoderma species. Vydate (a.s. oxamyl), which was often included as a traditional carbamate nematicide in the test, also showed excellent bio-compatibility with the tested fungi at concentrations of from 5 to 50 ppm (a.s.). Overall, the studies showed that beneficial soil fungi differ in their intrinsic sensitivity to these modern nematicides. These interactions may be considered when designing integrated nematode management programmes that leverage endemic or introduced biocontrol agents. However, it should be noted that additional studies under field conditions with recommended label rates of the products are needed to confirm the trends seen in these laboratory data.

Summary Currently a renaissance in chemical nematicides is taking place with novel products like Nimitz® (a.s. fluensulfone), Velum Prime® (a.s. fluopyram) and Salibro™ (a.s. fluazaindolizine – Reklemel™ active) entering the marketplace. Although a considerable amount of published data is already available on their laboratory and field impact on plant-parasitic nematodes, little is understood of their compatibility with the beneficial or free-living nematodes that are part of the soil health network. In a range of laboratory studies, the effects of these nematicides on the vitality and reproduction of several species was tested, including both cosmopolitan free-living nematodes (Acrobeloides, Cruznema, Panagrobelus) as well as commercially applied entomopathogenic nematodes (Steinernema, Heterorhabditis). Within aqueous exposure and agar plate in vitro assays, species sensitivity to those nematicides differed significantly but their fitness (vitality and reproduction; infectivity to insect hosts) was generally not adversely impacted by concentrations of 5-50 ppm (a.s.) of Salibro. Even at 250 ppm (a.s.) of Salibro only some species of the bacterial-feeding species showed some negative impact. By contrast, both Nimitz at 50 ppm (a.s.) and Velum at 5 ppm (a.s.) consistently demonstrated stronger adverse impacts. In second level soil drenching assays, either no, or occasionally slight, adverse effects on the natural community of free-living nematodes were observed if soils were drenched with different volumes of Salibro at 5-50 ppm (a.s.), while relatively stronger reductions were measured within the plant-parasitic species (especially root-knot nematodes). Both Nimitz and Vydate (a.s. oxamyl) showed some degree of compatibility at 5 and 25 ppm (a.s.), respectively, which was generally higher than for Velum Prime at 5 ppm (a.s.). Overall, these data indicate that, when used at common field rates, Salibro will be one of the best options as part of integrated nematode management programmes where the use of chemical nematicides is required.