PURPOSE:Composite neuromuscular injuries involving damage to peripheral nerves and skeletal muscles result in poor functional recovery due to excessive scarring. Current therapies lack specificity or carry significant side effects. We investigated the efficacy of a recombinant anti-collagen antibody (ACA) designed to inhibit extracellular collagen fibril formation, thereby reducing scar formation without disrupting intracellular reparative pathways. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In a rabbit model of composite injury involving a peroneal nerve crush and volumetric muscle loss of the tibialis anterior muscle, animals received local injections of an ACA-loaded or control thermoresponsive hydrogel. We measured neuromuscular functional recovery after composite injury using biomechanical and electrophysiological assays. Tissue was analyzed using histology, immunohistochemistry, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. RESULTS:While electrophysiological parameters of injured nerves declined in all injured groups, ACA treatment markedly improved biomechanical properties of the injured limbs at 4 weeks post-injury compared to controls. This functional benefit was sexually dimorphic; females, who exhibited a more robust fibrotic response and severe muscle atrophy compared to males, demonstrated the most pronounced therapeutic recovery with ACA treatment. FTIR spectroscopy and polarized light microscopy confirmed that ACA treatment modulated the scar architecture, showing a trend toward reduced collagen content and cross-link maturity. Notably, the uninjured contralateral limbs likely exhibited compensatory hypertrophy and electrophysiological changes, highlighting their active role in systemic adaptation. CONCLUSIONS:Together, these findings suggest that targeting extracellular collagen fibrillogenesis may modestly enhance early functional recovery in composite neuromuscular trauma, particularly in biological contexts prone to excessive fibrosis.
Background: Despite increasingly wider use, there remains controversy among anesthesiologists regarding preferred formulations and the role of steroid adjuvants in regional anesthesia. There is also uncertainty in the role of dexamethasone when administered directly versus peripherally. We hypothesize that directly mixing dexamethasone into the regional nerve block rather than peripherally administered intravenous dexamethasone will demonstrate a difference in efficacy concerning duration and rebound pain, decreased postoperative pain scores, or opioid consumption within the short-term postoperative period. Methods: A prospective, randomized controlled blinded study was conducted for patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation with a volar plate technique for distal radius fractures. Patients were randomized for their preoperative anesthesia. One group had ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block with ropivacaine with a direct mix of dexamethasone 4 mg (Direct group), while the other group had ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block with ropivacaine and peripheral intravenous dexamethasone 4 mg (Indirect group). Data was collected pre, intra, and postoperatively. Results: Fifty patients consented and participated in the study, with 27 participants in the direct group and 23 participants in the indirect group. Compared to intravenous administration, directly administered dexamethasone demonstrated a significant difference in the average time for the block to fade, onset of motor and sensory recovery, and block resolution. Conclusion: Our findings prove that directly mixing dexamethasone compared to peripherally administered intravenous dexamethasone will demonstrate a difference in efficacy with regards to duration and rebound pain, but do not prove that there will be a difference in decreased postoperative pain scores or opioid consumption within the 24-hour postoperative period. Level of Evidence: Prognosis Level I
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.02.009.].
Excessive posttraumatic scarring in orthopedic tissues, such as joint capsules, ligaments, tendons, muscles, and peripheral nerves, presents a significant medical problem, resulting in pain, restricted joint mobility, and impaired musculoskeletal function. Current treatments for excessive scarring are often ineffective and require the surgical removal of fibrotic tissue, which can aggravate the problem. The primary component of orthopedic scars is collagen I-rich fibrils. Our research team has developed a monoclonal anti-collagen antibody (ACA) that alleviates posttraumatic scarring by inhibiting collagen fibril formation. We previously established the safety and efficacy of ACA in a rabbit-based arthrofibrosis model. In this study, we evaluate the utility of a well-characterized thermoresponsive hydrogel (THG) as a delivery vehicle for ACA to injury sites. Crucial components of the hydrogel included N-isopropylacrylamide, poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate, and hyaluronic acid. Our investigation focused on in vitro ACA release kinetics, stability, and activity. Additionally, we examined the antigen-binding characteristics of ACA post-release from the THG in an in vivo context. Our preliminary findings suggest that the THG construct exhibits promise as a delivery platform for antibody-based therapeutics to reduce excessive scarring in orthopedic tissues.
Background Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure in the surgical management of symptomatic thumb basal joint arthritis. Following trapeziectomy, a number of suspensionplasty techniques are often used, but limited comparative evidence exists between these techniques. The central aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of 2 suspensionplasty techniques following trapeziectomy: suture button (TightRope) versus ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Methods Prospective data were collected on 112 consecutive patients with Eaton stage III-IV thumb CMC arthritis who underwent open trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty. There were 53 LRTI and 59 TightRope suspensionplasty procedures. Outcomes were measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand ( QuickDASH) questionnaire, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, radiographic analysis, and lateral pinch strength. Patient demographic data and complications were also recorded. Results Patients undergoing TightRope suspensionplasty had significantly higher trapeziometacarpal index and thus less subsidence than the LRTI group at 2 weeks (0.22 vs 0.17 [ P < .0001]) and 3 months (0.17 vs 0.15 [ P < .05]) postoperatively. TightRope suspensionplasty also had a significantly lower QuickDASH score at 2 weeks (64.7 vs 74.6 [ P < .05]), 3 months (20.7 vs 32.5 [ P < .05]), and 1 year postoperatively (7.57 vs 21.5 [ P < .05]) compared with the LRTI group. However, there was no difference in VAS pain, lateral pinch strength, reoperation, or complications at any time point between groups. Conclusions Thumb CMC joint arthroplasty performed with a TightRope suspensionplasty versus LRTI yielded short-term improved resistance to subsidence, long-term greater improvement in clinical outcome by QuickDASH, and no difference in pain or complication rates.
Purpose The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of 6 different commercially available waterproof cast protectors in their ability to maintain a dry environment and evaluate whether cast protectors perform better than a plastic bag secured with tape in keeping casts dry. Methods We enrolled 23 adult participants to test 6 different commercially available cast protectors and a plastic bag. Participants trialed all cast protectors twice, with and without motion, by fully submerging each cast protector in water with a paper towel held between their index and middle fingers. Moisture accumulation within the cast protectors was esti-mated by the change in weight of paper towel. An analysis of variance test was performed to compare differences between cast protectors in their ability to maintain a dry internal environment. Results The plastic bag showed an average moisture accumulation of 5.50 g without motion compared with all other cast protectors, which had 0.0 g of moisture accumulation. One cast protector and the plastic bag had an average moisture accumulation of 0.46 g and 4.51 g with motion compared to all other cast protectors. The plastic bag was ranked the worst by 100% of participants. Conclusions Cast protectors appear to offer superior protection from moisture compared with a plastic bag. (J Hand Surg Am. 2023;48(8):803-809. Copyright (c) 2023 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)
Excessive scar formation is a hallmark of localized and systemic fibrotic disorders. Despite extensive studies to define valid anti-fibrotic targets and develop effective therapeutics, progressive fibrosis remains a significant medical problem. Regardless of the injury type or location of wounded tissue, excessive production and accumulation of collagen-rich extracellular matrix is the common denominator of all fibrotic disorders. A long-standing dogma was that anti-fibrotic approaches should focus on overall intracellular processes that drive fibrotic scarring. Because of the poor outcomes of these approaches, scientific efforts now focus on regulating the extracellular components of fibrotic tissues. Crucial extracellular players include cellular receptors of matrix components, macromolecules that form the matrix architecture, auxiliary proteins that facilitate the formation of stiff scar tissue, matricellular proteins, and extracellular vesicles that modulate matrix homeostasis. This review summarizes studies targeting the extracellular aspects of fibrotic tissue synthesis, presents the rationale for these studies, and discusses the progress and limitations of current extracellular approaches to limit fibrotic healing.
Background: Scapholunate (SL) ligament injuries can occur concomitantly with distal radius fractures (DRFs), and the management of acute SL injury in the setting of DRFs remains controversial. The purpose of the study is to identify the radiographic incidence of SL widening in DRF treated with volar plate fixation and to determine the functional outcomes of DRF with concomitant radiographic SL-widening. Methods: One hundred and seventeen patients with DRFs, with and without radiographic SL-widening, and treated with volar locked plating, were prospectively enrolled. No SL ligament repairs or reconstructions were performed in any cases. Patients with DRFs with radiographic criteria for SL widening were compared to those without. Patients were evaluated at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively with Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires. Results: Thirty-one patients (26.5%) were found to have radiographic evidence of SL widening. Patients with concomitant SL widening had less wrist extension at 3 months (52.4 degrees vs 60.8, P = .034) and at 1 year (64.5 degrees vs 71.8, P = .023). The group with SL widening had greater articular step off at 3 months (0.33 vs 0.06, P = .042), but no difference at 1 year (0.11 vs 0.05, P = .348). There were no differences in wrist flexion, supination, pronation, volar tilt, radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance, PRWE scores, and Quick Dash scores at 3 months and 1 year. Conclusions: Radiographic SL-widening is a common finding associated with DRFs undergoing surgical repair. There are similar clinical outcomes between those with untreated SL widening compared to those without an SL widening at 1-year postoperatively.
Background:The median artery is an embryonic structure that typically regresses during gestation. Occasionally, the artery remains and is then termed a persistent median artery (PMA). A PMA can be associated with other anatomic anomalies, and has been known to contribute to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Recent literature has observed an increase in PMA prevalence, speculated to indicate microevolutionary change. We performed a prospective observational study to investigate the current prevalence rate of PMA in patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR).Methods:Institutional review board approval was obtained. From October 2020 to January 2021, patients ≥18 years old undergoing open CTR by 9 orthopaedic hand surgeons were included in analysis. Patients undergoing endoscopic CTR were excluded. Intraoperatively, the carpal tunnel was evaluated for the presence of a PMA, median nerve anomalies, or any other anatomic anomalies. If a patient underwent bilateral CTR during the study, only one side was included in analysis as determined randomly.Results:Three hundred and sixty open CTRs in 327 patients were performed during the study. Twenty-seven PMAs were identified, for an overall prevalence rate of 8.3%. The average age of patients with a PMA was 63.6 years (SD 13.3 years), consisting of 15 men and 12 women. There were no statistical differences in age, gender, or laterality between patients that did and did not have a PMA. Thirty-three patients underwent bilateral CTR during the study, with 3 being found to have a PMA unilaterally, and zero having a PMA bilaterally. Two bifid median nerves (0.6%) were also identified.Conclusion:This study represents the highest prevalence rate of PMA directly observed in CTR patients reported to date (8.3%). A PMA is not a rare finding, and it should be recognized and protected during CTR. Occasionally, a PMA can be the cause of an acute presentation of CTS.
Purpose:Medical cannabis (MC) has been proposed as a potential addition to multimodal pain management regimens in orthopedics. This study evaluates hand and upper-extremity patient perspectives of MC as a treatment for common orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study also aims to identify the proportion of patients already using MC, perceived barriers to MC use, and opinions on insurance coverage and legality of cannabis.Methods:An anonymous cross-sectional survey study was conducted of all patients at least 18 years old presenting from October 2020 to January 2021 to a hand and upper-extremity outpatient clinic. The survey collected information regarding opinion on MC, including use, legality, and willingness to use MC in the future. Medical cannabis was legal in the states where the study was conducted.Results:A total of 679 patients completed the survey (response rate 72.5%). Sixty-eight patients (10.0%) reported currently using MC. Of the 623 patients (90.0%) who reported not currently using MC, 504 (80.9%) would consider using MC for chronic pain, while the remaining 119 (19.1%) would not consider the use of MC for chronic pain. Age was not associated with whether a patient would consider using MC (P = .16) or was already using MC (P = .10). The most identified barrier to MC use was cost, reported as either expensive or not affordable by 477 patients (70.5%).Conclusions:This study found that most patients presenting for hand and upper-extremity complaints would consider using MC (80.9%), and most perceive it as a safe treatment option for common orthopedic conditions. Moreover, 10% of patients reported already using MC. One of the major barriers to MC use is the cost. Most (90.9%) patients support policies for legalization and insurance coverage of MC.Type of study/level of evidence:Therapeutic Level III.
BACKGROUND:Adequate pain control is critical after outpatient surgery where patients are not as closely monitored. A multimodal pain management regimen was compared to a conventional pain management method in patients undergoing operative fixation for distal radius fractures. We hypothesized that there would be a decrease in the amount of narcotics used by the multimodal group compared to the conventional pain management group, and that there would be no difference in bone healing postoperatively. METHODS:Forty-two patients were randomized into 2 groups based on pain protocols. Group 1, the control, received a regional block, acetaminophen, and oxycodone. Group 2 received a multimodal pain regimen consisting of daily doses of pregabalin, celecoxib, and acetaminophen up until postoperative day (POD) #3. They also received a regional block with oxycodone for breakthrough pain. RESULTS:From POD#3 to week 1, there was a significant increase in oxycodone use in the study group correlating with the point in time when the multimodal regimen was discontinued. The shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) scores taken at 2 weeks postoperation showed a significantly lower average score in the study group compared to the control. There was no difference in bone healing. CONCLUSIONS:The 2 regimens yielded similar pain control after surgery. The rebound increase in narcotic use after the multimodal regimen was discontinued, and significant difference in QuickDASH scores seen at 2 weeks postoperatively supported that multimodal regimens may not necessarily lead to decreased narcotic use in outpatient upper extremity surgery, but in the short term are shown to improve functional status.
Introduction Tramadol and codeine are both commonly prescribed in the setting of surgery or injury to the upper extremity. Despite their comparable strength in terms of opioid receptor affinity, the drugs differ pharmacologically and thus are not completely interchangeable. Methods This study analyzes all prescriptions for codeine and tramadol by a group of hand surgeons over a one-year period and tests the central hypothesis that the prescribing and refill patterns of these two drugs would be similar. Results Despite similar prescription amounts in terms of morphine equivalents, patients receiving tramadol required prescription refills at a significantly higher amount than those receiving codeine, and these individuals tended to be older. Additionally, patients treated nonoperatively were prescribed significantly more tramadol than those treated surgically. Conclusion Our findings suggest that codeine and tramadol are not equivalent in managing upper extremity pain. Further study is needed to articulate the situations in which physicians and patients are better served by tramadol versus codeine.
CASE:We present a case of a 51-year-old man with a retained supercharged rare earth magnetic finger mass sustained from an explosion injury at a semiconductor processing facility. The patient underwent excision of the rare metal mass, subsequently maintaining digital function without mass recurrence. CONCLUSION:Common to the semiconductor industry, neodymium is a rare earth metal and powerful magnet. Particulates are highly combustible, representing a potential explosive biohazard. To date, its toxicity and bioreactivity within the hand have not been thoroughly investigated. This is the first report of the successful surgical treatment of a retained rare earth neodymium magnetic hand mass.
BACKGROUND:Orthopedic procedures concerning the upper extremity commonly use a brachial plexus nerve block to achieve postoperative analgesia. The addition of dexamethasone to peripheral nerve blocks has been shown to significantly prolong its effect. We hypothesize that 1 mg doses of dexamethasone will prolong brachial plexus nerve block with similar efficacy to 4 mg and better than ropivacaine alone.METHODS:Seventy-nine patients who received a brachial plexus nerve block prior to undergoing upper extremity surgery were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: group 1 received only 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine without dexamethasone (control); groups 2, 3, and 4 received 4, 2, and 1 mg of dexamethasone, respectively, added to 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine.RESULTS:Comparison of block duration, specifically "first signs of the block wearing off" to the 0-mg group, referencing the 1-, 2-, and 4-mg groups (P = .02, .04, and .01, respectively) that received steroid adjuvant therapy demonstrated a significant increase in time until the block began to wear off. All study groups receiving steroids also demonstrated a significant increase in duration of the block prior to its effects being completely gone when compared with the control group (P < .01 for all groups).CONCLUSIONS:Our findings demonstrate that adjuvant dexamethasone can prolong brachial plexus nerve blocks effectively at low doses compared with high doses, in addition to prolonging analgesia compared with local anesthetic alone.
Dupuytren's disease is a benign fibroproliferative disorder of the hand that results in disabling digital contractures that impair function and diminish the quality of life. The incidence of this disease has been correlated with chronic inflammatory states, but any direct association between inflammatory cytokines and Dupuytren's disease is not known. We hypothesized that advanced fibroproliferation is associated with increased levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines. Blood and fibrotic cord tissue were collected preoperatively from patients with severe contracture and control patients. Blood plasma concentrations of known inflammatory cytokines were evaluated using a multiplex immunoassay. Proteins from the cord tissue were analyzed by RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, collagen-rich cords were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The results indicate that patients exhibited significantly elevated circulating inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-2, and IL-12p70, as compared with controls. Similarly, IL-4 and IL-13 were detected significantly more frequently in Dupuytren's disease as compared with control. RNA sequencing revealed 5311 differentially expressed genes and distinct clustering between diseased and control samples. In addition to increased expression of genes associated with fibroproliferation, we also observed upregulation of transcripts activated by inflammatory cytokines, including prolactin inducible protein and keratin intermediate filaments. IL-2, but not TNF-α, was detected in fibrotic cord tissue by immunohistochemistry. Finally, spectroscopic assays revealed a significant reduction of the collagen content and alterations of collagen cross-linking within the Dupuytren's disease tissues. In total, our results illustrate that patients with severe Dupuytren's disease exhibit substantially elevated circulating inflammatory cytokines that may drive fibroproliferation. Clinical Significance: The results from this study establish the basis for a specific cytokine profile that may be useful for diagnostic testing and therapeutic intervention in Dupuytren's disease.
Introduction Hand and upper extremity surgeries are largely performed in free-standing ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Rates of unexpected hospitalizations or visits to the urgent care or emergency departments in the month following hand and upper extremity surgery have been widely varied in the literature. We prospectively followed patients after hand and upper extremity outpatient surgery to determine the rate of unplanned health care utilization with the hypothesis that hospital admissions, emergency room visits, and urgent care center visits would be higher than the rates currently reported by retrospective studies. Methods All patients undergoing outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery by five hand surgeons were prospectively followed to monitor for hospital readmissions, emergency room visits, and urgent care presentations. The patients’ postoperative course was evaluated for direct transfers from the surgical center to the hospital. In addition, any urgent care or emergency room visits and hospital admissions for the first month after surgery were tabulated. Points of review of the patients’ postoperative course included the following: (1) phone contact on the first postoperative day, (2) routine ASC postoperative phone calls two to three days postoperatively, (3) first postoperative office at approximately one to two weeks, and (4) phone contact or office evaluation one-month postoperatively based on surgeon preference for follow-up. Results A total of 583 patients were identified for participation, of whom 22 patients were excluded; thus, 561 patients were included for evaluation, with 47.2% women (n=265) and 52.8% men (n=296). The average age was 54 years (range: 14-102 years). Nine (1.6%) patients presented postoperatively for further evaluation at an urgent care or hospital (95% C.I. 0.8-3.1%). Five patients presented to an emergency room and four patients presented to an urgent care facility. Of those patients, two were admitted to the hospital due to shortness of breath (0.35%; 95% CI: -0.08 to 1.4%). Emergency room and urgent care visits that did not lead to admission accounted for 1.25% (95% CI: 0.6-2.6%). No patients were transferred from the ASC to the hospital or emergency room. Conclusion There was a low rate of postoperative utilization of urgent care and emergency room services with hand and upper extremity surgery performed at free-standing, ASCs. Hospital readmissions were rare, and no patients required transfer from an ambulatory care center to the hospital. Outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery is safe in an ambulatory care center, with low postoperative transfers and readmissions in the month following surgery.
Background: Ultrasound-guided (USG) assistance has contributed to the acceptance of regional anesthesia as a safe and efficient alternative to traditional general anesthesia. However, limited data exist regarding the safety of supraclavicular blocks used in common hand surgery procedures. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate a large sample of cases to determine the effectiveness and complication rate of supraclavicular nerve blocks and confirm the safety of its use within the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting. Methods: Nerve blocks for the upper extremity were performed via the supraclavicular approach using the USG technique. Records were analyzed for all patients monitored during the immediate postoperative recovery and step-down phases at the ASC and contacted by phone or evaluated within 2 weeks at their first postoperative visit. Adverse outcomes related to the regional block anesthesia were identified via phone interview or postoperative surgical visit and documented. Results: In all, 713 records were reviewed with 56% female (n = 398) and 44% male (n = 315) patients. Of the 713 cases, 4 adverse events were identified (0.6%, 95% confidence interval [%]), including 2 abnormal reactions to the nerve block and 2 incomplete blocks with inadequate pain control. Conclusions: This study is the first report to evaluate a large sample of outpatient hand procedures at a high-volume ASC. We can report no clinically significant pulmonary or neurovascular complications with the use of USG supraclavicular nerve block techniques, further supporting its establishment as a safe and efficient procedure, yielding a low complication rate.
Background: Ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) are common concomitant injuries associated with distal radius fractures (DRFs). Recent studies have found conflicting evidence on whether these fractures treated or untreated effect pain and functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate pain and function outcomes of consecutively untreated USFs in surgically repaired DRFs. The study hypothesis was that there would be no difference in outcomes whether an USF is present or not, with all cases left untreated. Methods: A prospective study at a single institution of consecutive DRF treated surgically with volar locked plating was undertaken. No patients underwent fixation of an USF if present. There were no treated USF that were excluded. Patients with associated ulnar neck and shaft fractures were excluded. Functional outcome measures were analyzed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (QDASH) and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores. Outcome measures were collected at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Results: There was an incidence of 52.2% (n = 70/134) USF associated with surgically treated DRF. By location, there were 52.9% (n = 37/70) ulnar styloid tip fractures and 46.1% (33/70) ulnar styloid base. There were 75.7% of USF (53/70) still not healed by 1-year follow-up. When comparing patients with a DRF without an USF versus DRF with an associated USF at 12 months, there was no statistical difference in the QDASH score (6.7 vs 8.4, P = .47) or the PRWE total score (4.8 vs 7.5, P = .24). Similarly, subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference in QDASH or PRWE scores at final follow-up in united USF versus nonunited USF subjects (QDASH 14.2 vs 6.8, P = .112; PRWE 14.8 vs 5.4, P = .185). Conclusions: USFs are a common concomitant injury occurring in nearly half of DRFs treated surgically. Our prospective cohort analysis showed that neither the presence, type, nor bony union status of a concomitant USF has any significant effect on patient outcomes or reoperations at 1-year postoperatively. Our study confirms our hypothesis that USF of the tip and base should be left untreated.
Posttraumatic fibrotic scarring is a significant medical problem that alters the proper functioning of injured tissues. Current methods to reduce posttraumatic fibrosis rely on anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative agents with broad intracellular targets. As a result, their use is not fully effective and may cause unwanted side effects. Our group previously demonstrated that extracellular collagen fibrillogenesis is a valid and specific target to reduce collagen-rich scar buildup. Our previous studies showed that a rationally designed antibody that binds the C-terminal telopeptide of the α2(I) chain involved in the aggregation of collagen molecules limits fibril assembly in vitro and reduces scar formation in vivo . Here, we have utilized a clinically relevant arthrofibrosis model to study the broad mechanisms of the anti-scarring activity of this antibody. Moreover, we analyzed the effects of targeting collagen fibril formation on the quality of healed joint tissues, including the posterior capsule, patellar tendon, and subchondral bone. Our results show that blocking collagen fibrillogenesis not only reduces collagen content in the scar, but also accelerates the remodeling of healing tissues and changes the collagen fibrils’ cross-linking. In total, this study demonstrated that targeting collagen fibrillogenesis to limit arthrofibrosis affects neither the quality of healing of the joint tissues nor disturbs vital tissues and organs.
Background and objective With significant advancement in the field of biomaterials, alternatives to conventional fiberglass casts such as customized three-dimensional (3D) orthotics have been developed. However, there is a scarcity of reported experience regarding 3D-printed orthoses. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes and patient satisfaction with fractures treated with either conventional or 3D-printed casts. Materials and methods We included 23 limbs from 22 patients, who were aged between 8-18 years, and with a diagnosis of an acute nondisplaced wrist or forearm fracture. Patients were randomized into two groups: consisting of those treated with a 3D-printed orthosis and those with conventional fiberglass cast. Outcomes included X-ray alignment and healing, cast fit, the appearance of the skin, ease of care, and overall satisfaction. Results Of note, 10/11 (91%) in the 3D cast group healed in an excellent position, and 1/11 healed in an acceptable position. Also, 11/12 (92%) in the conventional cast group healed in an excellent position, and 1/12 healed in an acceptable position. Radiographically, 11/11 (100%) of the fractures in the 3D group and 11/12 (92%) in the conventional cast group were found to be fully healed. No differences were found in terms of skin irritation by a blinded hand therapist. Patients reported significant differences in skin irritation, comfort, satisfaction, and cast care favoring 3D casts (p<0.05). Conclusions 3D orthoses offer a promising opportunity to improve patients’ experiences with upper extremity casting while also providing appropriate immobilization.