The 15th edition of the Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (15th WRIB) was held on 27 September to 1 October 2021. Even with a last-minute move from in-person to virtual, an overwhelmingly high number of nearly 900 professionals representing pharma and biotech companies, contract research organizations (CROs), and multiple regulatory agencies still eagerly convened to actively discuss the most current topics of interest in bioanalysis. The 15th WRIB included three Main Workshops and seven Specialized Workshops that together spanned 1 week in order to allow exhaustive and thorough coverage of all major issues in bioanalysis, biomarkers, immunogenicity, gene therapy, cell therapy and vaccines. Moreover, in-depth workshops on biomarker assay development and validation (BAV) (focused on clarifying the confusion created by the increased use of the term "context of use" [COU]); mass spectrometry of proteins (therapeutic, biomarker and transgene); state-of-the-art cytometry innovation and validation; and critical reagent and positive control generation were the special features of the 15th edition. This 2021 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2021 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 2) covers the recommendations on ISR for Biomarkers, Liquid Biopsies, Spectral Cytometry, Inhalation/Oral & Multispecific Biotherapeutics, Accuracy/LLOQ for Flow Cytometry. Part 1A (Endogenous Compounds, Small Molecules, Complex Methods, Regulated Mass Spec of Large Molecules, Small Molecule, PoC), Part 1B (Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine) and Part 3 (TAb/NAb, Viral Vector CDx, Shedding Assays; CRISPR/Cas9 & CAR-T Immunogenicity; PCR & Vaccine Assay Performance; ADA Assay Comparability & Cut Point Appropriateness) are published in volume 14 of Bioanalysis, issues 9 and 11 (2022), respectively.

Background and Aims Wilson disease (WD) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder. Functional mutation of ATP7B causes inadequate loading of copper (Cu) into ceruloplasmin (CP) and defective Cu excretion into bile, resulting in Cu accumulation in liver and other organs. Currently, WD treatment monitoring lacks reliable and fully validated bioanalytical methods. The calculated non-CP Cu (NCC) method assumes a CP-Cu:Cp ratio of 6:1 and can yield negative NCC values, which are biologically implausible. A direct assay is needed to monitor NCC, especially for patients treated with an investigational Cu-binding agent, ALXN1840 (bis-choline tetrathiomolybdate), which mobilizes tissue Cu, contributing to a non-bioavailable pool of circulating Cu. Method A novel method utilizing immunocapture of CP, followed by chelation and filtration to isolate different Cu fractions subject to ICP-MS analysis (figure 1) was developed to fractionate and directly quantify multiple Cu species from human plasma. It permits measurement of CP-protein via LC-MS method and Cu species including CP bound Cu (CP-Cu), direct NCC, and labile bound Cu (LBC) via one workflow. Methods were validated for precision, accuracy, selectivity and stability following the FDA guidance for Bioanalytical Method Validation. A monoclonal anti-CP antibody was screened and selected for long-term assay use. Samples from healthy volunteers and from patients with WD were assessed for the Cu concentration in the CP fraction and the CP-Cu:Cp ratio. Results Full validations were successfully performed for each Cu fraction as well as CP-protein and showed a linear range from 5–1000 ng/mL (0.08 – 15.75 µM) for CP-Cu, direct NCC, LBC, and 5.00 – 800 µg/mL (0.03 – 5.97 µM) for CP-protein. The mean [95% confidence interval] for the CP-Cu:CP ratio was 4.68 [4.35, 5.00] in healthy volunteers and 4.09 [3.36, 4.82] in patients with WD, both being below the assumed ratio of 6. Conclusion Conventional calculated NCC is inaccurate and cannot be used for therapeutic guidance for WD. A novel method was developed that utilizes an immunocapture step and subsequent quantification of various fractions, including CP-Cu, direct NCC, LBC, and CP-protein. Validation data met defined acceptance criteria in terms of precision, accuracy, selectivity and stability. The assay is precise and reproducible and is valuable for accurate quantification of CP-Cu:CP-protein ratio, direct NCC and LBC, which may benefit WD therapy development.

Compared with conventional (monospecific) therapeutics, bispecific protein therapeutics present unique challenges for pharmacokinetic (PK) characterization - namely, the characterization of multiple functional domains as well as the consideration of biotransformation or interference by the formation of antitherapeutic antibodies against each functional domain. PK characterization is essential to the success of the overall drug development plan and for molecules with multiple binding domains; multiple bioanalytical methods may be needed to answer critical questions for each phase of drug development. The number of bispecific protein therapeutics entering drug development continues to increase, and therefore, a bioanalytical strategy for the PK characterization of bispecific molecules and study of their in vivo structure-function relationship is needed. This review presents case studies and a regulatory perspective.

Complement protein C5a is recognized as an important component of the alternative complement pathway. Its role is prominent enough to garner interest not only as a biomarker, but also as a potential therapeutic target. Bioanalytical challenges have been posed in proper quantitation of free C5a due to interference from its precursor, C5. Additionally, free therapeutic target quantitation can be difficult due to effects of sample dilution and prolonged sample incubation when therapeutic is used as capture reagent. Gyrolab technology enables quantitation of free target analyte with minimal sample dilution and rapid sample incubations, thus enabling in vitro results that are more representative of in vivo pharmacodynamics. When coupled with strategic sample pretreatment, Gyrolab offers an opportunity to quantitate free C5a in human plasma with an assay that vastly diminishes C5 interference. A Gyrolab assay for the quantitation of free C5a in human plasma was developed and validated. Validation results confirmed that proper sample pretreatment and use of the Gyrolab platform yield accurate and reliable results. Due to the advantages that it provides, Gyrolab has become our default technology of choice for quantitation of free target.

The 2018 12th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (12th WRIB) took place in Philadelphia, PA, USA on April 9-13, 2018 with an attendance of over 900 representatives from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5-day full immersion in bioanalysis, biomarkers and immunogenicity. As usual, it was specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest including both small- and large-molecule bioanalysis involving LC-MS, hybrid ligand binding assay (LBA)/LC-MS and LBA/cell-based assays approaches. This 2018 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2018 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1) covers the recommendations for LC-MS for small molecules, peptides, oligonucleotides and small molecule biomarkers. Part 2 (hybrid LBA/LC-MS for biotherapeutics and regulatory agencies' inputs) and Part 3 (large molecule bioanalysis, biomarkers and immunogenicity using LBA and cell-based assays) are published in volume 10 of Bioanalysis, issues 23 and 24 (2018), respectively.

Gene and nucleic acid therapies have demonstrated patient benefits to address unmet medical needs. Beside considerations regarding the biological nature of the gene therapy, the quality of bioanalytical methods plays an important role in ensuring the success of these novel therapies. Inconsistent approaches among bioanalytical labs during preclinical and clinical phases have been observed. There are many underlying reasons for this inconsistency. Various platforms and reagents used in quantitative methods, lacking of detailed regulatory guidance on method validation and uncertainty of immunogenicity strategy in supporting gene therapy may all be influential. This review summarizes recent practices and considerations in bioanalytical support of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity evaluations in gene therapy development with insight into method design, development and validations.

The impact of an anti-drug antibody (ADA) response on pharmacokinetic (PK) of a therapeutic protein (TP) requires an in-depth understanding of both PK parameters and ADA characteristics. The ADA and PK bioanalytical assays have technical limitations due to high circulating levels of TP and ADA, respectively, hence, significantly hindering the interpretation of this assessment. The goal of this study was to develop a population-based modeling and simulation approach that can identify a more relevant PK parameter associated with ADA-mediated clearance. The concentration-time data from a single dose PK study using five monoclonal antibodies were modeled using a non-compartmental analysis (NCA), one-compartmental, and two-compartmental Michaelis-Menten kinetic model (MMK). A novel PK parameter termed change in clearance time of the TP (α) derived from the MMK model could predict variations in α much earlier than the time points when ADA could be bioanalytically detectable. The model could also identify subjects that might have been potentially identified as false negative due to interference of TP with ADA detection. While NCA and one-compartment models can estimate loss of exposures, and changes in clearance, the two-compartment model provides this additional ability to predict that loss of exposure by means of α. Modeling data from this study showed that the two-compartment model along with the conventional modeling approaches can help predict the impact of ADA response in the absence of relevant ADA data.

Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (NAbs) can adversely impact efficacy and safety of biologic therapeutics. However, current assay formats to detect NAbs are limited in their use during the dosing phase due to interference by circulating drug, resulting in low drug tolerance. To improve the drug tolerance for NAb detection, an alternative approach for indirect NAb (iNAb) assessment was developed and qualified that uses a combination of pharmacokinetic (PK) assays to measure the serum concentrations of free and total drug. It is demonstrated that the ratio of free to total drug concentrations, referred to as F/T ratio, is a novel PK parameter that can indicate neutralizing activity in test samples. The iNAb assessment correctly identified NAb-positive samples with high drug concentrations that led to false negative results in a conventional NAb assay. Moreover, iNAb reliably distinguished between NAbs and non-neutralizing anti-drug antibodies over a wide range of concentrations. A proposal on how to deploy iNAb assessment within a broader immunogenicity testing strategy is presented.

Chris Macaraeg has been a lead scientist for method development, validation, and study support intended for regulated pre-clinical/clinical studies within the Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism department at Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA. He joined Amgen in 2006. His expertise also includes automation and method transfer to CROs. Chris received his BS degree in Physiological Science and Neuroscience from the University of California, Los Angeles, CA and MS in Forensic Science from Pace University, New York, NY. Stability of therapeutic proteins in biological matrix is an important parameter to evaluate in bioanalytical support of regulated nonclinical or clinical studies. Despite industry guidance publications, many questions still arise as to how these practices are implemented to establish therapeutic protein stability in bioanalytical method validations. This article presents findings from long-term, bench-top and freeze-thaw stability assessments for three therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using either ELISA or electrochemiluminescent technology. Studies illustrate the principles and challenges in stability tests which represent scenarios that samples will likely encounter during sample analysis. Thoughtful consideration of each study requirements and a fit-for-purpose approach is essential in successful establishment of the sample stability parameters in method validation.

The 2015 9th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (9th WRIB) took place in Miami, Florida with participation of 600 professionals from pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5 day, week-long event - A Full Immersion Bioanalytical Week - specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest in bioanalysis. The topics covered included both small and large molecules, and involved LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS and LBA approaches, including the focus on biomarkers and immunogenicity. This 2015 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2015 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts. Part 3 discusses the recommendations for large molecule bioanalysis using LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity. Part 1 (small molecule bioanalysis using LCMS) and Part 2 (hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory inputs from major global health authorities) have been published in volume 7, issues 22 and 23 of Bioanalysis, respectively.

To provide the first evaluation of pharmacokinetic (PK) drug–drug interactions (DDIs) between trebananib and chemotherapies across tumor types.

Specific guidelines on bioanalytical method validation for drug development support are recommended by regulatory agencies. Regarding stability assessment, US FDA states that ‘Stability procedures should evaluate the stability of the analytes during sample collection and handling, after long-term (frozen at the intended storage temperature) and short-term (bench-top, room temperature) storage, and after going through freeze and thaw cycles and the analytical process’. Additional regulatory considerations are discussed including topics such as analyte and reagent stability. This article reviews the regulatory requirements as issued by the USA (FDA), Europe (EMA) and Japan (MHLW), for stability studies where bioanalytical methods are used to support drug development programs and summarizes the current industry standard for conducting stability studies when utilizing ligand-binding assays.

Formulation changes at later stages of biotherapeutics development require biocomparability (BC) assessment. Using simulation, this study aims to determine the potential effect of bias difference observed between the two formulations after spiking into serum in passing or failing of a critical BC study. An ELISA method with 20% total error was used to assess any bias differences between a reference (RF) and test formulations (TF) in serum. During bioanalytical comparison of these formulations, a 9% difference in bias was observed between the two formulations in sera. To determine acceptable level of bias difference between the RF and TF bioanalytically, two in silico simulations were performed. The in silico analysis showed that the likelihood of the study meeting the BC criteria was >90% when the bias difference between RF and TF in serum was 9% and the number of subjects was ≥20 per treatment arm. An additional simulation showed that when the bias difference was increased to 13% and the number of subjects was <40, the likelihood of meeting the BC criteria decreased to 80%. The result from in silico analysis allowed the bioanalytical laboratory to proceed with sample analysis using a single calibrator and quality controls made from the reference formulation. This modeling approach can be applied to other BC studies with similar situations.

Decisions about efficacy and safety of therapeutic proteins (TP) designed to target soluble ligands are made in part by their ex vivo quantification. Ligand binding assays (LBAs) are critical tools in measuring serum TP levels in pharmacokinetic, toxicokinetic, and pharmacodynamic studies. This study evaluated the impact of reagent antibody affinities, assay incubation times, and analytical platform on free or total TP quantitation. An ELISA-based LBA that measures monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody (TPx) was used as the model system. To determine whether the method measures free or total TPx, the effects of K on, K off, and K D were determined. An 8:1 molar ratio of sclerostin (Scl) to TPx compared to a 1:1 molar ratio produced by rabbit polyclonal antibodies to TPx was required to achieve IC50, a measure of TPx interference effectiveness, making it unclear whether the ELISA truly measured free TPx. Kinetic analysis revealed that Scl had a rapid dissociation rate (K off) from TPx and that capture and detection antibodies had significantly higher binding affinities (K D) to TPx. These kinetic limitations along with long ELISA incubation times lead to the higher molar ratios (8:1) required for achieving 50% inhibition of TPx. However, a microfluidic platform with the same reagent pairs required shorter incubations to achieve a lower Scl IC50 molar ratio (1:1). The findings from this study provide the bioanalytical community with a deeper understanding of how reagent and platform selection for LBAs can affect what a particular method measures, either free or total TP concentrations.

Antibodies are critical tools for protein bioanalysis; their quality and performance dictate the caliber and robustness of ligand binding assays. After immunization, polyclonal B cells generate a diverse antibody repertoire against constant and variable regions of the therapeutic antibody immunogen. Herein we describe a comprehensive and multifactorial screening strategy to eliminate undesirable constant region-specific antibodies and select for anti-idiotypic antibodies with specificity for the unique variable region. Application of this strategy is described for the therapeutic antibody Mab-A case study. Five different factors were evaluated to select a final antibody pair for the quantification of therapeutics in biological matrices: (i) matrix effect in preclinical and clinical matrices, (ii) assay sensitivity with lower limit of quantification goal of single-digit ng/ml (low pM) at a signal-to-background ratio greater than 5, (iii) epitope distinction or nonbridging antibody pair, (iv) competition with target and inhibitory capacity enabling measurement of free drug, and (v) neutralizing bioactivity using bioassay. The selected antibody pair demonstrated superior assay sensitivity with no or minimal matrix effect in common biological samples, recognized two distinct binding epitopes on the therapeutic antibody variable region, and featured inhibitory and neutralizing effects with respect to quantification of free drug levels.

Background: Although substantial advances have been made in ligand-binding assays (LBA) for biotherapeutics in the past decade, there are still gaps that need to be addressed, especially in the context of understanding matrix effect and its root causes. Critical and in-depth characterization of matrix effect can provide valuable knowledge of the LBA limitations for proper results interpretation. Results: This article illustrates several strategic approaches with regard to identifying the root cause of matrix effect and practical solutions, including recognizing the confounding factors associated with matrix effect, selection of proper reagents to avoid matrix effect, and a systematic approach in dealing with matrix effect in method development and validation. Conclusion: These strategic approaches have enhanced the management of matrix effect in LBA.

With the advent of novel technologies, considerable advances have been made in the evaluation of the relationship between PK and PD. Ligand-binding assays have been the primary assay format supporting PK and immunogenicity assessments. Critical and in-depth characterizations of the ligand-binding assay of interest can provide valuable understanding of the limitations, for interpreting PK/PD and immunogenicity results. This review illustrates key challenges with regard to understanding the relationship between anti-drug antibody and PK/PD, including confounding factors associated with the development and validation of ligand-binding assays, mechanisms by which anti-drug antibody impacts PK/PD, factors to consider during data analyses and interpretation, and a perspective on integrating immunogenicity data into the well-established quantitative modeling approach. Through recognizing these challenges, we propose some opportunities for improvements in the development and validation of fit-for-purpose bioanalytical methods.

The 2014 8th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (8th WRIB), a 5-day full immersion in the evolving field of bioanalysis, took place in Universal City, California, USA. Close to 500 professionals from pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide convened to share, review, discuss and agree on approaches to address current issues of interest in bioanalysis. The topics covered included both small and large molecules, and involved LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS, LBA approaches and immunogenicity. From the prolific discussions held during the workshop, specific recommendations are presented in this 2014 White Paper. As with the previous years' editions, this paper acts as a practical tool to help the bioanalytical community continue advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2014 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 3) covers the recommendations for Large molecules bioanalysis using LBA and Immunogenicity. Part 1 (Small molecules bioanalysis using LCMS) and Part 2 (Hybrid LBA/LCMS, Electronic Laboratory Notebook and Regulatory Agencies' Input) were published in the Bioanalysis issues 6(22) and 6(23), respectively.

BACKGROUND:A microfluidic platform-based assay was validated to measure a humanized or fully human IgG in rat serum samples.MATERIALS & METHODS:The cumulative assessment for accuracy and precision was performed with three accuracy and precision runs.RESULTS:The inter-assay accuracy (mean %bias) ranged from -4.3 to 3.8%, and inter-batch %CV ranged from 5.0 to 9.2%. The method acceptance criterion was determined as 15% total error. The assay dynamic range was 50 to 10000 ng/ml. Incurred sample reanalysis passed with 95% of samples meeting incurred sample reanalysis acceptance criteria. Potential carryover effect was not observed.CONCLUSION:This study demonstrated the need for evaluating additional platform-specific processes when new technologies are employed to ensure the reproducibility of a successfully validated microfluidic platform method.