The ionotropic glutamate receptors comprise members of the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate), AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionic acid) and kainate receptor classes, named originally according to their preferred, synthetic, agonist [60, 99, 163]. Receptor heterogeneity within each class arises from the homo-oligomeric, or hetero-oligomeric, assembly of distinct subunits into cation-selective tetramers. Each subunit of the tetrameric complex comprises an extracellular amino terminal domain (ATD), an extracellular ligand binding domain (LBD), 3 TM domains (M1, M3 and M4), a channel lining re-entrant 'p-loop' (M2) located between M1 and M3 and an intracellular carboxy- terminal domain (CTD) [106, 74, 115, 163, 88]. The X-ray structure of a homomeric ionotropic glutamate receptor (GluA2- see below) has recently been solved at 3.6Å resolution [151] and although providing the most complete structural information current available may not be representative of the subunit arrangement of, for example, the heteromeric NMDA receptors [77]. It is beyond the scope of this supplement to discuss the pharmacology of individual ionotropic glutamate receptor isoforms in detail; such information can be gleaned from [60, 72, 34, 83, 44, 122, 27, 71, 163, 120, 121, 171]. Agents that discriminate between subunit isoforms are, where appropriate, noted in the tables and additional compounds that distinguish between receptor isoforms are indicated in the text below.The classification of glutamate receptor subunits has been re-addressed by NC-IUPHAR [31]. The scheme developed recommends a nomenclature for ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits that is adopted here.NMDA receptorsNMDA receptors assemble as obligate heteromers that may be drawn from GluN1, GluN2A, GluN2B, GluN2C, GluN2D, GluN3A and GluN3B subunits. Alternative splicing can generate eight isoforms of GluN1 with differing pharmacological properties. Various splice variants of GluN2B, 2C, 2D and GluN3A have also been reported. Activation of NMDA receptors containing GluN1 and GluN2 subunits requires the binding of two agonists, glutamate to the S1 and S2 regions of the GluN2 subunit and glycine to S1 and S2 regions of the GluN1 subunit [43, 28]. The minimal requirement for efficient functional expression of NMDA receptors in vitro is a di-heteromeric assembly of GluN1 and at least one GluN2 subunit variant, as a dimer of heterodimers arrangement in the extracellular domain [50, 106, 77]. However, more complex tri-heteromeric assemblies, incorporating multiple subtypes of GluN2 subunit, or GluN3 subunits, can be generated in vitro and occur in vivo. The NMDA receptor channel commonly has a high relative permeability to Ca2+ and is blocked, in a voltage-dependent manner, by Mg2+ such that at resting potentials the response is substantially inhibited.AMPA and Kainate receptorsAMPA receptors assemble as homomers, or heteromers, that may be drawn from GluA1, GluA2, GluA3 and GluA4 subunits. Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs) of class I (i.e. γ2, γ3, γ4 and γ8) act, with variable stoichiometry, as auxiliary subunits to AMPA receptors and influence their trafficking, single channel conductance gating and pharmacology (reviewed in [45, 110, 161, 70]). Functional kainate receptors can be expressed as homomers of GluK1, GluK2 or GluK3 subunits. GluK1-3 subunits are also capable of assembling into heterotetramers (e.g. GluK1/K2; [94, 127, 126]). Two additional kainate receptor subunits, GluK4 and GluK5, when expressed individually, form high affinity binding sites for kainate, but lack function, but can form heteromers when expressed with GluK1-3 subunits (e.g. GluK2/K5; reviewed in [127, 71, 126]). Kainate receptors may also exhibit 'metabotropic' functions [94, 139]. As found for AMPA receptors, kainate receptors are modulated by auxiliary subunits (Neto proteins, [126, 95]). An important function difference between AMPA and kainate receptors is that the latter require extracellular Na+ and Cl- for their activation [13, 128]. RNA encoding the GluA2 subunit undergoes extensive RNA editing in which the codon encoding a p-loop glutamine residue (Q) is converted to one encoding arginine (R). This Q/R site strongly influences the biophysical properties of the receptor. Recombinant AMPA receptors lacking RNA edited GluA2 subunits are: (1) permeable to Ca2+; (2) blocked by intracellular polyamines at depolarized potentials causing inward rectification (the latter being reduced by TARPs); (3) blocked by extracellular argiotoxin and joro spider toxins and (4) demonstrate higher channel conductances than receptors containing the edited form of GluA2 [147, 69]. GluK1 and GluK2, but not other kainate receptor subunits, are similarly edited and broadly similar functional characteristics apply to kainate receptors lacking either an RNA edited GluK1, or GluK2, subunit [94, 126]. Native AMPA and kainate receptors displaying differential channel conductances, Ca2+ permeabilities and sensitivity to block by intracellular polyamines have been identified [33, 69, 98]. GluA1-4 can exist as two variants generated by alternative splicing (termed ‘flip’ and ‘flop’) that differ in their desensitization kinetics and their desensitization in the presence of cyclothiazide which stabilises the nondesensitized state. TARPs also stabilise the non-desensitized conformation of AMPA receptors and facilitate the action of cyclothiazide [110]. Splice variants of GluK1-3 also exist which affects their trafficking [94, 126].

The Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a powerful genetic system that has revealed numerous conserved mechanisms for synapse development and homeostasis. The fly NMJ uses glutamate as the excitatory neurotransmitter and relies on kainate-type glutamate receptors and their auxiliary protein Neto for synapse assembly and function. However, despite decades of study, the reconstitution of NMJ glutamate receptors using heterologous systems has been achieved only recently, and there are no reports on the gating properties for the recombinant receptors. Here, using outside-out, patch clamp recordings and fast ligand application, we examine for the first time the biophysical properties of native type-A and type-B NMJ receptors in complexes with either Neto-α or Neto-β and compare them with recombinant receptors expressed in HEK293T cells. We found that type-A and type-B receptors have strikingly different gating properties that are further modulated by Neto-α and Neto-β. We captured single-channel events and revealed major differences between type-A and type-B receptors and also between Neto splice variants. Surprisingly, we found that deactivation is extremely fast and that the decay of synaptic currents resembles the rate of ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) desensitization. The functional analyses of recombinant iGluRs that we report here should greatly facilitate the interpretation of compound in vivo phenotypes of mutant animals. KEY POINTS: We report the reconstitution of Drosophila neuromuscular junction ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) with Neto splice forms. Using outside-out patches and fast ligand application, we examine the deactivation and desensitization of the four iGluR/Neto complexes found in vivo. Expression of functional channels is absolutely dependent on Neto. Single-channel recordings revealed different lifetimes for different receptor complexes. The decay of synaptic currents is controlled by desensitization.

The functional analysis of ctenophore neurotransmitter receptors, transporters, and ion channels can be greatly simplified by use of heterologous expression systems. Heterologous expression allows the characterization of individual membrane proteins, expressed at high levels in cells, where background activity by endogenous ion channels and transporters is with few exceptions minimal. The goal of such experiments is to gain an in-depth understanding of the behavior and regulation of individual molecular species, which is challenging in native tissue, but especially so in the case of ctenophores and other marine organisms. Coupled with transcriptome analysis, and immunohistochemical studies of receptor expression in vivo, experiments with heterologous expression systems can provide valuable insight into cellular activity, prior to more challenging functional studies on native tissues.

The formation of functional synapses requires co-assembly of ion channels with their accessory proteins which controls where, when, and how neurotransmitter receptors function. The auxiliary protein Neto modulates the function of kainate-type glutamate receptors in vertebrates as well as at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ), a glutamatergic synapse widely used for genetic studies on synapse development. We previously reported that Neto is essential for the synaptic recruitment and function of glutamate receptors. Here, using outside-out patch-clamp recordings and fast ligand application, we examine for the first time the biophysical properties of recombinant Drosophila NMJ receptors expressed in HEK293T cells and compare them with native receptor complexes of genetically controlled composition. The two Neto isoforms, Neto-α and Neto-β, differentially modulate the gating properties of NMJ receptors. Surprisingly, we found that deactivation is extremely fast and that the decay of synaptic currents resembles the rate of iGluR desensitization. The functional analyses of recombinant iGluRs that we report here should greatly facilitate the interpretation of compound in vivo phenotypes of mutant animals.

Jefferey Watkins was an Australian scientist who spent a large portion of his career working in the United Kingdom on glutamate receptors, the major mediators of excitatory synaptic transmission in vertebrate brains. He was responsible for the identification of glutamate receptor subtypes known today as AMPA, kainate, and N-Methyl-D-Aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors and for developing tools for their selective activation and inhibition. In many ways, this work marked the dawning of modern neuroscience, but getting there was a long and tortuous journey.

The ionotropic glutamate receptors comprise members of the NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate), AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionic acid) and kainate receptor classes, named originally according to their preferred, synthetic, agonist [36, 94, 157]. Receptor heterogeneity within each class arises from the homo-oligomeric, or hetero-oligomeric, assembly of distinct subunits into cation-selective tetramers. Each subunit of the tetrameric complex comprises an extracellular amino terminal domain (ATD), an extracellular ligand binding domain (LBD), 3 TM domains (M1, M3 and M4), a channel lining re-entrant 'p-loop' (M2) located between M1 and M3 and an intracellular carboxy- terminal domain (CTD) [101, 70, 109, 157, 84]. The X-ray structure of a homomeric ionotropic glutamate receptor (GluA2- see below) has recently been solved at 3.6Å resolution [145] and although providing the most complete structural information current available may not representative of the subunit arrangement of, for example, the heteromeric NMDA receptors [73]. It is beyond the scope of this supplement to discuss the pharmacology of individual ionotropic glutamate receptor isoforms in detail; such information can be gleaned from [36, 68, 32, 79, 43, 116, 25, 67, 157, 114, 115, 165]. Agents that discriminate between subunit isoforms are, where appropriate, noted in the tables and additional compounds that distinguish between receptor isoforms are indicated in the text below.The classification of glutamate receptor subunits has been re-addressed by NC-IUPHAR [29]. The scheme developed recommends a nomenclature for ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits that is adopted here.NMDA receptorsNMDA receptors assemble as obligate heteromers that may be drawn from GluN1, GluN2A, GluN2B, GluN2C, GluN2D, GluN3A and GluN3B subunits. Alternative splicing can generate eight isoforms of GluN1 with differing pharmacological properties. Various splice variants of GluN2B, 2C, 2D and GluN3A have also been reported. Activation of NMDA receptors containing GluN1 and GluN2 subunits requires the binding of two agonists, glutamate to the S1 and S2 regions of the GluN2 subunit and glycine to S1 and S2 regions of the GluN1 subunit [42, 26]. The minimal requirement for efficient functional expression of NMDA receptors in vitro is a di-heteromeric assembly of GluN1 and at least one GluN2 subunit variant, as a dimer of heterodimers arrangement in the extracellular domain [49, 101, 73]. However, more complex tri-heteromeric assemblies, incorporating multiple subtypes of GluN2 subunit, or GluN3 subunits, can be generated in vitro and occur in vivo. The NMDA receptor channel commonly has a high relative permeability to Ca2+ and is blocked, in a voltage-dependent manner, by Mg2+ such that at resting potentials the response is substantially inhibited.AMPA and Kainate receptorsAMPA receptors assemble as homomers, or heteromers, that may be drawn from GluA1, GluA2, GluA3 and GluA4 subunits. Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins (TARPs) of class I (i.e. γ2, γ3, γ4 and γ8) act, with variable stoichiometry, as auxiliary subunits to AMPA receptors and influence their trafficking, single channel conductance gating and pharmacology (reviewed in [44, 105, 155, 66]). Functional kainate receptors can be expressed as homomers of GluK1, GluK2 or GluK3 subunits. GluK1-3 subunits are also capable of assembling into heterotetramers (e.g. GluK1/K2; [89, 121, 120]). Two additional kainate receptor subunits, GluK4 and GluK5, when expressed individually, form high affinity binding sites for kainate, but lack function, but can form heteromers when expressed with GluK1-3 subunits (e.g. GluK2/K5; reviewed in [121, 67, 120]). Kainate receptors may also exhibit 'metabotropic' functions [89, 133]. As found for AMPA receptors, kainate receptors are modulated by auxiliary subunits (Neto proteins, [120, 90]). An important function difference between AMPA and kainate receptors is that the latter require extracellular Na+ and Cl- for their activation [12, 122]. RNA encoding the GluA2 subunit undergoes extensive RNA editing in which the codon encoding a p-loop glutamine residue (Q) is converted to one encoding arginine (R). This Q/R site strongly influences the biophysical properties of the receptor. Recombinant AMPA receptors lacking RNA edited GluA2 subunits are: (1) permeable to Ca2+; (2) blocked by intracellular polyamines at depolarized potentials causing inward rectification (the latter being reduced by TARPs); (3) blocked by extracellular argiotoxin and joro spider toxins and (4) demonstrate higher channel conductances than receptors containing the edited form of GluA2 [141, 65]. GluK1 and GluK2, but not other kainate receptor subunits, are similarly edited and broadly similar functional characteristics apply to kainate receptors lacking either an RNA edited GluK1, or GluK2, subunit [89, 120]. Native AMPA and kainate receptors displaying differential channel conductances, Ca2+ permeabilites and sensitivity to block by intracellular polyamines have been identified [31, 65, 93]. GluA1-4 can exist as two variants generated by alternative splicing (termed ‘flip’ and ‘flop’) that differ in their desensitization kinetics and their desensitization in the presence of cyclothiazide which stabilises the nondesensitized state. TARPs also stabilise the non-desensitized conformation of AMPA receptors and facilitate the action of cyclothiazide [105]. Splice variants of GluK1-3 also exist which affects their trafficking [89, 120].

This review summarizes structural studies on kainate receptors that explain unique functional properties of this receptor family. A large number of structures have been solved for ligand binding domain dimer assemblies, giving insight into the subtype selective pharmacology of agonists, antagonists, and allosteric modulators. Structures and biochemical studies on the amino terminal domain reveal mechanisms that play a key role in assembly of heteromeric receptors. Surprisingly, structures of full length homomeric GluK2, GluK3 and heteromeric GluK2/GluK5, receptors reveal a novel structure for the desensitized state that is strikingly different from that for AMPA receptors.

Single-channel analysis previously revealed a key role for a short-lived 'flipped' state during glycine receptor activation by partial agonists. Structures solved by Yu and colleagues now reveal a surprising mechanism involving a partially activated agonist-bound closed state that is too long-lived to be considered the flipped state.

In 1981 Jeff Watkins and Dick Evans wrote what was to become a seminal review on excitatory amino acids (EAAs) and their receptors (Watkins and Evans, 1981). Bringing together various lines of evidence dating back over several decades on: the distribution in the nervous system of putative amino acid neurotransmitters; enzymes involved in their production and metabolism; the uptake and release of amino acids; binding of EAAs to membranes; the pharmacological action of endogenous excitatory amino acids and their synthetic analogues, and notably the actions of antagonists for the excitations caused by both nerve stimulation and exogenous agonists, often using pharmacological tools developed by Jeff and his colleagues, they provided a compelling account for EAAs, especially l-glutamate, as a bona fide neurotransmitter in the nervous system. The rest, as they say, is history, but far from being consigned to history, EAA research is in rude health well into the 21st Century as this series of Special Issues of Neuropharmacology exemplifies. With EAAs and their receptors flourishing across a wide range of disciplines and clinical conditions, we enter into a dialogue with two of the most prominent and influential figures in the early days of EAA research: Jeff Watkins and Dick Evans.

The identification of AMPA, kainate and NMDA glutamate receptor subtypes by Watkins and colleagues underlies much of our understanding of excitatory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system of animals. Ongoing large scale genome sequencing projects in species for which physiological analysis of receptor function is challenging are resulting in identification of numerous eukaryotic glutamate receptor ion channels in the animal kingdom of life. On the basis of sequence similarity, these are frequently classified into the three vertebrate subtypes, initially identified using subtype selective ligands. Recent work reveals unexpected ligand binding profiles for these newly identified glutamate receptors, for example, kainate receptors on which NMDA acts as a competitive antagonist, and high affinity homomeric glycine activated glutamate receptors. Structural studies reveal that only subtle changes in the ligand binding domain, often identified only in retrospect, underlie different patterns of ligand binding, and that the biology of glutamate receptors is more complex than first anticipated.

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are tetrameric ion channels that mediate signal transmission at neuronal synapses, where they contribute centrally to the postsynaptic plasticity that underlies learning and memory. Receptor activation by L-glutamate triggers complex allosteric cascades that are transmitted through the layered and highly flexible receptor assembly culminating in opening a cation-selective pore. This process is shaped by the arrangement of the four core subunits as well as the presence of various auxiliary subunits, and is subject to regulation by an array of small molecule modulators targeting a number of sites throughout the complex. Here, we discuss recent structures of iGluR homomers and heteromers illuminating the organization and subunit arrangement of the core tetramer, co-assembled with auxiliary subunits and in complex with allosteric modulators.

Genome sequence data from a range of animal species are raising questions about the origins of glutamate receptors.

Genome sequence data from a range of animal species are raising questions about the origins of glutamate receptors.

Experiments on the action of glutamate on mammalian and amphibian nervous systems started back in the 1950s but decades passed before it became widely accepted that glutamate was the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS. The pace of research greatly accelerated in the 1980s when selective ligands that identified glutamate receptor subtypes became widely available, and voltage clamp techniques, coupled with rapid perfusion, began to resolve the unique functional properties of what cloning subsequently revealed to be a large family of receptors with numerous subtypes. More recently the power of X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM has been applied to the study of glutamate receptors, revealing their atomic structures, and the conformational changes that underlie their gating. In this review I summarize the history of this field, viewed through the lens of a career in which I spent 3 decades working on the structure and function of glutamate receptor ion channels. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled ‘Ionotropic glutamate receptors’.

Ion conductivity and the gating characteristics of tetrameric glutamate receptor ion channels are determined by their subunit composition. Competitive homo- and hetero-dimerization of their amino-terminal domains (ATDs) is a key step controlling assembly. Here we measured systematically the thermodynamic stabilities of homodimers and heterodimers of kainate and AMPA receptors using fluorescence-detected sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation. Measured affinities span many orders of magnitude, and complexes show large differences in kinetic stabilities. The association of kainate receptor ATD dimers is generally weaker than the association of AMPA receptor ATD dimers, but both show a general pattern of increased heterodimer stability as compared to the homodimers of their constituents, matching well physiologically observed receptor combinations. The free energy maps of AMPA and kainate receptor ATD dimers provide a framework for the interpretation of observed receptor subtype combinations and possible assembly pathways.

Glycine-activated ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) found in ctenophores are evolutionary precursors to NMDA receptors, which are important in regulating synaptic plasticity. Recent crystal structures of ctenophore iGluRs, which bind glycine with unusually high affinity, reveal a ctenophore-specific inter-lobe salt bridge in the ligand-binding domain (LBD) that is notably absent from vertebrate iGluRs. Using molecular dynamics umbrella sampling simulations, we show how perturbations to this strategically positioned salt bridge disrupt the conformational propensities of the LBD, significantly altering receptor kinetics and thermodynamics. We compare our computational results with electrophysiological, biochemical, and crystallographic analyses.

Multi-component protein complex formation is of great interest in physiological and biochemical studies as it is ubiquitous in biological systems. Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) provides powerful methods for studying such systems. It offers information on size, shape and binding energies for interacting systems from the analysis of sedimentation profiles of molecular mixtures in free solution. By virtue of the superb hydrodynamic resolution achieved in sedimentation velocity, co-existing complexes can be identified, even in the presence of impurities and aggregates. A recently introduced fluorescence optical detection system (FDS) for AUC substantially extends capabilities for studying high-affinity protein interactions because of the selectivity of fluorescence high sensitivity, allowing studies at picomolar concentrations. To overcome limitations posed by a single excitation wavelength, in the current study, we employed photoswitchable fluorescent proteins (FP) as probes in FDS-AUC. Taking advantage of their characteristic time-dependent fluorescent signal change due to photoswitching during FDS-AUC, a new dimension of detection is created that allows resolving specific FPs in multi-component mixtures. We have developed a computational framework for the analysis of sedimentation data exploiting the new temporal dimension. Experimentally we demonstrated this approach using mixtures of FPs commonly used in imaging, which could be readily distinguished from experimental FDS data. This approach extends FDS-AUC to more complicated protein system with multiple components and allows for quantitative characterization of protein complexes with regard to the binding mechanism and stoichiometry under very low macromolecular concentrations.

Phylogenetic analysis reveals AMPA, kainate, and NMDA receptor families in insect genomes, suggesting conserved functional properties corresponding to their vertebrate counterparts. However, heterologous expression of the Drosophila kainate receptor DKaiR1D and the AMPA receptor DGluR1A revealed novel ligand selectivity at odds with the classification used for vertebrate glutamate receptor ion channels (iGluRs). DKaiR1D forms a rapidly activating and desensitizing receptor that is inhibited by both NMDA and the NMDA receptor antagonist AP5; crystallization of the KaiR1D ligand-binding domain reveals that these ligands stabilize open cleft conformations, explaining their action as antagonists. Surprisingly, the AMPA receptor DGluR1A shows weak activation by its namesake agonist AMPA and also by quisqualate. Crystallization of the DGluR1A ligand-binding domain reveals amino acid exchanges that interfere with binding of these ligands. The unexpected ligand-binding profiles of insect iGluRs allows classical tools to be used in novel approaches for the study of synaptic regulation.