BackgroundNeuromuscular diseases (NMDs) are often progressive conditions that can reduce quality of life and life expectancy and require long-term caregiving. As patients age, caregivers face increasing demands, often resulting in significant caregiver burden. Treatment and care are complex, and a coordinated, family-centered approach is indicated. The current care situation for individuals with NMDs and their families in Switzerland is poorly understood, and there is no standardized NMD care management available. ObjectiveThe proposed study aims to assess the current care practices for individuals with NMDs in Switzerland, identifying unmet needs and challenges faced by patients, families, and health care providers. On the basis of these findings, a care management model will be developed, implemented, and evaluated to enhance support structures, strengthen specialized neuromuscular centers, and improve overall health care outcomes for affected individuals and their families. MethodsWe planned a 3-phase participatory mixed methods study (the Care-NMD-CH study). First, qualitative descriptive data and quantitative survey data were used to assess the current state of care practices. Then, a care management model and training program were codeveloped based on these insights. Finally, the care management service was implemented in pilot specialized neuromuscular centers and evaluated using quantitative, qualitative, and integrated methods. In addition to interview data and patient records, we measured patient-reported outcomes (quality of life and self-efficacy), family-reported outcomes (family functioning and caregiver burden), and stakeholder-reported outcomes (quality of care and interprofessional collaboration). The study population comprises individuals with NMDs and their families living in Switzerland. ResultsEthics approval was obtained in 2020. Baseline data (T0) were collected and analyzed in 2021 (phase A). The NMD care management model (phase B) was developed based on these data and finalized in 2022. Following the start of implementation in 8 centers in 2023, data collection for process and outcome evaluation (T1-T4) commenced and was completed in May 2025. Data analysis is currently ongoing, and results will be published separately. This paper reports only the study protocol. ConclusionsThis study represents an important step toward implementing and evaluating an evidence-based, family-centered care management service for individuals with NMDs and their families in specialized neuromuscular centers. Building on a 3-phase approach, the project identified gaps in current care; developed a structured care management model, including training; and evaluated its impact on patients, family members, and interprofessional care teams. Expected outcomes include possible improvements in the areas of care coordination, quality of life, and self-efficacy and family functioning. In addition, potential alleviation of disease and caregiver burden, as well as reduction in health care costs for those affected and the health system, will be investigated. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/82833

A variety of common and rare genetic factors have been implicated in the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and the evidence is that a genetic component is present in most affected individuals. However, our current understanding of ALS genetics causally explains only a small proportion of sporadic ALS, which accounts for over 90

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a heritable disorder where rare variants with low-to-moderate penetrance are thought to dominate genetic risk. To identify such rare variants, we harmonized and analyzed exome data from 22 cohorts, totaling 17,919 individuals with ALS and 200,703 controls across discovery and replication phases. Rare variant analyses identified several new risk genes, with replication confirming association of YKT6 and supporting HTR3C, GBGT1 and KNTC1. We also provide strong, independent validation for genes with limited previous evidence: ARPP21, DNAJC7 and CFAP410. Notably, in ARPP21, we identified a new high-effect variant (p.P747L) and confirmed that p.P563L is an ALS-associated variant leading to an aggressive disease course. Beyond new discoveries, our analyses largely recapitulated the known genetic architecture of ALS, identifying risk variants in over 20% of cases and supporting a cumulative oligogenic risk model. These findings highlight new translational targets and show that rare variant analyses capture substantially more genetic risk than common variant genome-wide association studies.

BackgroundDefining motor phenotypes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is important for individualized care and optimal therapeutic trial design. The "ALS-OPM" classification is based on the onset region (O), the propagation of motor symptoms (P), and the degree of clinical upper (UMN) and/or lower (LMN) motor neuron dysfunction (M).MethodsAn international ALS expert focus group was held in September 2025, followed by a consensus process through which revisions of the OPM classification were finalized.ResultsOnset (O1-4) identifies first motor symptoms as relating to the head (O1), distal/proximal arm (O2d/p), respiratory/axial trunk (O3r/a), or distal/proximal leg (O4d/p). Onset symptoms are defined by weakness or slowed, poorly coordinated voluntary movements in the muscles of the head, arm, trunk, or leg, including dysarthria, dysphagia, dysphonia, dyspnea, and axial instability. Propagation (P1(n)) or absence of propagation (P0(n)) of motor symptoms from the onset region to another body region are designated, where n denotes the number of months from onset to propagation or assessment. The degree of UMN dysfunction (slowed, poorly coordinated voluntary movements, hyperreflexia and/or spastic muscle tone, emotional lability) and/or LMN dysfunction (weakness with associated muscle atrophy) is classified as follows: balanced UMN and LMN dysfunction (M0); dominant (M1d) or pure UMN dysfunction (M1p); dominant (M2d) or pure LMN dysfunction (M2p); and dissociated UMN/LMN dysfunction (M3), in which the arms and legs predominantly show LMN and UMN involvement, respectively.ConclusionThe revised ALS-OPM classification aims to make it routine, practical and feasible to capture phenotype in clinical practice and therapeutic trials.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by the spread of muscle weakness across body regions. ROCK-ALS was a multicenter, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the Rho kinase inhibitor fasudil in ALS patients. A key exploratory objective was to evaluate fasudil's effect on the spread of muscle weakness using the Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX), an established, quantitative electrophysiological biomarker of lower motor neuron integrity. MUNIX was assessed in 10 muscles at baseline, day 26, day 90, and day 180. In the present post-hoc analysis, correlations were assessed between baseline serum biomarkers—neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)—and baseline clinical measures (ALSFRS-R, slow vital capacity, and MUNIX-10 sum scores) as well as their monthly rates of change, to explore potential prognostic relationships. For the analysis of disease spreading, muscles were classified as newly affected based on MUNIX decline relative to contralateral values or prior measurements, using thresholds of ≥10%, ≥20%, or ≥30%. Out of 118 participants included in the intention-to-treat population, 78 had full MUNIX datasets at baseline, and 67 had at least one follow-up. Baseline MUNIX-10 sum scores correlated with subsequent ALSFRS-R decline, suggesting prognostic value. Additionally, at day 90, fasudil significantly reduced the number of newly affected muscles compared to placebo in a dose-dependent manner over different thresholds. This supports MUNIX as a sensitive biomarker for monitoring disease spreading and demonstrates that fasudil may attenuate the progression of lower motor neuron involvement in ALS. Trial registration number: NCT03792490 (ClinicalTrials.gov); 2017-003676-31 (Eudra-CT).

Background Despite several studies suggesting a potential oligogenic risk model in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), case–control statistical evidence implicating oligogenicity with disease risk or clinical outcomes is limited. Considering its direct clinical and therapeutic implications, we aim to perform a large-scale robust investigation of oligogenicity in ALS risk and in the disease clinical course. Methods We leveraged Project MinE genome sequencing datasets (6711 cases and 2391 controls) to identify associations between oligogenicity in known ALS genes and disease risk, as well as clinical outcomes. Results In both the discovery and replication cohorts, we observed that the risk imparted from carrying multiple ALS rare variants was significantly greater than the risk associated with carrying only a single rare variant, both in the presence and absence of variants in the most well-established ALS genes. However, in contrast to risk, the relationships between oligogenicity and ALS clinical outcomes, such as age of onset and survival, did not follow the same pattern. Conclusions Our findings represent the first large-scale, case–control assessment of oligogenicity in ALS and show that oligogenic events involving known ALS risk genes are relevant for disease risk in ~6% of ALS but not necessarily for disease onset and survival. This must be considered in genetic counselling and testing by ensuring to use comprehensive gene panels even when a pathogenic variant has already been identified. Moreover, in the age of stratified medication and gene therapy, it supports the need for a complete genetic profile for the correct choice of therapy in all ALS patients.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by the spread of muscle weakness across body regions. The ROCK-ALS trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 study assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the Rho kinase inhibitor fasudil as an add-on to riluzole in ALS patients. A key exploratory objective was to evaluate fasudil's effect on the spread of muscle weakness using the Motor Unit Number Index (MUNIX), a quantitative electrophysiological biomarker of lower motor neuron integrity. MUNIX was assessed in 10 muscles (5 on each body side) at baseline, day 26, day 90, and day 180. Correlations were assessed between baseline serum biomarkers-neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-and baseline clinical measures (ALSFRS-R, slow vital capacity, and MUNIX sum scores) as well as their monthly rates of change, to explore potential prognostic relationships. For the analysis of disease spreading, muscles were classified as newly affected based on MUNIX decline relative to contralateral values or prior measurements, using thresholds of ≥10%, ≥20%, or ≥30%. 118 participants were included in the intention-to-treat population, 78 had full MUNIX datasets at baseline and 67 had at least one follow-up. Baseline MUNIX sum scores correlated with subsequent ALSFRS-R decline, suggesting prognostic value. Additionally, at day 90, fasudil significantly reduced the number of newly affected muscles compared to placebo in a dose dependent manner over different thresholds. These findings support MUNIX as a sensitive biomarker for monitoring disease spreading and demonstrate that fasudil may attenuate the progression of lower motor neuron involvement in ALS.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS:Many patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) experience muscle cramps during the course of the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered quinine sulfate for muscle cramps in ALS patients. METHODS:We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in ALS patients experiencing daily muscle cramps. After a two-week run-in period, patients were assigned to receive 250 mg quinine sulfate once daily, followed by a placebo or vice versa. Each treatment period lasted 2 weeks and was followed by a 4-week washout period. Patients used a daily diary to rate muscle cramp intensity on the numeric rating scale (NRS) and record muscle cramp frequency. The primary outcome measure was change in cramp intensity; coprimary outcome measures were number of muscle cramps during daytime and nighttime. RESULTS:Data from four women and three men were included in the analysis, all of whom reported a notable reduction in cramp intensity and frequency, leading them to continue the medication. Quinine sulfate was well-tolerated, with two patients reporting mild tinnitus. Cramp intensity was significantly reduced by 48% (p = 0.042). Further, the number of daytime muscle cramps declined significantly (p = 0.024). DISCUSSION:Our findings suggest the potential efficacy of quinine sulfate in reducing muscle cramp intensity and frequency in ALS patients. However, the small sample size (n = 7) limits generalizability. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results and fully assess its safety, serious adverse events, and therapeutic potential.

Background With the approval of disease-modifying treatments for 5q-spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), there is an increasing need for biomarkers for disease course and therapeutic response monitoring. Radially sampled Averaged Magnetization Inversion Recovery Acquisitions (rAMIRA) MR-imaging enables spinal cord (SC) gray matter (GM) delineation and quantification in vivo. This study aims to assess SC GM atrophy in patients with 5q-SMA and its associations with clinical disability. Methods Twenty-one patients with 5q-SMA and twenty-one age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) prospectively underwent 3 T axial 2D-rAMIRA MR-imaging at the intervertebral disc levels C2/C3-C5/C6 and T max (lumbar enlargement level). Associations between SC GM areas with muscle strength tested by dynamometry, Motor Function Measure (MFM), revised upper limb module (RULM), Revised Hammersmith Scale (RHS), and SMA-Functional Rating Scale (SMA-FRS) were assessed by Spearman Rank correlations and linear regression analysis. Results Compared to HCs, patients had significantly reduced SC GM areas at levels C3/C4 (relative reduction (RR) = 13.6%, p < 0.0001); C4/C5 (RR = 16.7%, p < 0.0001), C5/C6 (RR = 17.1%, p < 0.0001), and T max (RR = 17.4%, p < 0.0001). Significant correlations were found between cervical SC GM areas and muscle strength, RULM, MFM, RHS, and SMA-FRS. In linear regression analysis, GM area C3/C4 explained 33% of RHS variance. Conclusion SC GM atrophy is detectable in patients with 5q-SMA and is consistently associated with clinical measures of upper limb function, physiotherapeutic assessments, and SMA-FRS indicating the clinical relevance of the observed atrophy. Further longitudinal investigations are necessary next steps to evaluate this novel and easily applicable imaging marker as a potential disease course and therapeutic response marker.

A variety of common and rare genetic factors have been implicated in the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and the evidence is that a genetic component is present in most affected individuals. However, our current understanding of ALS genetics causally explains only a small proportion of sporadic cases which represent over 90% of all people with ALS. This limits the utility of genetic testing in screening, diagnosis and management to the 15-20% of people with ALS who carry a known pathogenic variant. Capsule Networks (CapsNets) constitute a deep learning method that has demonstrated strong performance in using genotyping data to predict individuals at risk for ALS. However, their use is constrained by a lack of generalised, flexible, and validated implementations across comprehensive datasets that account for the technical, biological, and clinical heterogeneity found in real-world disease scenarios. In this study, we build upon this method to address existing limitations, to develop a new model that is validated across diverse ALS populations, can handle discrepancies between genotyping technologies, and is applicable to individual external samples. Using large-scale datasets from over 47,000 individuals from 13 countries, genotyped with nine different genotyping platforms, our model achieved high precision and sensitivity in distinguishing between individuals with ALS and non-affected controls. Moreover, in simulations of population screening for ALS, its performance was comparable to that of conventional genetic screening for known ALS gene mutations, such as FUS and C9orf72. Our results demonstrate that this flexible and validated method could support the development of a genetic screening test for identifying individuals at risk and expediting ALS diagnosis. This would be applicable to all individuals, regardless of their family history or presence of known ALS mutations. ### Competing Interest Statement VS received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from AveXis, Cytokinetics, Italfarmaco, Liquidweb S.r.l., Amylyx, Novartis Pharma AG, Zambon Biotech SA, and Biogen. VS is in the Editorial Board of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, European Neurology, American Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Frontiers in Neurology, and Exploration of Neuroprotective Therapy. AAC reports receiving nonfinancial support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR); consultant fees from Amylyx, Clene Therapeutics, GenieUs, GSK, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, OrionPharma, Quralis, SanoGenetics, Sanofi, Voyager Therapeutics, and Wave Pharmaceuticals; and having a patent for use of CSF-neurofilament determinations and CSF-neurofilament thresholds of prognostic and stratification value with regards to response to therapy in neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases pending. ### Funding Statement This is an EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) project. The project is supported through the following funding organisations under the aegis of JPND http://www.neurodegenerationresearchneurodegenerati onresearch.eu/ (UK, Medical Research Council (MR/L501529/1 and MR/R024804/1) and Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L008238/1). AA-C is an NIHR Senior Investigator. AA-C receives salary support from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Dementia Biomedical Research Unit at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The work leading up to this publication was funded by the European Community's Health Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013; grant agreement number 259867) and Horizon 2020 Program (H2020-PHC-2014-two-stage; grant agreement number 633413). This project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement no. 772376-EScORIAL. This study represents independent research part funded by the NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. AI is funded by South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, MND Scotland, Motor Neurone Disease Association, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Spastic Paraplegia Foundation, Rosetrees Trust, Darby Rimmer MND Foundation, the Medical Research Council (UKRI), LifeArc, and Alzheimer's Research UK. Project MinE Belgium was supported by a grant from IWT (n 140935), the ALS Liga Belgie, the National Lottery of Belgium and the KU Leuven Opening the Future Fund. AAK is funded by The Motor Neurone Disease Association (MNDA), NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre and ALS Association Milton Safenowitz Research Fellowship, the Darby Rimmer MND Foundation, LifeArc, and the Dementia Consortium. AAK is supported by the UK Dementia Research Institute through UK DRI Ltd, principally funded by the Medical Research Council. VS Receives or has received research supports from the Italian Ministry of Health, AriSLA, E-Rare Joint Transnational Call, and the ERN Euro-NMD. ### Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: The datasets used in your study were individual-level data all individual-level data had been de-identified. All data used in this study are publicly available. The ALS genome data and GWAS data used in this study are from Project MinE and can be accessed via online application (www.projectmine.com). Other data utilized in this study include the following: the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (https://www.wtccc.org.uk/) and dbGaP datasets (phs000101.v3.p1, phs000101.v3.p1, phs000101.v3.p1, phs000101.v3.p1, phs000126.v1.p1, phs000196.v1.p1, phs000344.v1.p1, phs000344.v1.p1, phs000344.v1.p1). I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes All data used in this study are publicly available. The ALS genome data and GWAS data used in this study are from Project MinE and can be accessed via online application (www.projectmine.com). Other data utilized in this study include the following: the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (https://www.wtccc.org.uk/) and dbGaP datasets (phs000101.v3.p1, phs000101.v3.p1, phs000101.v3.p1, phs000101.v3.p1, phs000126.v1.p1, phs000196.v1.p1, phs000344.v1.p1, phs000344.v1.p1, phs000344.v1.p1).

In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), heterogeneity of motor phenotypes is a fundamental hallmark of the disease. Distinct ALS phenotypes were associated with a different progression and survival. Despite its relevance for clinical practice and research, there is no broader consensus on the classification of ALS phenotypes. An expert consensus process for the classification of ALS motor phenotypes was performed from May 2023 to December 2024. A three-determinant anatomical classification was proposed which is based on the (1) region of onset (O), (2) the propagation of motor symptoms (P), and (3) the degree of upper (UMN) and/or lower motor neuron (LMN) dysfunction (M). Accordingly, this classification is referred to as the “OPM classification”. Onset phenotypes differentiate the site of first motor symptoms: O1) head onset; O2d) distal arm onset; O2p) proximal arm onset; O3r) trunk respiratory onset; O3a) trunk axial onset; O4d) distal leg onset; O4p) proximal leg onset. Propagation phenotypes differentiate the temporal propagation of motor symptoms from the site of onset to another, vertically distant body region: PE) earlier propagation (within 12 months of symptom onset); PL) later propagation (without propagation within 12 months of symptom onset), including the established phenotypes of “progressive bulbar paralysis” (O1, PL), “flail-arm syndrome” (O2p, PL), and “flail-leg syndrome” (O4d, PL); PN) propagation not yet classifiable as time since symptom onset is less than 12 months. Phenotypes of motor neuron dysfunction differentiate the degree of UMN and/or LMN dysfunction: M0) balanced UMN and LMN dysfunction; M1d) dominant UMN dysfunction; M1p) pure UMN dysfunction (“primary lateral sclerosis”, PLS); M2d) dominant LMN dysfunction; M2p) pure LMN dysfunction (“progressive muscle atrophy”, PMA); M3) dissociated motor neuron dysfunction with dominant LMN and UMN dysfunction of the arms and legs (“brachial amyotrophic spastic paraparesis”), respectively. This consensus process aimed to standardize the clinical description of ALS motor phenotypes in clinical practice and research – based on the onset region, propagation pattern, and motor neuron dysfunction. This “OPM classification” contributes to specifying the prognosis, to defining the inclusion or stratification criteria in clinical trials and to correlate phenotypes with the underlying disease mechanisms of ALS.

BACKGROUND:Pathogenic variants of fused in sarcoma (FUS) cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (FUS-ALS), with evidence of gain of function. Jacifusen is an antisense oligonucleotide targeting FUS pre-mRNA, previously shown to delay neurodegeneration in a mouse model and potentially slow functional decline in a first-in-human study. Here, we sought to further evaluate use of jacifusen as a treatment for FUS-ALS. METHODS:This expanded access programme was conducted through a series of single-patient investigational new drug applications at five sites (four hospitals in the USA and one in Switzerland). Participants carried a FUS variant and had clinical evidence of motor neuron disease onset or electrophysiological abnormalities, if not a diagnosis of ALS. Participants were ineligible if chronically ventilated with tracheostomy. Enrolled sequentially, participants received serial intrathecal injections of jacifusen over 2·8-33·9 months. Based on multiple ascending doses of jacifusen (from 20 mg to 120 mg), successive protocols were modified as safety and other data were acquired, with the last participants enrolled receiving 120 mg doses monthly from the start of their treatment. Safety was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and standard cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) metrics. Concentration of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in CSF was used as a biomarker of axonal injury and neurodegeneration, and the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) score was used as an overall measure of motor function. Biochemical analysis and immunohistochemical staining were done on post-mortem CNS tissues to quantify FUS protein expression and assess the burden of FUS pathology. FINDINGS:Between June 11, 2019, and June 2, 2023, we recruited 12 participants (median age 26 years [range 16-45]; seven [58%] were female and five [42%] were male) into the expanded access programme. Transient elevations in cell counts or total protein concentration in CSF (six [50%] participants) were unrelated to treatment duration. The most common adverse events were back pain (six [50%]), headache (four [33%]), nausea (three [25%]), and post-lumbar puncture headache (three [25%]). Two participant deaths were recorded during the programme, both thought to be unrelated to the investigational drug. The concentration of NfL in CSF was reduced by up to 82·8% after 6 months of treatment. Although most participants had continued functional decline (as measured by ALSFRS-R) after starting treatment with jacifusen, one showed unprecedented, objective functional recovery after 10 months, and another remained asymptomatic, with documented improvement in electromyographic abnormalities. Biochemical and immunohistochemical analysis of CNS tissue samples from four participants showed reduced FUS protein levels and an apparent decrease in the burden of FUS pathology. INTERPRETATION:The findings suggest the safety and possible efficacy of jacifusen for treating FUS-ALS. The efficacy of jacifusen is being further evaluated in an ongoing clinical trial. FUNDING:ALS Association, Project ALS, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Tow Foundation, Nancy D Perlman and Thomas D Klingenstein Innovation Fund for Neurodegenerative Disease, National Institutes of Health, Angel Fund for ALS Research, Cellucci Fund for ALS Research, Max Rosenfeld ALS Fund, University of Minnesota, and the Muscular Dystrophy Association.

Treatment options for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remain suboptimal. Results from a phase 2 study of reldesemtiv in ALS suggested that it may slow disease progression. To assess the effect of reldesemtiv vs placebo on functional outcomes in ALS. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reldesemtiv in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (COURAGE-ALS) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted at 83 ALS centers in 16 countries from August 2021 to July 2023. The first 24-week period was placebo controlled vs reldesemtiv. All participants received reldesemtiv during the second 24-week period with a 4-week follow-up. Two interim analyses were planned, the first for futility and the second for futility and possible resizing. This was a hybrid decentralized trial with approximately half the trial visits performed remotely and the remaining visits in the clinic. Eligible participants met criteria for definite, probable, or possible ALS with lower motor neuron signs by modified El Escorial Criteria, ALS symptoms for 24 months or less, ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score of 44 or less, and forced vital capacity of greater than or equal to 65% of predicted. Oral reldesemtiv, 300 mg, or placebo twice daily. The primary end point was change in ALSFRS-R total score from baseline to week 24. Of the 696 participants screened, 207 were screen failures. A total of 486 participants (mean [SD] age, 59.4 [10.9] years; 309 male [63.6%]) were randomized to reldesemtiv (n = 325) or placebo (n = 161); 3 randomized patients were not dosed. The second interim analysis at 24 weeks after randomization included 256 participants. The data monitoring committee recommended that the trial should end due to futility, and the sponsor agreed. The mean (SE) group difference in the ALSFRS-R score from baseline to week 24 was −1.1 (0.53; 95% CI, −2.17 to −0.08; P = .04, favoring placebo). Given excess missing data from early termination, the combined assessment assumed greater importance; it, too, failed to show a benefit from treatment with reldesemtiv (win probability was 0.44 for reldesemtiv and 0.49 for placebo, with a win ratio of 0.91; 95% CI of win ratio, 0.77-1.10; P = .11). This randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate efficacy for reldesemtiv in slowing functional decline in ALS. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04944784

The median time to diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is approximately 12 months after the onset of first symptoms. This diagnostic delay is primarily due to the nonspecific nature of early symptoms and the clinical challenges in differentiating ALS from its mimics. Therefore, the discovery of reliable biomarkers for the early and accurate diagnosis of ALS represents a critical medical need. A total of 330 participants will be recruited across six international study sites. The cohort will include (1) pre-symptomatic gene mutation carriers, (2) symptomatic individuals up to 12 months after symptom onset with either ALS, ALS mimics, or a pure motor syndrome with yet unclear assignment, and (3) healthy controls. Participants will engage in a one-year longitudinal study, consisting of an initial evaluation at baseline visit and a follow-up visit 12 months later. Assessments will include an environmental and medical history questionnaire, neurological examinations, olfactory testing, cognitive/behavioral evaluations, and the collection of biological samples (serum, plasma, urine, tear fluid, and cerebrospinal fluid). Proteomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic analyses will be performed using mass spectrometry and targeted immunoassays, with all samples processed under standardized protocols. The resulting multimodal dataset will be systematically integrated in an effort to uncover a presymptomatic and early ALS signature. Perspective The premodiALS study aim to identify a clinico-molecular signature characteristic of presymptomatic and early ALS. These findings may have relevance to early diagnosis and future clinical practice for ALS disease.

The heterogeneity among the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)/MND patient population is well recognized but not well understood. Such heterogeneity may represent a significant confound in our current and prior clinical trials as certain subgroups of patients might have a selective response (or resistance) to a novel therapeutic. The basis on which to segregate the patient population is, however, unclear. The ALS/MND Committee of the World Federation of Neurology (WFN) convened a symposium to discuss various strategies that might be considered for separating (stratifying) the population to further study. The results of that conference are presented here as a white paper, reflecting current understanding of several of the various criteria that could be implemented to divide the patient population as presented and discussed at that meeting. Consideration of grouping patients based on phenotype, cognitive involvement, imaging, or electrophysiology is presented here.

Background:Evidence for the efficacy of nusinersen in adults with 5q-associated spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) has been demonstrated up to a period of 16 months in relatively large cohorts but whereas patients reach a plateau over time is still to be demonstrated. We investigated the efficacy and safety of nusinersen in adults with SMA over 38 months, the longest time period to date in a large cohort of patients from multiple clinical sites. Methods:Our prospective, observational study included adult patients with SMA from Germany, Switzerland, and Austria (July 2017 to May 2022). All participants had genetically-confirmed, 5q-associated SMA and were treated with nusinersen according to the label. The total Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) and Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) scores, and 6-min walk test (6 MWT; metres), were recorded at baseline and 14, 26, and 38 months after treatment initiation, and pre and post values were compared. Adverse events were also recorded. Findings:Overall, 389 patients were screened for eligibility and 237 were included. There were significant increases in all outcome measures compared with baseline, including mean HFMSE scores at 14 months (mean difference 1.72 [95% CI 1.19-2.25]), 26 months (1.20 [95% CI 0.48-1.91]), and 38 months (1.52 [95% CI 0.74-2.30]); mean RULM scores at 14 months (mean difference 0.75 [95% CI 0.43-1.07]), 26 months (mean difference 0.65 [95% CI 0.27-1.03]), and 38 months (mean difference 0.72 [95% CI 0.25-1.18]), and 6 MWT at 14 months (mean difference 30.86 m [95% CI 18.34-43.38]), 26 months (mean difference 29.26 m [95% CI 14.87-43.65]), and 38 months (mean difference 32.20 m [95% CI 10.32-54.09]). No new safety signals were identified. Interpretation:Our prospective, observational, long-term (38 months) data provides further real-world evidence for the continuous efficacy and safety of nusinersen in a large proportion of adult patients with SMA. Funding:Financial support for the registry from Biogen, Novartis and Roche.

BACKGROUND:Fasudil is a small molecule inhibitor of Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) and is approved for the treatment of subarachnoid haemorrhage. In preclinical studies, fasudil has been shown to attenuate neurodegeneration, modulate neuroinflammation, and foster axonal regeneration. We aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fasudil in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. METHODS:ROCK-ALS was a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 19 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis centres in Germany, France, and Switzerland. Individuals (aged 18-80 years) with at least probable amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (as per the revised El Escorial criteria), a disease duration of 6-24 months, and a slow vital capacity greater than 65% of predicted normal were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 30 mg (15 mg twice daily) or 60 mg (30 mg twice daily) fasudil or matched placebo intravenously for 20 days over a 4-week period. Follow-up assessments were performed at 45, 90, and 180 days after treatment initiation. The co-primary endpoints were safety until day 180 (defined as the proportion without drug-related serious adverse events) and tolerability during the treatment period (defined as the proportion who did not discontinue treatment due to suspected drug-related adverse events). The primary analyses were carried out in the intention-to-treat population, which included all participants who entered the treatment phase. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03792490) and Eudra-CT (2017-003676-31) and is now completed. FINDINGS:Between Feb 20, 2019, and April 20, 2022, 120 participants were enrolled and randomised; two individuals assigned fasudil 30 mg withdrew consent before the baseline visit. Thus, the intention-to-treat population comprised 35 in the fasudil 30 mg group, 39 in the fasudil 60 mg group, and 44 in the placebo group. The estimated proportion without a drug-related serious adverse event was 1·00 (95% CI 0·91 to 1·00) with placebo, 1·00 (0·89 to 1·00) with fasudil 30 mg, and 1·00 (0·90 to 1·00) with fasudil 60 mg; the difference in proportions was 0·00 (95% CI -0·11 to 0·10; p>0·99) for fasudil 30 mg versus placebo and 0·00 (-0·10 to 0·10; p>0·99) for fasudil 60 mg versus placebo. Treatment tolerability (the estimated proportion who did not discontinue) was 0·93 (95% CI 0·81 to 0·99) with placebo, 1·00 (0·90 to 1·00) with fasudil 30 mg, and 0·90 (0·76 to 0·97) with fasudil 60 mg; the difference in proportions was 0·07 (95% CI -0·05 to 0·20; p=0·25) for fasudil 30 mg versus placebo, and -0·03 (-0·18 to 0·10; p=0·70) for fasudil 60 mg versus placebo. Eight deaths occurred: two in the placebo group, four in the fasudil 30 mg group, and two in the fasudil 60 mg group. The most common serious adverse events were respiratory failure (seven events), gastrostomy (five events), pneumonia (four events), and dysphagia (four events). No serious adverse events or deaths were attributed to study treatment. Adverse events, which were mainly related to disease progression, occurred in 139 participants in the placebo group, 108 in the fasudil 30 mg group, and 105 in the fasudil 60 mg group. INTERPRETATION:Fasudil was well tolerated and safe in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The effect of fasudil on efficacy outcomes should be explored in larger clinical trials with a longer treatment duration, oral administration, and potentially higher dose of the trial drug. FUNDING:Framework of the E-Rare Joint Transnational Call 2016 "Clinical research for new therapeutic uses of already existing molecules (repurposing) in rare diseases".

Background Radially sampled averaged magnetization inversion-recovery acquisition (rAMIRA) imaging shows hyperintensity in the lateral corticospinal tract (CST) in patients with motor neuron diseases. Purpose To systematically determine the accuracy of the lateral corticospinal tract sign for detecting patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) at rAMIRA MRI. Materials and Methods This study included prospectively acquired data from participants in ALS and other motor neuron disease imaging studies at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. All participants underwent 3-T axial two-dimensional rAMIRA imaging at four cervical intervertebral disk levels. The lateral CST sign was defined as spinal cord white matter hyperintensity dorsolateral to the anterior horns, with higher signal intensity than in the dorsal columns on axial rAMIRA images. Marker accuracy was assessed in a study data set and in an independent validation data set. Postmortem rAMIRA imaging and histopathologic analysis were performed in one participant who died during the study. Results Participants with ALS (study data set: 38 participants [mean age, 61 years; IQR, 15 years], 22 male participants; validation data set: 10 participants [mean age, 61 years; IQR, 21 years], seven male participants), post-polio syndrome (study data set: 25 participants [mean age, 68 years; IQR, 8 years], 12 male participants), spinal muscular atrophy (study data set: 10 participants [mean age, 43 years; IQR, 14 years], eight male participants; validation data set: five participants [mean age, 38 years; IQR, 19 years], two male participants), and healthy control participants (study data set: 60 participants [mean age, 57 years; IQR, 20 years], 36 male participants; validation data set: 10 participants [mean age, 44 years; IQR, 17 years], seven male participants) were included. The sensitivity and specificity of rAMIRA for ALS were 60% (23 of 38) and 97% (91 of 94) in the study data set and 100% (10 of 10) and 93% (14 of 15) in the validation data set, respectively. Histopathologic analysis showed distinct loss of myelinated axons in the localization of the hyperintensities observed at rAMIRA imaging performed in situ and after organ extraction. Conclusion The recently defined marker at rAMIRA MRI may be a promising tool for assessing upper motor neuron degeneration in the lateral CST in patients with ALS. Clinical trials registration no. NCT03561623, NCT05764434, NCT06137612 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Sex is an important covariate in all genetic and epigenetic research due to its role in the incidence, progression and outcome of many phenotypic characteristics and human diseases. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a motor neuron disease with a sex bias towards higher incidence in males. Here, we report for the first time a blood-based epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis in 9274 individuals after stringent quality control (5529 males and 3975 females). We identified a total of 226 ALS saDMPs (sex-associated DMPs) annotated to a total of 159 unique genes. These ALS saDMPs were depleted at transposable elements yet significantly enriched at enhancers and slightly enriched at 3'UTRs. These ALS saDMPs were enriched for transcription factor motifs such as ESR1 and REST. Moreover, we identified an additional 10 genes associated with ALS saDMPs through chromatin loop interactions, suggesting a potential regulatory role for these saDMPs on distant genes. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between DNA methylation at specific CpG sites and overall survival in ALS using Cox proportional hazards models. We identified two ALS saDMPs, cg14380013 and cg06729676, that showed significant associations with survival. Overall, our study reports a reliable catalogue of sex-associated ALS saDMPs in ALS and elucidates several characteristics of these sites using a large-scale dataset. This resource will benefit future studies aiming to investigate the role of sex in the incidence, progression and risk for ALS.