INTRODUCTION/AIMS:Nusinersen intrathecal administration can be challenging in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) adults. We aimed to determine if the ultrasound (US)-assistance reduces the number of needle attempts and needle redirections needed for intrathecal drug administration and its impact on the procedure time, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and patient satisfaction in these patients. METHODS:Fifty-eight patients aged 18 years and older scheduled for intrathecal nusinersen injection were enrolled and randomized (1:1 ratio) into Group 1 (nusinersen infusion with US-assisted technique) or Group 2 (nusinersen infusion with landmark-based technique). The number of attempts, number of redirections, periprocedural time, AEs and patient satisfaction were reported. Continuous variables were compared with the Student t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variables were evaluated with the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test in case of expected frequencies <5. The p-values <.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS:There were no statistical differences in the number of attempts, AEs, or patient satisfaction between the two groups. The number of needle redirections was significantly lower in the ultrasound group versus landmark-based group (p < .05) in both the overall group of patients and in the subgroup with difficult spines. The periprocedural time was about 40 seconds longer in US-group versus landmark-based group (p < .05). DISCUSSION:In SMA adults, US assistance reduces the number of needle redirections needed for intrathecal drug administration. These results suggest that the US assistance may be advantageous for nusinersen therapy to reduce the therapeutic burden of intrathecal infusion.

Introduction/Purpose:Nusinersen, the first treatment approved for all spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) types, is administered intrathecally through lumbar puncture. We used ultrasound assistance or a landmark-based technique to access the lumbar intrathecal space in adult SMA patients. This study aimed to evaluate the technical success and adverse events (AEs) in such patients using either technique over a long observation period. Methods:Fifty-one adult patients received 507 consecutive interlaminar nusinersen administrations. Patients presented with both 'uncomplicated spines' or 'complicated spines'; two patients had previous back surgery. Technical success and AEs were recorded using either technique. A generalised linear mixed model was applied to evaluate predictors of technical success and complications. Results:An overall success rate of 99.6%, with only two procedures failing to reach the intrathecal space, and an overall optimal procedure rate of 90.3% have been reported. A total of 455 procedures (89.7%) were uneventfully performed. One (0.2%) case of severe AE (puncture of a bulky abdominal annexal cyst) was recorded. Twenty-seven episodes (5.3%) of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) and 24 episodes (4.7%) of radicular or back pain, both successfully treated with medical therapy, have also been reported. Technical success was significantly associated with 'complicated spines' (P = 0.022) and the use of ultrasound assistance (P = 0.01), and the use of ultrasound was the only independent predictor of uncomplicated procedures (P = 0.007). Discussion:In adult patients with SMA both landmark-based and ultrasound-assisted techniques are safe and effective even in the long term. The use of assistance is associated with technical success and can predict uncomplicated procedures. Conclusion:Our results support the use of ultrasonography in order to improve the success and reduce the burden of nusinersen intrathecal administration.

Background: Adequate pain management for abdominal hysterectomy is a key factor to decrease postoperative morbidity, hospital length of stay and chronic pain. General anesthesia is still the most widely used technique for abdominal hysterectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of blended anesthesia (spinal and general anesthesia) compared to balanced general anesthesia in patients undergoing hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer or for fibromatosis. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from adult ASA 1 to 3 patients scheduled for laparoscopic or mini-laparotomic hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy for ovarian, endometrial or cervical cancer or for fibromatosis. Exclusion criteria were age below 18 years, ASA > 3, previous chronic use of analgesics, psychiatric disorders, laparotomic surgery with an incision above the belly button and surgery extended to the upper abdomen for the presence of cancer localizations (e.g., liver, spleen or diaphragm surgery). The cohort of patients was retrospectively divided into three groups according to the anesthetic management: general anesthesia and spinal with morphine and local anesthetic (Group 1), general anesthesia and spinal with morphine (Group 2) and general anesthesia without spinal (Group 3). Results: NRS was lower in the spinal anesthesia groups (Groups 1 and 2) than in the general anesthesia group (Group 3) for every time point but at 48 h. The addition of local anesthetics conferred a small but significant NRS decrease (p = 0.009). A higher percentage of patients in Group 3 received intraoperative sufentanil (52.2 ± 18 mcg in Group 3 vs. Group 1 31.8 ± 16.2 mcg, Group 2 44.1 ± 15.6, p < 0.001) and additional techniques for postoperative pain control (11.4% in Group 3 vs. 2.1% in Group 1 and 0.8% in Group 2, p < 0.001). Intraoperative hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg) lasting more than 5 min was more frequent in patients receiving spinal anesthesia, especially with local anesthetics (Group 1 25.8%, Group 2 14.6%, Group 3 11.6%, p < 0.001), with the resulting increased need for vasopressors. Recovery-room discharge criteria were met earlier in the spinal anesthesia groups than in the general anesthesia group (Group 1 102 ± 44 min, Group 2 91.9 ± 46.5 min, Group 3 126 ± 90.7 min, p < 0.05). No differences were noted in postoperative mobilization or duration of ileus. Conclusions: Intrathecal administration of morphine with or without local anesthetic as a component of blended anesthesia is effective in improving postoperative pain control following laparoscopic or mini-laparotomic hysterectomy, in reducing intraoperative opioid consumption, in decreasing postoperative rescue analgesics consumption and the need for any additional analgesic technique. We recommend managing postoperative pain with a strategy tailored to the patient’s physical status and the type of surgery, preventing and treating side effects of pain treatments.

ESP block (ESPB) and posterior Quadratus Lumborum Block (pQLB) have been proposed as opioid-sparing techniques for the management of pain after abdominal surgery. Between December 2021 and October 2022, we conducted a retrospective comparative study at the delivery suite of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, to compare the efficacy of ESPB and pQLB in preventing postoperative pain after an elective caesarean section (CS). The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 h. Secondary outcomes were time to first opioid request; Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 h; vital signs; adverse events. Fifty-two women were included. The total cumulative dose of morphine was not significantly different between the two groups of patients (p = 0.897). Time to first dose of morphine, NPRS values and haemodynamic parameters were not statistically different between the two groups. NPRS values significantly increased (p < 0.001) at the different time intervals considered. The need for rescue doses of morphine was lower in the ESPB group compared to the pQLB group (hazard ratio of 0.51, 95% CI (0.27 to 0.95), p = 0.030). No adverse event was reported. ESPB seems to be as effective as pQLB in providing analgesia after CS.

Background: Lumbar epidural analgesia (EA) is the most commonly used method for reducing labour pain, but its impact on the duration of the second stage of labour and on neonatal and maternal outcomes remains a matter of debate. Our aim was to examine whether EA affected the course and the outcomes of labour among patients divided according to the Robson-10 group classification system. Methods: Patients of Robson’s classes 1, 2a, 3, and 4a were divided into either the EA group or the non-epidural analgesia (NEA) group. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed to balance the intergroup differences. The primary goal was to analyse the duration of the second stage of labour. The secondary goals were to evaluate neonatal and maternal outcomes. Results: In total, 21,808 cases were analysed. The second stage of labour for all groups was prolonged using EA (p < 0.05) without statistically significant differences in neonatal outcomes. EA resulted in a lower rate of episiotomies in nulliparous patients, with a higher rate of operative vaginal deliveries (OVD) (p < 0.05) and Caesarean sections (CS) (p < 0.05) in some classes. Conclusions: EA prolonged the duration of labour without affecting neonatal outcomes and reduced the rate of episiotomies, but also increased the rate of OVDs.

BACKGROUND: The posterior quadratus lumborum block (pQLB) has been used in postoperative pain management after cesarean section (CS). However, clinicians have no data about pQLB safety in pregnants, at increased risk of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). The purpose of the present study was to explore the efficacy and the safety of adding epinephrine to ropivacaine for bilateral pQLB vs. bilateral pQLB performed with ropivacaine alone in CS.METHODS: In this prospective trial 52 pregnants, ASA 2 physiological status, were consecutively allocated to one of two groups, e-pQLB and pQLB; e-pQLB group received 0.375% ropivacaine+100 mcg epinephrine, 20 mL each side; pQLB received 0.375% ropivacaine alone, 20 mL each side. The primary and secondary outcomes were to evaluate if the adjunct of epinephrine to ropivacaine increases efficacy and safety of pQLB, respectively.RESULTS: Authors found in e-pQLB group vs. p-QLB group: a total mean morphine consumption statistically lower during the first 24 postoperative hours (5.08±3.12, vs. 9.11±4.67 SD mg, P=0.0002); NRS values statistically lower at six hours from block, both at rest (1.73±1.88 SD vs. 2.88±2.53, P=0.03) and with movement (3.03±1.98 SD vs. 4.23±2.87, P=0.04); a longer time between block and the first opioid request (5.92±2.48 vs. 3.78±2.68 SD hrs, P<0.003); venous ropivacaine concentrations significantly lower at any time of samples but at 120 minutes.CONCLUSIONS: Adding epinephrine to ropivacaine increases efficacy and duration of pQLB. Moreover it increases block safety, reducing peak and mean venous ropivacaine concentration.

Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome is a rare syndrome characterized by particular craniofacial features, cardiac abnormalities, and multiple organ diseases. Patients present with pulmonary stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, short neck, micrognathia, laryngomalacia, and tracheomalacia. These conditions may strongly influence patient perioperative outcomes. We describe a 15-year-old child with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome presenting for a dentistry procedure. She had an uneventful perioperative and postoperative course except for difficult airway management.

Labor and delivery, while perceived as gratifying and joyful, are nonetheless among the most painful events women can experience in life. Treating pain is nowadays one of the essential elements in assisting women during labor. Epidural analgesia is the best option to ensure the optimal control of pain for the mother without compromising the wellbeing of the fetus. The main contraindications to neuraxial analgesia techniques include patient refusal, known bleeding diathesis or abnormal coagulation tests, elevated intracranial pressure (particularly in the presence of an intracranial space occupying lesion), severe aortic or mitralic valve stenosis and infections at the puncture site [1]. There are many pathogens responsible for cutaneous infections at the dorsal-lumbar level, yeasts of the Malassetia genus being the most commonly implicated. Malassetia Globulosa is the predominant species in the Tinea Versicolor infection [2,3]. Also implicated are M. Sympodialis, M. Furfur and others as well [4]. These fungi are normal components of the cutaneous flora but the transformation from yeasts to micelia can lead to the pathology. The cause for this occurrence is still unknown, yet there are a few contributing factors leading to this infection that affects mostly adolescents and young adults; these are genetic predisposition [5], heat and humidity, immunosuppression, contraceptives, pregnancy and malnutrition. It manifests with characteristic hypo- or hyper-pigmented spots alongside the trunk, the neck, and the face. The majority of the times infection is entirely superficial but cases of meningitis and Central Nervous System (CNS) infections from hematogenous spread have been reported [6,7]. The literature supports with data that adequate antiseptic preparation of the skin effectively prevents meningitis occurrence after epidural puncture [8]; other cases are reported where a small incision of the skin allows for a safer passage of the needle directly in the subcutis without going thnrough the corneal layer.

Background and aims The QLB2 efficacy has been demonstrated both in major abdominal surgery and in cesarean section (CS). QLB2 safety in parturients has never been investigated. Adding epinephrine to local anesthetic (LA), by determining a delayed LA systemic reabsorption and a reduced plasmatic concentration, could improve QLB2 safety, as demonstrated for other blocks. Our primary outcome has been the assessment of the chronological changes in venous LA concentration after QLB2 with or without epinephrine. Secondary outcomes have been duration, efficacy and collateral effects of block. Methods 20 parturients, at term, with singleton pregnancy, undergoing CS under SA have been enrolled and randomly allocated to receive at the end of surgery 20 ml for each side of 0,375% ropivacaine + 100 mcg epinephrine (QLB2-e group) or 0,375% ropivacaine alone (QLB2 group). After block, venous samples (2 ml each) have been performed at 10, 30, 45, 60, and 120 minutes. Symptoms of subjective neurological toxicity, block duration, total morphine consumption, pain scores and adverse events have also been recorded. Results Venous ropivacaine concentration peaked earlier in QLB2 vs QLB2-e group (Tmax=10 vs 60 minutes) and higher (1.3225 [0.6744–1.3383] vs. 0.7634 [0.4858–0.8946]). Ropivacaine plasmatic concentrations were significantly lower in QLB2-e vs QLB2 at 10 minutes (0.5303 [0.2886–0.7176] vs 1.3225 mcg/ml [674.4–1338.3], p 0.04). the total morphine consumption after QLB2-e was lower than after QLB2 (3 mg [2–11.5] vs 5 mg [3–10], p=0.63). Conclusions Adding epinephrine to QLB2 lowered the peak of venous ropivacaine concentration; this could increase safety of block in the obstetric population.