The co-evolution of prokaryotes, phages, and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) over the past billions of years has driven the emergence and diversification of defense and anti-defense systems alike. Anti-defense proteins have diverse functional domains, sequences, and are typically small, creating a challenge to detect anti-defense homologs across the prokaryotic genomes. To date, no tools comprehensively annotate anti-defense proteins within a desired genome or MGE. Here, we developed "AntiDefenseFinder" - a free open-source tool and web service that detects 156 anti-defense systems (of one or more proteins) in any genomic sequence. Using this dataset, we identified 47,981 anti-defense systems distributed across prokaryotes, phage, and MGEs. We found that some genes co-localize in "anti-defense islands", including E. coli T4 and Lambda phages, although many are standalone. Out of the 112 systems detected in bacteria, 100 systems localize only or preferentially in prophages, plasmids, phage satellites, integrons, and integrative and conjugative elements. However, over 80% of anti-Pycsar protein 1 (Apyc1) resides in non-mobile regions of bacteria. Evolutionary and functional analyses revealed that Apyc1 likely originated in bacteria to regulate cNMP signaling, but was co-opted multiple times by phages to overcome cNMP-utilizing defenses. With the AntiDefenseFinder tool, we hope to facilitate the identification of the full repertoire of anti-defense systems in MGEs, the discovery of new protein functions, and a deeper understanding of host-pathogen arms race.

ABSTRACT Prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas immunity is subverted via anti-CRISPRs (Acrs), small proteins that inhibit Cas protein activities when expressed during the phage lytic cycle or from resident prophages or plasmids. CRISPR-Cas defenses are classified into 6 types and 33 subtypes, which employ a diverse suite of Cas effectors and differ in their mechanisms of interference. As Acrs often work via binding to a cognate Cas protein, inhibition is almost always limited to a single CRISPR type. Furthermore, while acr genes are frequently organized together in phage-associated gene clusters, how such inhibitors initially evolve has remained unclear. Here we have investigated the Acr content and inhibition specificity of a collection of Listeria isolates, which naturally harbor four diverse CRISPR-Cas systems (types I-B, II-A, II-C, and VI-A). We observed widespread antagonism of CRISPR, which we traced to 12 novel and 4 known Acr gene families encoded on endogenous mobile genetic elements. Among these were two Acrs that possess sequence homology to type I-B Cas proteins and assemble into a defective interference complex. Surprisingly, an additional type I-B Cas homolog did not affect type I immunity, but instead inhibited the RNA-targeting type VI CRISPR system through sequestration of crRNA. By probing the IMGVR database of viral genomes, we detected abundant orphan cas genes located within putative anti-defense gene clusters. We experimentally verified the Acr activity of one viral cas gene, a particularly broad-spectrum cas3 homolog that inhibits type I-B, II-A, and VI-A CRISPR immunity. Our observations provide direct evidence of Acr evolution via cas gene co-option, and new genes with potential for broad-spectrum control of genome editing technologies.

Viruses have been evolving host-modifying factors for billions of years. Genomes of bacterial and archaeal viruses are replete with fast-evolving, uncharacterized accessory genes (AGs), most of which likely antagonize host defenses or other viruses 1, 2 . Systematic investigation of AGs could uncover a multitude of biological mechanisms involved in virus-host competition, but AG identification in genomic databases remains a challenge. We developed an integrated computational and high-throughput discovery platform to identify AGs in virus genomes and assay their functions in complementary phage infection-dependent and -independent contexts. Our approach showcases how phages interact with the principal layers of antiviral immunity, including cell surface modifications, restriction systems, and abortive infection (Abi) mechanisms, which operate simultaneously in the same host. We discovered multiple Enterobacteriophage AGs associated with counter-defense functions that activate rather than inhibit antiviral immunity in cells, including the surprising finding that anti-restriction AGs elicit programmed cell death (PCD) activity of some restriction-modification (R-M) systems. We propose that counter-defense AGs that trigger PCD create a conundrum for phages whereby keeping the AGs causes PCD but losing them exposes the phage to restriction by bacteria. Strategies employed by viruses to avoid this double jeopardy could be an important factor in virus evolution that remains to be explored.

Bacteria use a diverse arsenal of anti-phage immune systems, including CRISPR-Cas and restriction enzymes. Recent advances in anti-phage system discovery and annotation tools have unearthed many unique systems, often encoded in horizontally transferred defense islands, which can be horizontally transferred. Here, we developed Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) for defense systems and queried microbial genomes on the NCBI database. Out of the 30 species with >200 completely sequenced genomes, our analysis found Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibits the greatest diversity of anti-phage systems, as measured by Shannon entropy. Using network analysis to identify the common neighbors of anti-phage systems, we identified two core defense hotspot loci (cDHS1 and cDHS2). cDHS1 is up to 224 kb (median: 26 kb) with varied arrangements of more than 30 distinct immune systems across isolates, while cDHS2 has 24 distinct systems (median: 6 kb). Both cDHS regions are occupied in a majority of P. aeruginosa isolates. Most cDHS genes are of unknown function potentially representing new anti-phage systems, which we validated by identifying a novel anti-phage system (Shango) commonly encoded in cDHS1. Identifying core genes flanking immune islands could simplify immune system discovery and may represent popular landing spots for diverse MGEs carrying anti-phage systems.

Summary Bacteria have evolved multiple defense systems, including CRISPR-Cas, to cleave the DNA of phage and mobile genetic elements (MGE). In turn, phage have evolved anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins that use novel and co-opted mechanisms to block DNA binding or cleavage. Here, we report that an anti-CRISPR (AcrVA2) unexpectedly inhibits Cas12a biogenesis by triggering translation-dependent destruction of its mRNA. AcrVA2 specifically clears the mRNA of Cas12a by recognizing and binding its N-terminal polypeptide. Mutating conserved N-terminal amino acids in Cas12a prevents binding and inhibition by AcrVA2 but also decreases Cas12a anti-phage activity. This mechanism therefore enables AcrVA2 to specifically inhibit divergent Cas12a orthologs while constraining its ability to escape inhibition. AcrVA2 homologs are found on diverse MGEs across numerous bacterial classes, typically in the absence of Cas12a, suggesting that this protein family may induce similar molecular outcomes against other targets. These findings reveal a new gene regulatory strategy in bacteria and create opportunities for polypeptide-specific gene regulation in prokaryotes and beyond.

CRISPR systems are prokaryotic adaptive immune systems that use RNA-guided Cas nucleases to recognize and destroy foreign genetic elements, like bacteriophages and plasmids. To overcome CRISPR immunity, phages have evolved diverse families of anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs), each of which inhibits the nucleic acid binding or cleavage activities of specific Cas protein families. Recently, Lin et al. (2020) described the discovery and characterization of 7 different Acr families (AcrVIA1-7) that inhibit type VI-A CRISPR systems, which use the nuclease Cas13a to perform RNA-guided RNA cleavage. In this Matters Arising article, we detail several inconsistencies that question the results reported in the Lin et al. (2020) study. These include inaccurate bioinformatics analyses, as well as reported experiments involving bacterial strains that are impossible to construct. The authors were unable to provide their published strains with which we might reproduce their experiments. We independently tested the Acr sequences described in Lin et al. (2020) in two different Cas13 inhibition assays, but could not detect anti-CRISPR activity. Taken together, our data and analyses prompt us to question the claim that AcrVIA1-7 reported in Lin et al. are bona fide type VI anti-CRISPR proteins.

Protein conformations are shaped by cellular environments, but how environmental changes alter the conformational landscapes of specific proteins in vivo remains largely uncharacterized, in part due to the challenge of probing protein structures in living cells. Here, we use deep mutational scanning to investigate how a toxic conformation of α-synuclein, a dynamic protein linked to Parkinson's disease, responds to perturbations of cellular proteostasis. In the context of a course for graduate students in the UCSF Integrative Program in Quantitative Biology, we screened a comprehensive library of α-synuclein missense mutants in yeast cells treated with a variety of small molecules that perturb cellular processes linked to α-synuclein biology and pathobiology. We found that the conformation of α-synuclein previously shown to drive yeast toxicity-an extended, membrane-bound helix-is largely unaffected by these chemical perturbations, underscoring the importance of this conformational state as a driver of cellular toxicity. On the other hand, the chemical perturbations have a significant effect on the ability of mutations to suppress α-synuclein toxicity. Moreover, we find that sequence determinants of α-synuclein toxicity are well described by a simple structural model of the membrane-bound helix. This model predicts that α-synuclein penetrates the membrane to constant depth across its length but that membrane affinity decreases toward the C terminus, which is consistent with orthogonal biophysical measurements. Finally, we discuss how parallelized chemical genetics experiments can provide a robust framework for inquiry-based graduate coursework.

Bacteriophages must rapidly deploy anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) to inactivate the RNA-guided nucleases that enforce CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity in their bacterial hosts. Listeria monocytogenes temperate phages encode up to three anti-Cas9 proteins, with acrIIA1 always present. AcrIIA1 binds and inhibits Cas9 with its C-terminal domain; however, the function of its highly conserved N-terminal domain (NTD) is unknown. Here, we report that the AcrIIA1NTD is a critical transcriptional repressor of the strong anti-CRISPR promoter. A rapid burst of anti-CRISPR transcription occurs during phage infection and the subsequent negative feedback by AcrIIA1NTD is required for optimal phage replication, even in the absence of CRISPR-Cas immunity. In the presence of CRISPR-Cas immunity, full-length AcrIIA1 uses its two-domain architecture to act as a "Cas9 sensor," tuning acr expression according to Cas9 levels. Finally, we identify AcrIIA1NTD homologs in other Firmicutes and demonstrate that they have been co-opted by hosts as "anti-anti-CRISPRs," repressing phage anti-CRISPR deployment.

The best-characterized members of the plant-specific SIAMESE-RELATED (SMR) family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors regulate the transition from the mitotic cell cycle to endoreplication, also known as endoreduplication, an altered version of the cell cycle in which DNA is replicated without cell division. Some other family members are implicated in cell cycle responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the functions of most SMRs remain unknown, and the specific cyclin-dependent kinase complexes inhibited by SMRs are unclear. Here, we demonstrate that a diverse group of SMRs, including an SMR from the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens, can complement an Arabidopsis thaliana siamese (sim) mutant and that both Arabidopsis SIM and P. patens SMR can inhibit CDK activity in vitro. Furthermore, we show that Arabidopsis SIM can bind to and inhibit both CDKA;1 and CDKB1;1. Finally, we show that SMR2 acts to restrict cell proliferation during leaf growth in Arabidopsis and that SIM, SMR1/LGO, and SMR2 play overlapping roles in controlling the transition from cell division to endoreplication during leaf development. These results indicate that differences in SMR function in plant growth and development are primarily due to differences in transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation, rather than to differences in fundamental biochemical function.