Associations between lung cancer risk and common polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D (XPD), X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1), XRCC3 and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease/redox factor 1 were examined within a randomized clinical trial designed to determine whether alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene, or both would reduce cancer incidence among male smokers in Finland. We found no direct association between lung cancer risk and any of the DNA repair genotypes studied, however, the association between XPD codon 751 genotype and lung cancer was modified by alpha-tocopherol supplementation, and the association between XRCC1 codon 399 genotype and lung cancer was modified by the amount of smoking. Our results suggest that common alterations in single DNA repair genes are not major determinants of lung cancer susceptibility among smokers.
In order to examine whether a polymorphism in the promoter region of the myeloperoxidase (MPO) gene is associated with lung cancer among male smokers, we conducted a case–control study nested within a Finnish clinical trial cohort. Although we found no evidence of an overall association between lung cancer risk and MPO genotype, the variant MPO genotype was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer among a subset of older men. These findings contrast with those from previous studies that report decreased lung cancer risk among MPO variant individuals.
The GSTM1 (glutathione S-transferase mu-1) null genotype is suspected of increasing an individual's susceptibility to tobacco smoke carcinogens because of impaired carcinogen detoxification. We were interested in whether there were differences in lung cancer susceptibility to smoking within the GSTM1 genotypes and the impact of antioxidant supplementation on this. For this purpose, we conducted a nested lung cancer case-control study and evaluated the role of GSTM1 within the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study. GSTM1 genotype status was determined for 319 cases and 333 controls using a PCR-based approach. GSTM1 was evaluated as an independent risk factor and as an effect modifier of smoking using logistic regression analyses. The GSTM1 null genotype itself was unrelated to risk of lung cancer, odds ratio (OR) = 1.09 and 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-1.50, but it may have modified the effect of smoking. There was a suggestion for a stronger association between years of smoking and lung cancer among the GSTM1 null genotype, but the differences between GSTM1 null and present genotypes were not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Furthermore, the smoking association was strongest among those with the GSTM1 null genotype not receiving alpha-tocopherol supplementation, whereas among those receiving alpha-tocopherol, there was no modification by GSTM1 on the association between smoking duration and lung cancer risk. Beta-carotene supplementation did not modify the relationship between GSTM1, smoking years, and lung cancer risk. In conclusion, GSTM1 is not associated with lung cancer risk in male smokers but may confer a higher susceptibility to cumulative tobacco exposure. This association may be attenuated by alpha-tocopherol but not by beta-carotene supplementation.
We initiated the present study to evaluate the accuracy of a new epithelial biomarker of early lung cancer. We tested the hypothesis that expression of a tumor-associated antigen by exfoliated sputum epithelial cells has greater accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for the detection of preclinical, localized lung cancer than do routine clinical detection methods. Monoclonal antibody (MAb) 703D4 recognizes heterogeneous nuclear ribonuclear protein (hnRNP) A2/B1. We compared the accuracy of hnRNP up-regulation with cytology and radiographic screening for lung cancer detection in miners who were highly exposed to tobacco smoke, radon, and arsenic in southwestern China. The results showed that MAb 703D4 detection of hnRNP expression by sputum epithelial cells had greater accuracy for the detection of lung cancer than did routine screening methods, particularly for early (localized) disease. Among 57 cases and 76 noncases at the first screening, overall MAb detection of hnRNP was more sensitive (74 versus 21% for cytology and 42% for chest x-ray) but had lower specificity (70 versus 100% for cytology and 90% for chest x-ray) than standard methods. Recognizing hnRNP up-regulation resulted in detection of approximately one-third more early cases than did the combination of X-ray and cytology. Detection of hnRNP A2/B1 expression appears to be a good initial screening test for lung carcinogenesis, as it identified 74% of those who developed subsequent clinical lung cancer. Future studies might separate individuals with high lung cancer risk by MAb detection, confirming the positives with markers having greater specificity (e.g., clinical studies that become positive later in the morphological progression).
PURPOSE: To examine risk factors and establish a biologic specimen and data bank for the study of early markers of lung cancer.METHODS: We designed a dynamic cohort using an ongoing lung cancer screening program among radon-and arsenic-exposed tin miners in Yunnan China. Through the first four years of the study, 8,346 miners aged 40 years and older with over 10 years of occupational exposure have been enrolled, risk factors have been assessed, annual sputum and chest radiographs have been obtained, and numerous biologic specimens have been collected.RESULTS: A total of 243 new lung cancer cases have been identified through 1995. Radon and arsenic exposures are the predominant risk factors, but lung cancer risk is also associated with chronic bronchitis and silicosis, as well as a number of measures of exposure to tobacco smoke, including early age of first use, duration, and cumulative exposure. Tumor and sputum samples are being examined for early markers of lung cancer.CONCLUSION: A cohort of occupationally-exposed tin miners with an extensive biologic specimen repository has been successfully established to simultaneously study the etiology and early detection of lung cancer. Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
Background. Epidemiologic evidence indicates that diets high in carotenoid-rich fruits and vegetables, as well as high serum levels of vitamin E (alphatocopherol) and beta carotene, are associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer.Methods. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled primary-prevention trial to determine whether daily supplementation with alpha-tocopherol, beta carotene, or both would reduce the incidence of lung cancer and other cancers. A total of 29,133 male smokers 50 to 69 years of age from southwestern Finland were randomly assigned to one of four regimens: alpha-tocopherol (50 mg per day) alone, beta carotene (20 mg per day) alone, both alpha-tocopherol and beta carotene, or placebo. Follow-up continued for five to eight years.Results. Among the 876 new cases of lung cancer diagnosed during the trial, no reduction in incidence was observed among the men who received alpha-tocopherol (change in incidence as compared with those who did not, -2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, -14 to 12 percent). Unexpectedly, we observed a higher incidence of lung cancer among the men who received beta carotene than among those who did not (change in incidence, 18 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 3 to 36 percent). We found no evidence of an interaction between alpha-tocopherol and beta carotene with respect to the incidence of lung cancer. Fewer cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed among those who received alpha-tocopherol than among those who did not. Beta carotene had little or no effect on the incidence of cancer other than lung cancer. Alpha-tocopherol had no apparent effect on total mortality, although more deaths from hemorrhagic stroke were observed among the men who received this supplement than among those who did not. Total mortality was 8 percent higher (95 percent confidence interval, 1 to 16 percent) among the participants who received beta carotene than among those who did not, primarily because there were more deaths from lung cancer and ischemic heart disease.