ABSTRACT Background Etrasimod is an oral, once‐daily (q.d.), selective sphingosine 1‐phosphate (S1P) 1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Unlike the S1P receptor modulator ozanimod, etrasimod does not have a molecular structure to inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO). Coadministration of drugs that inhibit MAO with opioids and antidepressants may increase the risk of adverse events (AEs). Aims This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence of AEs potentially related to serotonin syndrome in patients taking etrasimod and concomitant opioids or antidepressants in the Phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials. Methods Safety data pooled from both trials were analysed in subgroups of patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg q.d. (up to 52 weeks of exposure) with/without concomitant opioids or antidepressants. We report the proportions of patients who had ≥ 1 concurrent AE potentially associated with serotonin syndrome, including hypertension‐related events. Results Among 527 patients receiving etrasimod, 77 (14.6%) and 35 (6.6%) were taking concomitant opioids or antidepressants, respectively. The incidence of AEs potentially related to serotonin syndrome, including hypertension‐related AEs, was low (≤ 8.6%) and generally comparable in all subgroups. No reported AEs were serious or led to treatment discontinuation among patients taking these concomitant medications. Conclusions The incidence of AEs was low and comparable in patients receiving etrasimod with or without concomitant opioids or antidepressants. This analysis further supports the low likelihood of clinically relevant drug–drug interactions between etrasimod and medications commonly prescribed to patients with UC, such as opioids or antidepressants. ( ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03945188; NCT03996369).

Background: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) 1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). It is known that non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) may not lead to UC drug discontinuation but can affect treatment tolerability. Objectives: This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence of specific, common, non-serious TEAEs reported in the etrasimod UC clinical programme and the characteristics of affected patients. Design: Data included patients from the Placebo-controlled UC cohort (phase II OASIS, and phase III ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials) receiving QD etrasimod (2 or 1 mg) or placebo. Methods: Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; the number of patients with a TEAE divided by the total exposure in patient-years (PYs), per 100 PY) of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness TEAEs were reported. Changes in heart rate among patients with Dizziness TEAEs were also evaluated. Results: Among 943 patients (etrasimod 2 mg, N = 577 (276.7 PY); etrasimod 1 mg, N = 52 (11.4 PY); placebo, N = 314 (115.1 PY)), 48, 34, 27 and 21 patients experienced events of Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness, respectively. All events were non-serious; one patient treated with etrasimod was discontinued due to a Pyrexia TEAE. Numerically, IRs of Headache and Dizziness TEAEs were higher, and Nausea slightly higher, with etrasimod versus placebo (13.45 vs 8.63 per 100 PY, 6.52 vs 1.69 and 7.18 vs 5.13 per 100 PY, respectively); IRs were similar for Pyrexia. The duration of most TEAEs was 1–10 days. Conclusion: In the etrasimod UC clinical programme, all Headache, Pyrexia, Nausea and Dizziness events were non-serious. Headache and Dizziness were more frequent, and Nausea slightly more frequent, among patients receiving etrasimod versus placebo. The post hoc nature of this analysis is a limitation. These results reiterate the favourable safety profile and tolerability of etrasimod. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02447302; NCT03945188; NCT03996369.

Abstract Background Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Unlike the other S1P receptor modulator approved for UC, etrasimod and its metabolites do not have a molecular structure to inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO).1 Coadministration of drugs that inhibit MAO with opioids and antidepressants may increase the risk of adverse events (AEs), including hypertension.2 This post hoc analysis evaluated the incidence of AEs potentially related to serotonin syndrome in patients taking etrasimod and concomitant opioids or antidepressants in the phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) and ELEVATE UC 12 (NCT03996369) trials. Methods Safety data pooled from both trials were analysed in patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg QD (up to 52 weeks of exposure) with/without concomitant opioids or antidepressants. We report the proportions of patients who had ≥1 concurrent AE potentially related to serotonin syndrome, consisting of one standardised MedDRA Query, one query based on the Hunter Criteria and supplemental preferred terms (pyrexia, tachycardia and hypertension-related AEs).3 Results Among 527 patients receiving etrasimod, 77 (14.6%) and 35 (6.6%) patients were taking concomitant opioids or antidepressants, respectively. Most patients on concomitant opioids or antidepressants were White (80.0–88.3%); male (50.6–51.4%); their median age was 35.0 (18.0–70.0) and 41.0 (19.0–74.0) years, respectively. More patients with vs without concomitant opioids or antidepressants, respectively, consumed alcohol (40.3% vs 24.7% and 48.6% vs 25.4%) and used tobacco (40.3% vs 20.9% and 34.3% vs 23.0%). The incidence of other AEs potentially related to serotonin syndrome was low and generally comparable in all subgroups; reported rates of pyrexia and tachycardia were similar in patients with/without concomitant opioids or antidepressants (Table). Hypertension-related AEs were infrequent and generally balanced. No AEs per the Hunter Criteria were reported in patients on concomitant opioids or antidepressants (Table). No reported AEs were serious or led to treatment discontinuation among patients taking these concomitant medications. Conclusion The incidence of AEs was low and comparable in patients receiving etrasimod with or without concomitant opioids or antidepressants. This analysis supports the low likelihood of clinically relevant drug–drug interactions between etrasimod and medications commonly prescribed to patients with UC, such as opioids or antidepressants. References 1. Lee CA et al. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2023; 12: 553–571. 2. Sands BE et al. J Crohns Colitis 2023; online ahead of print. 3. Dunkley EJC et al. QJM 2003; 96: 635–642.

Introduction: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily (QD), selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)(1,4,5) receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we report the primary analysis of a phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of etrasimod in patients from Japan with moderately to severely active UC. Methods: Patients from Japan who completed the 12-week ELEVATE UC 12 induction trial could enroll in the 40-week ELEVATE UC 40 JAPAN maintenance trial for a combined 52-week treatment period. Patients in this Japan cohort continued their baseline assigned treatment (etrasimod 2 mg QD or placebo) from ELEVATE UC 12. Efficacy was assessed at week 12 and week 52. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) pooled from both trials were assessed up to 52 weeks of exposure. Results: The Japan cohort comprised 32 and 16 patients who received etrasimod and placebo, respectively. A numerically greater proportion of patients who received etrasimod versus placebo achieved clinical remission at week 12 (etrasimod: 14.3%; placebo: 7.1%) and week 52 (etrasimod: 25.0%; placebo: 7.1%); a similar trend was observed for all key secondary efficacy endpoints. TEAEs occurred in 84.4% (27/32) and 62.5% (10/16) of patients who received etrasimod and placebo, respectively. No new safety signals were detected. Conclusion: In these induction and maintenance trials evaluating etrasimod in patients from Japan with UC, numerically higher proportions of patients who received etrasimod versus placebo achieved efficacy endpoints. Efficacy and safety findings were consistent with those from the global ELEVATE UC trial populations.

Background and Aims Etrasimod is an oral, once daily, selective, sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P]1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis [UC]. This subgroup analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily vs placebo by prior biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor [bio/JAKi] exposure in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12. Methods Pre-defined efficacy endpoints were assessed at Weeks 12 and 52 in ELEVATE UC 52 and Week 12 in ELEVATE UC 12 in bio/JAKi-na & iuml;ve and -experienced patients, and at Week 12 [pooled] based on prior advanced therapy exposure mechanism. Results In the ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 analysis populations, 80/274 [29.2%] and 74/222 [33.3%] patients receiving etrasimod and 42/135 [31.1%] and 38/112 [33.9%] patients receiving placebo, respectively, were bio/JAKi-experienced. In both bio/JAKi-na & iuml;ve and -experienced patients, a significantly greater proportion receiving etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical remission [p < 0.05] in ELEVATE UC 52 at Weeks 12 [na & iuml;ve: 30.9% vs 9.7%; experienced: 17.5% vs 2.4%] and 52 [na & iuml;ve: 36.6% vs 7.5%; experienced: 21.3% vs 4.8%]; in ELEVATE UC 12, this was observed only for bio/JAKi-na & iuml;ve patients [na & iuml;ve: 27.7% vs 16.2%, p = 0.033; experienced: 18.9% vs 13.2%, p = 0.349]. Similar patterns were observed for most efficacy endpoints. Among patients with prior anti-integrin exposure [N = 90], a significantly greater proportion achieved clinical response [54.1% vs 27.6%, p = 0.030], but not clinical remission [9.8% vs 3.4%, p = 0.248], with etrasimod vs placebo. Conclusions Bio/JAKi-na & iuml;ve and -experienced patients had clinically meaningful induction and maintenance treatment benefits with etrasimod vs placebo.

Background and Aims Pivotal trials in ulcerative colitis have historically excluded patients with isolated proctitis. Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily in patients with isolated proctitis (centrally read) from the phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials. Methods Patients, including those with isolated proctitis (<10 cm rectal involvement) who met all other inclusion criteria in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, were randomised 2:1 to receive etrasimod or placebo. Primary, secondary and other identified efficacy endpoints and safety were assessed. Results We analysed data from 64 and 723 patients at Week 12 (both trials pooled), and 36 and 397 patients at Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52 only) with isolated proctitis and more extensive colitis (>= 10 cm rectal involvement), respectively. Patients with isolated proctitis receiving etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo, including clinical remission rates at Weeks 12 (42.9% vs 13.6%) and 52 (44.4% vs 11.1%), endoscopic improvement (52.4% vs 22.7%) at Week 12 and bowel urgency numerical rating scale score at Week 12 (all p < 0.01). Generally similar trends were observed in patients with more extensive colitis. Safety was consistent across subgroups, with no new findings. Conclusions Etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in patients with isolated proctitis, and those with more extensive disease, in most efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and 52. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03945188; NCT03996369 Conclusions Etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in patients with isolated proctitis, and those with more extensive disease, in most efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and 52. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03945188; NCT03996369 {Graphical Abstract}