Oral contraceptive steroids are used by an estimated 60 to 70 million women worldwide. Over the past 20 years there have been both case reports and clinical studies on the topic of drug interactions with these agents. Some of the interactions are of definite therapeutic relevance, whereas others can be discounted as being of no clinical significance. Pharmacological interactions between oral contraceptive steroids and other compounds may be of 2 kinds: (a) drugs may impair the efficacy of oral contraceptive steroids, leading to breakthrough bleeding and pregnancy (in a few cases, the activity of the contraceptive is enhanced); (b) oral contraceptive steroids may interfere with the metabolism of other drugs.
The effect of the antimalarial drugs chloroquine (CQ) and primaquine (PQ) on rat liver microsomal drug metabolism has been studied in vitro and in vivo. After acute administration, PQ increased pentobarbitone sleeping time in a dose-related manner [control, 94.0 ± 9.4 min; 10mg/kg, 137.0 ± 2.4 min; 20mg/kg, 197.0 ± 7.5 min; 50 mg/kg, 269.0 ± 2.9 min (means ± S.E.M.)], prolonged zoxazolamine paralysis time (control, 140.0 ± 10.0 min; 50 mg/kg, 341.5 ± 25.6 min) and decreased antipyrine blood clearance from 2.17 ± 0.19 to 0.86 ± 0.12 ml/min. CQ showed no effect on pentobarbitone sleeping time or zoxazolamine paralysis time, but decreased antipyrine clearance from 2.17 ± 0.19 to 1.11 ± 0.18 ml/min. Both drugs inhibited aminopyrine N-demethylase activity, although the concentration required to produce 50% inhibition was much greater for CQ (10 mM) than for PQ (approximately 0.1 mM). Lineweaver-Burk plots showed that CQ inhibited competitively whereas PQ inhibition was apparently non-competitive. Ethoxyresorufin O-deethylase activity decreased by about 40 and 50% in the presence of CQ and PQ respectively (250 nM, equimolar with substrate). There was no evidence of induction following chronic administration of CQ and PQ (50 mg/kg/day for 4 days). There was an apparent decrease in cytochrome P-450 content and aminopyrine N-demethylase activity was decreased. These results demonstrate that PQ and CQ inhibit hepatic drug metabolism both in vitro and in vivo and that PQ appears to be the more potent inhibitor.
The pharmacokinetics of propranolol have been studied in pentobarbitone-anesthetized dogs after both systemic and portal venous administration. The results confirm that after systemic venous administration hepatic extraction is high, averaging 69–92% at one circulation, and that hepatic clearance accounts for 74–102% of the whole body elimination; thus the clearance of propranolol is chiefly dependent on hepatic blood flow. The kinetics differed when propranolol was given into the hepatic portal vein in a logarithmically declining fashion. Extraction of propranolol was initially complete in some dogs, but subsequently more propranolol left the liver in venous blood than entering via arterial and portal venous blood. These findings are interpreted as evidence for saturation of propranolol extraction by the liver.