Symptoms of hostility in patients during acute exacerbations of schizophrenia have been associated with aggressive behavior. Data suggest that some second-generation antipsychotics have specific anti-hostility effects, independent of sedation and positive symptom improvement. Two post hoc analyses were performed to examine the efficacy of lurasidone for reducing hostility in patients with schizophrenia. One analysis pooled adults (N = 1168) from 5 placebo-controlled, 6-week trials of lurasidone (40-160 mg). Another analysis pooled younger patients (up to age 25 years, N = 427) from the adult studies and a similarly designed trial of lurasidone (40 or 80 mg) in adolescent patients (13-17 years old). The outcome measure was mean change in the hostility item (P7) of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). To address pseudospecificity, results were adjusted for positive symptom change and sedation. In adults with a baseline PANSS hostility score >= 2, significant improvement in hostility was observed for all doses with a dose-related increase in effect size (Cohen's d): lurasidone 40 mg = 0.18, 80 mg = 0.24, 120 mg = 0.36, and 160 mg = 0.53. The same dose-response pattern was observed for the more severe hostility subgroups (P7: >= 3, >= 4), and in the early-onset population. Results suggest that lurasidone has specific, dose-related anti-hostility effects.

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety profile of lurasidone combined with either lithium or valproate, in the short-term treatment of patients with bipolar depression.MethodsData were pooled from two 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of patients with bipolar depression on stable doses of lithium or valproate randomized to lurasidone (20-120 mg/d) or placebo. Efficacy measures included the Montgomery-& Aring;sberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Scale, and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology via self-assessment and were analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures approach.ResultsNotably larger week 6 effect sizes were observed when lurasidone was added to lithium, compared with when lurasidone was added to valproate, on 2 of the 3 depression outcome measures, Montgomery-& Aring;sberg Depression Rating Scale total score (d = 0.45 vs 0.22) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology via self-assessment (d = 0.63 vs 0.29); the efficacy advantage was smaller on the Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Scale depression score (d = 0.34 vs 0.29). Similar adverse event profiles were observed for lurasidone treatment in combination with either lithium or valproate. The most frequently reported events (>= 5%) in both groups were nausea, parkinsonism, somnolence, akathisia, and insomnia. Minimal changes in weight, lipids, and measures of glycemic control were observed during treatment with lurasidone combined with either lithium or valproate.ConclusionsLurasidone added to either lithium or valproate was found to be an effective treatment for bipolar depression, with a larger antidepressant effect observed when lurasidone was combined with lithium. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety or tolerability of lurasidone when used adjunctively with lithium or valproate.

Abstract Background and Objectives The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia in adolescents and young adults (13–25). Methods The 2 pooled studies used similar designs and outcome measures. Patients (13–25) with schizophrenia completed an initial double-blind 6-week trial of lurasidone (40 and 80 mg/day) in the adolescent trial and (80 and 160 mg/day) in the young adult trial. In open-label long-term trials, adolescent patients were treated with 20–80 mg/day lurasidone, and adults were treated with 40–160 mg/day lurasidone. Efficacy was evaluated based on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S). Results The safety population consisted of 306 patients (mean age, 16.2 years; 208 patients (68.0%) who completed 12 months of treatment; 8.2% who discontinued treatment by 12 months due to an adverse event). The mean (SD) changes in the PANSS total score from the extension baseline to months 6 and 12 were − 11.8 (13.9) and – 15.3 (15.0), respectively (OC), and the mean (SD) changes in the CGI-S score were − 0.8 (1.0) and − 1.0 (1.1), respectively (OC). The most frequent adverse events were headache (17.6%), anxiety (11.4%), schizophrenia (9.8%), and nausea (9.8%). No clinically meaningful changes were observed in weight, metabolic parameters, or prolactin. Conclusions In adolescents and young adults with schizophrenia, treatment with lurasidone was generally well tolerated and effective. Long-term treatment was associated with a continued reduction in symptoms of schizophrenia. Long-term treatment was associated with minimal effects on weight, metabolic parameters, and prolactin. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers D1050234, D1050302.

IntroductionSchizophrenia is a chronic neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms. While current antipsychotic (AP) medications are generally effective in treating positive symptoms, they don’t effectively manage the negative symptoms of schizophrenia (NSS). This study examined the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost among patients with NSS in the United States.MethodsThis retrospective longitudinal observational study utilized de-identified administrative claims data from STATinMED RWD Insights (01/01/2016-09/30/2022). Study sample included patients with schizophrenia identified using ICD-10-CM: F20.XX, diagnosed with NSS (cases; ICD-10-CM: F20.5; index=first NSS diagnosis) or not (controls; random date assigned as index); identification period: 01/01/2017-09/30/2021. Patients were 13 years or older at index, had 12-month of continuous capture data pre-(baseline) and post-(follow-up) index date, and had evidence of AP use at baseline. Outcomes were prevalence of NSS, mental health (MH)-related, schizophrenia-related, and all-cause HCRU and costs per patient per year (PPPY). Patients’ demographic, clinical characteristics, and other psychiatry and neurodevelopmental comorbidities were assessed at baseline. Unadjusted and Inverse Proportional Treatment Weighted (IPTW) comparison were conducted for baseline characteristics and outcomes followed by Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) for HCRU and costs.ResultsThe final study sample had 5,691 NSS and 236,895 non-NSS patients. Prevalence rate of NSS was estimated at 24.66 per 1000 patients of Schizophrenia. Patients with NSS were significantly older (mean: 50 vs 48 years), less commercially insured (10% vs 15%), and had greater comorbidities including alcohol abuse (12% vs 8%), depression (30% vs 24%), diabetes without chronic complications (22% vs 17%), drug abuse (21% vs 16%), uncomplicated hypertension (41% vs 32%), and psychoses (80% vs 58%); all p-values<0.001. After controlling for baseline characteristics, patients with NSS had significantly higher all-cause inpatient admissions (mean: 5.2 vs 4.2), outpatient emergency room (ER) visits (mean: 2.8 vs 2.0), inpatient stay costs ($23,830 vs $20,669), outpatient ER visit costs ($1,738 vs $1,167.20) and less prescriptions (mean: 49.2 vs 51.4); all p-values<0.05. GLM analysis also showed patients with NSS had significantly higher all-cause inpatient admissions (mean: 4.8 vs 3.7), number of outpatient visits (mean: 14.3 vs 13.8), and inpatient stay costs ($20,853 vs $17,809); all p-values<0.05. MH- and schizophrenia-related HCRU and costs PPPY were consistent with all-cause HCRU and cost results.ConclusionsPatients with predominant NSS had higher HCRU and healthcare costs compared to patients without predominant NSS. New therapies that improve negative symptoms may reduce the burden of schizophrenia.FundingSumitomo Pharma America (formerly Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc).

Background:: The presence of mixed (subsyndromal hypomanic) symptoms may influence treatment outcomes in pediatric bipolar depression. This post-hoc analysis investigated “bridge” symptoms that have cross-sectional and predictive associations with depressive and manic symptom clusters in youth with bipolar depression. Methods:: The moderating effects of these bridge symptoms on the response to flexibly dosed lurasidone 20-80 mg/d compared to placebo treatment was analyzed in children and adolescents with bipolar I depression in a six-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind study followed by a 2-year, openlabel extension study of lurasidone. Results:: Sleep disturbances, assessed by “difficulty with sleep” (Children’s Depression Rating Scale, Revised [CDRS-R] item 4) and “decreased need for sleep” (Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS] item 4), and “irritability” (CDRS-R item-8, YMRS item 5) were identified as “bridge” symptoms and found to have replicable causal associations with depressive (CDRS-R total) and manic symptom clusters (YMRS total) at baseline and week-6. A greater improvement in overall depression severity at week 6 with lurasidone (vs. placebo) treatment was observed in the presence (vs. absence) of decreased need for sleep at study baseline, mediated in part by significant reductions from study baseline in decreased need for sleep and manic symptom severity. The absence of sleep disturbance and irritability in patients at open-label extension study baseline was associated with higher rates of sustained recovery (symptomatic and functional remission) over 6 months compared to patients with those symptoms at baseline (68% vs. 50%, Number Needed to Treat=6). Conclusion:: Our findings suggest that sleep disturbance and irritability are cardinal symptoms that “bridge” between depressive and manic symptom clusters and influence treatment outcomes in youth with bipolar depression.

AbstractIntroductionEarly onset of bipolar disorder is associated with high rates of psychiatric comorbidity (e.g., anxiety disorders, ADHD, PTSD), high rates of recurrence, and marked impairment in functioning and quality of life. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone in bipolar depression in youth and young adult patients (10–30 years old).MethodsData from two 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of lurasidone monotherapy for bipolar I depression were pooled for this analysis. In the 1st study, patients 10–17 years old were evaluated using the Children’s Depression Rating Scale–Revised (CDRS-R) and the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Severity (CGI-BP-S) depression scale; in the 2nd study, a subgroup of adult patients (18–30 years old) were evaluated by CGI-BP-A, and the MADRS, with the latter being converted to a CDRS-R scores using a validated conversion algorithm.ResultsThe safety population consisted of 465 patients (mean age, 17.1 years; mean age of onset, 14.1; mean CDRS-R total score, 60.8). 400 patients (85.7%) completed the study. For lurasidone vs. placebo, LS mean Week 6 change was -21.4 vs. -15.3 for the CDRS-R total score (P<0.0001; ES, 0.46); and -1.6 vs. -1.1 for the CGI-BP-S score (P<0.0001; ES, 0.50). Adverse events (≥5%) on lurasidone vs. placebo were nausea (15.9% vs. 5.2%), headache (15.1% vs. 13.1%), somnolence (7.9% vs. 3.8%), vomiting (5.2% vs. 3.3%), and weight increase (5.2% vs. 2.3%). No clinically meaningful changes were observed in weight, metabolic parameters, or prolactin.ConclusionsIn this post-hoc analysis of two placebo-controlled trials, lurasidone demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement of depressive symptoms in youth and young adults with bipolar depression. Lurasidone was generally safe, well-tolerated, and associated with minimal effects on weight, metabolic parameters, and prolactin.FundingServier Laboratories (Aust.) Pty. Ltd., and Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.

ObjectiveThe elevated prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients with depression has been associated with increased mortality. This post hoc analysis assessed the effect of treatment with lurasidone on risk of MetS in patients with bipolar depression. MethodsData used in the current analyses consisted of 3 double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, 6-week studies in adults with bipolar I depression (N = 1192), consisting of 1 monotherapy, and 2 adjunctive trials (lithium or valproate). Also analyzed was a 6-month open-label (OL) extension study (monotherapy, N = 316; adjunctive therapy, N = 497); and a 5-month, OL, stabilization phase followed by randomization to a 28-week DB, placebo-controlled, adjunctive therapy study with lurasidone (N = 490). MetS was defined based on NCEP ATP III criteria (2005 revision). ResultsThe proportion of patients with new-onset MetS was similar for lurasidone vs placebo in the short-term studies (monotherapy, 13.9% vs 15.3%; adjunctive therapy, 13.6% vs 11.0%); and remained stable during both the 6-month extension phase study (monotherapy, 15.2%; adjunctive therapy, 16.9%), and the 5-month stabilization study (adjunctive therapy, 12.2%). After 28 weeks of DB treatment (following 5-month treatment in the stabilization study), new onset MetS was observed at endpoint (OC) in 26.2% of the lurasidone group, and 30.8% of the placebo group. ConclusionsThis post hoc analysis found that both short and long-term treatment with lurasidone was associated with a relatively low risk for the development of MetS in patients with bipolar I disorder. These findings are consistent with similar analyses in patients with schizophrenia.

Objective: To assess the effects of lurasidone on anxiety symptoms and sleep disruption, and their moderating and mediating roles on treatment response in bipolar depression.Methods: This post hoc analysis included pooled data from 2 previously published 6-week placebo-controlled trials of lurasidone for bipolar I depression conducted between April 2009 and February 2012. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) "psychic anxiety" (items 1-6, 14) and "somatic anxiety" (items 7-13) subscores were calculated. Functional outcome was assessed by the Sheehan Disability Scale.Results: All subjects (n = 824) had at least 1 psychic anxiety and 729 (88.5%) had at least 1 somatic anxiety symptom at baseline. 594 subjects (72.1%) experienced baseline sleep disturbance. Lurasidone, as monotherapy (20-60 mg/d and 80-120 mg/d pooled dose groups vs placebo) and adjunctive therapy (20 to 120 mg/d flexibly dosed vs placebo) with lithium or valproate, significantly reduced HAM-A psychic anxiety (-4.82 vs -2.97, P < .001, monotherapy; -5.56 vs -4.26, P = .009, adjunctive therapy) and somatic anxiety (-1.89 vs -1.37, P = .048, monotherapy; -2.22 vs -1.47, P = .006, adjunctive therapy) subcomponents. Improvement in anxiety symptoms mediated reduction in depressive symptoms and functional impairment. Decrease in sleep at baseline predicted change in anxiety symptoms with lurasidone treatment at week 6.Conclusions: Lurasidone was superior to placebo in reducing psychic and somatic anxiety in the short-term treatment of bipolar depression. Improvement in depressive symptoms and reduction in functional impairment were associated with reduction in anxiety symptoms moderated by baseline sleep disturbance during lurasidone treatment.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00868699 and NCT00868452.

AbstractBackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy of short-term lurasidone in antipsychotic treatment-naïve (TN) adolescents with schizophrenia versus those treated previously (TP) with antipsychotics.MethodsPatients aged 13–17 with schizophrenia, and a Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) score ≥ 70 and < 120, were randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone (40 or 80 mg/day) or placebo. In a post-hoc, pooled-dose analysis, efficacy was evaluated for TN (criteria: never received antipsychotic treatment) versus TP at the time of the study. Treatment response criteria: ≥20% reduction in PANSS total score.ResultsAltogether, 57 TN and 269 TP patients enrolled in the 6-week DB study. Mean endpoint change in PANSS total score was significantly greater for lurasidone versus placebo in both the TN group (−25.0 vs. -14.4; p < 0.02; effect size = 0.75), and in the TP group (−17.3 vs. -10.0; p < 0.001; effect size = 0.45); and responder rates were higher for lurasidone versus placebo in both the TN group 84.6% versus 38.9%; number needed to treat [NNT] = 3 and in the TP group (60% vs. 42%; NNT = 6). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events, and mean changes in body weight and metabolic parameters were similar for the TN and TP groups.ConclusionsIn a 6-week, placebo-controlled trial, lurasidone demonstrated significant efficacy in adolescents with schizophrenia regardless of previous antipsychotic therapy status; however, the effect size was notably larger in the TN patient group. In both the TN and TP groups, minimal effects were noted on weight, metabolic parameters, or prolactin.

Abstract Background Minimal long-term benefit: Risk data are available regarding antipsychotic treatments for schizophrenia in pediatric populations. This study evaluated the long-term safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of lurasidone in adolescents with schizophrenia. Methods Patients aged from 13 to 17 who completed 6 weeks of double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled treatment with lurasidone were enrolled in a 2-year, open-label (OL), flexible dose (20-80 mg/day) lurasidone treatment study. Safety was assessed via spontaneous reporting, rating scales, body weight measurement, metabolic, and prolactin testing. Effectiveness measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Results About 271 patients completed 6 weeks of DB treatment and entered the 2-year OL extension study. Altogether, 42.4% discontinued prematurely, 10.7% due to adverse events. During OL treatment, the most common adverse events were headache (24.0%); anxiety (12.9%), schizophrenia, and nausea (12.5%); sedation/somnolence (12.2%); and nasopharyngitis (8.9%). Minimal changes were observed on metabolic parameters and prolactin. Mean change from DB baseline in weight at week 52 and week 104 was +3.3 kg and + 4.9 kg, respectively, compared to an expected weight gain of +3.4 kg and + 5.7 kg, respectively, based on the sex- and age-matched US Center for Disease Control normative data. Continued improvement was observed in PANSS total score, with mean change from OL baseline of −15.6 at week 52 and −18.4 at week 104. Conclusion In adolescents with schizophrenia, long-term lurasidone treatment was associated with minimal effects on body weight, lipids, glycemic indices, and prolactin. Continued improvement in symptoms of schizophrenia was observed over 2 years of lurasidone treatment.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this post-hoc analysis was to assess the impact of lurasidone monotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with bipolar depression. METHODS:Data were analyzed from a 6-week randomized, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled trial of lurasidone monotherapy (NCT00868699) and a 6-month open label extension (OLE; NCT00868959). Patients who received lurasidone monotherapy or placebo during the DB trial were eligible to continue or switch to lurasidone monotherapy during the OLE. The 16-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) was collected at DB baseline, DB week 6/OLE baseline, OLE month 3, and OLE month 6. Effect size (ES) and mean changes from baseline were reported for Q-LES-Q-SF total and item scores during the DB trial and OLE, respectively. RESULTS:Of 485 patients in the DB trial (lurasidone monotherapy: n = 323; placebo: n = 162), 316 patients continued or switched to lurasidone monotherapy during the OLE. Significant improvements in Q-LES-Q-SF scores in lurasidone vs. placebo were reported for 13 of 16 items (all p < .05) at DB week 6. The greatest improvements were overall life satisfaction (ES = 0.57), social relationships (0.55), medication satisfaction (0.48), family relationships (0.46), and ability to function in daily life (0.45, all p < .001). Improvements in Q-LES-Q-SF total and item scores were sustained at OLE month 6. CONCLUSIONS:Treatment with lurasidone provided a significant improvement across HRQoL items including overall life satisfaction, social and family relationships, medication satisfaction, and ability to function in daily life. Improvements were sustained during the 6-month OLE.

Bipolar I disorder (BPD-1) is a chronic mood disorder characterized by manic and depressive episodes that produces a substantial financial burden in the US. This retrospective chart review study compared healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among patients with depressive episodes associated with BPD-1 treated with lurasidone or cariprazine, two atypical antipsychotics approved for treatment of bipolar depression. Data on adult patients prescribed lurasidone or cariprazine for BPD-1 depressive episodes on or after June 2019 were collected from patient medical charts by clinicians in the US in 2021. HRU after treatment initiation was assessed in terms of BPD-1-related inpatient (IP) admissions, emergency room (ER) visits, and outpatient (OP) visits at the responding clinician’s practice. Results were compared between cohorts using Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. A total of 107 patients taking lurasidone and 93 patients on cariprazine were included in the analysis. Patients in both groups were similar in terms of average age (lurasidone: 37 years; cariprazine: 39 years), sex (lurasidone: 48% male; cariprazine: 46% male), and time since BPD-1 diagnosis (lurasidone: 7 years; cariprazine: 8 years). Average time observed for both cohorts was 14 months. A significantly higher proportion of patients taking cariprazine experienced any BPD-1-related IP admission compared to patients on lurasidone (lurasidone: 1%; cariprazine: 9%; p<0.05). Proportions of patients with any ER (lurasidone: 3%; cariprazine: 1%; p=0.63) or OP (lurasidone: 68%; cariprazine: 81%; p=0.07) visit were not statistically significantly different between groups. Average number of OP visits was significantly higher for patients taking cariprazine (7.4) compared to those on lurasidone (5.4; p<0.05). In this study, patients with depressive episodes associated with BPD-1 treated with lurasidone or cariprazine had low rates of IP and ER visits; HRU for BPD-1-related hospitalization and number of OP visits was lower for patients taking lurasidone compared to patients on cariprazine.

Objective The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to assess the impact of lurasidone monotherapy on functional impairment, productivity, and associated indirect costs in patients with bipolar depression. Methods Data were analyzed from a 6-week randomized, double-blind (DB; NCT00868699), placebo-controlled trial of lurasidone monotherapy and a 6-month open label extension (OLE; NCT00868959) study. Patients with bipolar depression who completed the 6-week DB trial were subsequently enrolled in the OLE. Analysis of the OLE was limited to patients who either continued lurasidone (LUR-LUR) or switched from placebo to lurasidone monotherapy (PBO-LUR). The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), which measures functional impairment and productivity, was collected at DB baseline, DB week 6/OLE baseline, OLE month 3, and OLE month 6. Annual indirect costs were calculated based on days lost or unproductive from work/school due to symptoms. Effect sizes (ES) in functioning and days lost/unproductive were reported for the DB trial and mean changes for the OLE. Results A total of 485 patients were enrolled in the DB trial (lurasidone: n = 323; placebo: n = 162) and 316 were in the lurasidone monotherapy group during the OLE (LUR-LUR: n = 210; PBO-LUR: n = 106). In the DB trial, improvements in functioning (work: ES = 0.36, p = .0071; social: ES = 0.55, p < .0001; family: ES = 0.50, p < .0001) were significantly greater for lurasidone compared to placebo. Reductions in days lost (ES = 0.33, p = .0050) and unproductive (ES = 0.45, p = .0001) were significantly higher for lurasidone vs. placebo. This resulted in a greater reduction in indirect costs for lurasidone vs. placebo (least squares mean (standard error) = -$32,322 ($2,100) vs. -$20,091 ($2,838)). Improvements in functioning and productivity were sustained during the 6-month OLE for both LUR-LUR and PBO-LUR. Conclusions Lurasidone monotherapy for the treatment of bipolar depression significantly improved functioning and reduced indirect costs vs. placebo at week 6. Significant improvements in functioning and productivity were sustained for 6 months for both LUR-LUR and PBO-LUR.

Background: There is a relative lack of long-term, prospective data evaluating the safety and effectiveness of treatment in early-onset adolescent patients with schizophrenia who are treatment-naive. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to examine the long-term safety and effectiveness of lurasidone in adolescents with schizophrenia who were antipsychotic treatment-naive (TN; at the time of enrolment in the initial study) compared to adolescents treated previously (TP) with an antipsychotic. Methods: Patients aged 13-17 who completed 6 weeks of double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled treatment with lurasidone were enrolled in a 2-year, open-label (OL), flexible-dose (20-80 mg/day) lurasidone study. Results: The long-term analysis sample consisted of 50 TN and 221 TP patients, of whom 40% and 43%, respectively, discontinued prematurely. The three most common adverse events for TN and TP patients, respectively, were headache (26.0%, 23.5%); schizophrenia (14.0%, 12.2%), dizziness (16.0%, 4.1%), and nausea (16.0%, 11.8%). At endpoint, mean increase in weight was similar to expected weight gain based on growth charts for both TN (+4.5 kg vs. + 5.7 kg) and TP (+4.6 kg vs. + 6.6 kg) patients. Minimal changes were observed for each group in metabolic parameters and prolactin. Mean improvement was consistently greater in the TN vs. TP group (-19.2 vs.-15.9; effect size of 0.33) for between-group change in PANSS total score at Week 104. Conclusions: In both TN and TP adolescents with schizophrenia, long-term treatment with lurasidone was associated with minimal effects on body weight, lipids, glycemic indices, and prolactin, with generally small differences noted in rates of reported AEs. Continued improvement in symptoms of schizophrenia was evident for both the TN and TP groups. These data indicate that lurasidone is a safe and efficacious treatment option for treatment-naive youth with schizophrenia, who are generally most sensitive to antipsychotic adverse effects.

The objective of this study is to confirm the efficacy and safety of lurasidone in the acute treatment of schizophrenia in European patients. Data were pooled from three studies of patients randomized to 6 weeks of double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose (40/80 mg and 120/160 mg) lurasidone. The primary efficacy endpoint was a week 6 change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and secondary endpoints included the Clinical Global Impression, Severity scale (CGI-S). In total 328 safety patients were enrolled; 72.6% were completers. Endpoint change was significantly greater in patients treated with 40–80 mg/d and 120–160 mg/d compared to placebo on the PANSS total score ( P < 0.001) and the CGI-Severity score ( P < 0.001) for all comparisons. For PANSS total scores, endpoint effect sizes for lurasidone 40–80 mg/d and 120–160 mg/d were 0.68 to 0.77, respectively. Adverse events with a frequency ≥5% (and were greater than for combined lurasidone) were insomnia (11.7%), akathisia (11.3%), headache (7.4%), Parkinsonism (6.5%) and nausea (5.7%). Median changes (in mg/dL) at endpoint were minimal for total cholesterol (−8.0); triglycerides (−8.5) and glucose (−2.0) and in mean weight (−0.2 kg). In European patients with schizophrenia, short-term treatment with lurasidone in doses of 40–160 mg/d was generally safe, well-tolerated and effective with minimal effects on weight and metabolic parameters.