Purpose Patients complain of moderate-intensity pain following thyroid surgery. Superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) can be employed as a component of multimodal analgesia after thyroid surgery. This double-blind, randomized study aimed to compare the effects of bilateral SCPB (BSCPB) on postoperative analgesic requirements following thyroid surgery. Methods A total of 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II patients who underwent elective total thyroidectomy under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to Group 1 and Group 2. After inducing general anesthesia, BSCPB was not administered to Group 1, whereas BSCPB was administered using a three-point injection technique with 0.5% levobupivacaine in Group 2. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was applied by using tramadol in both groups for postoperative analgesia. Tenoxicam was administered as rescue analgesic to patients in case of numeric rating scale (NRS) >4. The postoperative consumption of tramadol, rescue analgesic requirement, and hoarseness, hematoma, signs of local anesthetic toxicity were recorded. Results The consumption of tramadol for PCA at two, six, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, NRS scores in the recovery room, and the number of patients who used tenoxicam as rescue analgesic were significantly lower in Group 2 than in Group 1. The hemodynamic values were similar between the groups. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that BSCPB, when applied as a component of multimodal analgesia, is an effective method for reducing the analgesic requirements following thyroid surgery.

Aims: In laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery (LCS), for anesthesiologist and surgeons postoperative analgesia method is still problem. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative paravertebral block (PVB) application as a part of multimodal analgesia on postoperative pain management in this surgery. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, single blinded study, over 18 years old, 70 (ASA I-II) patients who underwent elective LCS were included. In the control group, analgesia was managed with only traditional multimodal analgesia methods, while ultrasound- guided PVB (20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine,T7 level) was added to multimodal anagesia in the study group. Postoperative pain reduction was evaluated using VAS at 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively, and morphine consumption amount was caLCSulated with IV patient-controlled analgesia in the postoperative period. Results: Demographic data were similar in both groups. VAS scores at 1 and 6 hours were statistically significantly lower in the PVB group (p<0.05). When evaluated in terms of morphine consumption, it was observed that significantly less morphine was consumed in the PVB group compared to the control group in the first 24-hour period (p< 0.001). Shoulder pain was seen only in 3 patients in the control group. Conclusions: In LCS, it was observed that PVB application under the guidance of US increased the effectiveness of multimodal anagesia and decreased postoperative morphine consumption. In addition, problems such as postoperative nausea, vomiting and shoulder pain were less common.

Background: Obesity causes various difficulties in intubation and ventilation, which are confronted due to increased fat tissue in the upper airway and diminished compliance in the chest wall. Videolaryngoscopes and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) are good options as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesologists (ASA) difficult airway guidelines. We aimed to compare ILMA and Airtraq (a channeled videolaryngoscope) in obese patients. Methods: Eighty patients with ASA physical status I -III, aged between 18 and 65 years and with a body mass index greater than 35 kg.m-2, who were undergoing elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation, were included in the study. Patients were intubated with one of the devices cited. Results: There was no difference between the number of intubation attempts, insertion times and need for optimisation manoeuvres of Airtraq and ILMA. The intubation with Airtraq was accomplished in a shorter period of time than in that in the ILMA group (29.9 22.1 s vs. 50.7 21.2 s; p< 0.001). A significant difference was found when the times of total intubation were compared (29.9 22.1 s vs. 97.4 42.7 s; p < 0.001). The mean arterial pressure statistically increased after device insertion in the ILMA group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Airtraq appears to be superior to ILMA in obese patients, with a total of time intubation of less than 60 seconds and with low mean arterial pressure changes. However, ILMA is still a useful tool that provides both ventilation and intubation throughout the whole intubation process. 0 2020 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by nc-nd/4.0/).

A obesidade dificulta a ventilação manual e intubação traqueal devido ao acúmulo de tecido adiposo na via aérea superior e a complacência diminuída na caixa torácica. Os videolaringoscópios e as Máscaras Laríngeas para Intubação (MLI) são alternativas boas para o manuseio da via aérea difícil, de acordo com as diretrizes da Sociedade Americana de Anestesologia (ASA). O objetivo do estudo foi comparar o uso da MLI e do Airtraq, um videolaringoscópio com canal, em pacientes obesos. Estudamos 80 pacientes com classificação ASA I‐III, com idades entre 18 e 65 anos e índice de massa corporal acima de 35 kg.m‐2, submetidos a cirurgia eletiva com indicação de intubação orotraqueal. Os pacientes foram intubados empregando‐se um dos seguintes dispositivos: MLI ou Airtraq. Não houve diferença entre o número de tentativas de intubação, tempo de inserção do dispositivo e necessidade de manobras de otimização para o Airtraq e MLI. A intubação com Airtraq foi realizada mais rapidamente do que no Grupo MLI (29,9 ± 22,1 s vs. 50,7 ± 21,2 s; p < 0,001). Houve diferença significante na comparação do tempo total para intubação (29,9 ± 22,1 s vs. 97,4 ± 42,7 s; p < 0,001). Houve aumento estatisticamente significante da pressão arterial média após a inserção do dispositivo no Grupo MLI (p < 0,05). Airtraq parece ser superior a MLI em pacientes obesos, apresentando tempo total de intubação abaixo de 60 segundos e com menor variação na pressão arterial média. Todavia, a MLI ainda é ferramenta útil que propicia tanto ventilação quanto intubação durante todo o processo de manejo da via aérea. Obesity causes various difficulties in intubation and ventilation, which are confronted due to increased fat tissue in the upper airway and diminished compliance in the chest wall. Videolaryngoscopes and Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) are good options as recommended by the American Society of Anesthesologists (ASA) difficult airway guidelines. We aimed to compare ILMA and Airtraq (a channeled videolaryngoscope) in obese patients. Eighty patients with ASA physical status I‐III, aged between 18 and 65 years and with a body mass index greater than 35 kg.m‐2, who were undergoing elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation, were included in the study. Patients were intubated with one of the devices cited. There was no difference between the number of intubation attempts, insertion times and need for optimisation manoeuvres of Airtraq and ILMA. The intubation with Airtraq was accomplished in a shorter period of time than in that in the ILMA group (29.9 ± 22.1 s vs. 50.7 ± 21.2 s; p < 0.001). A significant difference was found when the times of total intubation were compared (29.9 ± 22.1 s vs. 97.4 ± 42.7 s; p < 0.001). The mean arterial pressure statistically increased after device insertion in the ILMA group (p < 0.05). Airtraq appears to be superior to ILMA in obese patients, with a total of time intubation of less than 60 seconds and with low mean arterial pressure changes. However, ILMA is still a useful tool that provides both ventilation and intubation throughout the whole intubation process.

In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of forced-air warming upper body blankets and forced-air warming underbody blankets on intraoperative hypothermia in patients who were planned to undergo open abdominal surgical operations in which extensive heat loss occurs. This prospective and randomized study included 92 patients who would undergo lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized by closed envelope method and divided into two groups. Group I (n:46) included the patients who would receive warming with forced-air warming upper body blanket, and Group II (n:46) consisted of the patients who received warming with forced-air warming underbody blanket. Central body temperature was recorded by measuring with a temperature probe placed in distal esophagus. Demographic data, amount of fentanyl, crystalloid and blood products used, duration of operation, type of operation, hemodynamic parameters, shivering and thermal damage information were recorded. There was not any statistically significant difference among the patients in terms of demographic data, amount of fentanyl, crystalloid and blood products used, duration and type of operation and hemodynamic parameters. No difference was found between the groups in terms of body temperatures (Group I:36.1 °C, Group II:36.3 °C, respectively) (P > 0.05). Forced air warming underbody blanket can be as effective as forced-air warming upper body blankets in preventing intraoperative hypothermia. They can be alternative in cases where use of forced-air warming upper body blankets is not feasible.

OBJECTIVE:Endotracheal intubation should be performed with care when cervical spine (C-spine) injury is suspected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the movement of the C-spine using fluoroscopy during intubation with Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) CTrach, C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope.METHODS:This was a single-centre, prospective, observational, controlled trial. In total, 22 surgical patients aged 18-65 years planned to undergo operation under general anaesthesia, were enrolled. X-ray images of the C-spine were obtained using fluoroscopy with the patients' head in a neutral position. All patients underwent laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade, LMA CTrach and C-MAC videolaryngoscope, and fluoroscopic images of the C-spine were obtained. All the patients were intubated at the last laryngoscopy simulation (using the C-MAC). The atlanto-occipital distance (AOD) and angles between C0C1, C0C2, C0C3, C0C4, C1C2 and C2C3 lines were measured and compared between each device.RESULTS:The mean AOD was measured as 20.4 mm in a neutral position, which decreased to 13.1, 17.2 and 12.3 mm after the insertion of the Macintosh laryngoscope, LMA CTrach and C-MAC videolaryngoscope, respectively. The differences were significant (p<0.001). Moreover, significant difference was noted in C0C2, C0C3 and C1C2 angles with the insertion of the three devices (p<0.001). The LMA CTrach resulted in significantly lesser C-spine movements in C0C2, C0C3 and C0C4 angles compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope (p<0.001).CONCLUSION:The LMA CTrach resulted in lesser C-spine movements compared to Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope. In case of the C-spine injury, LMA CTrach may be preferred and may cause fewer traumas during endotracheal intubation.

Background: Spinal administration of dexmedetomidine has been proposed as an adjuvant in spinal anesthesia. However, there is limited information about its possible neurotoxic effect after its neuraxial administration. Potential spinal neurotoxicity should be investigated in animals before administering drugs through the spinal cord. Our aim was to investigate the neurotoxic effects of intrathecal dexmedetomidine in rats. Methods: Two groups were performed: the dexmedetomidine (D) group (n = 10) received 10 μg (0.5 ml), whereas the control (C) group (n = 10) received 0.9% (0.5 ml) sodium chloride through indwelling intrathecal catheter. Seven days after the injection, the medulla spinalis was extracted. Samples were withdrawn from both groups for histologic, electron microscopic examination. The histologic examination was performed separately on each of the four sites. The findings were categorized as follows: 0 - normal neuron; 1 - intermediate neuron damage; and 2 - neurotoxicity. Results: Intrathecal administration of dexmedetomidine sensorial block was seen in the dexmedetomidine group and significant differences in the dexmedetomidine group than control group in 15th and 30th min (P < 0.05). Histological examination did not show evidence suggestive of neuronal body or axonal lesion, gliosis, or myelin sheath damage in any group. In all animals, there were observed changes compatible with unspecific inflammation at the tip of the needle location. On the four-area scoring histologic examination, the scores of both groups were 0–1, and no statistical difference was observed between the groups. Conclusions: A single dose of intrathecal dexmedetomidine did not produce histologic evidence of neurotoxicity.

Univent tube (UT) and EZ-blocker were used for one-lung ventilation (OLV). UT is a single lumen tube with a small separate lumen containing a bronchial blocker. EZ-blocker differs with its unique y-shaped double-cuffed distal end. We aimed to compare these two airway devices effects on airway pressures, oxygenation, ventilation and haemodynamics during OLV. Patients undergoing elective thoracotomy for the first time were included in this prospective randomized study. Patients were divided into two groups as UT and EZ. Bronchial blockers (BB) placement time was recorded. In lateral decubitus position, airway pressures, static compliance, tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR) and haemodynamic findings were recorded before inflating the BB cuff (Pre-OLV) and during OLV every 15 min. Arterial blood gas (ABG) samples were obtained before and during OLV. 70 patients were enrolled in the study. The demographic characteristics and data related to anesthesia and surgery were similar in both groups. It took longer to place EZ than UT (p = 0.02). Ppeak values were similar in both groups. Pplateau was significantly lower at the beginning of OLV (OLV15th min) and higher at the end of OLV (pre-DLV) in EZ group compared to UT (p = 0.01, p = 0.03). Cstatic were significantly higher at the beginning of OLV (OLV15th min) in EZ group compared to UT (p = 0.01). During the following measurements, Cstatic values were similar for both groups. Ventilation were achieved with similar TV and RR. ABG findings and haemodynamic variables were similar. EZ and Univent tube affected the airway pressures, oxygenation, ventilation and haemodynamic variables similarly during OLV in patients with normal respiratory function. These devices can be alternatives to each other based on clinical conditions.

An ultrasound-guided dorsal penile nerve (DPN) block was performed for postoperative analgesia in a 6-year-old, 19 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologists class II patient undergoing hypospadias surgery. The block was applied following the induction of general anesthesia. Anesthesia maintenance was provided with sevoflurane 2% in a 1:2 ratio of oxygen and nitrous oxide. The DPN block was performed using 0.2 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine. Almost 24 hours of analgesia was provided following surgery.

The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of analgesia nociception index (ANI) monitoring during intraoperative period for patients with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) undergoing breast surgery under general anesthesia. This prospective randomized trial was performed after receiving ethics committee approval in 44 patients who were scheduled to undergo breast surgery under general anesthesia. TPVB was performed in the preoperative period using 20 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% at T4 level. Anesthesia maintenance was provided with sevoflurane in O2: air mixture and remifentanil infusion. Intraoperative concentration of sevoflurane was adjusted according to BIS monitoring keeping the values between 40–60. In a randomized manner patients were divided into two groups. In Group control (n:22) intraoperative remifentanil infusion rate was regulated according to hemodynamic parameters, in Group ANI (n:22) remifentanil infusion rate was titrated to keep ANI monitoring values between 50–70. Total remifentanil consumption was recorded as micrograms. Demographic data, anesthesia and surgery time, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, post-anesthesia recovery time and requirement of additional analgesic in the recovery drug were recorded. There were no significant difference in demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, post-anesthesia recovery time and requirement of additional analgesic drug. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in total remifentanil consumption (Group ANI: 629.6 ± 422.4 mcg, Group control: 965.2 ± 543.6 mcg) (p = 0.027). In patients under general anesthesia ANI monitorisation can help optimisation of opioid consumption and provide data about nociception/antinociception intraoperatively but further experimental and clinical trials in a large scale are needed.

Respiratory problems occur more frequently in patients who undergo open heart surgery. Intraoperative and postoperative ventilation strategies can prevent these complications and reduce mortality. We hypothesized that PCV would have better effects on gas exchange, lung mechanics and hemodynamics compared to VCV in CABG surgery. Our primary outcome was to compare the PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Patients were randomized into two groups, (VCV, PCV) consisting of 30 individuals each. Two patients were excluded from the study. I/E ratio was adjusted to 1:2 and, RR:10/min fresh air gas flow was set at 3L/min in all patients. In the VCV group TV was set at 8 mL/kg of the predicted body weight. In the PCV group, peak inspiratory pressure was adjusted to the same tidal volume with the VCV group. PaO2/FiO2 was found to be higher with PCV at the end of the surgery. Time to extubation and ICU length of stay was shorter with PCV. Ppeak was similar in both groups. Pplateau was lower and Pmean was higher at the and of the surgery with PCV compared to VCV. The hemodynamic effects of both ventilation modes were found to be similar. PVC may be preferable to VCV in patients who undergo open heart surgery. However, it would be convenient if our findings are supported by similar studies.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of the temperature of irrigation fluid on core body temperature in patients undergoing transurethral resection (TUR) in urology. Material and Methods: 70 patients undergoing TUR under spinal anaesthesia were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. Group I consisted of 35 patients who received room temperature irrigation fluid during surgery; Group II consisted of 35 patients whose procedure was performed with warmed irrigation fluid. The core body temperature was determined with the use of an infrared tympanic thermometer and was expressed as the change from baseline. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between groups for demographical data, amount of irrigation and of iv fluids used, length of operation and hemodynamic parameters. The temperature drops at the 90th minute (P=0.001) and at the end of the operation (P=0.008) were lower in Group II, which were statistically significant. Patient thermal comfort scores were significantly higher in Group II (P=0.018). Conclusion:We concluded that the use of warm irrigation fluids during TUR reduces the degree of temperature drop, which helps to prevent hypothermia.

OBJECTIVE:Cricoid pressure is useful in fasted patients requiring emergency intubation. We compared the effect of cricoid pressure on laryngeal view during Macintosh, McGrath MAC X-Blade and GlideScope video laryngoscopy.METHODS:After obtaining approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee and written informed consent from patients, we enrolled 120 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II, age 18-65 years) undergoing elective surgery that required endotracheal intubation in this prospective randomised study. Patients were divided into three groups (Macintosh, McGrath MAC X-Blade and GlideScope).RESULTS:Demographic and airway variables were similar in the groups. Cormack-Lehane grades were improved or unchanged on using cricoid pressure in Macintosh and McGrath MAC X-Blade groups. However, laryngeal views worsened in 12 patients (30%), remained unchanged in 26 patients (65%) and improved in 2 patients (5%) in the GlideScope group (p<0.001). Insertion and intubation times for Macintosh and McGrath MAC X-Blade video laryngoscopes were similar. Insertion times for GlideScope and Macintosh video laryngoscopes were similar, but were longer than those for the McGrath MAC X-Blade video laryngoscope (p=0.02). Tracheal intubation took longer with the GlideScope video laryngoscope than with the other devices (p<0.001 and p=0.003). Mean arterial pressures after insertion increased significantly in Macintosh and GlideScope groups (p=0.004 and p=0.001, respectively) compared with post-induction values. Heart rates increased after insertion in all three groups compared with post-induction values (p<0.001). Need for optimisation manoeuvres and postoperative minor complications were comparable in all three groups.CONCLUSION:Although all three devices are useful for normal or difficult intubation, cricoid pressure improved Cormack-Lehane grades of Macintosh and McGrath MAC X-Blade video laryngoscopes but statistically significantly worsened that of the GlideScope video laryngoscope.

In recent years, brachial plexus anesthesia techniques for upper limb surgery have been used more and more commonly on children; however, the patient is typically under deep sedation or general anesthesia. For eligible, cooperative children, surgery can also be performed using regional blocks while the patient is awake. We present 5 cases in which Ultrasound (US)-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (ICB) were used on children for hand or forearm surgery. Surgical anesthesia was achieved in all patients and surgery was completed uneventfully using brachial plexus anesthesia, without need for deep sedation.

Sonuç: %6 HES (130/0.4), on-pump açık kalp cerrahisinde KPB sonucu sıvı dengesini azaltmakla birlikte, bu etkisi cerrahinin sonuna kadar devam edebilmiştir. Kanama ve hemostaz üzerine etkisi kristaloidlerle benzer bulunmuştur. Yüzde 6 HES (130/0.4)’ün böbrek fonksiyonları sağlam olan hastalarda kreatinin düzeylerini olumsuz etkisi görülmemekle birlikte, gerçek ilaçlar gibi düşünülüp uygun hastalarda uygun doz ve sürede kullanılmalıdır.

Objective: Glidescope and Airtraq were designed for facilitating intubation and for teaching regarding the airway anatomy. We aimed to evaluate their efficacy in normal airway, tongue oedema and face-to-face orotracheal intubation models when used by novice personnel.Methods: After the local human research ethics committee approval, 36 medical students who were in the beginning of their third year were enrolled in this study. After watching a video regarding intubation using one of these devices, the students intubated a paediatric manikin with a Glidescope or Airtraq via the normal airway, tongue oedema and face-to-face approach.Results: Although the insertion and intubation times were similar among the groups, the intubation success rate of the Glidescope was higher in the normal airway (100% vs 67%) and tongue oedema (89% vs. 50%) compared with the Airtraq (p=0.008 and p=0.009). The success rates with the paediatric manikin by the face-to-face approach were similar among the groups (50%) (p=0.7). The need for manoeuvres in the Glidescope was lower in the normal and tongue oedema models (p=0.02 and p=0.002). In addition, oesophageal intubation was low in the control and tongue oedema models with the Glidescope (p=0.03 and p<0.001).Conclusion: Novice personnel could more easily intubate the trachea with the Glidescope than with the Airtraq. Intubation with the Glidescope was superior to that with the Airtraq in the normal and tongue oedema models. The face-to-face intubation success rates were both low with both the Glidescope and Airtraq groups.

Lumbar plexus block has been shown to be effective for providing postoperative analgesia after major hip surgeries in children. The goal of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of ultrasound guidance during lumbar plexus block in children undergoing hip surgery for congenital hip dislocation. After obtaining local institutional ethical committee approval and parental informed consent, ASA I or II, 1–6 years old children undergoing hip surgery were included into the study. Lumbar plexus block was performed after general anaesthesia using ultrasound guided Shamrock Method. Bupivacaine 0.25 % was used during block performance. Dose of the local anaesthetic was 1 ml/kg and the maximum dose was limited to 20 ml. In the postoperative period pain was assessed using modified CHEOPS (Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale) pain score. If pain score in the postoperative period exceeded 3, patients received IV paracetamol 15 mg/kg−1. Morphine 0.1 mg/kg−1 IV was planned to administer if pain scores were still higher than 3 despite paracetamol treatment. 75 patients whose mean age was 47 months were enrolled into the study. All blocks were performed successfully and without complications. Mean time for the first analgesic is found as 10 h after surgery. Only one patient required morphine in the recovery unit and 23 patients received paracetamol. US guided lumbar plexus block using Shamrock Method is an effective technique for providing postoperative analgesia after hip surgeries in children and it’s effect lasts for 8–12 h after surgery.

ABS TRACT Objective: Trauma victims occasionally cannot be intubated by emergency staff via conventional techniques. We sought to evaluate the efficacies of the application of the Glidescope and Airtraq in normal airway, tongue edema and face-to-face tracheal intubation models as used by emergency medical staff. Material and Methods: Following approval from the local human research ethics committee, 14 emergency medical staff enrolled in this study. The participants attempted to intubate pediatric manikins in three different airway models (in a random order) with a Glidescope, Airtraq and Direct Laryngoscope. Results: All emergency medical staff intubated the normal and tongue edema models successfully with the three devices. The intubation success rates for the Airtraq and Glidescope were 93% with the face-to-face approach (entrapped). The intubation time with the Glidescope was longer than that for the other devices in three models (p=0.001, p=0.02, p=0.02). When compared within groups, the intubation time for the Glidescope was increased relative to the normal face-to-face approach (16 [14.0-21.5] seconds vs. 31 [18.8-34.3] seconds, 57 [43.0-71.0] seconds; p<0.001). This was not the case when we examined the other devices. Conclusion: The emergency medical staff was able to intubate the pediatric manikin in the tongue edema and face-to-face models with the Glidescope and Airtraq with similar rates of success. In the Glidescope group, tracheal intubation required much more time, but this prolongation was clinically negligible. This study has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov.tr (NCT02478203).

We experienced a case of successful nasotracheal intubation using the X-Blade of the McGrath MAC in a 28-year-old woman with a 2.5-cm mouth opening. She had no teeth on the right side, her neck movement was limited, her mandibular protrusion was grade C, and her Mallampati could not be evaluated. Her tongue was fixed to the left wall during a previous surgery. We evaluated the awake glottic view using the McGrath MAC X-Blade and topical oral anesthesia. We obtained a Cormack-Lehane grade II view and then decided to administer general anesthesia. Intubation was attempted with a Macintosh laryngoscope, but we could not insert the scope deeply enough and there was no area in which to insert the Magill forceps or endotracheal tube. We then used the X-Blade 3 of the McGrath MAC and obtained a sufficient area in which to insert the tube and manipulate the Magill forceps. A laryngoscopic view was achieved in 7 s and nasotracheal intubation was performed in 16 s with a 7.0-mm spiral tube using the Magill forceps. McGrath MAC X-Blade can be used with the Magill forceps in patients with restricted mouth opening with careful patient selection, in experienced hands.