All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is only clinically useful in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), but not other subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In the present study, a clinically achievable concentration of trametinib, a highly selective inhibitor of MEK, enhanced ATRA-induced differentiation in AML cell lines, HL-60 and U937 as well as AML primary cells. Moreover, trametinib-ATRA (tra-ATRA) co-treatment restored ATRA sensitivity in ATRA-resistant AML cell line, HL-60Res. The protein level of STAT3 and the phosphorylation of Akt or JNK were enhanced with tra-ATRA treatment in HL-60, U937, and HL-60Res cells, respectively. Furthermore, tra-ATRA-induced differentiation in HL-60, U937, and HL-60Res cells was inhibited by STAT3, PI3K, and JNK inhibitors, respectively. Therefore, STAT3, Akt, and JNK signaling pathways were involved in tra-ATRA-induced differentiation in HL-60, U937, and HL-60Res cells, respectively. Taken together, our findings may provide novel therapeutic strategies for AML patients.

BackgroundAll-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is considered to be the sole clinically useful differentiating agent in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it has been effective only in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) but not other subtypes of AML. Therefore, finding strategies to sensitize cells to ATRA may develop ATRA-based therapy in the treatment of non-APL AML patients.MethodsCell proliferation was assessed by cell growth. Cell death was evaluated by cell viability and Annexin-V assay. Cell differentiation was analyzed by CD11b expression and morphology. To explore the underlying mechanisms, we studied the role of PKCβ, MEK, ERK, AKT, PU.1, C/EBPβ and C/EBPε by Western-blotting analysis.ResultsIn this study, a clinically achievable concentration of enzastaurin enhanced ATRA-induced differentiation of AML cell lines, HL-60 and U937 as well as non-APL AML primary cells, while it also restored ATRA sensitivity in ATRA-resistant cell line, HL-60Res. Mechanistically, in all these cell lines, enzastaurin-ATRA (enz-ATRA) enhanced the protein levels of PU.1, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) and C/EBPε. The activity of protein kinase C β (PKCβ) was suppressed by enz-ATRA treatment in HL-60 and HL-60Res cells. However, another PKCβ-selective inhibitor mimicked the cellular and molecular effects of enzastaurin only in HL-60 cells. Only in U937 cells, enz-ATRA activated MEK and ERK, and a MEK specific inhibitor suppressed enz-ATRA-triggered differentiation and reduced the protein levels of PU.1, C/EBPβ and C/EBPε. Enz-ATRA activated Akt in HL-60 and HL-60Res cells. However, an Akt inhibitor blocked enz-ATRA-triggered differentiation and restored the protein levels of PU.1, C/EBPβ and C/EBPε only in HL-60Res cells. Therefore, PKCβ inhibition, MEK/ERK and Akt activation are involved in enz-ATRA-induced differentiation in HL-60, U937 and HL-60Res cells, respectively by modulation of the protein levels of C/EBPβ, C/EBPε and PU.1.ConclusionsEnzastaurin, at the clinically achievable concentration, enhances ATRA-induced differentiation of AML cells by PKCβ inhibition, MEK/ERK and Akt activation. This study may provide a potential therapeutic strategy for AML patients.

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) resistance continues to be a critical problem in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)-relapsed patients. In this study, a clinically achievable concentration of enzastaurin synergized with ATRA to induce differentiation and apoptosis in ATRA-resistant APL cell lines, NB4-R1 and NB4-R2. Mechanistically, although enzastaurin is a protein kinase Cβ (PKCβ) inhibitor, PKCβ may not be required since the activity of PKCβ was not suppressed by enzastaurin-ATRA (enz-ATRA) co-treatment, and another PKCβ-selective inhibitor did not mimic the effects of enzastaurin. An MEK inhibitor but not a RAF-1 inhibitor suppressed enz-ATRA treatment-triggered differentiation, activation of MEK/ERK and up-regulation of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) and/or PU.1. Therefore, RAF-1-independent MEK/ERK signaling was required for enz-ATRA treatment-induced differentiation via modulation of the protein levels of C/EBPβ and/or PU.1. Enz-ATRA treatment collapsed mitochondrial transmembrane potential without the activation of caspase-3, -6 and -7. Moreover, caspase-3/7- and caspase-6-specific inhibitors had no inhibitory effect on enz-ATRA treatment-triggered apoptosis. Therefore, enz-ATRA treatment-induced apoptosis was mitochondria-dependent but caspase-independent. Enz-ATRA treatment degraded PML-RARα, which may be involved in enz-ATRA treatment-induced dual effects and may also be beneficial for APL eradication. These findings may provide a potential therapy for ATRA-resistant APL patients.

With the introduction of arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid, the prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia has greatly improved. However, all-trans retinoic acid resistance is still unresolved in acute promyelocytic leukemia relapsed patients. In this study, the clinical achievable concentration of 7-hydroxystaurosporine synergized with all-trans retinoic acid to induce terminal differentiation in all-trans retinoic acid resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia cell lines. Though 7-hydroxystaurosporine is a PKC inhibitor, PKC might not be involved in the combination-induced differentiation since other PKC selective inhibitors, Gö 6976 and rottlerin failed to cooperate with all-trans retinoic acid to trigger differentiation. The combination significantly enhanced the protein level of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β and/or PU.1 as well as activated MEK/ERK. U0126 (MEK specific inhibitor) not only suppressed the combination-induced differentiation but also restored the protein level of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β and/or PU.1. However, RAF-1 inhibitor had no inhibitory effect on MEK activation and the combination-induced differentiation. Therefore, the combination overcame differentiation block via RAF-1 independent MEK/ERK modulation of the protein level of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β and/or PU.1. These findings may provide a preclinical rationale for the potential role of this combination in the treatment of all-trans retinoic acid resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia patients.

All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) resistance has been a critical problem in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) relapsed patients. In this study, dasatinib synergized with ATRA to trigger differentiation in ATRA-resistant APL cell lines. The combined treatment activated RAF-1, MEK and ERK as well as enhanced ATRA-promoted up-regulation of the protein level of PU.1, C/EBPβ and C/EBPε. U0126 (MEK specific inhibitor) and sorafenib tosylate (RAF-1 specific inhibitor) suppressed the combined treatment-induced differentiation, ERK phosphorylation and the up-regulation of C/EBPs and PU.1. Sorafenib tosylate also attenuated the MEK activity. However, the combined treatment did not enhance Ras activity and Ras inhibitor neither blocked MEK activation nor inhibited differentiation. Therefore, the combined treatment induced differentiation via Ras independent RAF-1/MEK/ERK. Earlier than RAF-1 activation, dasatinib suppressed Lyn activity, the predominant activated Src family kinase (SFK) and dephosphorylated RAF-1 at S259. Furthermore, SFK inhibitor, PP2 did suppress Lyn activity and mimicked the effect of dasatinib on ATRA-induced differentiation as well as decreased phosphorylation of RAF-1 at S259. Thus, it was suggested that Lyn inhibition might activate RAF-1 by the dephosphorylation of RAF at S259 and lead to differentiation. In conclusion, the combination of dasatinib and ATRA could overcome ATRA resistance through Lyn inhibition-mediated activation of RAF-1/MEK/ERK.

Although all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is regarded as a prominent example of differentiation therapy, it is not effective for the treatment of other subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) beyond acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Therefore, new strategies need to be explored to extend the efficacy of ATRA-based therapy to non-APL AML patients. In the present study, staurosporine, a protein kinase C (PKC) pan-inhibitor, exhibited synergism with ATRA to promote granulocytic differentiation in poorly ATRA-sensitive U937 cells but not in ATRA unresponsive K562 and Kasumi cells. Staurosporine or the combined treatment did not affect PKC activity in U937 cells. Moreover, other selective PKC inhibitors, UCN-01, Go6976 or rottlerin failed to enhance ATRA‑induced granulocytic differentiation in U937 cells. Therefore, staurosporine-enhanced ATRA-induced granulocytic differentiation in U937 cells may be independent of PKC. Staurosporine activated mitogen‑activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) and extracellular signal‑regulated kinase (ERK). Meanwhile, staurosporine also enhanced ATRA-promoted upregulation of the protein level of CCAAT/enhancer‑binding protein β (C/EBPβ) and C/EBPε in U937 cells. Furthermore, blockade of MEK activation suppressed staurosporine‑enhanced differentiation as well as the elevated protein level of C/EBPs. Taken together, we concluded that staurosporine enhanced ATRA‑induced granulocytic differentiation in U937 cells via MEK/ERK-mediated modulation of the protein level of C/EBPs.