Importance Success rates of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are modest for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Additional linear ablation beyond PVI has not been proved superior to PVI alone in randomized trials. Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) facilitates ablation at the mitral isthmus and may lead to improved effectiveness of a linear ablation strategy. Objective To determine whether linear ablation with radiofrequency energy combined with EIVOM added to PVI improves sinus rhythm maintenance compared with PVI alone in patients with persistent AF. Design, Setting, and Participants The PROMPT-AF trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial involving 12 tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 498 patients aged 18 to 80 years, with AF persisting for more than 3 months, undergoing first-time AF ablation, were enrolled and randomized from August 27, 2021, to July 16, 2023. Interventions Patients were randomized to undergo PVI alone or PVI plus EIVOM and linear ablation (intervention). The latter group first underwent EIVOM, followed by PVI and linear ablation of the left atrial roof, mitral isthmus, and cavotricuspid isthmus. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmias lasting more than 30 seconds, without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence, AF, atrial arrhythmia recurrence after multiple procedures, and documented atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter with or without antiarrhythmic drugs; AF burden; and improvement in quality of life. Patients were monitored with wearable single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) patches, worn for 24 hours a week, supplemented by symptom-triggered ECGs and Holter monitoring. Results Among 498 randomized patients, 495 (99.4%) were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 61.1 years [SD, 9.7] years, 361 male [72.9%]). After 12 months, 174 of 246 patients (70.7%) assigned to undergo PVI plus EIVOM and linear ablation and 153 of 249 patients (61.5%) assigned to undergo PVI alone remained free from atrial arrhythmias without taking antiarrhythmic drugs (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99, P = .045). The intervention effect was consistent across all prespecified subgroups. The comparison of secondary outcomes did not demonstrate significant results. Conclusion Among patients with persistent AF, linear ablation combined with EIVOM in addition to PVI significantly improved freedom from atrial arrhythmias within 12 months compared with PVI alone.

Background Frailty is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. It is uncertain whether frailty modifies the efficacy of intensive blood pressure (BP) control among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM). Methods The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure (ACCORD BP) trial, a two-by-two factorial trial, examined the effects of systolic BP (<120 vs <140 mm Hg) and glycaemic control on cardiovascular events in T2DM. We constructed a frailty index using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the effectiveness of intensive BP treatment according to frailty status. The primary composite outcome was non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or death from cardiovascular causes. Results There were 4733 participants (mean age: 62.7 years; 39.9% frailty). The mean average number of antihypertensive medications was higher in frail patients compared with non-frail patients in both the standard (2.2 vs 1.7) and intensive (3.1 vs 2.7) treatment groups. In the standard glycaemic arm, intensive BP treatment reduced the risk of the primary outcome (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.97) regardless of frailty status (p value for interaction=0.86). The benefits of intensive BP intervention were consistent across the spectrum of the frailty index (p value for interaction=0.96) in the standard glycaemic arm. However, no benefits of intensive BP treatment (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.43) were observed in the intensive glycaemic arm. Conclusions In the ACCORD BP study, the benefit of intensive BP treatment was consistent regardless of frailty in the setting of standard glycaemic control. Frailty should not be a barrier to intensive BP control in patients with T2DM treated with guideline-recommended standard glycaemic control.

INTRODUCTION:Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation approach using rapid electrical pulses to cause cardiac cell apoptosis via electroporation. Our study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of PFA for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). METHODS:Thirty-two consecutive patients diagnosed with PeAF were enrolled in our study. All patients underwent PFA treatment using the strategy including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) isolation, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block, and mitral isthmus (MI) block. Acute and follow-up procedure outcomes were evaluated, and adverse events related to the ablation procedure were also observed. RESULTS:One-year survival free from atrial tachyarrhythmia post-ablation was 65.6%. Acute success rates for PVI, LAPW isolation, CTI block, and MI block were 100%, 100%, 96.9%, and 81.3%, respectively. Eleven cases (34.4%) experienced atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, with eight cases being atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence and three cases being atrial flutter recurrence. Three patients underwent repeat ablation. Minor complications were encountered in four patients with asymptomatic cerebral lesions. Vagal responses were commonly observed during the procedure. No severe coronary vasospasm or severe hemolysis occurred in our cohort. CONCLUSION:PFA with the strategy including PVI, LAPW isolation, CTI block, and MI block is feasible, safe, and associated with a high rate of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at 1 year in patients with PeAF. TRIAL REGISTRATION:This study registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068980).

ImportanceSuccess rates of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are modest for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Additional linear ablation beyond PVI has not been proved superior to PVI alone in randomized trials. Ethanol infusion of the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) facilitates ablation at the mitral isthmus and may lead to improved effectiveness of a linear ablation strategy.ObjectiveTo determine whether linear ablation with radiofrequency energy combined with EIVOM added to PVI improves sinus rhythm maintenance compared with PVI alone in patients with persistent AF.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe PROMPT-AF trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial involving 12 tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 498 patients aged 18 to 80 years, with AF persisting for more than 3 months, undergoing first-time AF ablation, were enrolled and randomized from August 27, 2021, to July 16, 2023.InterventionsPatients were randomized to undergo PVI alone or PVI plus EIVOM and linear ablation (intervention). The latter group first underwent EIVOM, followed by PVI and linear ablation of the left atrial roof, mitral isthmus, and cavotricuspid isthmus.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmias lasting more than 30 seconds, without the use of antiarrhythmic drugs within 12 months. Secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence, AF, atrial arrhythmia recurrence after multiple procedures, and documented atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter with or without antiarrhythmic drugs; AF burden; and improvement in quality of life. Patients were monitored with wearable single-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) patches, worn for 24 hours a week, supplemented by symptom-triggered ECGs and Holter monitoring.ResultsAmong 498 randomized patients, 495 (99.4%) were included in the primary analysis (mean age, 61.1 years [SD, 9.7] years, 361 male [72.9%]). After 12 months, 174 of 246 patients (70.7%) assigned to undergo PVI plus EIVOM and linear ablation and 153 of 249 patients (61.5%) assigned to undergo PVI alone remained free from atrial arrhythmias without taking antiarrhythmic drugs (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99, P = .045). The intervention effect was consistent across all prespecified subgroups. The comparison of secondary outcomes did not demonstrate significant results.ConclusionAmong patients with persistent AF, linear ablation combined with EIVOM in addition to PVI significantly improved freedom from atrial arrhythmias within 12 months compared with PVI alone.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04497376

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether cancer modifies the effect of intensive blood pressure control on major cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: Using data of the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), we compared the risk of the composite outcomes of myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular death in patients with and without a history of cancer. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, we tested interactions between history of cancer and intensive blood pressure control on major cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: The study included a total of 9336 patients, with a mean age of 67.9±9.4 years, among whom 2066 (22.2%) were cancer survivors. Over a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 561 primary cardiovascular outcomes were observed. Cancer survivors had a similar risk of experiencing the primary outcome compared with patients without cancer after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.77–1.15]). Intensive blood pressure control reduced risk of the primary cardiovascular outcome similarly for cancer survivors (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.51–0.97]) and patients without cancer (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.63–0.93]; P for interaction 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: In SPRINT study, intensive blood pressure treatment reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events in cancer survivors to a similar extent to that of patients without cancer. Cancer history not requiring active treatment in last 2 years should not be an obstacle to intensive treatment of hypertension. This post hoc analysis should be considered as hypothesis-generating and merit further clinical trial. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

Abstract Background Intensive blood pressure (BP) control has been proven to reduce the risks of major cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (1). Excessive orthostatic BP changes should be fully addressed, given its high prevalence and associations with adverse events among T2DM patients (2-5). However, the benefits of intensive BP control among T2DM patients with significant orthostatic BP changes have been equivocal. Purpose To examine whether orthostatic BP changes modify the efficacy of intensive BP control on CVD outcomes in patients with T2DM. Methods The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure trial (ACCORD BP) is a 2×2 factorial designed trial that aimed to evaluate the effects of intensive glycemia and BP control on major CVD events among T2DM patients (6). We enrolled participants with at least one record of orthostatic BP values for analysis. The composite CVD outcome in this study comprised cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and hospitalized congestive heart failure. Associations between orthostatic BP changes and the composite CVD outcome and all-cause death, respectively, were presented by restricted cubic spline curves based on multivariable Cox models. We examined if the effects of intensive BP control varied across the orthostatic BP change for the composite CVD outcome and all-cause death. Results Among 4330 participants, 877 (20.3%) experienced episodes of orthostatic hypotension (OH) at baseline or during follow-up. There was no significant difference in the proportions of OH participants between the intensive and standard BP arms. U-shaped associations were observed between orthostatic systolic BP changes and the composite CVD outcome, as well as all-cause mortality (Figure 1). In the standard glycemia arm, intensive BP control was significantly associated with a lower risk of composite CVD outcome (HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.59-0.97). There was a beneficial association of intensive BP control with all-cause mortality without statistical significance (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.56-1.30). The favorable effect of intensive BP control was not influenced by orthostatic BP changes (P for interaction 0.51 for the composite CVD outcome and 0.97 for all-cause mortality) (Figure 2). Beneficial effects of intensive BP control were not observed for participants in the intensive glycemia arm on the composite CVD outcome (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.76-1.28) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.19, 0.79-1.80). Conclusion Orthostatic BP changes should not be a barrier to intensive BP control for T2DM patients treated with guideline-recommended standard glycemia control.

心房颤动（房颤）是临床上最常见的持续性心律失常，也是缺血性卒中的重要病因。过去20年，随着人口结构老龄化进程加速以及危险因素的累积，我国房颤相关疾病负担呈上升趋势，但知晓率和综合管理率还处于较低水平。随着房颤检测设备的进步与普及、筛查策略的优化，房颤检出率将进一步提高，有利于诊断治疗关口前移，改善房颤患者生活质量和预后。面对有限的医疗资源和庞大的患者数量，借助移动互联网、人工智能技术实现高质量、高效率的远程管理将发挥巨大价值，是解决这一矛盾的重要途径。

Background. Effects of intensive blood pressure (BP) control on cognitive outcomes in patients with excess orthostatic BP changes are unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether orthostatic BP changes modified the effects of BP intervention on cognitive impairment.Methods. We analyzed 8547 participants from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Memory and cognition IN Decreased Hypertension. Associations between orthostatic BP changes and incident cognitive outcomes were evaluated by restricted cubic spline curves based on Cox models. The interactions between orthostatic BP changes and intensive BP intervention were assessed.Results. The U-shaped associations were observed between baseline orthostatic systolic BP changes and cognitive outcomes. However, there were insignificant interactions between either change in orthostatic systolic BP (P for interaction = 0.81) or diastolic BP (P for interaction = 0.32) and intensive BP intervention for the composite outcome of probable dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The hazard ratio of intensive versus standard target for the composite cognitive outcome was 0.82 (95% CI 0.50-1.35) in those with an orthostatic systolic BP reduction of >20 mmHg and 0.41 (95% CI 0.21-0.80) in those with an orthostatic systolic BP increase of >20 mmHg. Results were similar for probable dementia and MCI. The annual changes in global cerebral blood flow (P for interaction = 0.86) consistently favored intensive BP treatment across orthostatic systolic BP changes.Conclusion. Intensive BP control did not have a deteriorating effect on cognitive outcomes among hypertensive patients experiencing significant postural BP changes.

BACKGROUND:The anatomy of myocardial fibers around the right cardiac veins (RCVs) and their roles in accessory pathways (APs) are rarely reported.METHODS:Six RCV-APs were identified from 566 patients with right-sided APs. Mapping of retrograde atrial activation was performed using CARTO 3 system under orthodromic tachycardia or right ventricular pacing. Venography of RCVs was acquired at the earliest retrograde atrial activation.RESULTS:Patients enrolled had a median age of 30 (11-51) years, 5 of them were male. Venography of RCVs could be classified into 3 distinct patterns based on the identified ventricular branches, right marginal vein only (type I; n=3), both right marginal vein and anterior cardiac veins (type II; n=2), and anterior cardiac vein only (type III; n=1). Patients with type I venography had rS QRS pattern in lead V1, negative delta wave in lead III and negative or isoelectric delta wave in lead aVF. However, patients with type II and III venography had QS QRS patterns in lead V1 and variable patterns of delta wave in inferior leads. Earliest retrograde atrial activation was found at a median of 16.75 (14.60-20.00) mm away from the tricuspid annulus, all with A larger than V. At the earliest retrograde atrial activation, far-field ventricular electrogram was found 30 ms later than QRS onset in 1 patient under sinus rhythm. AP conduction was eliminated by mechanical pressure in 2 and by radiofrequency ablation in 4 at the ostium of the veins colocalizing with the earliest retrograde activation of the right atrium. No recurrence was observed during 36 (10-60) months follow-up.CONCLUSIONS:The RCV-AP is a rare form of right-sided APs characterized by atrial insertions distant from the annulus. ECG-speculated ventricular insertion sites conformed to the location of identified RCVs.

Background: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a risk factor for poor kidney function independent of blood pressure (BP) in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Little is known about the association between kidney function decline and BPV in hypertensive patients without CKD. Methods: A post-hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was performed. BPV was measured as standard deviation (SD) and average real variability (ARV). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to explore the relationship between BPV and incident CKD and albuminuria. Results: A total of 5700 patients were included, with a mean age of 66.4 years old. During a median of 3.29 years follow-up, 150 (2.6%) patients developed CKD and 222 (7.2%) patients developed albuminuria. Patients were divided into four groups according to the quartiles of BPV. Compared with SBPV Q1, the incidence of CKD was higher in SBPV Q2-Q4; hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval were 1.81 (1.07-3.04), 1.85 (1.10-3.12) and 1.90 (1.13-3.19), respectively. The association between incident CKD and albuminuria with DBPV was less significant than SBPV. Similar results were found when measuring BPV as ARV and SD. No interaction was detected in BP-lowering strategy and SBPV on incident CKD and albuminuria (P > 0.05). Conclusion: This study found that BPV was a risk factor for incident CKD and albuminuria in patients without CKD, especially SBPV. Although intensive BP control increased the risk of CKD, the association between SBPV and kidney function decline did not differ between the two treatment groups.

BACKGROUND:Co-morbid hypertension is strong predictor of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) but the optimal target for blood pressure (BP) control in this patient population has not been clearly defined. METHODS:The Cardiovascular Risk reduction in patients with Atrial Fibrillation Trial (CRAFT) is an investigator-initiated and conducted, international, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, blinded outcome assessed, randomized controlled trial of intensive BP control in patients with AF. The aim is to determine whether intensive BP control (target home systolic blood pressure [SBP] <120 mmHg) is superior to standard BP control (home SBP <135 mmHg) on the hierarchical composite outcome of time to CV death, number of stroke events, time to the first stroke, number of myocardial infarction (MI) events, time to the first MI, number of heart failure hospitalization (HFH) events, and time to the first HFH. A sample size of 1,675 patients is estimated to provide 80% power to detect a win-ratio of 1.50 for intensive versus standard BP control on the primary composite outcome. Study visits are conducted at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months postrandomization, and every 6 months thereafter during the study. CONCLUSIONS:This clinical trial aims to provide reliable evidence of the effects of intensive BP control in patients with AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION:The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04347330).

BACKGROUND:Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been widely used in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of ICE in the training of transseptal puncture (TSP) is unclear. METHODS:ICE-Training Study was a single-center, parallel-group, unmasked, randomized controlled trial registered in ChineseClinicalTrials.gov. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to different groups (1) the ICE simulator training group (ICE-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed under the guidance of both ICE and x-ray; and (2) the conventional simulator training group (Con-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed only under the guidance of x-ray. The trainees need to undergo the training stage and the evaluation stage. RESULTS:From October 2022 to December 2022, 18 consecutive fellows (age 32.4 ± 4.4 years, 12 males) without experience of TSP were included. The training period (16.9 ± 6.6 vs. 29.6 ± 8.7 times, p = 0.003) and the fluoroscopy time (120.3 ± 25.3 vs. 189.3 ± 40.2 s, p < 0.001) of the ICE-ST group was significantly shorter than that of the Con-ST group. No significant difference was found in the comprehensive performance of TSP in the ICE-ST group (composite score 96.7 ± 5.7) and the Con-ST group (composite score 95.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.62), but the selection of TSP sites in the ICE-ST group was commonly better than that in the Con-ST group. CONCLUSIONS:ICE could improve the efficiency of TSP training and optimize the site of TSP to facilitate catheter manipulation in the ablation. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2200058377.

AbstractAimsTo describe the role of left atrial (LA) epicardial conduction and targets of ablation in biatrial tachycardias (BiATs).Methods and resultsConsecutive patients with BiAT diagnosed by high-density mapping and appropriate entrainment were enrolled. A systematic review of case reports or series was then performed. Biatrial tachycardia was identified in 20 patients aged 63.5 ± 11.1 years. Among them, eight had LA epicardial conduction, including four via the ligament of Marshall, two via myocardial fibres between the great cardiac vein (GCV) and LA, one via septopulmonary bundle, and one via myocardial fibres between the posterior wall and coronary sinus. Ablation was targeted at the anatomical isthmus in 14, including 5 undergoing vein of Marshall ethanol infusion and 2 undergoing ablation in the GCV. Another six underwent ablation at interatrial connections, including one with septopulmonary bundle at the fossa ovalis and five at the atrial insertions of Bachmann’s bundle. After a mean follow-up of 8.7 ± 3.8 months, five patients had recurrence of atrial fibrillation/flutter. Systematic review enrolled 87 patients in previous and the present reports, showing a higher risk of impairment in atrial physiology in those targeting interatrial connections (30.4 vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001) but no significant difference in short- and long-term effectiveness.ConclusionLeft atrial epicardial conduction is common in BiATs and affects the ablation strategy. Atrial physiology is a major concern in selecting the target of intervention.

Background The association between sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation among patients with diabetes and AF remains unclear. Methods and Results Patients with AF undergoing initial catheter ablation with a history of diabetes from the China AF registry were included. Patients using SGLT2i were identified and matched by propensity score with non‐SGLT2i patients in a 1:3 ratio. The main outcome was AF recurrence during the 18‐month follow‐up. A total of 138 patients with diabetes with SGLT2i therapy and 387 without SGLT2i were analyzed. AF recurrence occurred in 37 patients (26.8%) in the SGLT2i group and 152 patients (39.3%) in the non‐SGLT2i group during a total of 593.3 person‐years follow‐up. The SGLT2i group was associated with lower AF recurrence compared with the non‐SGLT2i group (hazard ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.44–0.90], P=0.007). A total of 4 studies were analyzed in our meta‐analysis demonstrating that SGLT2i was associated with lower AF recurrence after catheter ablation (odds ratio, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.54–0.69]; P<0.001, I2=0.0%). Conclusions Our prospective study coupled with a meta‐analysis demonstrated a lower risk of AF recurrence with the use of SGLT2i among patients with diabetes after AF ablation.

Epicardial roof-dependent macro-reentrant tachycardias (epi-RMAT) after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation are not rare but the prevalence and characteristics remain unclear. To report the prevalence of epicardial conduction in RMATs, and further describe their electrophysiological characteristics and ablation outcome Forty-four consecutive patients with 45 roof-dependent macroreentrant tachycardia (RMAT) after AF ablation were enrolled. High-density mapping and appropriate entrainment were performed to diagnose epi-RMATs. Epi-RMAT was identified in 15 (34.1%) patients. Under the right lateral view, the activation pattern can be briefly classified into 3 types, including clockwise reentry (n=4), counterclockwise reentry (n=9), and biatrial reentry (n=2). Five (33.3%) of them had a 'pseudo focal' activation pattern. All epi-RMATs had continuous slow or no conduction zone with a mean width of 21.3±12.3mm traversing both pulmonary antra, and 9 (60.0%) of them had missing cycle length >10% actual cycle length. Compared with endocardial RMAT (endo-RMAT), epi-RMAT required longer ablation time (9.60±4.98 min vs 3.68±3.42 min, P<0.001), more floor line ablation (85.7% vs 6.7%, P<0.001) and electrogram guided posterior wall ablation (78.6% vs 3.3%, P<0.001). Electric cardioversion was required in 3(20.0%) with epi-RMATs, while all endo-RMATs were terminated by radiofrequency applications (P=0.032). Posterior wall ablation was performed under esophagus deviation in 2 patients. Among 43 patients with follow-up over 3 months, 2 of 14 patients with epi-RMAT had recurrent tachycardia after a mean follow-up of 9.6±3.7 months, and 7 of 29 patients with endo-RMAT had recurrent tachycardia after a mean follow-up of 13.9±6.1 months (P=0.721 for log-rank). Epi-RMATs are not uncommon in recurrent RMATs after roof or posterior wall ablation. An explicable activation pattern with a conduction obstacle in the dome and appropriate entrainment is critical for the diagnosis. The effectiveness of Posterior wall ablation may be restricted by the risk of esophagus impairment.

OBJECTIVE:This study sought to assess the effect of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) on the acute success of left pulmonary vein (LPV) isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). METHODS AND RESULTS:A total of 313 patients with drug-resistant PeAF were enrolled (135 in Group 1 and 178 in Group 2). In Group 1, EIVOM was firstly performed, followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) including bilateral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation at roofline, cavotricuspid isthmus, and mitral isthmus (MI). In Group 2, PVI and linear ablations were completed with RFA. First-pass isolation of the LPV was achieved in 119 (88.1%) and 132 (74.2%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.002). The rate of acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) was significantly lower in Group 1 (9.6% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.003). About half of acute PVR occurred in the carina with or without EIVOM. CONCLUSION:EIVOM is effective in achieving a higher first-pass isolation and a lower acute PVR of LPV in PeAF.

BACKGROUND Epicardial roof-dependent macro-re-entrant tachycardias (epi-RMAT) after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation are not rare but the prevalence and characteristics remain unclear.OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence, electrophysiological characteristics and ablation strategy of recurrent epi-RMATs after ablation of atrial fibrillation.METHODS A total of 44 consecutive patients with 45 roof-dependent RMATs after atrial fibrillation ablation were enrolled. High-density mapping and appropriate entrainment were performed to diagnose epi-RMATs.RESULTS Epi-RMAT was identified in 15 patients (34.1%). Under the right lateral view, the activation pattern can be briefly classified into clockwise re-entry (n = 4), counterclockwise re-entry (n = 9), and bi-atrial re-entry (n = 2). Five (33.3%) had a pseudofocal activation pattern. All epi-RMATs had continuous slow or no conduction zone with a mean width of 21.3 +/- 12.3 mm traversing both pulmonary antra, and 9 (60.0%) had missing cycle length of >10% actual cycle length. Compared with endocardial RMAT (endo-RMAT), epi-RMAT required longer ablation time (9.60 +/- 4.98 minutes vs 3.68 +/- 3.42 minutes; P < 0.001), more floor line ablation (93.3% vs 6.7%; P < 0.001), and electrogram-guided posterior wall ablation (78.6% vs 3.3%; P < 0.001). Electric cardioversion was required in 3 patients (20.0%) with epi-RMATs, whereas all endo-RMATs were terminated by radiofrequency applications (P = 0.032). Posterior wall ablation was performed under esophagus deviation in 2 patients. We did not observe a significant difference in the recurrence of atrial arrhythmias between patients with epi-RMATs and endo-RMATs after the procedure.CONCLUSIONS Epi-RMATs are not uncommon after roof or posterior wall ablation. An explicable activation pattern with a conduction obstacle in the dome and appropriate entrainment is critical for the diagnosis. The effectiveness of posterior wall ablation may be restricted by the risk of esophagus impairment.

BackgroundPerimitral atrial tachycardia (PMAT) is the most frequent type of iatrogenic atrial tachycardia (AT) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (EIVOM) is a promising technique in mitral isthmus (MI) ablation. MethodsA total of 165 patients with PMAT were divided into three groups according to ablation strategies, including RF only group (n = 89), RF-EIVOM group (initial RF ablation with adjunctive EIVOM, n = 28), and EIVOM-RF group (first-step EIVOM with touch-up RF ablation, n = 48). Acute and follow-up procedure outcomes were evaluated. ResultsPMAT terminated in 89.9%, 89.3%, and 93.7% of patients in RF only, RF-EIVOM and EIVOM-RF groups, respectively (p = .715), with complete MI block achieved in 80.9%, 89.3%, and 95.8% of patients (EIVOM-RF vs. RF only, p = .012). First-step utilization of EIVOM was associated with a significant shortening of RF ablation time at MI (EIVOM-RF 2.1 +/- 1.3 min, RF only 7.9 +/- 5.9 min, RF-EIVOM 6.8 +/- 5.8 min; p < .001) and a decrease in the proportion of patients need ablation within coronary sinus (CS, EIVOM-RF 14.6%, RF only 61.8%, RF-EIVOM 64.3%; p < .001). After a mean follow-up of 12.1 +/- 6.2 months, AF/AT recurred in 39 (43.8%), 6 (21.4%), and 12 (25.0%) patients in RF only, RF-EIVOM, and EIVOM-RF group (RF-EIVOM vs. RF only, p = .026; EIVOM-RF vs. RF only, p = .022). ConclusionsEIVOM was associated with an enhanced acute MI block rate as well as reduced AF/AT recurrence. First-step utilization of EIVOM promises to significantly simplify the RF ablation process. Condensed abstractPMAT is the most common type of iatrogenic AT after AF ablation procedures. EIVOM contributed to a higher acute MI block rate and lower arrhythmia recurrence risk during follow-up. First-step utilization of EIVOM significantly reduced the need for radiofrequency ablation at MI and inside CS with the advantage of creating a homogenous, transmural lesion and eliminating epicardial connections.

BACKGROUND:Evidence on outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with autoimmune disease (AD) is limited.HYPOTHESIS:Patients with AD had worse outcomes after CA procedures for AF.METHODS:A retrospective analysis was performed in patients undergoing AF ablation between 2012 and 2021. The risk of recurrence after ablation was investigated in patients with AD and a 1:4 propensity score matched non-AD group.RESULTS:We identified 107 patients with AD (64 ± 10 years, female 48.6%) who were matched with 428 non-AD patients (65 ± 10 years, female 43.9%). Patients with AD exhibited more severe AF-related symptoms. During the index procedure, a higher proportion of AD patients received nonpulmonary vein trigger ablation (18.7% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.002). Over a median follow-up of 36.3 months, patients with AD experienced a similar risk of recurrence with the non-AD group (41.1% vs. 36.2%, p = 0.21, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-1.76) despite a higher incidence of early recurrences (36.4% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.001). Compared with non-AD patients, patients with connective tissue disease were at an increased risk of recurrence (46.3% vs. 36.2%, p = 0.049, HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.00-2.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the duration of AF history and corticosteroid therapy were independent predictors of postablation recurrence in patients with AD.CONCLUSIONS:In patients with AD, the risk of recurrence after ablation for AF during the follow-up was comparable with non-AD patients, but a higher risk of early recurrence was observed. Further research into the impact of AD on AF treatment is warranted.

BACKGROUND:Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior stroke history have a high risk of cardiovascular events despite anticoagulation therapy. It is unclear whether catheter ablation (CA) has further benefits in these patients.METHODS:AF patients with a previous history of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) from the prospective Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study between August 2011 and December 2020 were included in the analysis. Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio to CA or medical treatment (MT) based on propensity score. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or ischemic stroke (IS)/SE.RESULTS:During a total of 4.1 ± 2.3 years of follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in 111 patients in the CA group (3.3 per 100 person-years) and in 229 patients in the MT group (5.7 per 100 person-years). The CA group had a lower risk of the primary outcome compared to the MT group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47-0.74, P < 0.001]. There was a significant decreasing risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.31-0.61, P < 0.001), IS/SE (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97, P = 0.033), cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.54, P < 0.001) and AF recurrence (HR = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.30-0.37, P < 0.001) in the CA group compared to that in the MT group. Sensitivity analysis generated consistent results when adjusting for time-dependent usage of anticoagulants.CONCLUSIONS:In AF patients with a prior stroke history, CA was associated with a lower combined risk of all-cause death or IS/SE. Further clinical trials are warranted to confirm the benefits of CA in these patients.