Background and objectives: Ocular involvement is common in sarcoidosis. Our study aimed to evaluate the role of screening for uveitis in subjects with sarcoidosis. Methods: Retrospective case series of 88 subjects with a pre-existing diagnosis of sarcoidosis, with no previous diagnosis of uveitis, reviewed by Ophthalmology at Auckland District Health Board between January 2016 and May 2022. Results: Among those undergoing a screening examination, uveitis was observed in 27.8% (15 out of 54 subjects). In those presenting with acute eye symptoms, uveitis was observed in 94.1% (32 out of 34 subjects). Sarcoid uveitis was diagnosed in a total of 50 out of 88 subjects (56.8%). 45 subjects required ocular treatment. Sarcoid uveitis was observed in 6 out of 27 subjects (22.2%) who were entirely asymptomatic at screening. On multivariate analysis, blurring of vision (OR 26.2 p < 0.001), eye pain (OR 7.3 p = 0.014) and respiratory disease (OR 7.1 p = 0.044) were associated with increased risk of sarcoid uveitis. In the 41 subjects with no uveitis at initial examination, 3 subjects (7.3%) subsequently developed uveitis. Conclusion: Our study highlights the importance of ophthalmic screening of all patients with systemic sarcoidosis, even in asymptomatic patients. With a high correlation of ocular symptoms in diagnosis of sarcoid uveitis, ophthalmologists should educate patients to look out for the development of symptoms of ocular inflammation, and clinicians who continue follow up for systemic sarcoidosis should remind patients to watch carefully for these symptoms to facilitate timely diagnosis and intervention.
Rationale and ObjectivesFibrotic scarring in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) typically develops first in the posterior-basal lung tissue before advancing to involve more of the lung. The complexity of lung shape in the costo-diaphragmatic region has been proposed as a potential factor in this regional development. Intrinsic and disease-related shape could therefore be important for understanding IPF risk and its staging. We hypothesized that lung and lobe shape in IPF would have important differences from controls.Materials and MethodsA principal component (PC) analysis was used to derive a statistical shape model (SSM) of the lung for a control cohort aged > 50 years (N = 39), using segmented lung and fissure surface data from CT imaging. Individual patient shape models derived for baseline (N = 18) and follow-up (N = 16) CT scans in patients with IPF were projected to the SSM to describe shape as the sum of the SSM average and weighted PC modes. Associations between the first four PC shape modes, lung function, percentage of fibrosis (fibrosis%) and pulmonary vessel-related structures (PVRS%), and other tissue metrics were assessed and compared between the two cohorts.ResultsShape was different between IPF and controls (P < 0.05 for all shape modes), with IPF shape forming a distinct shape cluster. Shape had a negative relationship with age in controls (P = 0.013), but a positive relationship with age in IPF (P = 0.026). Some features of shape changed on follow-up. Shape in IPF was associated with fibrosis% (P < 0.05) and PVRS% (P < 0.05).ConclusionQuantitative comparison of lung and lobe shape in IPF with controls of a similar age reveals shape differences that are strongly associated with age and percent fibrosis. The clustering of IPF cohort shape suggests that it could be an important feature to describe disease.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease leading to significant morbidity and mortality. In 2017 the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) and Lung Foundation Australia (LFA) published a position statement on the treatment of IPF. Since that time, subsidized anti-fibrotic therapy in the form of pirfenidone and nintedanib is now available in both Australia and New Zealand. More recently, evidence has been published in support of nintedanib for non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). Additionally, there have been numerous publications relating to the non-pharmacologic management of IPF and PPF. This 2023 update to the position statement for treatment of IPF summarizes developments since 2017 and reaffirms the importance of a multi-faceted approach to the management of IPF and progressive pulmonary fibrosis.
Background Lung function testing remains a cornerstone in the assessment and management of interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients. The clinical implications of the Global Lung function Initiative (GLI) reference equations and the updated interpretation strategies remain uncertain. Methods Adult patients with ILD with baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) were included from the Australasian ILD registry and the National Healthcare Group ILD registry, Singapore. The European Coal and Steel Community and Miller reference equations were compared with the GLI reference equations to assess (a) differences in lung function percent predicted values; (b) ILD risk prediction models and (c) eligibility for ILD clinical trial enrolment. Results Among 2219 patients with ILD, 1712 (77.2%) were white individuals. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), connective tissue disease-associated ILD and unclassifiable ILD predominated. Median FVC was 2.60 (2.01-3.36)L, forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 2.09 (1.67-2.66)L and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was 13.60 (10.16-17.60)mL/min/mm Hg. When applying the GLI reference equations, the mean FVC percentage predicted was 8.8% lower (87.7% vs 78.9%, p<0.01) while the mean DLCO percentage predicted was 4.9% higher (58.5% vs 63.4%, p<0.01). There was a decrease in 19 IPF and 119 non-IPF patients who qualified for the nintedanib clinical trials when the GLI reference equations were applied. Risk prediction models performed similarly in predicting mortality using both reference equations. Conclusion Applying the GLI reference equations in patients with ILD leads to higher DLCO percentage predicted values and smaller lung volume percentage predicted values. While applying the GLI reference equations did not impact on prognostication, fewer patients met the clinical trial criteria for antifibrotic agents.
BACKGROUND:Biological sex, gender, and race are important considerations in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). RESEARCH QUESTION:Does a patient's sex assigned at birth, and race, influence ILD treatment initiation? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS:Patients with ILD from three longitudinal prospective registries were compared in this observational study. ILD-related medications included antifibrotics and immunomodulating medications. Race was dichotomized as "White" vs "non-White." Time to treatment initiation was determined from the date of the initial ILD registry visit to the date of first medication initiation. Proportions of treated patients were compared between groups by χ2 test. Cox proportional analysis was used to determine how sex and race were associated with time to treatment initiation stratified by ILD diagnosis. RESULTS:A total of 4,572 patients were included across all cohorts. The proportion of men who received treatment was higher than for women in the Canadian cohort (47% vs 40%; P < .001), and the proportion of White patients who received treatment was also higher compared with non-White patients (46% vs 36%; P < .001). In contrast, the proportion of treated men in the Chicago cohort was lower compared with women (56% vs 64%; P = .005), and that of White patients was lower compared with non-White patients (56% vs 69%; P < .001). No sex- or race-based differences in proportions of patients treated were found in the Australasian cohort. White race was significantly associated with earlier treatment initiation compared with non-White race across diagnoses in the Canadian cohort, whereas the opposite association was found in the Australasian cohort. INTERPRETATION:Sex- and race-based differences exist in the initiation of ILD treatment, with variability across different cohorts in different countries. Reasons for these differences need to be further explored in future studies.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterised by progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia with an associated irreversible decline in lung function and quality of life. IPF prevalence increases with age, appearing most frequently in patients aged > 50 years. Pulmonary vessel-like volume (PVV) has been found to be an independent predictor of mortality in IPF and other interstitial lung diseases, however its estimation can be impacted by artefacts associated with image segmentation methods and can be confounded by adjacent fibrosis. This study compares PVV in IPF patients (N = 21) with PVV from a healthy cohort aged > 50 years (N = 59). The analysis includes a connected graph-based approach that aims to minimise artefacts contributing to calculation of PVV. We show that despite a relatively low extent of fibrosis in the IPF cohort (20% of the lung volume), PVV is 2–3 times higher than in controls. This suggests that a standardised method to calculate PVV that accounts for tree connectivity could provide a promising tool to provide early diagnostic or prognostic information in IPF patients and other interstitial lung disease.
Rationale and Objectives: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive interstitial lung disease characterised by heterogeneously distributed fibrotic lesions. The inter- and intra-patient heterogeneity of the disease has meant that useful biomarkers of severity and progression have been elusive. Previous quantitative computed tomography (CT) based studies have focussed on characterising the pathological tissue. However, we hypothesised that the remaining lung tissue, which appears radiologically normal, may show important differences from controls in tissue characteristics. Materials and Methods: Quantitative metrics were derived from CT scans in IPF patients (N = 20) and healthy controls with a similar age (N = 59). An automated quantitative software (CALIPER, Computer-Aided Lung Informatics for Pathology Evaluation and Rating) was used to classify tissue as normal-appearing, fibrosis, or low attenuation area. Densitometry metrics were calculated for all lung tissue and for only the normal-appearing tissue. Heterogeneity of lung tissue density was quantified as coefficient of variation and by quadtree. Associations between measured lung function and quantitative metrics were assessed and compared between the two cohorts. Results: All metrics were significantly different between controls and IPF (p < 0.05), including when only the normal tissue was evaluated (p < 0.04). Density in the normal tissue was 14% higher in the IPF participants than controls (p < 0.001). The normalappearing tissue in IPF had heterogeneity metrics that exhibited significant positive relationships with the percent predicted diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide. Conclusion: We provide quantitative assessment of IPF lung tissue characteristics compared to a healthy control group of similar age. Tissue that appears visually normal in IPF exhibits subtle but quantifiable differences that are associated with lung function and gas exchange.
IntroductionOral pirfenidone reduces lung function decline and mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Systemic exposure can have significant side effects, including nausea, rash, photosensitivity, weight loss and fatigue. Reduced doses may be suboptimal in slowing disease progression.MethodsThis phase 1b, randomised, open-label, dose–response trial at 25 sites in six countries (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) registration number ACTRN12618001838202) assessed safety, tolerability and efficacy of inhaled pirfenidone (AP01) in IPF. Patients diagnosed within 5 years, with forced vital capacity (FVC) 40%–90% predicted, and intolerant, unwilling or ineligible for oral pirfenidone or nintedanib were randomly assigned 1:1 to nebulised AP01 50 mg once per day or 100 mg two times per day for up to 72 weeks.ResultsWe present results for week 24, the primary endpoint and week 48 for comparability with published trials of antifibrotics. Week 72 data will be reported as a separate analysis pooled with the ongoing open-label extension study. Ninety-one patients (50 mg once per day: n=46, 100 mg two times per day: n=45) were enrolled from May 2019 to April 2020. The most common treatment-related adverse events (frequency, % of patients) were all mild or moderate and included cough (14, 15.4%), rash (11, 12.1%), nausea (8, 8.8%), throat irritation (5, 5.5%), fatigue (4, 4.4%) and taste disorder, dizziness and dyspnoea (three each, 3.3%). Changes in FVC % predicted over 24 and 48 weeks, respectively, were −2.5 (95% CI −5.3 to 0.4, −88 mL) and −4.9 (−7.5 to −2.3,–188 mL) in the 50 mg once per day and 0.6 (−2.2 to 3.4, 10 mL) and −0.4 (−3.2 to 2.3, −34 mL) in the 100 mg two times per day group.DiscussionSide effects commonly associated with oral pirfenidone in other clinical trials were less frequent with AP01. Mean FVC % predicted remained stable in the 100 mg two times per day group. Further study of AP01 is warranted.Trial registration numberACTRN12618001838202 Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.