There is limited data on forced marriages in the context of India. This study involved validation of new measures of women’s marital choice in terms of partner selection and timing of marriage as indicators of women’s marital agency in rural India. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from N = 1192 married women aged 18–30 who participated in the Counseling Husbands and wives to Achieve Reproductive health and Marital equity (CHARM2) trial in rural Maharashtra, India. We included two novel items on women’s decision-making regarding who the married and when they married. We evaluated the construct validity of these measures by testing their associations with other traditionally gender normative practices related to marriage including girl child marriage, purdah, and dowry using Fisher’s exact test. We then conducted crude and adjusted regression models to determine associations between our marital choice variables and indicators of current marital agency, specifically recent intimate partner violence, marital quality, and contraceptive self-efficacy. 15.5

Background:Effective family planning interventions may have inadvertent effects on births of girls given son preference in India. We conducted 36 and 48-month follow-ups to our CHARM2 family planning study to determine long-term intervention effects on births and sex of children. Methods:Our non-blinded two-armed cluster RCT randomized young married couples (N = 1201 couples) from 20 geographic clusters (60-61 couples per cluster) into either the CHARM2 intervention or control (referral to local care) condition. CHARM2 offers 5-session gender-synchronized family planning and gender equity counseling delivered by trained local medical providers. Data were collected at baseline in September 2018-June 2019 and then follow-ups at 9, 18, 36 and 48 months, up to September 2023. We retained 88 %-91 % of women across follow-ups with no difference in retention by treatment group. We used adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models examining sex composition of births at each follow-up and over the total 48-month follow-up to assess differences in all births of boys and girls by treatment group. We adjusted for treatment condition, cluster, and relevant demographics in adjusted models. Results:We saw no treatment effects on total births or boy births, but lower likelihood of a girl birth was seen at 9-month follow-up and for the total 48-month follow-up period. We found at 9-month follow-up a girl birth was less likely for intervention compared with control participants (7.1 % vs. 10.3 %, respectively, p = 0.06), and the male to female sex ratio of births born between baseline and 9-month follow-up was also significantly higher for intervention vs. comparison participants (1.50 [95 % CI 1.00-2.26] vs. 0.83 [95 % CI 0.56-1.21], p = 0.04). We conducted a sensitivity analysis to determine treatment effects on boy births and girl births over the 48-month follow-up and again found no effects on boy births, but a significantly lower likelihood of a girl birth for the intervention group (22 % vs 29 %, p = 0.03). Conclusion:The CHARM2 family planning intervention, previously demonstrating significant effects on contraceptive use and women's reproductive agency in rural India, resulted in lower likelihood of girl births over time, suggesting that family planning programs can contribute to sex ratio imbalances if broader social changes eliminating son preference and improving value of a girl child do not occur. Funding:National Institutes of Health, Grant R01HD084453 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. INV002967. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03514914.].

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric performance of the Desire to Avoid Pregnancy (DAP) scale in India. STUDY DESIGN:We utilized survey data from married women enrolled in a family planning intervention in Maharashtra, India, who provided responses to the 14-item DAP scale at 18-month intervention study follow-up. We assessed scale internal consistency using Cronbach α and used exploratory factor analysis to evaluate scale unidimensionality and item response theory (IRT) to assess item performance. We used regression models to assess whether DAP predicts current reported contraceptive use, as well as future contraceptive use and pregnancy, to evaluate construct validity. RESULTS:A total of 1088 participants responded to 18-month intervention study follow-up survey; 99% of eligible participants (887/888) provided the full-scale response. One item, "makes me smile," performed in the reverse direction as anticipated (negative item-test correlation) and was excluded for use in this analysis. The mean 13-item DAP score (DAP-13) was 2.14 of 4 (SD 0.95, range 0-4); internal consistency was high (Cronbach α = 0.92). Most items fit the partial credit model on IRT. Exploratory factor analyses supported either a one- or two-factor model; the unidimensional model was considered acceptable for use as the single factor explained 71% of all variance, and all items had stable absolute factor loadings ≥0.38. DAP-13 score only differed by parity; nulliparous women had the lowest scores (0.56), followed by women with one (1.94), two (2.60), or three or more births (2.56; p < 0.001). A one-point increase in DAP-13 was associated with greater odds of current contraception use reported at time of DAP assessment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.79, 95% CI 1.43-2.26), subsequent contraception use reported 18 months after DAP assessment (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.44-2.44), and half the odds of subsequent pregnancy in the 18-month period after DAP assessment (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.71). CONCLUSIONS:The DAP scale demonstrated good reliability and unidimensionality in this population. Higher DAP scores were associated with higher odds of contraception use and lower odds of pregnancy, supporting construct validity. Future research on the DAP scale in Maharashtra should explore alternative translations of the "makes me smile" item that better capture local expressions of joy about potential childbearing. IMPLICATIONS:A modified version of the DAP scale is acceptable for use in an Indian population and can be utilized in future research and program evaluation that focus on contraception and pregnancy prevention in this context. One item was excluded and requires additional formative research to better capture the intended emotional valence in this cultural context. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT03514914.

BACKGROUND:Despite the benefits of healthy birth spacing for mothers and infants, the use of postpartum family planning (PPFP) by women in India remains low. We qualitatively examined barriers to PPFP access and use to understand the intersections between women's reproductive agency, fertility and contraceptive norms, and community interactions with health providers in rural Maharashtra, India. METHODS:We conducted 62 qualitative in-depth interviews with postpartum women, husbands and mothers-in-law of postpartum women, frontline health workers (FLWs) and key community stakeholders in rural Maharashtra from March to May 2022. Semi-structured interview guides included probes related to knowledge of and access to PPFP services, contraceptive decision-making dynamics, interactions with health providers, community norms related to fertility and family planning, and existing and aspirational models for PPFP service delivery. We used an inductive approach to organize emerging codes into themes using Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, categorizing findings into a thematic framework to inform PPFP programming. RESULTS:Five key themes emerged: (1) Few women received PPFP counseling or services, with marginalized communities disproportionately affected by poor access. (2) Postpartum women lacked agency in contraceptive decision-making and often needed their husband's approval to access PPFP services. (3) Clinicians identified misinformation, lack of education, and community beliefs in contraceptive myths for lack of informed choice. (4) While norms for limiting family size were strong, contraception was considered a 'sensitive' subject and sparked concerns regarding confidentiality in discussing PPFP. (5) Community reported that counseling services were prescriptive and lacked information on the side effects of contraception, leading to the perception of low-quality care and dissatisfaction with PPFP health services. CONCLUSIONS:There is an urgent need to enhance PPFP counseling and service provision within family planning programs in India, emphasize reproductive choice among women, broaden the public dialogue on contraceptive use and find ways to engage men in contraceptive decision making. Interventions that can enhance knowledge and change acceptability of contraception in the community will enhance informed choice for contraceptive use among couples as well as PPFP access and use.

Background: Previous literature suggests that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes are more likely to use condoms, but there is a paucity of data evaluating whether these attitudes are associated with contraceptive communication and use. The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that men reporting more gender-equitable attitudes will be more likely to (a) engage in contraceptive communication with their wives and (b) that they and/or their wives will be more likely to use all forms of family planning, compared to men with less equitable attitudes. Methods: Using cross-sectional dyadic survey data from young married couples from rural Maharashtra, India (N = 989), we assessed the associations between men's gender role attitudes and a) spousal contraceptive communication and b) contraceptive use by type (none, traditional, condoms, pills, or IUD). The contraceptive use outcome is based on wives' report. We assessed these associations via bivariate t-test (communication outcome) or ANOVA test (contraceptive type outcome), as well as unadjusted and adjusted logistic (communication outcome) and multinomial logistic (contraceptive type outcome) regression models. Adjusted models included sociodemographic factors selected a priori based on established associations with gender-equitable attitudes and/or our assessed outcomes. Findings: Men with more gender-equitable attitudes were more likely to discuss family planning with their wives (AOR = 1·05, 95%CI 1·03-1·07, p < 0·001) and to use condoms (ARRR = 1·03, 95%CI 1·00-1·06, p = 0·07). There was no association between gender-equitable attitudes and use of other types of contraception. Interpretation: While gender-equitable attitudes among men may facilitate condom use and family planning communication in marriage, they do not appear to be linked with greater likelihood of use of more effective types of contraceptive use. This suggests that males supportive of gender equity may take greater responsibility for family planning vis a vis a less effective contraceptive, condoms, in the absence of more effective short-acting contraceptives for men. Funding: The National Institutes of Health [Grant number 5R01HD084453-01A1] and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA [grant number INV-002967].

Using a two-armed cluster randomised controlled trial, CHARM2 (Counselling Husbands to Achieve Reproductive health and Marital equity), a 5-session gender equity and family planning intervention for couples in rural India, showed an impact on family planning outcomes in primary trial analyses. This study examines its effects on gender-equitable attitudes, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and marital quality. We used multilevel mixed-effects models to assess the intervention impact on each outcome. Both male (aIRR at 9 months: 0.64, C.I.: 0.45,0.90; aIRR at 18 months: 0.25, C.I.: 0.18,0.39) and female (aIRR at 9 months: 0.57, C.I.: 0.46,0.71; aIRR at 18 months: 0.38, C.I.: 0.23,0.61) intervention participants were less likely than corresponding control participants to endorse attitudes accepting physical IPV at 9- and 18-month follow-ups. Men in the intervention, compared to those in the control condition, reported more gender-equitable attitudes at 9- and 18 months (ß at 9 months: 0.13, C.I.: 0.06,0.20; ß at 18 months: 0.26, C.I.: 0.19,0.34) and higher marital quality at the 18-month follow-up (ß: 0.03, C.I.: 0.01,0.05). However, we found no effects on women’s experiences of IPV, reproductive coercion, or marital quality. CHARM2 shows promise in improving men’s and women’s attitudes towards gender equality and male perceptions of marital quality. Still, IPV and reproductive coercion reductions may require more intensive programming than that provided within this 5-session model focused on family planning.

This study aimed to assess couple concordance in attitudes toward intimate partner violence (IPV) and its association with physical IPV against women. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 1,201 nonsterilized women aged 18-29 years and their husbands. It was found that husbands were significantly more likely (69.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.3%, 72.5%) to justify IPV than wives (56.5%, 95% CI: 53.7%, 59.3%). Couples who both hold attitudes justifying IPV against women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.57%-8.00%) and couples where women hold these attitudes, but men do not (AOR: 2.93; 95% CI: 1.18-7.28), were more likely to report male -perpetrated IPV against women in the prior 12 months.

Background Linking family planning with infant vaccination care has the potential to increase contraceptive use among postpartum women in rural settings. We explored the multilevel factors that can facilitate or impede uptake of contraception at the time of infant vaccination among postpartum women and couples in rural Maharashtra, India. Methods We conducted 60 semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders including: postpartum married women (n = 20), husbands (n = 10), and mothers-in-law (n = 10) of postpartum women, frontline healthcare workers (auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) and Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), (n = 10), and community leaders (physician medical officers and village panchayat leaders) (n = 10). We sought to assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering community-based postpartum family planning care in rural India at the time of infant vaccination. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to design a structured interview guide and codebook. Data were analyzed via directed content analysis. Results Three major themes emerged: (1) Social fertility and gender norms including son preference and male control over contraceptive decision-making influence postpartum contraceptive access and choice. (2) Linking contraceptive care and infant vaccination is perceived as potentially feasible and acceptable to implement by families, health workers, and community leaders. The intervention provides care to women and families in a convenient way where they are in their community. (3) Barriers and facilitators to linked infant postpartum contraception and infant vaccination were identified across the five CFIR domains. Key barriers included limited staff and space (inner setting), and contraceptive method targets for clinics and financial incentives for clinicians who provide specific methods (outer setting). Key facilitators included convenience of timing and location for families (intervention characteristics), the opportunity to engage husbands in decision-making when they attend infant vaccination visits (participant characteristics), and programmatic support from governmental and community leaders (process of implementation). Conclusions Linked provision of family planning and infant vaccination care may be feasible and accessible in rural India utilizing strategies identified to reduce barriers and facilitate provision of care. A gender-transformative intervention that addresses gender and social norms has greater potential to impact reproductive autonomy and couples’ contraceptive decision-making.

Much of the research on intimate partner violence (IPV) documents the negative impacts of violence on women, which are substantial. Less attention has been given to perceptions of the marital relationship given these experiences of violence. However, evidence suggests that many women affected by IPV within marriage remain in their relationships, particularly in contexts such as India, where divorce remains highly stigmatized. Understanding and supporting marital quality may need greater prioritization to support women who remain in relationships affected by violence. This study examines the association between IPV and marital quality among young married couples in rural India. We interviewed 1084 women and 1084 men at two time points (baseline, 18 months) in a western state in India and used multilevel mixed effects models to test the association between IPV and marital quality. We found that women’s experience of physical and sexual IPV was associated with poor marital quality at 18 months. Women’s experience of sexual IPV was also negatively associated with men’s self-reported marital quality at 18 months. Among men, spouse’s marital quality was positively associated with their own rating of marital quality. We also examined the reciprocal relationship between IPV and marital quality and found that women’s report of poor marital quality was associated with their future experience of physical IPV, sexual IPV, and emotional IPV. Taken together, these findings suggest that IPV interventions need to target marital quality to be effective. To do this, we would need to shift our lens from empowering individuals to empowering couples to work together to improve their relationships.

Objectives: The CHARM2 (Counseling Husbands and wives to Achieve Reproductive Health and Marital Equity) intervention engages health care providers to deliver gender-equity and family planning sessions to couples using a person-centered shared decision-making approach for contraception counseling. We previously showed that the intervention improved contraceptive use at 9-month follow-up. We sought to assess whether the intervention was further associated with the quality of care reported by participants and whether the quality of care reported mediated the effect of the intervention on contraceptive use. Study design: This is a planned secondary analysis of the effect of the CHARM2 intervention on 1201 married couples in rural Maharashtra, India in a cluster randomized controlled trial completed between 2018 and 2020. We assessed the effect of CHARM2 on perceived quality of care as measured by the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning (IQFP) scale using a difference-in-differences linear regression approach including a mixed-effects model with nested random effects to account for clustering. We as-sessed whether the association between CHARM2 and modern contraceptive use was mediated by quality of family planning care.Results: Intervention participants had higher mean IQFP scores than control participants at 9-month follow-up (intervention 3.2, SD 0.6 vs. control 2.3 mean, SD 0.9, p < 0.001). The quality of care reported mediated the effect of the intervention on contraceptive use (indirect effect coefficient 0.29, 95% CI 0.07- 0.50).Conclusion: Family planning interventions such as CHARM2, which utilize person-centered shared decision-making contraceptive counseling approaches improve women's perceived quality of care. Effects on quality of care mediate observed effects of the intervention on contraceptive use. Implications: Contraceptive interventions should focus on improving person-centered outcomes, such as quality of care, rather than contraceptive use targets. By focusing on improving person-centered care, in-terventions will improve contraceptive use among those who desire a method while meeting the holistic reproductive health needs of clients and couples.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Social norms related to fertility may be driving pregnancy desire, timing and contraceptive use, but measurement has lagged. We validated a 10-item injunctive Fertility Norms Scale (FNS) and examined its associations with family planning outcomes among 1021 women and 1020 men in India. FNS captured expectations around pronatalism, childbearing early in marriage and community pressure. We assessed reliability and construct validity through Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) respectively, examining associations with childbearing intention and contraceptive use. FNS demonstrated good reliability (α = 0.65-0.71) and differing sub-constructs by gender. High fertility norm among women was associated with greater likelihood of pregnancy intention [RRR = 2.35 (95% CI: 1.25,4.39); ARRR = 1.53 (95% CI: 0.70,3.30)], lower likelihood of delaying pregnancy [RRR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.50,0.96); ARRR = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.51,1.02)] and greater ambivalence on delaying pregnancy [RRR = 1.92 (95% CI: 1.18,3.14); ARRR = 1.99 (95% CI: 1.21,3.28)]. Women's higher FNS scores were also associated with higher sterilization [RRR = 2.17 (95% CI: 1.28,3.66); ARRR = 2.24 (95% CI: 1.32,3.83)], but the reverse was noted for men [RRR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.36,1.04); ARRR = 0.54 (95% CI: 0.32,0.94)]. FNS indicated better predictive value among women compared to men for key reproductive outcomes. This measure may be useful for social norms-focused evaluations in family planning and warrants cross-contextual study.

Background Pathways to low healthcare utilisation under the COVID-19 pandemic are not well understood. This study aims to understand women's concerns about the health system's priorities and their increased burden of domestic responsibilities during COVID-19 as predictors of delayed or non-receipt of needed care for themselves or their children.Methods We surveyed married women in rural Maharashtra, India (N = 1021) on their health and economic concerns between Feb 1 and March 26, 2021. This study period was when India emerged from the first wave of the pandemic, which had severely impacted the health systems, and before the second-even more devastating wave had started. We captured if women were concerned about access to non-COVID health services due to healthcare being directed solely to COVID-19) (exposure 1) and whether their domestic responsibilities increased during the pandemic (exposure 2). Our outcomes included women's reports on whether they delayed healthcare seeking (secondary outcome and mediator) and whether they received healthcare for themselves or their children when needed (primary outcome). We conducted adjusted regression models on our predictor variables with each outcome and assessed the mediation effects of delayed healthcare seeking for each of the exposure variables.Findings We found that women who were concerned that healthcare was directed solely towards COVID-19 were more likely not to receive healthcare when needed (Adjusted Risk Ratio [ARR] = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.14, 1.95). We also found that women whose domestic care burden increased under the pandemic were more likely to delay healthcare seeking (ARR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.05, 3.21). Delayed healthcare seeking mediated the associations between each of our exposure variables with our outcome variable, non-receipt of needed healthcare.Interpretation Our findings suggested that women's perceptions of healthcare systems and their domestic labour burdens affected healthcare seeking during the pandemic in India, even before the second wave of COVID-19 incapacitated the health system. Support for women and health systems is needed to ensure healthcare uptake during crises.Funding Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, USA (grant numbers: R01HD084453-01A1 and RO1HD61115); Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (grant #BT/IN/US/01/BD/2010); the EMERGE project (Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Grants: OPP1163682 and INV018007; PI Anita Raj), and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Grant number INV-002967.Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

INTRODUCTION: Gender synchronized family planning interventions are posited to be an important means of engaging men while supporting women’s reproductive agency and increasing modern contraceptive use, particularly in contexts where traditional gender norms prevail. The Counseling Husbands to Achieve Reproductive Health and Marital Equity (CHARM) intervention counsels men, women, and couples on gender equity and family planning. METHODS: This is an institutional review board (IRB)-approved cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of the CHARM2 intervention on contraceptive use, communication and agency, pregnancy, and quality of care among married couples across 20 clusters in rural Maharashtra, India. RESULTS: We enrolled 1,201 couples. Full-couple retention at 18 months was 90.5%. Contraceptive use was higher among intervention participants at 9 but not 18 months (adjusted ratio of odds ratio [AROR] 1.5, 95% CI 1.03-2.3 and AROR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.4). Communication (9-month AROR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.6; 18-month AROR 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-4.8) and agency (9-month AROR 5.1, 95% CI 1.2-22.4; 18-month AROR 8.1, 95% CI 1.4-48.2) improved at both times. Intervention participants had significantly higher mean Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning scale scores at both times (9-month intervention 3.2 vs control 2.3, P <.001; 18-month intervention 3.2 vs control 2.8, P <.001). There was no significant difference in pregnancy between groups over the 18-month period (AOR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.1) However, unintended pregnancy was marginally less likely among intervention participants (47% vs 19%) ( P =.07). CONCLUSION: Broad implementation of the CHARM2 intervention has the potential to improve contraceptive use, communication, agency, and quality of care and to possibly decrease unplanned pregnancies in rural India.

Abstract In India, traditional social practices around marriage, such as non-involvement of prospective brides in choice of partner and timing of marriage, child/early marriage, dowry and purdah, compromise women’s agency at the time of marriage and may also affect contraceptive practices in marriage. This paper examines the associations between traditional marital practices and contraceptive behaviours, including women’s control over contraceptive decision-making, couples’ communication about contraception, and ever use of contraceptives, among married women aged 18–29 years (N = 1,200) and their husbands in rural Maharashtra, India. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between these marginalising social practices and family planning behavioural outcomes, adjusting for demographic and parity confounders. Wives who were the primary decision-makers on who to marry had higher odds of ever having communicated with their husband on pregnancy prevention (AOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.16-2.68), and ever using modern contraceptives (AOR 2.19, 95% CI 1.52-3.16). Wives who were the primary decision-makers on when to marry also had higher odds of ever having used modern contraceptives (AOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.21-2.93). Women’s involvement in marital choice may facilitate couples’ engagement related to family planning, possibly via the establishment of better communication between partners.

Women's contraceptive decision-making control is crucial for reproductive autonomy, but research largely relies on the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) measure which asks who is involved with decision-making. In India, this typically assesses joint decision-making or male engagement. Newer measures emphasize female agency. We examined three measures of contraceptive decision-making, the DHS and two agency-focused measures, to assess their associations with marital contraceptive communication and use in rural Maharashtra, India. We analyzed follow-up survey data from women participating in the CHARM2 study (n = 1088), collected in June-December 2020. The survey included the DHS (measure 1), Reproductive Decision-Making Agency (measure 2), and Contraceptive Final Decision-Maker measures (measure 3). Only Measure 1 was significantly associated with contraceptive communication (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.75, 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 1.69-4.49) and use (AOR: 1.73, 95 percent CI: 1.14-2.63). However, each measure was associated with different types of contraceptive use: Measure 1 with condom (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR]: 1.99, 95 percent CI: 1.12-3.51) and intrauterine device (IUD) (aRRR: 4.76, 95 percent CI: 1.80-12.59), Measure 2 with IUD (aRRR: 1.64, 95 percent CI: 1.04-2.60), and Measure 3 with pill (aRRR: 2.00, 95 percent CI: 1.14-3.52). Among married women in Maharashtra, India, male engagement in decision-making may be a stronger predictor of contraceptive communication and use than women's agency, but agency may be predictive of types of contraceptives used.

Unmet need for family planning (FP) continues to be high in India, especially among young and newly married women. Mothers-in-law (MILs) often exert pressure on couples for fertility and control decision making and behaviors around fertility and FP, yet there is a paucity of literature to understand their perspectives. Ten focus group discussions (FGDs) were carried out with MILs of young married women (aged 18-29 years) participating in a couple-focused FP intervention as a part of a cluster-randomized intervention evaluation trial (the CHARM2 study) in rural Maharashtra, India. FGDs included questions on their roles, attitudes, and decision making around fertility and FP. Audio-recorded data were translated/transcribed into English and analyzed for key themes using a deductive coding method. MILs reported having social norms of early fertility and son preference. They understood that family size norms are lower among daughters-in-law and that spacing can be beneficial but were not supportive of short-term contraceptives, especially before the first child. They preferred female sterilization, opposed abortion, had apprehensions around side effects from contraceptive use, and had misconceptions about the intrauterine device, with particular concerns around its coercive insertion. MILs mostly believed that decision making should be done jointly by a husband and wife, but that as elders, they should be consulted and involved in the decision-making process. These findings highlight the need for engagement of MILs for FP promotion in rural India and the potential utility of social norms interventions.

Several countries, including India, imposed mandatory social distancing, quarantine, and lockdowns to stop the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Although these measures were effective in curbing the spread of the virus, prolonged social distancing, quarantine, and the resultant economic disruption led to an increase in financial stress and mental health concerns. Prior studies established a link between the first lockdown and an increase in mental health issues. However, few studies investigated the association between post-lockdown financial hardship, job loss, and mental health. In this study, we examined the association between COVID-19-related financial hardship, job loss, and mental health symptoms approximately nine months after the end of the first nationwide lockdown in India. Job loss was associated with higher reporting of mental health symptoms among men (aIRR = 1.16) while financial hardship was associated with poor mental health symptoms among women (aIRR = 1.29). Conversely, social support and government aid were associated with better mental health symptoms among women. Our findings highlight the need for financial assistance and job creation programs to aid families in the recovery process. There is also an urgent need for improving the availability and affordability of mental health services in rural areas.