How do new ideas come about? The central hypothesis presented here states that insights might happen during mental navigation and correspond to rapid plasticity at the cellular level. We highlight the differences between neocortical and hippocampal mechanisms of insight. We argue that the suddenness of insight can be related to the sudden emergence of place fields in the hippocampus. According to our hypothesis, insights are supported by a state of mind-wandering that can be tied to the process of combining knowledge pieces during sharp-wave ripples (SWRs). Our framework connects the dots between research on creativity, mental navigation, and specific synaptic plasticity mechanisms in the hippocampus.

Theories of attention and learning have hypothesized a central role for high-frequency bursting in cognitive functions, but experimental reports of burst-mediated representations \emph{in vivo} have been limited. Here we used a novel demultiplexing approach by considering a conjunctive burst code. We studied this code \emph{in vivo} while animals learned to report direct electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex and found two acquired yet independent representations. One code, the event rate, showed a sparse and succint stiumulus representation and a small modulation upon detection errors. The other code, the burst fraction, correlated more globally with stimulation and more promptly responded to detection errors. Potent and fast modulations of the burst fraction were seen even in cells that were considered unresponsive based on the firing rate. During the later stages of training, this modulation in bursting happened earlier, gradually aligning temporally with the representation in event rate. The alignment of bursting and event rate modulation sharpened the firing rate response, and was strongly associated with behavioral accuracy. Thus a fine-grained separation of spike timing patterns reveals two signals that accompany stimulus representations: an error signal that can be essential to guide learning and a sharpening signal that could implement attention mechanisms.

Hippocampal output influences memory formation in the neocortex, but this process is poorly understood because the precise anatomical location and the underlying cellular mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we show that perirhinal input, predominantly to sensory cortical layer 1 (L1), controls hippocampal-dependent associative learning in rodents. This process was marked by the emergence of distinct firing responses in defined subpopulations of layer 5 (L5) pyramidal neurons whose tuft dendrites receive perirhinal inputs in L1. Learning correlated with burst firing and the enhancement of dendritic excitability, and it was suppressed by disruption of dendritic activity. Furthermore, bursts, but not regular spike trains, were sufficient to retrieve learned behavior. We conclude that hippocampal information arriving at L5 tuft dendrites in neocortical L1 mediates memory formation in the neocortex.

Signals sent back to the neocortex from the hippocampus control the long-term storage of memories in the neocortex[1][1],[2][2], but the cellular mechanisms underlying this process remain elusive. Here, we show that learning is controlled by specific medial-temporal input to neocortical layer 1. To show this we used direct cortical microstimulation detection task that allowed the precise region of learning to be examined and manipulated. Chemogenetically suppressing the last stage of the medial temporal loop, i.e. perirhinal cortex input to neocortical layer 1, profoundly disrupted early memory formation but had no effect on behavior in trained animals. The learning involved the emergence of a small population of layer 5 pyramidal neurons (~10%) with significantly increased firing involving high-frequency bursts of action potentials that were also blocked by suppression of perirhinal input. Moreover, we found that dendritic excitability was correspondingly enhanced in a similarly-sized population of pyramidal neurons and suppression of dendritic activity via optogenetic activation of dendrite-targeting inhibitory neurons also suppressed learning. Finally, single-cell stimulation of cortical layer 5 pyramidal neurons showed that burst but not regular firing retrieved previously learned behavior. We conclude that the medial temporal input to the neocortex controls learning through a process in L1 that elevates dendritic calcium and promotes burst firing. [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #ref-2