Multidimensional high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is a key method in shotgun proteomics approaches for analyzing highly complex protein mixtures by complementary chromatographic separation principles. Here, we describe an integrated 3D-nano-HPLC/nano-electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry system that allows an enzymatic digestion of proteins followed by an enrichment and subsequent separation of the created peptide mixtures. The online 3D-nano-HPLC system is composed of a monolithic trypsin reactor in the first dimension, a monolithic affinity column with immobilized monomeric avidin in the second dimension, and a reversed phase C18 HPLC-Chip in the third dimension that is coupled to a nano-ESI-Q-TOF mass spectrometer. The 3D-LC/MS setup is exemplified for the identification of biotinylated proteins from a simple protein mixture. Additionally, we describe an online 2D-nano-HPLC/nano-ESI-LTQ-Orbitrap-MS/MS setup for the enrichment, separation, and identification of cross-linked, biotinylated species from chemical cross-linking of cytochrome c and a calmodulin/peptide complex using a novel trifunctional cross-linker with two amine-reactive groups and a biotin label.
Liquid chromatography is often the method of choice for the analysis of proteins in their native state. Nevertheless compared to two-dimensional electrophoresis, the resolution of common chromatographic techniques is low. Liquid chromatography in the displacement mode has previously been shown to offer higher resolution and to elute proteins in the high concentrations. In this study we compared to what extend displacement mode was a suitable alternative to gradient mode for the separation of a complex protein mixture using anion-exchange displacement chromatography and if it is therefore helpful for proteomic investigations. Hence we analyzed the qualitative protein composition of each fraction by tryptic digestion of the proteins, analysis of the tryptic peptides by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry followed by data base analysis and by measuring the elution profiles of 22 selected proteins with selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. In the fractions of displacement mode a significantly higher number of identified proteins (51 versus 16) was yielded in comparison to gradient mode. The resolution of displacement chromatography was slightly lower than of gradient chromatography for many but not for all proteins. The selectivities of displacement mode and gradient mode are very different. In conclusion displacement chromatography is a well suited alternative for top-down proteomic approaches which start with separating intact proteins first prior to mass spectrometric analysis of intact or digested proteins. The significant orthogonality of both modes may be used in the future for combining them in multidimensional fractionation procedures.