Potatoes of a number of varieties of contrasting levels of resistance were planted in pure or mixed stands in lour experiments over 3 years. Three experiments compared the late blight severity and progress in mixtures with that in pure stands. Disease on susceptible or moderately resistant varieties typical of those in commercial use was similar in mixtures and pure stands. In 2 of 3 years, there were slight reductions oil cv. Same, which is moderately susceptible, in mixture with cv. Cara, which is moderately resistant. Cara was unaffected by this mixture. Mixtures of an immune or near-immune partner with Cara or Same substantially reduced disease on the latter. The effect of the size of plots of individual varieties or mixtures on blight severity was compared in two experiments. Larger plots had a greater area under the disease progress curve, but the average rate of disease progress was greater in smaller plots; this may be because most disease progress took place later, under more favourable conditions, in the smaller plots. in one experiment, two planting densities were used. Density had no effect on disease and did not interact with mixture effects. The overall conclusion is that, while mixtures of potato varieties may be desirable for other reasons, they do not offer any improvement on the average of the disease resistance of the components.

Plants bred for monoculture require inputs for high fertility, and to control weeds, pests and diseases. Plants that are bred for such monospecific communities are likely to be incompatible with the deployment of biodiversity to improve resource use and underpin ecosystem services. Two different approaches to breeding for agricultural diversity are described: (1) the use of composite cross populations and (2) breeding for improved performance in crop mixtures.