The Runx1/core binding factor-beta (CBFbeta) transcriptional complex is required for the establishment of hematopoiesis during development. Despite its critical role during development, a detailed analysis of Runx1 expression within specific lineages and developmental stages of the adult hematopoietic system is lacking. To address this, we have developed a Runx1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) knock-in mouse. We show that Runx1 is expressed in several hematopoietic lineages, including myeloid, B-lymphoid, and T-lymphoid cells. By contrast, Runx1 is weakly expressed in early erythroid cells, and its expression is rapidly extinguished during later stages of erythropoiesis. Runx1 expression is induced during early B-cell development and is expressed at a uniform level during all subsequent stages of B-cell development. Within the thymus, Runx1 is expressed at the highest level in CD4-CD8- double-negative thymocytes. In peripheral T cells, Runx1 is differentially expressed, with CD4+ T cells expressing 2- to 3-fold higher levels of Runx1 than CD8+ cells. Taken together, these findings indicate that although widely expressed in the hematopoietic system, the expression of Runx1 is regulated in a cell type- and maturation stage-specific manner. In addition, the Runx1-IRES-GFP knock-in mouse strain should prove valuable for investigation of Runx1 function in adult hematopoiesis.

The AML1/CBFbeta transcription factor complex, a frequent target of chromosomal translocations in leukemia, is essential for the generation of definitive hematopoietic stem cells. Paradoxically, expression of the acute myeloid leukemia-associated AML1-ETO fusion protein in mice results not in leukemia, but in embryonic lethality due to an absence of normal hematopoiesis. To bypass the embryonic lethality, we generated a mouse strain with a conditional AML1-ETO knockin allele that contains a loxP bracketed transcriptional stop cassette 5' to the AML1-ETO fusion site. Activation of this allele in vivo by Cre-mediated recombination resulted in an enhanced replating efficiency of myeloid progenitors, but it did not block their differentiation, nor was it sufficient to induce leukemia. However, induction of cooperating mutations resulted in the development of an acute myeloid disease that mimicked many of the features of human AML1-ETO-expressing leukemia.

t(8;21) and t(16;21) create two fusion proteins, AML-1-ETO and AML-1-MTG16, respectively, which fuse the AML-1 DNA binding domain to putative transcriptional corepressors, ETO and MTG16. Here, we show that distinct domains of ETO contact the mSin3A and N-CoR corepressors and define two binding sites within ETO for each of these corepressors. In addition, of eight histone deacetylases (HDACs) tested, only the class I HDACs HDAC-1, HDAC-2, and HDAC-3 bind ETO. However, these HDACs bind ETO through different domains. We also show that the murine homologue of MTG16, ETO-2, is also a transcriptional corepressor that works through a similar but distinct mechanism. Like ETO, ETO-2 interacts with N-CoR, but ETO-2 fails to bind mSin3A. Furthermore, ETO-2 binds HDAC-1, HDAC-2, and HDAC-3 but also interacts with HDAC-6 and HDAC-8. In addition, we show that expression of AML-1-ETO causes disruption of the cell cycle in the G(1) phase. Disruption of the cell cycle required the ability of AML-1-ETO to repress transcription because a mutant of AML-1-ETO, Delta469, which removes the majority of the corepressor binding sites, had no phenotype. Moreover, treatment of AML-1-ETO-expressing cells with trichostatin A, an HDAC inhibitor, restored cell cycle control. Thus, AML-1-ETO makes distinct contacts with multiple HDACs and an HDAC inhibitor biologically inactivates this fusion protein.

The identification of clonal chromosomal translocations in human leukemias provided one of the first insights into the underlying pathogenesis of this clinically heterogeneous disease. Over the last decade a large number of these chromosomal rearrangements have been molecularly cloned and the involved genes identified. A surprising finding that has emerged from this work is that many of these chromosomal alterations target the genes encoding the AML1/CBFbeta transcription factor complex, a critical regulator of normal hematopoiesis. In this review, we summarize our present understanding of the mechanisms through which alterations of AML1/CBFbeta contribute to leukemogenesis.

The AML-1-encoded transcription factor, AML-1B, regulates numerous hematopoietic-specific genes. Inappropriate expression of AML-1-family proteins is oncogenic in cell culture systems and in mice. To understand the oncogenic functions of AML-1, we established cell lines expressing AML-1B to examine the role of AML-1 in the cell cycle. DNA content analysis and bromodeoxyuridine pulse-chase studies indicated that entry into the S phase of the cell cycle was accelerated by up to 4 h in AML-1B-expressing 32D.3 myeloid progenitor cells as compared with control cells or cells expressing E2F-1. However, AML-1B was not able to induce continued cell cycle progression in the absence of growth factors. The DNA binding and transactivation domains of AML-1B were required for altering the cell cycle. Thus, AML-1B is the first transcription factor that affects the timing of the mammalian cell cycle.

We have identified a family with an autosomal dominant platelet disorder with a predisposition for developing myeloid malignancies and have previously demonstrated linkage of this trait to chromosome 21q22.1-22.2. The nearest flanking markers, D21S1265 and D21S167, define the familial platelet disorder (FPD) critical region at a genetic distance of approximately 15.2 centimorgans and physical distance of approximately 6 megabases. This locus is of particular interest as it has previously been implicated in the pathogenesis of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) through the (8;21), (3;21) and (12;21) chromosomal translocations. In each of these cases, the CBFA2 gene is rearranged. As well, there is a potential association of this locus with the hematologic abnormalities seen in Down syndrome (trisomy 21). To identify the mutant gene in this pedigree, a positional cloning strategy has been undertaken. Several candidate genes map to this locus including: CBFA2, IFNAR1, IFNAR2, CRFB4, GART, SON, KCNE1, SCL5A3 and ATP50. CBFA2, as well as IFNAR1 and CRFB4, were the focus of initial mutational analysis efforts. In this report, we exclude CBFA2 as a candidate by Northern and Southern blotting, RNase protection, single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP), direct sequencing and gel-shift analysis. Exons of the IFNAR1 and CRFB4 genes were also analyzed by SSCP and demonstrated no evidence of mutation. SSCP analysis identified a new polymorphism in the second exon of the CRFB4 gene and confirmed a previously described polymorphism in the fourth exon of IFNAR1. Efforts are currently underway to delimit further the FPD critical region and to analyze the other known candidate genes, as well as novel candidate genes, which map to this locus.

AML-1B is a hematopoietic transcription factor that is functionally inactivated by multiple chromosomal translocations in human acute myeloblastic and B-cell lymphocytic leukemias. The t(8;21)(q22;q22) translocation replaces the C terminus, including the transactivation domain of AML-1B, with ETO, a nuclear protein of unknown function. We previously showed that AML-1-ETO is a dominant inhibitor of AML-1B-dependent transcriptional activation. Here we demonstrate that AML-1-ETO also inhibits C/EBP-alpha-dependent activation of the myeloid cell-specific, rat defensin NP-3 promoter. AML-1B bound the core enhancer motifs present in the NP-3 promoter and activated transcription approximately sixfold. Similarly, C/EBP-alpha bound NP-3 promoter sequences and activated transcription approximately sixfold. Coexpression of C/EBP-alpha with AML-1B or its family members, AML-2 and murine AML-3, synergistically activated the NP-3 promoter up to 60-fold. The t(8;21) product, AML-1-ETO, repressed AML-1B-dependent activation of NP-3 and completely inhibited C/EBP-alpha-dependent activity as well as the synergistic activation. In contrast, the inv(16) product, which indirectly targets AML family members by fusing their heterodimeric DNA binding partner, CBF-beta, to the myosin heavy chain, inhibited AML-1B but not C/EBP-alpha activation or the synergistic activation. AML-1-ETO and C/EBP-alpha were coimmunoprecipitated and thus physically interact in vivo. Deletion mutants demonstrated that the C terminus of ETO was required for AML-1-ETO-mediated repression of the synergistic activation but not for association with C/EBP-alpha. Finally, overexpression of AML-1-ETO in myeloid progenitor cells prevented granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced differentiation. Thus, AML-1-ETO may contribute to leukemogenesis by specifically inhibiting C/EBP-alpha- and AML-1B-dependent activation of myeloid promoters and blocking differentiation.

AML-1B is targeted directly and indirectly in multiple chromosomal translocations in myeloid and B-cells. The AML-1/ETO and TEL/AML-1 fusion proteins, created by the t(8;21) and t(12;21) respectively, disrupt AML-1B-dependent transcription. Recently, two human members of the runt homology domain family of transcription factors have been identified, AML-2 and AML-3, which also regulate transcription through enhancer core motifs. If multiple factors regulate transcription through the same site, a dominant interfering protein may be required to promote leukemogenesis, rather than the inactivation of both AML1 alleles. To determine which AML family proteins are active in hematopoietic cells, we developed antisera specific to each family member for use in gel mobility shift assays. We have found that AML-1B is the major DNA binding activity in T-cell lines, while both AML-1B and AML-2 are expressed in myeloid and B-cell lines. AML-1B represents most of the active protein in the mouse thymus, whereas AML-1 and AML-2 are equally expressed in the mouse spleen. AML-3 is expressed at very low levels in a single myeloid cell line, 32D.3, and is the only core binding activity present in Buffalo rat liver cells. We demonstrate that AML-2-dependent transactivation mediated by enhancer core motifs is inhibited by the AML-1/ETO and TEL/AML-1 fusion proteins. This indicates that the t(8;21) and t(12;21) fusion proteins inhibit transcriptional activation by the AML-1 transcription factor family, and in so doing contributes to leukemogenesis.

The t(12;21) translocation is present in up to 30% of childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic and fuses a potential dimerization motif from the ets-related factor TEL to the N terminus of AML1. The t(12;21) translocation encodes a 93-kDa fusion protein that localizes to a high-salt- and detergent-resistant nuclear compartment. This protein binds the enhancer core motif, TGTGGT, and interacts with the AML-1-binding protein, core-binding factor beta. Although TEL/AML-1B retains the C-terminal domain of AML-1B that is required for transactivation of the T-cell receptor beta enhancer, it fails to activate transcription but rather inhibits the basal activity of this enhancer. TEL/AML-1B efficiently interferes with AML-1B dependent transactivation of the T-cell receptor beta enhancer, and coexpression of wild-type TEL does not reverse this inhibition. The N-terminal TEL helix-loop-helix domain is essential for TEL/AML-1B-mediated repression. Thus, the t(12;21) fusion protein dominantly interferes with AML-1B-dependent transcription, suggesting that the inhibition of expression of AML-1 genes is critical for B-cell leukemogenesis.

Certain chromosomal translocations are characteristically associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), suggesting that alteration of specific genes at the translocation breakpoints contribute to the genesis or maintenance of leukemia. The t(8;21) is the second most frequent chromosomal abnormality associated with AML, occurring in 12–15% of cases (Downing et al. 1993). The t(8;21) breakpoint was cloned and the disrupted gene on chromosome 21 was termed AML1 (Miyoshi et al. 1991). Cytogenetic evidence from t(8;21)-containing leukemia cells with complex translocations indicates that the der(8) chromosome is conserved in each case; tightly linking this chromosomal aberration to the pathogenesis of AML (Rowley 1982). In addition, AML1 is interrupted in the less commonly observed (3;21) and (12;21) translocations found in chronic myeloid leukemia and acute lymphocytic leukemia, respectively (Nucifora et al. 1993; Golub et al. 1995), suggesting that AML-l may be a principal regulatory protein.

The AML-1/ETO fusion protein is created by the (8;21) translocation, the second most frequent chromosomal abnormality associated with acute myeloid leukemia. In the fusion protein the AML-1 runt homology domain, which is responsible for DNA binding and CBF beta interaction, is linked to ETO, a gene of unknown function. The primary sequences of the runt homology domain indicates no known DNA binding motifs, but is predicted to contain six beta-strands, two alpha-helices and a nucleotide binding motif. Mutagenesis of AML-1/ETO was performed to delimit the functional domains of the chimeric protein. Most mutations in the runt homology domain that resulted in reduced CBF beta binding also inhibited DNA binding, indicating that the DNA and CBF beta binding sequences are tightly linked. However, these activities were separated by a point mutation of residue 144, within the putative ATP binding motif, which nearly eliminated DNA binding, but did not affect CBF beta binding. Random mutagenesis identified the hydrophobic face of the amphipathic fifth beta-strand, adjacent to the putative ATP binding motif, as critical for both DNA and CBF beta binding. C-terminal deletion mutants of AML-1/ETO indicated that ETO sequences are essential for interference with AML-1B-mediated transcriptional activation, and that residue 540 defines the C-terminal boundary of a potential repression domain. Thus, these mutational analyses define the regions of AML-1/ETO which regulate its function and that may be important in promoting leukemia.

The AML-1/CBF beta transcription factor complex is targeted by both the t(8;21) and the inv(16) chromosomal alterations, which are frequently observed in acute myelogenous leukemia. AML-1 is a site-specific DNA-binding protein that recognizes the enhancer core motif TGTGGT. The t(8;21) translocation fuses the first 177 amino acids of AML-1 to MTG8 (also known as ETO), generating a chimeric protein that retains the DNA-binding domain of AML-1. Analysis of endogenous AML-1 DNA-binding complexes suggested the presence of at least two AML-1 isoforms. Accordingly, we screened a human B-cell cDNA library and isolated a larger, potentially alternatively spliced, form of AML1, termed AML1B. AML-1B is a protein of 53 kDa that binds to a consensus AML-1-binding site and complexes with CBF beta. Subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrated that both AML-1 and AML-1/ETO are efficiently extracted from the nucleus under ionic conditions but that AML-1B is localized to a salt-resistant nuclear compartment. Analysis of the transcriptional activities of AML-1, AML-1B, and AML-1/ETO demonstrated that only AML-1B activates transcription from the T-cell receptor beta enhancer. Mixing experiments indicated that AML-1/ETO can efficiently block AML-1B-dependent transcriptional activation, suggesting that the t(8;21) translocation creates a dominant interfering protein.