Lenacapavir (LEN) is a novel long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (ART) drug for heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with HIV (PWH). However, real-world data on its use and outcomes are limited. We describe early real-world experience with LEN among HTE PWH across five clinics in Chicago, IL and Pittsburgh, PA. We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study of HTE PWH who started LEN from November 13, 2020, through April 4, 2025. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including previous ART regimens, HIV drug resistance mutations, HIV viral loads (VL), and self-reported adherence to optimized background regimen (OBR) after starting LEN. Forty-six individuals received at least one dose of LEN; most were cisgender men (61%), Black (72%), and had stable housing (87%) (Table 1). At initiation, their mean age was 52 years and on average had been living with HIV for 25 years. Extensive drug resistance was common: 34 had resistance to ≥2 NRTIs, 34 to ≥2 NNRTIs, 13 to ≥2 PIs, and 21 to ≥2 INSTIs; four showed resistance across all four drug classes. Among 23 individuals with viremia at LEN initiation (VL ≥200 c/mL), 91% achieved viral suppression during the observed period, with 70% doing so within the first 3 months (Figures 1 and 2). Two individuals remained unsuppressed after LEN due to self-reported OBR non-adherence. All individuals without viremia at initiation maintained viral suppression throughout follow-up. Before LEN, 30% had a genotypic susceptibility score indicating their regimen had fewer than two fully active agents; after initiation, all had regimens with at least two active agents (Table 2). Nearly all individuals (91%) remained on LEN through the observation period; median time on LEN was 373 days (IQR 123–576). Discontinuations (n=4) were due to OBR non-adherence, injection site reaction, hospice entry, or loss to follow-up. In this real-world cohort, LEN-based regimens resulted in high rates of virologic suppression among HTE PWH. Our findings support LEN as a promising salvage therapy when paired with an active OBR. As LEN use expands, targeted implementation strategies will be critical to address adherence challenges, manage side effects, and optimize sustained treatment success for HTE populations. Aniruddha Hazra, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences, Inc: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences, Inc: Grant/Research Support|GSK/ViiV Healthcare: Advisor/Consultant

Background:Lenacapavir (LEN), a first-in-class long-acting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid inhibitor, has demonstrated potent antiviral activity in heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with HIV (PWH) in clinical trials, but real-world data remain limited. We describe outcomes from 6 US HIV clinics using LEN-based regimens in a largely HTE cohort of PWH to assess virologic response, regimen potency, and tolerability. Methods:We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults with HIV who initiated LEN between November 2020 and June 2025 at 6 clinics in Chicago, Illinois and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Demographic, clinical, and genotypic data were abstracted from electronic health records. Virologic suppression was defined as HIV viral load <200 copies/mL. Stanford genotypic susceptibility scores (S-GSS) were calculated to assess regimen potency. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared antiretroviral therapy pill burden and regimen potency before and after LEN initiation. Results:Seventy PWH initiated LEN. Median follow-up was 12 months. At baseline, 18 (26%) PWH with available genotypes had multidrug-resistant HIV, and 54% had unsuppressed virus. Among 38 PWH with unsuppressed virus, 34 (89%) achieved viral suppression, and none of the PWH with suppressed HIV experienced rebound. LEN significantly improved regimen potency (P < .00005) and reduced daily pill burden from 2 tablets to 1 tablet (P < .00005). Injection site reactions occurred in 30% and led to discontinuation in 1 person. Conclusions:In this real-world cohort, LEN-based regimens achieved high rates of virologic suppression, improved regimen activity, and reduced pill burden with good tolerability. LEN represents a promising salvage therapy for PWH, warranting equitable and implementation-focused integration into HIV care.

Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment (LAI ART) has the potential to transform HIV care and reduce HIV-related health inequities in achieving and maintaining viral suppression. However, without a plan for equitable roll-out of LAI ART, new pharmacological innovations in HIV treatment and prevention risk further deepening health disparities. This study delineates a process for providing universal LAI ART education to people with HIV (PWH) at an urban outpatient infectious disease clinic and documents the outcomes of these efforts. We compared the number and proportion of patients with HIV educated about injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine (iCAB/RPV) and, among those educated, the number and proportion of patients interested in learning more about iCAB/RPV under a selective education model compared to a universal education model, disaggregated by race/ethnicity, sex, and age. We used a Chi-sq test to estimate p-values for the difference in proportions. The universal compared to selective education approach resulted in a larger proportion of clients educated and a greater proportion of people educated reporting interest in LAI ART. Slight differences observed between those never versus ever educated in the selective education were absent after the adoption of a universal education approach. Reasons for disinterest -- including fear of injections, not interested in more frequent clinic visits, and content with oral ART regimen -- did not differ across educational approaches. Our programmatic data offers preliminary evidence that a universal education approach can support and enhance equitable roll-out of LAI ART. Most patients with HIV are interested in learning more about LAI ART.

Hepatitis D (HDV) is a severe infection with well-recognised clinical ramifications that remains relatively neglected and underdiagnosed; consequently, the epidemiology of HDV is poorly characterised, both in the United States and globally. In 2022, a pilot project involving eight healthcare institutions was undertaken to ascertain the prevalence of HDV in healthcare institutions with an HBV seropositivity of at least 1%, describe the characteristics of patients testing positive for HDV, and evaluate diagnostic and laboratory processes of HDV screening. From August 2022 to April 2024, a total of 106,693 patients were tested for HBsAg, of whom 65,341 (61.2%) were female and 40,863 (38.3%) were male, with a mean age of 47 years. The overall HBsAg positivity rate was 1.04% (n = 1112). Among the HBsAg+ samples, 645 (58.0%) underwent HDV Ab testing. The HDV Ab positivity rate was 0.81% (n = 9), with 2 cases of HDV RNA positivity (0.18%). The incomplete testing reflects several challenges associated with screening for both HBV and HDV. Further research is necessary to better understand the epidemiology and burden of HDV in the United States and considerations for implementation.

BACKGROUND:The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been increasing in the United States, and this trend has continued alongside expanding/changing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention strategies, moving from reliance solely on behavioral interventions like condoms to biomedical methods like oral and injectable antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). In 2019, the Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative was released to prioritize resource allocation to the 50 jurisdictions in the United States with the highest HIV incidence, providing an opportunity to monitor STI incidence in a national group of discrete, geographic units and identify trends and differences across jurisdictions. OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN:Using existing data from the US CDC and Census Bureau, a retrospective analysis was conducted to examine the incidence of STIs in 49 of the 50 EHE priority counties between 2005 and 2019. This timeframe was divided into 2 periods representing a before and after entry into the biomedical era of HIV prevention: P1 (2005-2011) and P2 (2012-2019). KEY RESULTS:A total of 49 EHE counties were included in this analysis, representing 27.4% of the total US population. Entry into the biomedical HIV prevention era was associated with an increase in STI incidence in 28 EHE counties and a decrease in 14 EHE counties. The greatest percent increase in total STI incidence was in the District of Columbia (+12.1%; incidence rate ratio = 1.121 [1.115, 1.127]; P < 0.001) and the greatest percent decrease was identified in Orleans Parish, LA (-8.7%; incidence rate ratio = 0.913 [0.908, 0.919]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Rising STI rates in the biomedical era of HIV prevention represent missed opportunities for comprehensive sexual and preventive healthcare. County-level data provide actionable insight for reducing STI incidence. The EHE counties that have experienced decreases in STI incidence while being in the biomedical era may provide models of best practice, which may be scaled in other jurisdictions.

BACKGROUND:The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruptions in access to routine HIV screening. SETTING:We assess HIV and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing across 6 emergency departments (EDs) in Cook County, Illinois. METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed the number of SARS-CoV-2 tests, HIV screens, and the proportion of concurrent tests (encounters with both SARS-CoV-2 and HIV testing), correlating with diagnoses of new and acute HIV infection. RESULTS:Five sites reported data from March 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, and 1 site from September 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021. A total of 1,13,645 SARS-CoV-2 and 36,094 HIV tests were performed; 17,469 of these were concurrent tests. There were 102 new HIV diagnoses, including 25 acute infections. Concurrent testing proportions ranged from 6.7% to 37% across sites (P < 0.001). HIV testing volume correlated with the number of new diagnoses (r = 0.66, P < 0.01). HIV testing with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing was strongly correlated with diagnosis of acute infections (r = 0.87, P < 0.001); this was not statistically significant when controlling for HIV testing volumes (r = 0.59, P = 0.056). Acute patients were more likely to undergo concurrent testing (21/25) versus other new diagnoses (29/77; odds ratio = 8.69, 95% CI: 2.7 to 27.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Incorporating HIV screening into SARS-CoV-2 testing in the ED can help maintain HIV screening volumes. Although all patients presenting to the ED should be offered opt-out HIV screening, testing individuals with symptoms of COVID-19 or other viral illness affords the opportunity to diagnose symptomatic acute and early HIV infection, rapidly link to care, and initiate treatment.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created increased need for telehealth appointments. To assess differences in appointment adherence for telehealth compared to in-person HIV medical care visits, we conducted a cross-sectional study of patients receiving HIV care in a safety-net hospital-based outpatient infectious disease clinic in a large urban area (Chicago, IL). The sample (N = 347) was predominantly Black (n = 251) and male (62.5%, n = 217); with a mean age of 44.2 years. Appointment attendance was higher for telehealth (78.9%) compared to in-person (61.9%) appointments. Compared to patients without drug use, those with drug use had 19.4 percentage point lower in-person appointment attendance. Compared to those with stable housing, those in unstable housing arrangements had 15.0 percentage point lower in-person appointment attendance. Telehealth as a modality will likely have some staying power as it offers patients newfound flexibility, but barriers to telehealth need to be assessed and addressed.

HIV incidence remains high in the U.S. as do disparities in new HIV diagnosis between White and Black populations and access to preventive therapies like pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The federal Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative was developed to prioritize resources to 50 jurisdictions with high HIV incidence. We conducted secondary analyses of data (2013–2019) from the CDC, Census Bureau, and AIDSVu to evaluate the correlation between PrEP use, HIV incidence, and HIV incidence disparities. We compared the PrEP-to-need ratio (PnR) with the ratio of Black and White HIV incidence rates in 46 EHE counties. Subsequent analyses were performed for the seven states that contained multiple EHE counties. These 46 counties represented 25.9% of the U.S. population in 2019. HIV incidence ranged from 10.5 in Sacramento County, CA, to 59.6 in Fulton County, GA (per 100,000). HIV incidence disparity ranged from 1.5 in Orleans Parish, LA, to 12.1 in Montgomery County, MD. PnR ranged from 26.8 in New York County, NY, to 1.46 in Shelby County, TN. Change in HIV incidence disparities and percent change in PnR were not significantly correlated (ρ = 0.06, p = 0.69). Change in overall HIV incidence was significantly correlated with increase in PnR (ρ = −0.42, p = 0.004). PrEP has the potential to significantly decrease HIV incidence; however, this benefit has not been conferred equally. Within EHE priority counties, we found significant HIV incidence disparities between White and Black populations. PrEP has decreased overall HIV incidence, but does not appear to have decreased HIV incidence disparity.

BACKGROUND:Despite decreases in overall HIV mortality in the U.S., large racial inequities persist. Most previous analyses of HIV mortality and mortality inequities have utilized national- or state-level data.METHODS:Using vital statistics mortality data and American Community Survey population estimates, we calculated HIV mortality rates and Black:White HIV mortality rate ratios (RR) for the 30 most populous U.S. cities at two time points, 2010-2014 (T1) and 2015-2019 (T2).RESULTS:Almost all cities (28) had HIV mortality rates higher than the national rate at both time points. At T2, HIV mortality rates ranged from 0.8 per 100,000 (San Jose, CA) to 15.2 per 100,000 (Baltimore, MD). Across cities, Black people were approximately 2-8 times more likely to die from HIV compared to White people at both time points. Over the decade, these racial disparities decreased at the national level (T1: RR = 11.0, T2: RR = 9.8), and in one city (Charlotte, NC).DISCUSSION:We identified large geographic and racial inequities in HIV mortality in U.S. urban areas. These city-specific data may motivate change in cities and can help guide city leaders and other health advocates as they implement, test, and support policies and programming to decrease HIV mortality.

Millions of Americans have been infected with COVID-19 and communities of color have been disproportionately burdened. We investigated the relationship between demographic characteristics and COVID-19 positivity, and comorbidities and severe COVID-19 illness (use of mechanical ventilation and length of stay) within a racial/ethnic minority population. Patients tested for COVID-19 between March 2020 and January 2021 (N = 14171) were 49.9% (n = 7072) female; 50.1% (n = 7104) non-Hispanic Black; 33.2% (n = 4698) Hispanic; and 23.6% (n = 3348) aged 65+. Overall COVID-19 positivity was 16.1% (n = 2286). Compared to females, males were 1.1 times more likely to test positive (p = 0.014). Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic persons were 1.4 (p = 0.003) and 2.4 (p<0.001) times more likely, respectively, to test positive. Compared to persons ages 18–24, the odds of testing positive were statistically significantly higher for every age group except 25–34, and those aged 65+ were 2.8 times more likely to test positive (p<0.001). Adjusted for race, sex, and age, COVID-positive patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were 1.9 times more likely to require a ventilator compared to those without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.001). Length of stay was not statistically significantly associated with any of the comorbidity variables. Our findings emphasize the importance of documenting COVID-19 disparities in marginalized populations.

Objective A recommendation in March 2020 to expand hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening to all adults in the United States will likely increase the need for HCV treatment programs and guidance on how to provide this service for diverse populations. We evaluated a pharmacist-led HCV treatment program within a routine screening program in an urban safety-net health system in Chicago, Illinois. Methods We collected data on all patient treatment applications submitted from January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2019, and assessed outcomes of and patient retention in the treatment cascade. Results During the study period, 203 HCV treatment applications were submitted for 187 patients (>1 application could be submitted per patient): 49% (n = 91) were aged 55-64, 62% (n = 116) were male, 67% (n = 125) were Black, and 15% (n = 28) were Hispanic. Of the 203 HCV treatment applications, 87% (n = 176) of patients were approved for treatment, 91% (n = 161) of whom completed treatment. Of the 161 patients who completed treatment, 81% (n = 131) attended their sustained virologic response (SVR) follow-up visit, 98% (n = 129) of whom reached SVR. The largest drop in the treatment cascade was the 19% decline from receipt of treatment to SVR follow-up visit. Conclusion The pharmacist-led model for HCV treatment was effective in navigating patients through the treatment cascade and achieving SVR. Widespread implementation of pharmacist-led HCV treatment models may help to hasten progress toward 2030 HCV elimination goals.

Objective Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major threat to public health in the United States. We describe and evaluate an HCV screening and linkage-to-care program, including emergency department, inpatient, and outpatient settings, in an urban safety-net health system in Chicago. Methods Sinai Health System implemented a universal HCV screening program in September 2016 that offered patient navigation services (ie, linkage to care) to patients with a positive result for HCV on an RNA test. We collected data from February 1, 2017, through January 31, 2019, on patient demographic characteristics, risk factors, and various outcomes (eg, number of patients screened, test results, proportions of new diagnoses, number of patients eligible for patient navigation services, and proportion of patients who attended their first medical appointment). We also examined outcomes by patients’ knowledge of infection. Results Of 21 018 people screened for HCV, 6% (1318/21 018) had positive test results for HCV antibody, 68% (878/1293) of whom had positive HCV RNA test results. Of these 878 patients, 68% were born during 1945-1965, 68% were male, 65% were Black, 19% were Latino, 55% were newly diagnosed, and 64% were eligible for patient navigation services. Risk factors included past or current drug use (53%), unemployment (30%), and ever incarcerated (21%). Of 562 patients eligible for navigation services, 281 (50%) were navigated to imaging services, and 203 (72%) patients who completed imaging attended their first medical appointment. Conclusion Patient navigation played a critical role in linkage success, but securing stable, long-term financial support for patient navigators is a challenge.

Growing evidence suggests that rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy for HIV improves care continuum outcomes. We evaluated process and clinical outcomes for rapid initiation in acute HIV infection within a multisite health care–based HIV testing and linkage to care program in Chicago. Through retrospective analysis of HIV testing data (2016-2017), we assessed linkage to care, initiation of antiretroviral therapy, and viral suppression. Of 334 new HIV diagnoses, 33 (9.9%) individuals had acute HIV infection. Median time to linkage was 11 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-19.5) days, with 15 days (IQR 5-27) to initiation of antiretroviral therapy. Clients achieved viral suppression at a median of 131 (IQR: 54-188) days. Of all, 69.7% were retained in care, all of whom were virally suppressed. Sites required few additional resources to incorporate rapid initiation into existing processes. Integration of rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy into existing HIV screening programs is a promising strategy for scaling up this important intervention.

Abstract Background The rapid spread of COVID-19 in recent months has caused local and regional governments to enact protective measures that have hindered economies and imposed demanding restrictions on daily life. Households may be experiencing physical, psychological, social, and economic challenges due to these preventative measures. Populations with fewer resources and/or pre-existing conditions may be at higher risk for these negative, life-altering effects. Therefore, we investigated COVID-19 impact on daily life among persons living with HIV (PLH) in Chicago’s under-resourced, largely minority, west and southwest side communities. Methods We modified the EPII, a survey designed to measure pandemic disease impact over nine domains of life, to assess how COVID-19 affected PLH receiving outpatient HIV care. From 5/11–29/2020, participants (n=49) completed the survey online or over the phone and received a $10 grocery gift card. We present the proportion of respondents who reported that they or any household member was impacted by select survey items. Results More than half of respondents reported a household member getting laid off and/or furloughed (63%), increased mental health (45%) or sleep problems (51%), less physical activity (61%), and increased screen time (82%); 45% were unable to pay important bills. Positive changes included eating healthier foods (53%), more time for enjoyable activities (63%), more quality time with friends or family (65%), and paying more attention to personal health (76%). We observed differences by gender, age, and race/ethnicity over all domains (Table 1). Finally, 80% of those who participated in telehealth services were satisfied with their experience. Table 1. Conclusion Overall, respondents struggled with employment, emotional and physical health effects of COVID-19, yet also experienced aspects of positive life change. In the future, these results should be compared with results from a general population to determine whether PLH are disproportionately burdened. Regardless, COVID-19 has negatively impacted daily life for everyone, including PLH, and these individuals may need additional resources compared to their less resource-challenged counterparts. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Author(s): Mammen, P; White, D; Giordano, T; Jacobson, K; Feaster, D; Glick, N; Sha, B; Moreno-Walton, L; Pasalar, S; Hunt, B; Adomolga, V; Favaloro III, E; Todorovic, T; Branson, B

Persons with acute HIV infection have high viral loads and are highly infectious compared with those with chronic infection. Rapid linkage to care and initiation of therapy, facilitated by new testing algorithms, allows for immunologic preservation and rapid virologic control, which benefits the individual and decreases transmission events. We analyzed testing data (2016–2017) from the xTLC Program, a collaborative effort between 13 healthcare centers on the South and West sides of Chicago. For acute HIV infections, we assessed linkage to care, initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and viral suppression across sites. Of 334 new HIV diagnoses in xTLC, 33 (9.9%) had acute infection across six sites (five acute care hospitals/emergency departments, one clinic). Baseline viral load (VL) was 2.19 million copies/mL (IQR 0.47–5.00) and baseline CD4 count was 440.5/µL (IQR 287.5–568.5). Table 1 shows care continuum outcomes for patients with acute HIV infection. Table 1: Care Continuum Outcomes for Acute HIV Infections Diagnosed Through X-TLC *Median. **Currently in care. Table 1: Care Continuum Outcomes for Acute HIV Infections Diagnosed Through X-TLC *Median. **Currently in care. Patients with acute HIV infection can be successfully managed in existing programs for HIV screening and linkage to care. The xTLC program had a high linkage to care rate, timely initiation of ART, and relatively quick reduction in viral loads. Our outcomes approach those seen for intensive immediate therapy programs, but without additional costs beyond those of the xTLC program. This will likely create similar public health benefits as dedicated programs for rapid initiation of therapy. B. Hunt, Gilead: supported by Gilead FOCUS grant, Salary. A. Tobin, Gilead: supported by Gilead FOCUS grant, Salary. A. B. Maheswaran, Gilead: supported by Gilead FOCUS grant, Salary. J. Lin, Gilead: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient. R. Novak, Gilead: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Viiv: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Theratech: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. B. Sha, Gilead Sciences: Grant Investigator and Investigator, Grant recipient and Research grant. Viiv Healthcare: Investigator, Research grant. D. Pitrak, Gilead: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient and Research grant. N. Glick, Gilead: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Grant recipient

Study objective: Newer combination HIV antigen-antibody tests allow detection of HIV sooner after infection than previous antibody-only immunoassays because, in addition to HIV-1 and-2 antibodies, they detect the HIV-1 p24 antigen, which appears before antibodies develop. We determine the yield of screening with HIV antigen-antibody tests and clinical presentations for new diagnoses of acute and established HIV infection across US emergency departments (EDs). Methods: This was a retrospective study of 9 EDs in 6 cities with HIV screening programs that integrated laboratory-based antigen-antibody tests between November 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015. Unique patients with newly diagnosed HIV infection were identified and classified as having either acute HIV infection or established HIV infection. Acute HIV infection was defined as a repeatedly reactive antigen-antibody test result, a negative HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation assay, or Western blot result, but detectable HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA); established HIV infection was defined as a repeatedly reactive antigen-antibody test result and a positive HIV-1/HIV-2 antibody differentiation assay or Western blot result. The primary outcomes were the number of new HIV diagnoses and proportion of patients with laboratory-defined acute HIV infection. Secondary outcomes compared reason for visit and the clinical presentation of acute HIV infection. Results: In total, 214,524 patients were screened for HIV and 839 (0.4%) received a new diagnosis, of which 122 (14.5%) were acute HIV infection and 717 (85.5%) were established HIV infection. Compared with patients with established HIV infection, those with acute HIV infection were younger, had higher RNA and CD4 counts, and were more likely to have viral syndrome (41.8% versus 6.5%) or fever (14.3% versus 3.4%) as their reason for visit. Most patients with acute HIV infection displayed symptoms attributable to acute infection (median symptom count 5 [interquartile range 3 to 6]), with fever often accompanied by greater than or equal to 3 other symptoms (60.7%). Conclusion: ED screening using antigen-antibody tests identifies previously undiagnosed HIV infection at proportions that exceed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's screening threshold, with the added yield of identifying acute HIV infection in approximately 15% of patients with a new diagnosis. Patients with acute HIV infection often seek ED care for symptoms related to seroconversion.

Women account for 25% of all people living with HIV and 19% of new diagnoses in the United States. African American (AA) women are disproportionately affected. Yet, differences in the care continuum entry are not well understood between patient populations and healthcare sites. We aim to examine gender differences in diagnosis and linkage to care (LTC) in the Expanded HIV Testing and Linkage to Care (X-TLC) program within healthcare settings. Data were collected from 14 sites on the South and West sides of Chicago. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the differences in HIV diagnoses and LTC by gender and HIV status. From 2011 to 2016, X-TLC performed 281,017 HIV tests; 63.7% of those tested were women. Overall HIV seroprevalence was 0.57%, and nearly one third (29.4%) of HIV-positive patients identified were cisgender women. Of newly diagnosed HIV-positive women, 89% were AA. 58.5% of new diagnoses in women were made at acute care hospitals, with the remainder at community health centers. Women who were newly diagnosed had a higher baseline CD4 count at diagnosis compared with men. Overall, women had lower odds of LTC compared with men (adjusted odds ratio=0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.78) when controlling for patient demographics and newly versus previously diagnosed HIV status. Thus, interventions that focus on optimizing entry into the care continuum for AA women need to be explored.