Background: Evaluation of the effects of candidate drugs on the nervous system in preclinical safety pharmacology studies utilises a global neurobehavioral assessment, usually in the rat. This either takes the form of the functional observational battery (FOB) or modified Irwin Test, both of which evaluate effects across 4 functional domains: autonomic, neuromuscular, sensorimotor and behavioral. Although there is a great deal of overlap in the parameters they address, the two tests approach the assessments slightly differently. We undertook a broad pharmacological validation of both the FOB and the Irwin test, and compared the two outcomes. Methods: Male rats (6 per treatment group) were used to assess each of 12 reference drugs alongside vehicle controls in separate FOB and Irwin studies. The drugs compared in the two study types were chlorpromazine, chlordiazepoxide, clonidine, baclofen, (+)-amphetamine, harmaline, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin, buspirone, physostigmine, picrotoxin, yohimbine and atropine. There is a high degree of semantic equivalence in the parameters assessed in the autonomic domain between the two tests, with a lower degree of equivalence for neuromuscular and behavioral domains, whereas sensorimotor reflex testing in the FOB is far more extensive than in the Irwin test. Results: Across the set of reference drugs, concordance between the two tests was generally good across the 4 functional domains at the 'domain' level (i.e., detecting 'an effect'), whereas there was generally a poor concordance at the individual parameter level. However, this was partially explained by variability between repeated studies on a single reference drug using the same test (FOB or Irwin). Conclusions: Both tests are 'fit-for-purpose' in detecting effects of candidate drugs on the nervous system. We would encourage the global safety pharmacology community to consider whether (a) the tests could be combined into one industry standard; (b) candidate drugs could be triaged according to CNS penetration, with the level of scrutiny in the CNS core battery assessment adjusted accordingly and (c) whether new home cage technology could be applied to semi-automate the preclinical neurobehavioral assessment.

Introduction: Gastrointestinal adverse effects contribute significantly to drug attrition as well as reduced patient compliance. Determination of gastrointestinal liability early in a compound's preclinical development would be a valuable tool. We evaluated the non-invasive faecal pellet method in the rat, assessed the feasibility of adding the endpoint to other study types and investigated correlation with the charcoal meal method. Methods: Han Wistar rats, pair housed in metabolism cages, received a single dose of vehicle, atropine, bethanechol, loperamide or metoclopramide. The number, weight and appearance of pellets produced were assessed over 10 h and at 24 h post-dose. The endpoint was also added to a modified Irwin screen (testing atropine, theophylline, clonidine, amphetamine, baclofen or quinine) and a whole body plethysmography study (testing theophylline or bethanechol). Pellets were collected from home cages out to 4 h post-dose (Irwin) or following a 45 minutes plethysmography session. To assess correlation with stomach emptying and intestinal transit charcoal meal data was generated where published data was not available. Results: Atropine decreased, while bethanechol and metoclopramide increased the number and weight of faecal pellets produced. Atropine produced darker, harder pellets and bethanechol lighter, softer pellets. Loperamide reduced pellet production at later time points only. Theophylline increased (Irwin and plethysmography) and atropine (Irwin) decreased pellet number and weight. Effects were maximal at the T-max and detected in all study environments. Primary data generation was not affected by pellet collection. Pellet findings were generally comparable to charcoal meal transit data, with compounds showing an inhibition (atropine, loperamide, amphetamine, baclofen, clonidine, quinine) or stimulation (bethanechol) in both models. Discussion: We have demonstrated that the faecal pellet method can detect expected reference compound induced changes in pellet transit. The technique is a useful non-invasive 'add-on' to other study types allowing gastrointestinal effects to be flagged earlier in preclinical development. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.