Retroviral replication has two distinctive features, reverse transcription of the viral ssRNA genome into a dsDNA and integration of the viral DNA into the host genome. Viral DNA integration establishes a provirus in the host genome that resides as a stable viral genetic element for the life of the cell and serves as the source of progeny virion production. However, integration requires the viral preintegration complex (PIC) to overcome the structural barriers of the densely packed chromatin to access the host DNA. Eukaryotic chromosomes are organized by the repeating units of nucleosomes. A nucleosome comprises of a DNA segment of ∼150 base pairs compacted by an octamer of histone proteins, which regulate access to the DNA through a network of chemical modifications. Interestingly, several histone tail modifications play an outsized role in regulating retroviral integration into specific regions of the host genome. Studies in the last few decades have identified several viral and host factors that promote retroviral integration and regulate integration targeting. However, the interaction between the PIC and host nucleosomes that promote retroviral integration is an understudied area. In this review, we will focus on the biochemical and molecular interactions of retroviral PICs with the host nucleosome in an attempt to identify the barriers and factors involved in retroviral integration.

1The Center for AIDS Health Disparities Research 8 2Department of Biochemistry, Cancer Biology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience 9 3School of Graduate Studies and Research 10 4Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Physiology 11 Meharry Medical College, Nashville, TN, USA. 12 13 5Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, 6Department of Physics 14 Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA 15 16 6Laboratory of Molecular Biology, 17 National Institutes of Diabetes, and Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, 18 National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA 19 20 7Division of Infectious Diseases 21 University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. 22 23 8Department of Biochemistry 24 University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 25

HIV-1 DNA is preferentially integrated into chromosomal hot spots by the preintegration complex (PIC). To understand the mechanism, we measured the DNA integration activity of PICs-extracted from infected cells-and intasomes, biochemically assembled PIC substructures using a number of relevant target substrates. We observed that PIC-mediated integration into human chromatin is preferred compared to genomic DNA. Surprisingly, nucleosomes lacking histone modifications were not preferred integration compared to the analogous naked DNA. Nucleosomes containing the trimethylated histone 3 lysine 36 (H3K36me3), an epigenetic mark linked to active transcription, significantly stimulated integration, but the levels remained lower than the naked DNA. Notably, H3K36me3-modified nucleosomes with linker DNA optimally supported integration mediated by the PIC but not by the intasome. Interestingly, optimal intasome-mediated integration required the cellular cofactor LEDGF. Unexpectedly, LEDGF minimally affected PIC-mediated integration into naked DNA but blocked integration into nucleosomes. The block for the PIC-mediated integration was significantly relieved by H3K36me3 modification. Mapping the integration sites in the preferred substrates revealed that specific features of the nucleosome-bound DNA are preferred for integration, whereas integration into naked DNA was random. Finally, biochemical and genetic studies demonstrate that DNA condensation by the H1 protein dramatically reduces integration, providing further evidence that features inherent to the open chromatin are preferred for HIV-1 integration. Collectively, these results identify the optimal target substrate for HIV-1 integration, report a mechanistic link between H3K36me3 and integration preference, and importantly, reveal distinct mechanisms utilized by the PIC for integration compared to the intasomes. IMPORTANCE HIV-1 infection is dependent on integration of the viral DNA into the host chromosomes. The preintegration complex (PIC) containing the viral DNA, the virally encoded integrase (IN) enzyme, and other viral/host factors carries out HIV-1 integration. HIV-1 integration is not dependent on the target DNA sequence, and yet the viral DNA is selectively inserted into specific "hot spots" of human chromosomes. A growing body of literature indicates that structural features of the human chromatin are important for integration targeting. However, the mechanisms that guide the PIC and enable insertion of the PIC-associated viral DNA into specific hot spots of the human chromosomes are not fully understood. In this study, we describe a biochemical mechanism for the preference of the HIV-1 DNA integration into open chromatin. Furthermore, our study defines a direct role for the histone epigenetic mark H3K36me3 in HIV-1 integration preference and identify an optimal substrate for HIV-1 PIC-mediated viral DNA integration.

HIV-1 DNA integration into the host chromosomes is carried out by the preintegration complex (PIC). The PIC contains the viral DNA, virally encoded integrase enzyme and other critical viral/host factors. The PIC-associated viral DNA is preferentially integrated into gene bodies of actively transcribing genes. Here, we identify a biochemical mechanism underlying the preference of PIC-mediated viral DNA integration (PIC-VDI). Specifically, we observed that the PIC-VDI into human chromatin is preferred over the genomic DNA. Surprisingly, nucleosome core particles without any histone modifications were not preferred for PIC-VDI when compared to the analogous naked DNA. However, PIC-VDI was markedly enhanced with nucleosomes containing the trimethylated histone 3 lysine 36 (H3K36me3), an epigenetic mark linked to HIV-1 DNA integration preference. Interestingly, we observed that nucleosomes with flanking linker DNA promoted PIC-VDI in the presence of LEDGF/p75. We also discovered that nucleosomes with linker DNA and H3K36me3 served as the optimal substrate for PIC-VDI. Mapping of the integration sites within these substrates suggest preference of specific regions of the nucleosome core DNA for integration. Finally, we provide biochemical and genetic evidence that histone H1 protein, that condenses the chromatin, negatively regulates HIV-1 DNA integration, consistent with the integration preference for open chromatin structure. Collectively, these results identify the role of specific chromatin marks that drive HIV-1 integration preference and define the optimal substrate requirement for efficient DNA integration by the PIC.

Productive HIV-1 infection is dependent on a number of cellular factors. Therefore, a clear understanding of how the virus exploits the cellular machinery will identify new targets for inhibiting HIV-1 infection.

Cohesins are important for chromosome structure and chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis. Cohesins are composed of two structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC1-SMC3) proteins that form a V-shaped heterodimer structure, which is bridged by a α-kleisin protein and a stromal antigen (STAG) protein. Previous studies in mouse have shown that there is one SMC1 protein (SMC1β), two α-kleisins (RAD21L and REC8) and one STAG protein (STAG3) that are meiosis-specific. During meiosis, homologous chromosomes must recombine with one another in the context of a tripartite structure known as the synaptonemal complex (SC). From interaction studies, it has been shown that there are at least four meiosis-specific forms of cohesin, which together with the mitotic cohesin complex, are lateral components of the SC. STAG3 is the only meiosis-specific subunit that is represented within all four meiosis-specific cohesin complexes. In Stag3 mutant germ cells, the protein level of other meiosis-specific cohesin subunits (SMC1β, RAD21L and REC8) is reduced, and their localization to chromosome axes is disrupted. In contrast, the mitotic cohesin complex remains intact and localizes robustly to the meiotic chromosome axes. The instability of meiosis-specific cohesins observed in Stag3 mutants results in aberrant DNA repair processes, and disruption of synapsis between homologous chromosomes. Furthermore, mutation of Stag3 results in perturbation of pericentromeric heterochromatin clustering, and disruption of centromere cohesion between sister chromatids during meiotic prophase. These defects result in early prophase I arrest and apoptosis in both male and female germ cells. The meiotic defects observed in Stag3 mutants are more severe when compared to single mutants for Smc1β, Rec8 and Rad21l, however they are not as severe as the Rec8, Rad21l double mutants. Taken together, our study demonstrates that STAG3 is required for the stability of all meiosis-specific cohesin complexes. Furthermore, our data suggests that STAG3 is required for structural changes of chromosomes that mediate chromosome pairing and synapsis, DNA repair and progression of meiosis.