INTRODUCTION:Colonic diverticulosis is the most common structural abnormality of the colon in developed countries, with an increasing global prevalence. Approximately 20-25% of affected individuals develop symptoms, collectively referred to as diverticular disease. Given its wide clinical spectrum, evolving pathophysiological insights and growing disease burden, updated guidance is essential. METHODS:This International Consensus, developed by 32 experts from 14 countries through a structured Delphi process based on the PICO framework and GRADE methodology, provides evidence-based recommendations across five domains: epidemiology and pathogenesis; clinical features; diagnosis; medical therapy; and surgical management. RESULTS:Key statements define diverticulosis as the presence of diverticula without symptoms and diverticular disease as diverticula associated with symptoms or complications. High dietary fibre intake is protective whereas smoking, obesity and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, opioids or immunotherapy increase risk. Imaging is essential in suspected acute diverticulitis: ultrasound may be appropriate in experienced hands, while CT remains preferred for complicated cases. Diverticulosis itself requires no treatment. In symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, dietary fibre, selected probiotics, mesalazine and rifaximin may help relieve symptoms. Routine antibiotic use is not recommended for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, and elective surgery should be individualised, prioritising quality of life considerations over episode count. CONCLUSIONS:These Consensus statements aim to standardise and optimise the diagnosis, management and prevention of diverticular disease across diverse healthcare systems, while highlighting research priorities such as microbiome characterisation, genetic risk profiling and long-term outcomes of selective antimicrobial and surgical strategies.

CT colonography (CTC) is an established alternative to optical colonoscopy in cases of incomplete examination or obstructive colorectal lesions; however, its role in colon cancer management remains incompletely defined and likely underutilized. This review provides a clinically oriented synthesis of current evidence on the role of contrast-enhanced CTC (CE-CTC) in colon cancer, focusing on diagnosing, staging, preoperative planning, and multidisciplinary decision-making. By combining luminal distension with intravenous contrast enhancement, CE-CTC may improve visualization of both intraluminal and transmural tumor extent compared with conventional CT. This approach may facilitate precise tumor localization and assessment of mural invasion and circumferential tumor involvement, thereby supporting clinical decision-making regarding neoadjuvant treatment. Furthermore, detailed mesenteric vascular mapping may support surgical planning by guiding lymph node dissection and central vascular ligation, with the goal of achieving oncologically adequate (R0) resection. In an evolving therapeutic landscape, CE-CTC may serve as a complementary imaging modality to enhance preoperative assessment and support individualized management strategies. Prospective studies are needed to further define its role and integration into clinical pathways.

Introduction Colonic diverticulosis is the most common structural abnormality of the colon in developed countries, with an increasing global prevalence. Approximately 20-25% of affected individuals develop symptoms, collectively referred to as diverticular disease. Given its wide clinical spectrum, evolving pathophysiological insights and growing disease burden, updated guidance is essential. Methods This International Consensus, developed by 32 experts from 14 countries through a structured Delphi process based on the PICO framework and GRADE methodology, provides evidence-based recommendations across five domains: epidemiology and pathogenesis; clinical features; diagnosis; medical therapy; and surgical management. Results Key statements define diverticulosis as the presence of diverticula without symptoms and diverticular disease as diverticula associated with symptoms or complications. High dietary fibre intake is protective whereas smoking, obesity and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, opioids or immunotherapy increase risk. Imaging is essential in suspected acute diverticulitis: ultrasound may be appropriate in experienced hands, while CT remains preferred for complicated cases. Diverticulosis itself requires no treatment. In symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease, dietary fibre, selected probiotics, mesalazine and rifaximin may help relieve symptoms. Routine antibiotic use is not recommended for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis, and elective surgery should be individualised, prioritising quality of life considerations over episode count. Conclusions These Consensus statements aim to standardise and optimise the diagnosis, management and prevention of diverticular disease across diverse healthcare systems, while highlighting research priorities such as microbiome characterisation, genetic risk profiling and long-term outcomes of selective antimicrobial and surgical strategies.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, and its long-standing course significantly elevates the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), primarily arising from dysplastic lesions. While regular surveillance by colonoscopy is well established for UC patients, guidelines for CD remain uncertain. Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) offers a minimally invasive alternative for evaluating the colon, particularly in cases where colonoscopy is incomplete or contraindicated. Although not commonly utilized in IBD management, CTC provides substantial advantages in identifying complications such as fistulas, strictures, and colonic neoplasms. Additionally, it offers anatomical detail, which is crucial for surgical planning and decision-making. In this review we aim to demonstrate the usefulness of CTC in selected IBD cases, particularly in patients for whom colonoscopy is not feasible, and to show how its integration into clinical practice enhances decision-making and provides crucial insights into disease complications.

Background: COVID-19 increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) through a complex interplay of mechanisms collectively referred to as immunothrombosis. Limited data exist on VTE challenges in the acute setting throughout a dynamic long-term follow-up of COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients. The aim of the study was to investigate acute and long-term management and complications in VTE patients with and without COVID-19. Methods: A prospective, observational, single-center cohort study on VTE patients followed from the acute care stage until 24 months post-diagnosis. Results: 157 patients, 30 with COVID-19-associated VTE and 127 unrelated to COVID-19, were enrolled. The mean follow-up was 10.8 (±8.9) months. COVID-19 patients had fewer comorbidities (1.3 ± 1.29 vs. 2.26 ± 1.68, p < 0.001), a higher proportion of pulmonary embolism at baseline (96.7% vs. 76.4%, p = 0.01), and had a lower probability of remaining on anticoagulant therapy after three months (p < 0.003). The most used initial therapy was low-molecular-weight heparin in 130/157 cases, followed by long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants in 123/157. Two (6.7%) COVID-19 vs. three (2.4%) non-COVID-19 patients (p = 0.243) had major hemorrhagic events, all of them within the first three months. Four (3.1%) non-COVID-19 patients had VTE recurrence after six months. Three (2.4%) non-COVID-19 patients developed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. There were no fatalities among patients with COVID-19, compared to a mortality of 12/127 (9.4%) in the non-COVID-19 subgroup (p = 0.027). Discussion: Our study offers a comprehensive overview of the evolving nature of VTE management, emphasizing the importance of personalized risk-based approaches, including a limited course of anticoagulation for most COVID-19-associated VTE cases and reduced-dose extended therapy for high-risk subsets.

The diagnosis of colonic fistulae is crucial in defining the best therapeutic approach. Fistulae can be suspected from clinical history or specific symptoms, but imaging plays a key role in confirming the diagnosis. Previous studies described conventional studies with barium as methods of choice for the diagnosis; more recently intestinal ultrasound, CT and MR have been considered promising tests. CT Colonography is the best radiologic test to evaluate the colon, but only few case reports described its role in this setting. Aim of this paper is to highlight the potentials of CT colonography in evaluating patients with suspected colonic fistulae.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the ability of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in discriminating symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) among patients with abdominal symptoms including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: This observational, prospective study included consecutive patients classified into the following categories: (i) SUDD; (ii) IBS; (iii) unclassifiable abdominal symptoms; and (iv) controls, including asymptomatic healthy subjects and diverticulosis. The IUS evaluation of the sigmoid: assessed the presence of diverticula, thickness of the muscularis propria, and IUS-evoked pain, namely the intensity of pain evoked by compression with the ultrasound probe on sigmoid colon compared with an area of the left lower abdominal quadrant without underlying sigmoid colon. RESULTS: We enrolled 40 patients with SUDD, 20 patients with IBS, 28 patients with unclassifiable abdominal symptoms, 10 healthy controls, and 20 patients with diverticulosis. Patients with SUDD displayed significantly (P < 0.001) greater muscle thickness (2.25 ± 0.73 mm) compared with patients with IBS (1.66 ± 0.32 mm), patients with unclassifiable abdominal pain, and healthy subjects, but comparable with that of patients with diverticulosis (2.35 ± 0.71 mm). Patients with SUDD showed a greater (not significant) differential pain score than other patients. There was a significant correlation between the thickness of the muscularis propria and the differential pain score only for patients with SUDD (r = 0.460; P: 0.01). Sigmoid diverticula were detected by colonoscopy in 40 patients (42.4%) and by IUS with a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 98.5%. DISCUSSION: IUS could represent a useful diagnostic tool for SUDD, potentially useful in characterizing the disease and appropriately address the therapeutic approach.

This review article addresses the role of lung ultrasound in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for diagnosis and disease management. As a simple imaging procedure, lung ultrasound contributes to the early identification of patients with clinical conditions suggestive of COVID-19, supports decisions about hospital admission and informs therapeutic strategy. It can be performed in various clinical settings (primary care facilities, emergency departments, hospital wards, intensive care units), but also in outpatient settings using portable devices. The article describes typical lung ultrasound findings for COVID-19 pneumonia (interstitial pattern, pleural abnormalities and consolidations), as one component of COVID-19 diagnostic workup that otherwise includes clinical and laboratory evaluation. Advantages and limitations of lung ultrasound use in COVID-19 are described, along with equipment requirements and training needs. To infer on the use of lung ultrasound in different regions, a literature search was performed using key words “COVID-19”, “lung ultrasound” and “imaging”. Lung ultrasound is a noninvasive, rapid and reproducible procedure; can be performed at the point of care; requires simple sterilisation; and involves non-ionising radiation, allowing repeated exams on the same patient, with special benefit in children and pregnant women. However, physical proximity between the patient and the ultrasound operator is a limitation in the current pandemic context, emphasising the need to implement specific infection prevention and control measures. Availability of qualified staff adequately trained to perform lung ultrasound remains a major barrier to lung ultrasound utilisation. Training, advocacy and awareness rising can help build up capacities of local providers to facilitate lung ultrasound use for COVID-19 management, in particular in low- and middle-income countries.

Long-term sequelae of COVID-19 pneumonia are still unknown.Han et al. [1] were the first to describe chest CT findings with pulmonary fibrosis-like changes (FLC) in about one third of patients at six-months follow-up; in this study FLC were defined by the presence of traction bronchiectasis, parenchymal bands and/or honeycombing.Similar results were observed by our group at six months in a cohort of patients hospitalized for severe Covid-19 pneumonia [2].However, whether these lesions represent a marker of ongoing fibrosis and their clinical meaning remain uncertain.The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiologic findings at two-years follow-up chest CT-scans in patients who presented FLC on chest-CT performed 6 months after severe COVID-19 pneumonia.This study obtained ethical approval by the Ethics Committee of our Hospital.We retrospectively evaluated two-years CT scans of patients who had evidence of FLC at 6-months follow-up after severe COVID 19 pneumonia.All CT images were evaluated by a radiologist with 20-years experience in thoracic radiology, who was blinded to patients' clinical data.CT lesions were defined according

OBJECTIVES: Prone positioning allows to improve oxygenation and decrease mortality rate in COVID-19–associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS). However, the mechanisms leading to these effects are not fully understood. The aim of this study is to assess the physiologic effects of pronation by the means of CT scan and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). DESIGN: Experimental, physiologic study. SETTING: Patients were enrolled from October 2020 to March 2021 in an Italian dedicated COVID-19 ICU. PATIENTS: Twenty-one intubated patients with moderate or severe C-ARDS. INTERVENTIONS: First, patients were transported to the CT scan facility, and image acquisition was performed in prone, then supine position. Back to the ICU, gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and ventilation and perfusion EIT-based analysis were provided toward the end of two 30 minutes steps (e.g., in supine, then prone position). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prone position induced recruitment in the dorsal part of the lungs (12.5% ± 8.0%; p < 0.001 from baseline) and derecruitment in the ventral regions (–6.9% ± 5.2%; p < 0.001). These changes led to a global increase in recruitment (6.0% ± 6.7%; p < 0.001). Respiratory system compliance did not change with prone position (45 ± 15 vs 45 ± 18 mL/cm H2O in supine and prone position, respectively; p = 0.957) suggesting a decrease in atelectrauma. This hypothesis was supported by the decrease of a time-impedance curve concavity index designed as a surrogate for atelectrauma (1.41 ± 0.16 vs 1.30 ± 0.16; p = 0.001). Dead space measured by EIT was reduced in the ventral regions of the lungs, and the dead-space/shunt ratio decreased significantly (5.1 [2.3–23.4] vs 4.3 [0.7–6.8]; p = 0.035), showing an improvement in ventilation-perfusion matching. CONCLUSIONS: Several changes are associated with prone position in C-ARDS: increased lung recruitment, decreased atelectrauma, and improved ventilation-perfusion matching. These physiologic effects may be associated with more protective ventilation.

Differently from computed tomography (CT), well-defined terminology for chest radiography (CXR) findings and standardized reporting in the setting of known or suspected COVID-19 are still lacking. We propose a revision of CXR major imaging findings in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia derived from the comparison of CXR and CT, suggesting a precise and standardized terminology for CXR reporting. This description will consider asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients, and patients with SARS-CoV-2-related pulmonary complications. We suggest using terms such as ground-glass opacities, consolidation, and reticular pattern for the most common findings, and characteristic chest radiographic pattern in presence of one or more of the above-mentioned findings with peripheral and mid-to-lower lung zone distribution.

While lung ultrasonography (LUS) proved to be a useful diagnostic and prognostic tool in acute phase of COVID 19 pneumonia, its role in detecting long-term pulmonary sequelae has yet to be explored. In our prospective observational study we assessed the potential of LUS in detecting the presence of computed tomography (CT) fibrotic-like changes after 6 months from COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients who were discharged with a diagnosis of severe COVID-19 pneumonia were enrolled. After 6 months from hospital discharge they underwent LUS, chest CT scan and pulmonary function tests. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between presence of symptoms, LUS score and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) at 6-month after hospital discharge and CT scan fibrotic-like changes. A second logistic model was performed to assess the value of some predefined baseline factors (age, sex, worst PaO2/FiO2, ventilator support, worst CRP value, worst D-dimer value and worst LUS score during hospitalization) to predict fibrotic-like changes on 6-month CT scan. Seventy-four patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-four (32%) showed lung abnormalities suitable for fibrotic-like changes. At multivariate logistic regression analysis LUS score after 6 months from acute disease was significantly associated with fibrotic-like pattern on CT scan. The second logistic model showed that D-dimer value was the only baseline predictive variable of fibrotic-like changes at multivariate analysis. LUS performed after 6 months from severe COVID-19 pneumonia may be a promising tool for detection and follow-up of pulmonary fibrotic sequelae.

Radiological and functional sequelae of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia are still poorly understood. This was a prospective, observational, physiological, cohort study on consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted in April–May 2020 in the high dependency respiratory unit of L. Sacco University Hospital in Milan (Italy). During hospitalization, patients underwent chest computed tomography (CT), blood gas analysis, spirometry, and lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco), which were repeated 6 weeks post-discharge. Chest CTs were individually read by two expert radiologists, that calculated the total severity score (TSS). Twenty patients completed the study (mean age 58.2 years, 70% males). During the acute phase, mean DLco, alveolar volume (VA), and vital capacity (VC) were 56.0 (16.3), 64.8 (14.0), and 71.7 (16.9) % predicted, respectively, and were inversely associated with PaO2/FiO2 ratio. Fifty percent of patients had a restrictive ventilatory pattern; mean TSS was 7.9 (4.0). At follow up, gas exchange parameters were normalized; consolidations persisted in 10% of cases, while DLco was <80% predicted in 65% of patients and was independently predicted by Log10D-dimer at admission (β −18.675; 95%CI, −28.373–−9.076; p = 0.001). In conclusion, functional abnormalities in COVID-19 pneumonia survivors can persist during follow up and are associated with the severity of the disease.

INTRODUCTION:Among the multiple complex pathophysiological mechanisms underlying COVID-19 pneumonia, immunothrombosis has been shown to play a key role. One of the most dangerous consequences of the prothrombotic imbalance is the increased incidence of micro- and macrothrombotic phenomena, especially deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).METHODS:We investigated the correlation between radiological and clinical-biochemical characteristics in a cohort of hospitalised COVID-19 patients.RESULTS:PE was confirmed in 14/61 (23%) patients, five (35.7%) had DVT. The radiographic findings, quantified by Qanadli score calculated on CT angiography, correlated with the clinical score and biochemical markers. The ratio between the right and left ventricle diameter measured at CT angiography correlated with the length of hospital stay.CONCLUSION:In our cohort radiological parameters showed a significant correlation with clinical prognostic indices and scores, thus suggesting that a multidisciplinary approach is advisable in the evaluation of PE in COVID-19 patients.