PURPOSE:To evaluate the setup accuracy and workflow efficiency of a fully tattooless surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) workflow across different breast radiotherapy techniques and determine the impact of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) frequency on these outcomes. METHODS:In total, 324 patients had undergone whole-breast irradiation (WBI) under free breathing, WBI with deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), or chest wall and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) after mastectomy, all guided via AlignRT. A tattooless workflow was consistently applied during simulation and treatment. Based on the implementation period, patients were categorized into daily IGRT (dIGRT) and periodic IGRT (pIGRT) groups. Setup accuracy was evaluated using residual 3D vector errors after IGRT, and treatment duration was derived from AlignRT monitoring-on logs. RESULTS:Mean 3D vector errors (95% confidence interval) were 1.4 mm (1.4-1.5) for WBI, 1.3 mm (1.2-1.4) for DIBH, and 3.6 mm (3.5-3.7) for RNI. The proportions of fractions within 5 mm were 97.1%, 94.4%, and 81.9%, respectively. No significant accuracy differences were observed between dIGRT and pIGRT. In RNI, longer monitoring-on times correlated with greater setup errors, particularly in the dIGRT group. Monitoring-on time was significantly reduced with pIGRT compared to dIGRT (mean reduction: 0.7-2.4 min) and showed a gradual decline across fractions. CONCLUSION:A fully tattooless SGRT workflow ensures accurate and efficient patient setup for breast radiotherapy. Periodic IGRT maintains high precision while reducing treatment time, supporting its clinical feasibility and optimized integration into routine practice.

Objective: Single-center studies or randomized controlled trials have evaluated the impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on quality of life (QOL). We investigated the real-world impact of radiotherapy for bone metastases on QOL using nationwide multicenter cohort data. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study at 26 centers in Japan. Of 333 patients who received radiotherapy for bone metastases between December 2020 and March 2021, 232 (70%) were enrolled in the study. Patient-reported QOL was evaluated at enrollment and at two- and six-month follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). Possible predictors (patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors) of QOL improvement were screened using logistic regression models. Results: QOL scores showed significant improvement at two-month follow-up in seven (global health status/QOL, emotional functioning, pain, insomnia, painful sites, pain characteristics and functional interference) of the 14 scales. Of these seven scales, mean improvement >= the minimal clinically important difference (defined by a change of 10 or more on the 0 to 100 scale) was seen in four scales (pain, insomnia, pain characteristics and functional interference). We did not find any predictors of QOL improvement in the functional interference scale of QLQ-BM22. Conclusion: Radiotherapy for bone metastases performed in daily practice is effective in improving some scales of QOL.

Purpose of this study is to evaluate patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes in bone metastasis radiotherapy practice. Patients for whom radiotherapy for bone metastasis was planned at 26 institutions in Japan between December 2020 and March 2021 were consecutively registered in this prospective, observational study. Study measures included patient characteristics, pain relief, skeletal-related events (SREs), overall survival and incidence of radiation-related adverse events. Pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10. Irradiated dose was analyzed by the biologically effective dose (BED) assuming alpha/beta = 10. Overall, 232 patients were registered; 224 patients and 302 lesions were fully analyzed. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status was 0/1/2/3/4 in 23%/38%/22%/13%/4%; 59% of patients had spinal metastases and 84% had painful lesions (NRS >= 2). BED was <20 Gy (in 27%), 20-30 Gy (24%), 30-40 Gy (36%) and >= 40 Gy (13%); 9% of patients were treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 4% and no grade 4-5 toxicity was reported. Pain relief was achieved in 52% at 2 months. BED is not related to pain relief. The cumulative incidence of SREs was 6.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-9.9) at 6 months; no factors were significantly associated with SREs. With spinal lesions, 18% of patients were not ambulatory at baseline and 50% of evaluable patients in this group could walk at 2 months. The 6-month overall survival rate was 70.2% (95% CI 64.2-76.9%). In conclusion, we report real-world details of radiotherapy in bone metastasis.

We sought to identify potential evidence-practice gaps in palliative radiotherapy using quality indicators (QIs), previously developed using a modified Delphi method. Seven QIs were used to assess the quality of radiotherapy for bone metastases (BoM) and brain metastases (BrM). Compliance rate was calculated as the percentage of patients for whom recommended medical care was conducted. Random effects models were used to estimate the pooled compliance rates. Of the 39 invited radiation oncologists, 29 (74%) from 29 centers participated in the survey; 13 (45%) were academic and 16 (55%) were non-academic hospitals. For the QIs, except for BoM-4, the pooled compliance rates were higher than 80%; however, for at least some of the centers, the compliance rate was lower than these pooled rates. For BoM-4 regarding steroid use concurrent with radiotherapy for malignant spinal cord compression, the pooled compliance rate was as low as 32%. For BoM-1 regarding the choice of radiation schedule, the compliance rate was higher in academic hospitals than in non-academic hospitals (P = 0.021). For BrM-3 regarding the initiation of radiotherapy without delay, the compliance rate was lower in academic hospitals than in non-academic hospitals (P = 0.016). In conclusion, overall, compliance rates were high; however, for many QIs, practice remains to be improved in at least some centers. Steroids are infrequently used concurrently with radiotherapy for malignant spinal cord compression.

Background: Utility values of responders and nonresponders are essential inputs in cost-effectiveness studies of radiation therapy for painful bone metastases but, to our knowledge, they have not been reported separately.Objective: We sought to determine the utility values of responders and nonresponders using data from a prospective observational study on bone metastases.Methods: The original prospective observational study was conducted at 26 centers in Japan. Of 232 enrolled patients, 181 whose pain scores at baseline were >= 2 were analyzed. Health-related quality of life (QOL) was measured using the EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L) instrument at baseline and 2- and 6-month follow-up assessments. At follow-up assessments, patients were categorized as responders or nonresponders. Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints.Results: Of the 181 patients analyzed, 133 (73%) and 84 (46%) were evaluable at the 2- and 6-month follow-up assessment, respectively. The EQ-5D-5L index score (utility) increased from baseline to the 2- and 6-month follow-up assessments; regarding opioid analgesic use, no clear trend was observed during the same period. The mean utility was significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders at both follow-up times. The mean daily oral morphine equivalent dose was significantly lower in responders than in nonresponders at both follow-up times.Conclusion: We determined utility values for responders and nonresponders. Pain response was associated with better QOL and less opioid use. Our utility values according to response status can be used for model input in future cost-effectiveness studies on radiation therapy for bone metastases.

OBJECTIVE:To identify factors significantly associated with quality of life (QOL) and determine if these associations are strong enough to predict certain aspects of QOL without measuring them. METHODS:We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of baseline data of 224 patients (enrolled between December 2020 and March 2021) from a previously published prospective observational study on radiotherapy for bone metastases at 26 centres. Using univariable linear regression, we assessed the association between patient/treatment factors and QOL scale scores as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative (QLQ-C15-PAL) and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). RESULTS:Age and sex were not significantly associated with QOL. Worse performance status, higher pain scores, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales; these four factors were associated with worse global QOL, worse functioning status, and more severe symptoms. The coefficients of determination for most QOL scales were less than 0.2, indicating that most of the variability in QOL scores was not explained by any of the explanatory variables. CONCLUSION:Performance status, pain intensity, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales. However, the associations were not strong enough to estimate QOL. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:To date, the association between treatment factors and QOL in patients with bone metastases has not been fully studied. We identified the factors that were significantly associated with QOL and found that these associations were not strong enough to predict QOL.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to understand the income and employment status of patients at the start of and during follow-up after palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis. Methods and Materials: From December 2020 to March 2021, a prospective multi-institutional observational study was conducted to investigate income and employment of patients at the start of administration of radiation therapy for bone metastasis and at 2 and 6 months after treatment. Of 333 patients referred to radiation therapy for bone metastasis, 101 were not registered, mainly because of their poor general condition, and another 8 were excluded from the follow-up analysis owing to ineligibility. Results: In 224 patients analyzed, 108 had retired for reasons unrelated to cancer, 43 had retired for reasons related to cancer, 31 were taking leave, and 2 had lost their jobs at the time of registration. The number of patients who were in the working group was 40 (30 with no change in income and 10 with decreased income) at registration, 35 at 2 months, and 24 at 6 months. Younger patients (P = 0), patients with better performance status (P = 0), patients who were ambulatory (P = .008), and patients with lower scores on a numerical rating scale of pain (P = 0) were significantly more likely to be in the working group at registration. There were 9 patients who experienced improvements in their working status or income at least once in the follow-up after radiation therapy. Conclusions: The majority of patients with bone metastasis were not working at the start of or after radiation therapy, but the number of patients who were working was not negligible. Radiation oncologists should be aware of the working status of patients and provide appropriate support for each patient. The benefit of radiation therapy to support patients continuing their work and returning to work should be investigated further in prospective studies. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

A long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), nuclear enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1) variant 1 (NEAT1v1), is involved in the maintenance of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CSCs are suggested to play important roles in therapeutic resistance. Therefore, we investigated whether NEAT1v1 is involved in the sensitivity to radiation therapy in HCC. Gene knockdown was performed using short hairpin RNAs, and NEAT1v1-overexpressing HCC cell lines were generated by stable transfection with a NEAT1v1-expressing plasmid DNA. Cells were irradiated using an X-ray generator. We found that NEAT1 knockdown enhanced the radiosensitivity of HCC cell lines and concomitantly inhibited autophagy. NEAT1v1 overexpression enhanced autophagy in the irradiated cells and conferred radioresistance. Gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) expression was downregulated by NEAT1 knockdown, whereas it was upregulated in NEAT1v1-overexpressing cells. Moreover, GABARAP was required for NEAT1v1-induced autophagy and radioresistance as its knockdown significantly inhibited autophagy and sensitized the cells to radiation. Since GABARAP is a crucial protein for the autophagosome-lysosome fusion, our results suggest that NEAT1v1 confers radioresistance to HCC by promoting autophagy through GABARAP.

There is a lack of data on combined radiotherapy (RT) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) risk factors and toxicity. This study aimed to assess the incidence of and risk factors for non-hematologic toxicities in patients treated with combined RT and CDK4/6i using dose-volume parameter analysis. We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving RT within 14 days of CDK4/6i use. The endpoint was non-hematologic toxicities. Patient characteristics and RT treatment planning data were compared between the moderate or higher toxicities (≥ grade 2) group and the non-moderate toxicities group. Sixty patients were included in the study. CDK4/6i was provided at a median daily dose of 125 mg and 200 mg for palbociclib and abemaciclib, respectively. In patients who received concurrent RT and CDK4/6i (N = 29), the median concurrent prescribed duration of CDK4/6i was 14 days. The median delivered RT dose was 30 Gy and 10 fractions. The rate of grade 2 and 3 non-hematologic toxicities was 30

BACKGROUND International guidelines recommend brachytherapy for patients with dysphagia from esophageal cancer, whereas brachytherapy is infrequently used to palliate dysphagia in some countries. To clarify the availability of palliative treatment for dysphagia from esophageal cancer and explain why brachytherapy is not routinely performed are unknown, this study investigated the use of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for dysphagia from esophageal cancer. METHODS Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group members completed a survey and selected the treatment that they would recommend for hypothetical cases of dysphagia from esophageal cancer. RESULTS Of the 136 invited facilities, 61 completed the survey (44.9%). Four (6.6%) facilities performed brachytherapy of the esophagus, whereas brachytherapy represented the first-line treatment at three (4.9%) facilities. Conversely, external beam radiotherapy alone and chemoradiotherapy were first-line treatments at 61 and 58 (95.1%) facilities, respectively. In facilities that performed brachytherapy, the main reason why brachytherapy of the esophagus was not performed was high invasiveness (30.2%). Definitive-dose chemoradiotherapy with (≥50 Gy) tended to be used in patients with expected long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS Few facilities routinely considered brachytherapy for the treatment of dysphagia from esophageal cancer in Japan. Conversely, most facilities routinely considered external beam radiotherapy. In the future, it will be necessary to optimize external beam radiotherapy.

Abstract Evidence regarding postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for metastases to the long bones is lacking. Characterizing the current practice patterns and identifying factors that influence dose-fractionation schedules are essential for future clinical trials. An internet-based survey of the palliative RT subgroup of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group was performed in 2017 to collect data regarding PORT prescription practices and dose-fractionation schedules. Responders were also asked to recommend dose-fractionation schedules for four hypothetical cases that involved a patient with impending pathological fractures and one of four clinical features (poor prognosis, solitary metastasis, radio-resistant primary tumor or expected long-term survival). Responders were asked to indicate their preferred irradiation fields and the reasons for the dose fractionation schedule they chose. Responses were obtained from 89 radiation oncologists (67 institutions and 151 RT plans) who used 22 dose-fractionation schedules, with the most commonly used and recommended schedule being 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Local control was the most common reason for preferring longer-course RT. High-dose fractionated schedules were preferred for oligometastasis, and low-dose regimens were preferred for patients with a poor prognosis; however, single-fraction RT was not preferred. Most respondents recommended targeting the entire orthopedic prosthesis. These results indicated that PORT using 30 Gy in 10 fractions to the entire orthopedic prosthesis is preferred in current Japanese practice and that single-fraction RT was not preferred. Oligometastasis and poor prognosis influenced the selection of high- or low-dose regimens.

Purpose Palliative radiotherapy is the standard of care for bone metastases. However, skeletal-related events, defined as a pathologic fracture, paraplegia, surgery or radiotherapy for local recurrence, or severe pain in previously irradiated bone with radio-resistant histology type still present high incidence. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether zoledronic acid hydrate and palliative radiotherapy could prevent local skeletal-related events. Methods Eligible patients with bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma were treated with zoledronic acid hydrate every 3 or 4 weeks and concurrent palliative radiotherapy of 30 Gy in 3 Gy fractions. The criteria for radiotherapy were established by the treating physician, but patients with complicated bone metastases (impending pathological fracture or spinal cord compression) which needed immediate surgery were excluded. The primary endpoint was the local skeletal-related event-free survival rate at 1 year. Results Twenty-seven patients were included in the study. The median age was 65 (range, 50-84) years. Radiotherapy dose was 30 Gy for all patients except 1 whose radiotherapy was terminated due to brain metastasis progression at 18 Gy. Zoledronic acid hydrate was administered in a median of 12 (range, 0-34) times. The median follow-up period was 12 months and 19 months in patients who were still alive. Of 27 patients in the efficacy analysis, the 1-year local skeletal-related event-free rate was 77.6% (80% confidence interval, 66.2-89.0). Common grade 3 toxicities were hypocalcemia (1 [4%]), sGPT level increase (1 [4%]) and sGOT level increase (1 [4%]). There was no grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Conclusion Zoledronic acid hydrate administration and palliative radiotherapy were a well-tolerated and promising treatment reducing skeletal-related events for bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND:In end-stage cancer, bleeding may markedly influence the patient's quality of life, and radiotherapy plays an important role in the control of the bleeding. In particular, there is no clear evidence of the benefit of palliative radiotherapy for cancers including gastric, rectal, and bladder cancers. A clarification of the current status of palliative radiotherapy for bleeding is needed.METHODS:A survey was conducted by the palliative radiotherapy working group of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG), focusing on annual cases of radiotherapy for tumors of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tracts and genitourinary organs (excluding the uterus) and applicable fractionated doses for three hypothetical patients.RESULTS:A total of 54 radiation oncologists at 43 facilities answered. Most of the facilities reported that they conducted hemostatic irradiation for less than one patient per year, though the median annual number of patients treated with radiotherapy in these facilities was 594. The most frequently observed doses per fraction for two of the hypothetical cases were 3.0 and 2.0 Gy. On the other hand, in each case, the numbers of fractions reported varied markedly among the respondents, ranging from 20 Gy in five fractions to over 30 fractions.CONCLUSIONS:Especially in gastric cancer, hemostatic irradiation is rarely performed in most facilities in Japan. An optimal dose fractionation has not been established. Thirty Gy in 10 fractions is one of the most frequently used regimens, but re-bleeding was observed in approximately one-third of the patients.

To prospectively investigate the changes of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in diffusion weighted-MRI (DWI) of uterine cervical cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Also, to assess the relationship between tumor ADCs in DWI prior to treatment and the tumor response to CCRT. The institutional review board approved this study and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Between June 2010 and January 2015, 53 consecutive women with biopsy-proven cervical squamous cell carcinomas were recruited. All patients were treated with combination of external beam radiation (EBRT) to whole pelvis with dosage of 50.4 Gy by 28 fractions for 5.5 weeks and high-dose-rate Iridium-192 intracavitary brachytherapy of 4 sessions every once a week, total dosage of 24 Gy at point A. All patients received concurrent chemotherapy of six cycles of weekly cisplatin (60 mg/sqm). All patients underwent MRI by 3.0 Tesla MR scanner using phased-array body coil, before initiating CCRT (pre-Tx), at EBRT dosage of 30.6 Gy (mid-Tx), and 1 month after completion of the therapy (post-Tx), respectively. At pre-, mid-, and post-Tx, each value was obtained as follows: (1) tumor size on T2 weighted image, (2) ADC values in the tumors and in the normal gluteus maximus muscles on the ADC maps, and (3) ADC ratio derived from ADC in tumor divided by ADC in muscle, respectively. The patient characteristics and the results of CCRT are shown in Table 1. Median follow up time was 36 months and median local recurrence free survival time was 28 months. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) local control group; achieved complete response at post-Tx with no evidence of recurrence during follow up, and (2) progression disease during follow up period with evidence of recurrence in primary tumor proven by biopsy (relapse group). By linear regression analysis, tumor ADCs at Pre-Tx had strong correlation with the initial tumor size (R2 = 0.036, P = 0.036), while ADCs at mid-Tx or post-Tx had no correlation to that. Tumor size (mm) at each therapeutic time (pre-, mid-, and post-Tx) was 44.9 +/- 19.0, 23.8 +/- 11.8, and 5.3 +/- 8.7 (mean +/- SD), respectively. In addition, ADC value (×10-3mm2/s) at each therapeutic time was, tumor: 0.85 +/- 0.25, 0.93 +/- 0.17, and 1.47 +/- 0.28, gluteus muscle: 1.47 +/- 0.10, 1.49 +/- 0.09, and 1.48 +/- 0.11, respectively. ADC ratio at Pre-Tx showed significant difference between local control group (0.64 +/- 0.58) and relapse group (0.43 +/- 0.25) (P = 0.03), while that at mid-Tx and post-Tx showed no significant difference by paired t test. ADCs obtained by pre-Tx DWI may have potentials in predicting the therapeutic response to CCRT in patients with cervical cancer.

The purpose of this study is to survey the current patterns of practice, and barriers to implementation, of 3D image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT) for cervical cancer in Japan. A 30-item questionnaire was sent to 171 Japanese facilities where high-dose-rate brachytherapy devices were available in 2012. In total, 135 responses were returned for analysis. Fifty-one facilities had acquired some sort of 3D imaging modality with applicator insertion, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used in 51 and 3 of the facilities, respectively. For actual treatment planning, X-ray films, CT and MRI were used in 113, 20 and 2 facilities, respectively. Among 43 facilities where X-ray films and CT or MRI were acquired with an applicator, 29 still used X-ray films for actual treatment planning, mainly because of limited time and/or staffing. In a follow-up survey 2.5 years later, respondents included 38 facilities that originally used X-ray films alone but had indicated plans to adopt 3D-IGBT. Of these, 21 had indeed adopted CT imaging with applicator insertion. In conclusion, 3D-IGBT (mainly CT) was implemented in 22 facilities (16%) and will be installed in 72 (53%) facilities in the future. Limited time and staffing were major impediments.

The routine quality assurance (QA) procedure for a high-dose-rate (HDR) 192Ir radioactive source is an important task to provide appropriate brachytherapy. Traditionally, it has been difficult to obtain good quality images using the 192Ir source due to irradiation from the high-energy gamma rays. However, a direct-conversion flat-panel detector (d-FPD) has made it possible to confirm the localization and configuration of the 192Ir source. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate positional and temporal accuracy of the 192Ir source using a d-FPD system, and the usefulness of d-FPD as a QA tool. As a weekly verification of source positional accuracy test, we obtained 192Ir core imaging by single-shot radiography for three different positions (1300/1400/1500 mm) of a check ruler. To acquire images for measurement of the 192Ir source movement distance with varying interval steps (2.5/5.0/10.0 mm) and temporal accuracy, we used the high-speed image acquisition technique and digital subtraction. For accuracy of the 192Ir source dwell time, sequential images were obtained using various dwell times ranging from 0.5 to 30.0 sec, and the acquired number of image frames was assessed. Analysis of the data was performed using the measurement analysis function of the d-FPD system. Although there were slight weekly variations in source positional accuracy, the measured positional errors were less than 1.0 mm. For source temporal accuracy, the temporal errors were less than 1.0%, and the correlation between acquired frames and programmed time showed excellent linearity (R2 = 1). All 192Ir core images were acquired clearly without image halation, and the data were obtained quantitatively. All data were successfully stored in the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for time-series analysis. The d-FPD is considered useful as the QA tool for the 192Ir source.

Purpose: To determine whether fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) before and after palliative radiation therapy (RT) can predict long-term pain control in patients with painful bone metastases.Methods and Materials: Thirty-one patients with bone metastases who received RT were prospectively included. Forty painful metastatic treatment fields were evaluated. All patients had undergone pre-RT and post-RT PET/CT scanning. We evaluated the relationships between the pre-RT, post-RT, and changes in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the pain response, and between SUVmax and pain relapse of the bone metastases in the treatment field. In addition, we compared the SUVmax according to the length of time from the completion of RT to pain relapse of the bone metastases.Results: Regarding the pain response at 4 weeks after the completion of RT, there were 36 lesions of 27 patients in the responder group and 4 lesions of 4 patients in the nonresponder group. Changes in the SUVmax differed significantly between the responder and nonresponder groups in both the early and delayed phases (P=.0292 and P=.0139, respectively), but no relationship was observed between the pre-RT and post-RT SUVmax relative to the pain response. The responder group was evaluated for the rate of relapse. Thirty-five lesions of 26 patients in the responder group were evaluated, because 1 patient died of acute renal failure at 2 months after RT. Twelve lesions (34%) showed pain relapse, and 23 lesions (66%) did not. There were significant differences between the relapse and nonrelapse patients in terms of the pre-RT (early/delayed phases: P<.0001/P<.0001), post-RT (P=.0199/P=.0261), and changes in SUVmax (P=.0004/P=.004).Conclusions: FDG-PET may help predict the outcome of pain control in the treatment field after palliative RT for painful bone metastases. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PURPOSE:To seek for the possible factors influencing overall survival (OS) with radiotherapy (RT) for biliary tract cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Data were collected retrospectively from RT database of 31 institutions in Japan. All patients underwent at least external beam RT. The factors influencing OS were investigated.RESULTS:Data of 498 patients were analyzed. Median OS of the 212 patients who underwent surgery was significantly better than that of the 286 patients without surgery (31 vs. 15 months, p<0.001). The OS for the R0 or R1 resection group was significantly longer than that for the R2 or non-surgery group, as well as for n0 compared to n1 (all p<0.001). Chemoradiotherapy (CRT), both sequential and concurrent, resulted in a better OS than RT alone for the n1 group (31 vs. 13 months, p<0.001), and marginally better for the R0/R1 group (p=0.065; p=0.054 for concurrent CRT). However, no such benefit was observed for the R2/non-surgical patients. Multivariate analysis identified performance status, clinical stage, and surgery as significant factors.CONCLUSION:Surgery, especially R0/R1 resection, seemed as the gold standard for treatment of biliary tract cancer including RT, even in the highly heterogeneous population obtained from the multicenter retrospective study. The possibility was shown that CRT yielded better survival benefit especially for n1 patients. We recommend that future prospective trials include an arm of adjuvant CRT at least for n1 and possibly R0/R1 patients.