Robotic technology is an expansion of laparoscopic surgery. Robots can be conceived of as specialized laparoscopic tools; their aim is to improve dexterity of the operating surgeon, and therefore they correspond to computer-enhanced telemanipulator devices. For the patient, the advantage of robotic surgery is essentially the advantage of the laparoscopic approach. It gives surgeons tremendous benefits, however, with its intuitive Endowrist and dexterity. From the patient perspective, the biggest difference is between an open operation and one that uses minimally invasive techniques. The contribution of robotics to the evolution of surgery will be obvious if these new systems increase the number of conventionally trained surgeons performing more complex operations using minimally invasive surgical techniques, or if the outcome data from different centers worldwide suggest that the use of advanced technology permits surgeons to have augmented technical performance.

The most important change in urology during the past decade was the development of minimally invasive surgery, particularly laparoscopy. However, the main drawback of laparoscopy is a steep learning curve, which results from the significant changes in the surgical environment. Although laparoscopy can provide important advantages for the patient, including decreased length of hospitalization, decreased analgesic requirement, and a shortened postoperative convalescence, one concern has been whether laparoscopic techniques should be learned solely in the operating room. For example, sports, music, and aviation are practiced before an actual performance is ever undertaken. In this review, the advantages and limitations of all available training modalities in minimally invasive surgery are described. Testing basic laparoscopic skills on inanimate models, becoming familiar with the principles of dissection and hemostasis on living animals, and studying surgical anatomy on cadavers should be considered as indispensable and complementary elements for laparoscopic training in the future. In addition, telementoring with the help of modern image processing and virtual reality eventually may become the basis of tomorrow's surgical instruction.

For many years, robots have been used in manufacturing to perform a variety of delicate tasks. Their use is now being generalized to other fields, such as biology, domestic applications, and especially medicine, in which they are poised to make a significant contribution. This evolution comes from the progress made in the field of robotics and from recent changes in medical and surgical techniques, namely, developments in medical imaging and a new desire for minimally invasive interventions. This emerging combination of high-precision robotic manipulators, new medical diagnostic techniques, and efficient minimally invasive surgery has not yet been perfected. After a brief discussion of state-of-the-art robotic systems used in urology, this article discusses new challenges presented by robotic minimally invasive surgery. A computer-integrated approach aimed at increasing the efficiency of such interventions through better preparedness is presented. This approach is illustrated by a case study in human nephrectomy and a cardiac animal experiment.

PURPOSE:We developed and assessed the feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy performed using the da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, California) robotic system.MATERIALS AND METHODS:In June 2002, 4 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent extraperitoneal, robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. After development of the extraperitoneal space the surgeon performed laparoscopic prostatectomy from the remote control unit. The assistant aligned and exchanged robotic instruments and used conventional laparoscopic instruments to facilitate prostatectomy. Perioperative data and pathological results were recorded.RESULTS:No difficulties were noted when developing the extraperitoneal space. All additional steps were successfully performed with telerobotics. More distal placement of the robotic ports appeared to improve the feasibility of the extraperitoneal approach. The peritoneum acted as a natural bowel retractor and the distal port placement facilitated use of the assistant ports. Mean operative time was 274 minutes (range 124 to 360). Mean catheterization time and hospital stay were 2.7 and 5.3 days, respectively. A positive margin was observed in 1 patient and pathological stage was pT2 in 3 and pT3 in 1. No postoperative complications or open conversions were observed.CONCLUSIONS:The extraperitoneal approach was feasible with the da Vinci robotic system. Distal port placement for the robot appeared to create an ergonomic environment for the surgeon and assistant and more direct prostatic access. While additional clinical experience is required, the extraperitoneal approach may ultimately provide advantages for robotic and nonrobotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Objectives. To evaluate prospectively the diagnostic yield of a 21-sample ultrasound-guided needle biopsy procedure for prostate cancer in patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings.Methods. Between December 2000 and May 2002, 303 patients underwent 21-sample needle biopsy under local anesthesia, comprising sextant biopsies at a 45degrees angle, 3 biopsies in each peripheral zone at an 80degrees angle, 3 biopsies in each transition zone (TZ), and 3 biopsies in the midline peripheral zone. Morbidity was assessed clinically. A short questionnaire was filled out by 90 consecutive patients.Results. The cancer detection rate using 6 biopsy samples (sextant biopsies only), 12 samples (sextant plus lateral biopsies), 18 samples (sextant plus lateral plus TZ biopsies), and 21 samples (sextant plus lateral plus TZ, plus midline biopsies) was 22.7%, 28.3%, 30.7%, and 31.3%, respectively. The 21-sample procedure statistically improved the cancer detection rate by 37.9% relative to the 6-sample procedure. The improvement was most marked in patients with a prostate volume of more than 40 cm(3) (48.3%), patients with Stage T1c prostate disease (44.9%), patients undergoing repeat biopsy (66.2%), and patients with prostate-specific antigen levels greater than 10 ng/mL (38.5%). Adverse effects were infrequent (3%), consisting of prostatitis in 3 patients, acute urinary retention in 6 patients, and rectal bleeding requiring hospitalization in 1 patient taking aspirin. Using the questionnaire, 84% of patients reported macroscopic hematuria for an average of 3.4 days and hematospermia for 12.8 days, and 45% reported minor rectal bleeding lasting 1.1 days. The mean pain score, with a visual analog scale ranging between 0 (no pain) and 10 (intense pain), was 4.56.Conclusions. A 21-sample needle biopsy procedure increased the prostate cancer detection rate relative to a 6-sample procedure, without increasing morbidity. Patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen values should undergo sextant biopsies and at least 6 additional biopsies in the peripheral zone and 6 in the TZ. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.

Objectives. To assess the incidence of the complications in laparoscopic urologic procedures with regard to clinical presentation, etiology, and treatment.Methods. From January 1994 to December 2000, 1085 laparoscopic procedures were performed at three institutions in 1075 patients (702 men, 373 women). A referent surgeon for laparoscopy was at each institution. The major procedures were radical prostatectomy (n = 232), different types of nephrectomy (n = 171) and nephroureterectomy (n = 15), adrenalectomy (n = 130), pyeloplasty (n = 61), pelvic lymph node dissection (n = 130), genitourinary prolapse repair (n = 86), bladder neck suspension (n = 104), and treatment of benign kidney pathologic findings (lithiasis, cysts, and diverticula, n = 55). The complications were listed by incidence and etiology according to the procedure attempted.Results. A total of 75 complications (6.9%) occurred in this multi-institutional series. The mortality rate was 0.09%, and the conversion rate was 2.1%. Vascular (n = 7) and visceral injuries (n = 11) occurred in 24% of complications. Hematomas (n = 10), urinomas (n = 8), and wound infections (n = 7) at the trocar sites were the most frequent postoperative surgical complications. Pulmonary disorders (n = 9) and urinary infections (n = 9) were predominant in the postoperative medical problems.Conclusions. Even though it appears to be minimally invasive, laparoscopy remains major surgery, with serious complications possible. These complications should be preventable with better mastery of the different steps of the procedures. Increased knowledge of the possible complications is essential for urologists in laparoscopic training and may help them improve their learning curve. UROLOGY 58: 899-903, 2001. (C) 2001, Elsevier Science Inc.