Abstract Spatial variability of rainfall was studied through a gauge network on the Delmarva Peninsula. The gauge network consists of 11 dual- or triple-tipping-bucket sites ranging from 1- to 150-km separation distances. The time of the tip (0.254 mm) was recorded to a datalogger, and a continuous dataset was available from all sites for over 5 yr (May 2005–July 2010). A three-parameter exponential function was fitted to the paired correlations and the resultant correlation distance was 8–13 km during summer and 51–85 km during winter. The correlation distances showed pronounced year-to-year variability as being 8–43 km and 13–67 km during spring and autumn, respectively. The airmass convection was the main weather system during summer while nor’easters played an important role during winter. The 30-min integration and two-tip rain/no-rain threshold was selected for the base of this study. The correlation distance increased with longer integration periods and was 17 and 32 km for 30 min and 1 h, respectively.

Abstract An experimental study of small-scale variability of raindrop size distributions (DSDs) has been carried out at Wallops Island, Virginia. Three Joss–Waldvogel disdrometers were operated at a distance of 0.65, 1.05, and 1.70 km in a nearly straight line. The main purpose of the study was to examine the variability of DSDs and its integral parameters of liquid water content, rainfall, and reflectivity within a 2-km array: a typical size of Cartesian radar pixel. The composite DSD of rain events showed very good agreement among the disdrometers except where there were noticeable differences in midsize and large drops in a few events. For consideration of partial beam filling where the radar pixel was not completely covered by rain, a single disdrometer reported just over 10% more rainy minutes than the rainy minutes when all three disdrometers reported rainfall. Similarly two out of three disdrometers reported 5% more rainy minutes than when all three were reporting rainfall. These percentages were b...

Cloud processes of the main precipitation systems in Brazil: A contribution to cloud resolving modeling and to the global precipitation measurement.

A comparative study of daily and monthly rainfall between research and operational gauges was conducted at the mid-Atlantic region. Fifty research tipping-bucket gauges were deployed to 20 sites where each site had dual or triple gauges. The gauges were in place to validate the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's newly developed polarimetric radar rainfall estimate. For logistic purposes, these research gauges were collocated with operational gauges and were operated over a year at each site. Therefore, this is an experimental study, which involves a mixture of one to five sites of seven operational gauge networks.A very good to excellent agreement between the two collocated research gauges at daily time scale raised the authors' confidence to consider them as a reference before comparing with the operational gauges. Among operational networks, the National Weather Service's (NWS) Automated Surface Observing Systems (ASOS) weighing bucket and the Climate Reference Network and Forest Services tipping-bucket gauges demonstrated high performance for both daily and monthly rainfall, while the Federal Aviation Administration's Automated Weather Observing Systems (AWOS) tipping-bucket gauges performed poorly. Among the other networks, the ASOS tipping-bucket and Cooperative observer program's stick gauges seemed to be reliable for monthly rainfall, but not always for daily rainfall. The Virginia Agricultural Experimental Station (VAES) tipping-bucket gauges, on the other hand, had a mixture of high and low performance for daily and monthly rainfall. Unlike other gauge networks, VAES gauges were in place for long-term research applications.

Characteristics of the raindrop size distribution in seven tropical cyclones have been studied through impact-type disdrometer measurements at three different sites during the 2004–06 Atlantic hurricane seasons. One of the cyclones has been observed at two different sites. High concentrations of small and/or midsize drops were observed in the presence or absence of large drops. Even in the presence of large drops, the maximum drop diameter rarely exceeded 4 mm. These characteristics of raindrop size distribution were observed in all stages of tropical cyclones, unless the storm was in the extratropical stage where the tropical cyclone and a midlatitude frontal system had merged. The presence of relatively high concentrations of large drops in extratropical cyclones resembled the size distribution in continental thunderstorms. The integral rain parameters of drop concentration, liquid water content, and rain rate at fixed reflectivity were therefore lower in extratropical cyclones than in tropical cyclones. In tropical cyclones, at a disdrometercalculated reflectivity of 40 dBZ, the number concentration was 700 100 drops m 3 , while the liquid water content and rain rate were 0.90 0.05 g m 3 and 18.5 0.5 mm h 1 , respectively. The mean mass diameter, on the other hand, was 1.67 0.3 mm. The comparison of raindrop size distributions between Atlantic tropical cyclones and storms that occurred in the central tropical Pacific island of Roi-Namur revealed that the number density is slightly shifted toward smaller drops, resulting in higher-integral rain parameters and lower mean mass and maximum drop diameters at the latter site. Considering parameterization of the raindrop size distribution in tropical cyclones, characteristics of the normalized gamma distribution parameters were examined with respect to reflectivity. The mean mass diameter increased rapidly with reflectivity, while the normalized intercept parameter had an increasing trend with reflectivity. The shape parameter, on the other hand, decreased in a reflectivity range from 10 to 20 dBZ and remained steady at higher reflectivities. Considering the repeatability of the characteristics of the raindrop size distribution, a second impact disdrometer that was located 5.3 km away from the primary site in Wallops Island, Virginia, had similar size spectra in selected tropical cyclones.

Error characteristics of rainfall measurements were studied using six collocated Joss-Waldvogel (JW) disdrometers that are located at NASA's Wallops Flight Facility. The six disdrometer means of rain rate R, reflectivity Z, and differential reflectivity ZDR, for a given minute were considered, as a reference. The maximum deviations of R, Z, and ZDR from the mean in a rain event were 0.6 mm h-1, 1.3 dB, and 0.05 dB, respectively. Rainfall statistics were then examined between disdrometer pairs. The root-mean-square (rms) difference of R, Z, and ZDR between paired disdrometers in a rain event were as high as 3.2 mm h(-1), 3.7 dB, and 0.3 dB, respectively. The rms difference of R and ZDR were even higher when the disdrometer observations were stratified based on reflectivity intervals. The differences in disdrometer rainfall measurements have a potential impact when the disdrometers are considered as calibration tools for vertically pointing and scanning radars. The differences between the disdrometer measurements also result in differences in coefficients and exponents of the derived relations between radar parameters and rain rate. Among the four different relations between radar parameters and rain rate, the absolute difference in rain rate |&UDelta; R| from two different JW disdrometers was highest in R(ZH, ZDR) and lowest in R(KDP, ZDR). The other two relations were R(Z) and R(KDP). The |&UDelta; R| increases with increasing horizontally polarized reflectivity ZH, and differential specific phase KDP in both single- and dual-parameter rainfall estimators, while the | AR| increases with decreasing ZDR in dual-parameter rainfall estimators. Several sources of JW disdrometer malfunctions were also presented. The hardware problems were the leading cause for the malfunction of the JW disdrometers, as identified by the manufacturer. A single JW disdrometer could have inherent measurement errors that can only be identified in the presence of collocated (preferably two) rain-measuring instruments.

The Joss-Waldvogel (JW) disdrometer is considered to be a reference instrument for drop size distribution measurements. It has been widely used in many field campaigns as part of validation efforts of radar rainfall estimation. It has also been incorporated in radar rain gauge rainfall observation networks at several ground validation sites for NASA s Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM). It is anticipated that the Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer will be one of the key instruments for ground validation for the upcoming Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission. The JW is an impact type disdrometer and has several shortcomings. One such shortcoming is that it underestimates the number of small drops in heavy rain due to the disdrometer dead time. The detection of smaller drops is also suppressed in the presence of background noise. Further, drops larger than 5.0 to 5.5 mm diameter cannot be distinguished by the disdrometer. The JW assumes that all raindrops fall at their terminal fall speed. Ignoring the influence of vertical air motion on raindrop fall speed results in errors in determining the raindrop size. Also, the bulk descriptors of rainfall that requires the fall speed of the drops will be overestimated or underestimated due to errors in measured size and assumed fall velocity. Long-term observations from a two-dimensional video disdrometer are employed to simulate the JW disdrometer and assess how it s shortcomings affect radar rainfall estimation. Data collected from collocated JW disdrometers were also incorporated in this study.

As part of the NASA tropical rainfall measuring mission ground validation (TRMM-GV) program, a field campaign was conducted in Florida Keys during August-September 2002. The purpose of the field campaign was to study the characteristics of rainfall over the Florida Keys, utilizing Key West WSR-88D, NASA's s-band polarimetric radar (NPOL), and a network of rain gauges and disdrometers. This study focuses on the performance of the rain gauges and disdrometers and its impact on the radar rainfall algorithms.

Four impact disdrometers and 27 tipping bucket rain gauges were operated at 11 different sites during August and September 2001, as part of the Keys Area Microphysics Project. The rain gauge and disdrometer network was designed to study the range dependency of radar calibration and rainfall verification in tropical storms. The gauges were collocated at eight sites, while three to five gauge clusters were deployed at three sites. Four disdrometers were also collocated with rain gauges. Overall the experiment was quite successful, although some problems did occur including flooding of gauge loggers, vandalism, and excessive noise at disdrometer sites.Both a south-to-north and east-to-west rainfall gradient was observed, whereby the gauges on the western and northern sides of the Lower Keys recorded more rainfall. Considering the campaign-long rain accumulations, collocated gauges agreed well, with differences generally less than 2%, except for one gauge cluster where the rain accumulation difference was attributed to individual gauge calibration error. The duration of a rain event was sensitive to the definition of a rain event, while this was not a factor in rain intensity. Only 7% of the rain events had significant storm total differences in excess of 2.5 mm. All of these events occurred at storm conditional mean and maximum rain rates higher than 5 and 50 mm h(-1), respectively. Nevertheless, there were many other rain events for which the storm total differences were not significant in heavy rainfall. Combining most of the rain events from all collocated gauge sites, the correlation coefficient and mean percent absolute difference between the gauge storm totals were 0.99 and about 9%, respectively, on average. A rain gauge was typically able to measure rainfall within +/-1.2 mm. As the storm total increased, the standard deviation of the rain total difference and correlation coefficient increased, while mean percent absolute difference decreased. Considering the gauge that recorded higher overall accumulation as the reference, and ignoring the natural variability of rainfall between collocated gauges, the gauge rainfall error was about 9%. Two disdrometers that were placed away from noise sources performed well and recorded higher rainfall accumulation than their collocated rain gauges.