Why is it important? Hypersonics has had two major applications. The first has been to provide thermal protection during atmospheric entry. Success in this enterprise has supported ballistic-missile nose cones, has returned strategic reconnaissance photos from orbit and astronauts from the Moon, and has even dropped an instrument package into the atmosphere of Jupiter. The last of these approached Jupiter at four times the speed of a lunar mission returning to Earth.

The aerodynamic design of an aircraft involves the total flight envelope — flight ranging from takeoff and landing at low speeds to cruise at transonic Mach numbers, and to flight at the maximums speeds, Mach numbers, angles of attack and yaw that the aircraft will forseeably encounter. The design issues, the parameters of interest, and the dominant fluid physics can be vastly different for these different regimes of flight.

Information is given in viewgraph form on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for aircraft design. Topics covered include CFD validation for advanced systems, cavity flow, transonic flow, separated flow, boundary layer interaction, hypersonic flow, heat transfer, zonal modeling, the mathematical foundation for Navier-Stokes simulation, hypersonic inlets, and the role of wind tunnel tests.

An Euler code has been developed for the analysis of a wing-mounted propfan configuration. Surface-fitted grids are used to represent the wing, fuselage, and nacelle geometry. The propeller is simulated by an actuator disk along a computational plane. A grid embedding technique is employed to capture detailed flow field resolution in the vicinity of the engine exhaust plume. Results of a NASA turboprop configuration are compared with test data. Specific issues on grid embedding and methods of resolving them are discussed.

Euler codes for both axisymmetric and general three-dimensional nacelle-propeller flow analysis have been developed. Surface-fitted grids are generated either by a finite difference method or by an algebraic method. The propeller is represented by an actuator disk along a computational plane where proper boundary conditions are assigned to simulate the propeller power loading. Computed results for a NASA SR3 propeller as well as a NASA turboprop configuration are compared with test data. Good agreement has been achieved through the present simulation method.

This paper presents the results of a study that used a three-dimensional transonic analysis method to analyze flow around a wing-mounted prop-fan configuration. The transonic analysis method employs a cell-oriented finite volume approach to solve the full potential equation in conservative form over a numerically generated surface-fitted grid. The propeller slipstream effects are simulated using a linearized transpiration boundary condition. The results of analyses of flow over clean wing/body, wing/body/nacelle, and wing/body nacelle with slipstream are compared to test data.

: A numerical method for transonic shock-free or nearly shock-free airfoil and wing redesign based on the full potential equation is presented. The method utilizes a generalized fictitious gas approach wherein a variety of parameters controlling the character of the fictitious gas laws are introduced to provide a degree of control over the redesigned upper surface geometry and the pressure distribution of the redesigned shape. Results for a redesigned advanced airfoil as well as a three-dimensional wing are illustrated. Significantly improved aerodynamic characteristics are achieved through the present redesigned technique. (Author)

The basic integral equations of linearized supersonic theory for an advanced supersonic panel method are derived. Methods using only linear varying source strength over each panel or only quadratic doublet strength over each panel gave good agreement with analytic solutions over cones and zero thickness cambered wings. For three dimensional bodies and wings of general shape, combined source and doublet panels with interior boundary conditions to eliminate the internal perturbations lead to a stable method providing good agreement experiment. A panel system with all edges contiguous resulted from dividing the basic four point non-planar panel into eight triangular subpanels, and the doublet strength was made continuous at all edges by a quadratic distribution over each subpanel. Superinclined panels were developed and tested on s simple nacelle and on an airplane model having engine inlets, with excellent results.

The application of a higher-order subsonic potential flow panel method to the solution of three-dimensional flow about wing and wing-body combinations with leading-edge vortex separation is presented. The governing equations are the linear flow differential equation and nonlinear boundary conditions which require that the flow be parallel to the wing and body surfaces and that the free vortex sheet, springing from the leading and trailing edges, be aligned with the local flow and support no pressure jump. The vortex core is modeled as a simple line vortex which receives vorticity from the free sheet through a connecting sheet. The Kutta condition is imposed on all appropriate edges of the wing. This set of nonlinear equations is solved by an iterative procedure. The Goethert rule accounts for compressibility. The method has been programmed for the CDC 6600. Delta wings, gothic wings, arrow wings, cambered wings, and wing with body have been analyzed. Initial studies involving variations of panel density, vortex sheet sizing, Jacobian update, and initial geometry demonstrate that the present method generally exhibits good convergence characteristics.