12024 Background: Cardiotoxicity is a known side effect of trastuzumab and combination with anthracyclines increases the risk for cardiotoxicity. Adjuvant dose-dense (DD) chemotherapy has demonstrated beneficial breast cancer (BC) outcomes in patients with high risk for relapse, but data on long-term cardiac toxicity when combined with trastuzumab is scarce. We have previously reported on the safety of trastuzumab at six years follow-up, in a subset of patients treated with dose-dense chemotherapy in the Pan-European Tailored Chemotherapy (PANTHER) phase III trial. We hereby present long-term safety data from 10-year follow-up from the same subset. Methods: This is a protocol-predefined cardiac safety study, among Swedish sites included in the PANTHER trial, including patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) BC matched for age, treatment group and institution. Enrolled patients were up to 65 years old with node-positive or high-risk, node-negative BC were randomized 1:1 to either dose tailored (according to hematologic nadirs) and biweekly DD epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel or standard 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide plus docetaxel every 3 weeks. Patients with HER2-positive disease received 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab. They underwent echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition scanning and electrocardiography at baseline, at 4, 6 and 10 years of follow-up. Data on cardiac medication NT-proBNP, lipid profile and ECG were also collected. Results: ECHO at 10-years follow-up was available for 94 patients; 48 HER2+ (19 DD, 29 control) and 46 HER2- (21 DD, 25 control). Overall, incidence of cardiotoxicity was low. Mean LVEF was 58 % (range 49-68%) and 60.65% (range 50-76%) in HER2+ and HER2- respectively. Only one patient had LVEF < 50% (DD HER2+) and additional 12 patients had LVEF 50-54%, equally distributed between the treatment groups. In total, 27 patients were treated with cardiac medications at this point; 15 (56%) of which had been treated with trastuzumab and 10 of them (n = 7 HER2+), not reporting cardiac medication at previous timepoints. The majority of the patients did not report any symptoms related to heart disease, per NYHA-classification (41 patients in both groups report NYHA class 0). Overall, no significant changes were seen in the biomarkers. Conclusions: Cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab in DD anthracycline chemotherapy, examined in the context of a randomized trial sub-study, was very low. Our results underline the safety of trastuzumab in this context, providing support to offer the patients best treatment options for improving breast cancer survival. Clinical trial information: NCT00798070 .

BACKGROUND:There are currently no molecular tests to identify individual breast cancers where radiotherapy (RT) offers no benefit. Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) is a 16-gene molecular signature developed to identify low-risk cancers where RT will not further reduce recurrence rates. METHODS:An individual participant data meta-analysis was performed in 623 patients of node-negative estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative early breast cancer enrolled in 3 RT randomized trials for whom primary tumor material was available for analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model on time to locoregional recurrence was used to test the interaction between POLAR score and RT. RESULTS:A total of 429 (69%) patients' tumors had a high POLAR score, and 194 (31%) had a low score. Patients with high POLAR score had, in the absence of RT, a 10-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (20%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15% to 26%, vs 5%, [CI] 2% to 11%) for those with a low score. Patients with a high POLAR score had a large benefit from RT (hazard ratio [HR] for RT vs no RT = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.60; P < .001). In contrast, there was no evidence of benefit from RT for patients with a low POLAR score (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.42 to 2.02; P = .832). The test for interaction between RT and POLAR was statistically significant (P = .022). CONCLUSIONS:POLAR is not only prognostic for locoregional recurrence but also predictive of benefit from RT in selected patients. Patients aged 50 years and older with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative disease and a low POLAR score could consider omitting adjuvant RT. Further validation in contemporary clinical cohorts is required.

Supplementary Materials and Methods, along with Supplementary Figure S1

Background: There are currently no commercially available tests to identify early stage breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and systemic therapy at low risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) for whom postoperative radiotherapy (RT) may be safely omitted. Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) is a 16-gene molecular signature developed to identify invasive breast cancer patients who may be candidates for RT omission after BCS. In this work, we seek to validate POLAR in a meta-analysis of three RCTs of BCS +/- RT: SweBCG91RT, Scottish Conservation Trial (SCT) and Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH). Methods: A patient-level meta-analysis was performed in 623 node-negative breast cancer patients with ER+/HER2-negative tumors who were enrolled in the three RCTs and for whom primary tumor material was available for analysis. Contributions from each cohort were as follows: SweBCG91RT N=354 (57%), SCT N=137 (22%), and PMH N=132 (21%). Numbers of LRR events in each cohort were as follows: SweBCG91RT N=72 (20%), SCT N=28 (20%), and PMH N=16 (12%). There was a mix of systemic therapy used (no systemic therapy for SweBCG91RT, chemotherapy or adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not both, in SCT, and tamoxifen but no chemotherapy for PMH). Median follow-up time for the patients who did not have LRR was 13.3 years for SweBCG91RT, 21.1 years for SCT, and 8.6 years for PMH. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model on time to LRR, including the continuous standardized POLAR score, RT, and interaction, stratified by cohort, was used to test the interaction between the continuous POLAR score and RT. Additional Cox models tested the association between treatment arms separately for patients with a low and high POLAR score using a pre-specified cut point. Cumulative incidences were computed, with distant metastasis and death without recurrence considered as competing events. Results: The test for interaction between RT treatment and POLAR was statistically significant (p = 0.022). Patients with a high POLAR score (N=429 [69%]) had a large benefit from RT (10-year cumulative incidence of LRR: 20% [15%-26%] for those not treated with RT vs 7% [4%-11%] for those treated with RT; hazard ratio for RT vs no RT: 0.37 [0.23-0.60], p < 0.001), whereas there was no evidence of benefit from RT for patients with a low POLAR score (N=194 [31%], 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR: 5% [2%-11%] for those not treated with RT vs 7% [3%-14%] for those treated with RT; hazard ratio for RT vs no RT: 0.92 [0.42-2.02], p = 0.832). Conclusions: To our knowledge, POLAR is the first genomic classifier that is not only prognostic for LRR but also predictive, showing a significant interaction between RT and the classifier. Patients with a high POLAR score should be recommended radiotherapy while patients with a low score may be candidates for omission of radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery. Citation Format: Per Karlsson, Anthony Fyles, S. Laura Chang, Bradley Arrick, Frederick Baehner, Per Malmström, Mårten Fernö, Erik Holmberg, Martin Sjöström, Fei-Fei Liu, David A. Cameron, Linda J. Williams, John MS Bartlett, Joanna Dunlop, Jacqueline Caldwell, Joseph F. Loane, Elizabeth Mallon, Tammy Piper, Wilma J. Jack, Ian Kunkler, Felix Y. Feng, Corey W. Speers, Lori Pierce, John Bennett, Karen J. Taylor. Validation of Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) in a meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials of breast conserving surgery +/- radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-03.

<p>PDF file- 51K, Clinical and molecular characteristics of the 577-sample set</p>

Association between GPER1 intensity score and various prognostic factors in ER-positive subgroups of cohorts I and II.

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is a clinically important event, where an isolated in-breast recurrence is a potentially curable event but associated with an increased risk of distant metastasis and breast cancer death. It remains unclear if IBTRs are associated with molecular changes that can be explored as a resource for precision medicine strategies. Here, we employed proteogenomics to analyze a cohort of 27 primary breast cancers and their matched IBTRs to define proteogenomic determinants of molecular tumor evolution. Our analyses revealed a relationship between hormonal receptors status and proliferation levels resulting in the gain of somatic mutations and copy number. This in turn re-programmed the transcriptome and proteome towards a highly replicating and genomically unstable IBTRs, possibly enhanced by APOBEC3B. In order to investigate the origins of IBTRs, a second analysis that included primaries with no recurrence pinpointed proliferation and immune infiltration as predictive of IBTR. In conclusion, our study shows that breast tumors evolve into different IBTRs depending on hormonal status and proliferation and that immune cell infiltration and Ki-67 are significantly elevated in primary tumors that develop IBTR. These results can serve as a starting point to explore markers to predict IBTR formation and stratify patients for adjuvant therapy.

Representative histograms of MCF7 and MCF7-shGPER1 cell cycle distribution as determined by propidium iodide staining of DNA content and flow cytometry. Cells were treated without (grey) and with 1 μM G1 (clear) for 24 hr before analysis.

Pro-apoptotic signaling by increasing concentrations of G1 and 4OHT in T47D cells. Cell lysates were immunoblotted for cytochrome C and cleaved PARP. β-Actin serves as a loading control.

Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of GPER1 in HEK transiently transfected with FGPER1 and treated without (-EPX) and with 50 nM EPX for 24 hr (+EPX). FGPER1 is shown in green and endogenous cytokeratin 8 is shown in red.

We employed proteogenomics to analyze a cohort of 27 primary breast cancers and their matched IBTRs to define proteogenomic determinants of molecular tumor evolution.

Background: Tamoxifen is an established treatment for breast cancer, but its long-term effects on survival and on secondary cancers are not fully evaluated. Material and methods: We studied 30 years outcome of 4124 postmenopausal patients who were randomized to receive (totally) two or five years of adjuvant tamoxifen. Results: After 5 years of follow-up, when tamoxifen treatment was finished in both groups, until 15 years of follow-up, overall mortality (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72–0.90, p < 0.001), breast cancer mortality for all patients (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68–0.94, p = 0.006) and breast cancer mortality for patients with estrogen receptor positive disease (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.83, p < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the five-year group as compared to the two-year group. After 15 years, the difference remained but did not further increase.In the five-year group, the incidence of contralateral breast cancer was gradually reduced during the entire period of observation. The incidence of lung cancer was also reduced in the five-year group. In contrast there was an increased endometrial cancer incidence in the five-year group and for those receiving 40 mg of tamoxifen this incidence was further increased. Conclusion: Three more years of tamoxifen therapy reduced the risk of breast cancer mortality. The difference was established during the first 15 years after randomization. Moreover, the incidence of contralateral breast cancer gradually decreased for 30 years. The incidence of lung cancer was reduced in the five-year group. In contrast the incidence of endometrial cancer was increased.

Background Breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy is part of standard treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Hypoxia is common in cancer and may affect the benefit of radiotherapy. Cells adapt to hypoxic stress largely via the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α. Here, we aim to determine whether tumour HIF-1α-positivity and hypoxic gene-expression signatures associated with the benefit of radiotherapy, and outcome. Methods Tumour HIF-1α-status and expression of hypoxic gene signatures were retrospectively analysed in a clinical trial where 1178 women with primary T1-2N0M0 breast cancer were randomised to receive postoperative radiotherapy or not and followed 15 years for recurrence and 20 years for breast cancer death. Results The benefit from radiotherapy was similar in patients with HIF-1α-positive and -negative primary tumours. Both ipsilateral and any breast cancer recurrence were more frequent in women with HIF-1α-positive primary tumours (hazard ratio, HR 0–5 yrs 1.9 [1.3–2.9], p = 0.003 and HR 0–5 yrs = 2.0 [1.5–2.8], p < 0.0001). Tumour HIF-1α-positivity is also associated with increased breast cancer death (HR 0–10 years 1.9 [1.2–2.9], p = 0.004). Ten of the 11 investigated hypoxic gene signatures correlated positively to HIF-1α-positivity, and 5 to increased rate/risk of recurrence. Conclusions The benefit of postoperative radiotherapy persisted in patients with hypoxic primary tumours. Patients with hypoxic primary breast tumours had an increased risk of recurrence and breast cancer death.

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is a clinically important event, where an isolated in-breast recurrence is a potentially curable event but also associated with an increased risk of distant metastases and breast cancer death. It currently remains unclear if IBTRs are associated with molecular changes that can be explored as a resource for precision medicine strategies targeting locally recurring breast cancer. Here, we employed a recently developed proteogenomics workflow to analyze a cohort of 27 primary breast cancers and their matched IBTRs by whole genome sequencing, RNA sequencing, and mass spectrometry-based proteomics to define proteogenomic features of tumor evolution. Analysis of mutational signatures, copy number changes, and cancer specific mutations revealed a relationship with estrogen and progesterone receptor statuses and increased levels of genetic change. This in turn altered the re-programming of the transcriptome and proteome towards a recurring molecular disease phenotype with high replicating capacity and a higher degree of genomic instability possibly enhanced by high expression of APOBEC3B . In conclusion, this study defines how primary breast tumors differentially evolve into different ipsilateral recurrent malignancies depending on their key biomarker status, suggesting that further enhancing the genomic instability in some tumors could serve as an alternative treatment option.

512 Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is currently the standard of care for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer (BC) treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS). However, some women may have very low risk of recurrence and could safely be spared RT. This study aimed to identify these women using a molecularly-based approach. Methods: We performed an analysis of the SweBCG91-RT cohort, a trial randomizing women with node-negative stage I-II invasive BC +/- RT following breast conserving surgery, with sparse use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Only patients with ER+, HER2- tumors, and not treated with adjuvant systemic therapy, were included in this analysis. Transcriptome-wide profiling of tumors was performed using the Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0 ST microarray. The SweBCG91-RT cohort was divided into a training cohort of 243 patients and a validation cohort of 354 patients. Biological gene sets and individual genes related to locoregional recurrence in patients not receiving RT of the training set were identified, and a 16-gene signature was trained using elastic net regression. The signature, named Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiation (POLAR), was locked prior to validation. Results: In the validation cohort, POLAR was prognostic for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients not treated with RT (multivariable Cox model adjusting for age, grade, tumor size, and luminal A vs luminal B: HR = 1.7 [1.2,2.3], p < 0.001). Patients categorized as POLAR low-risk had a 10-year locoregional recurrence rate of 7% in the absence of RT. Notably, there was no significant benefit from RT for these POLAR low-risk patients (HR = 1.1 [0.38,3.3], p = 0.83), whereas patients categorized as POLAR high-risk had a significant decreased risk of locoregional recurrence when treated with RT (recurrence rate without RT at 10-years 19%, HR = 0.43 [0.24,0.78], p = 0.0053). Conclusions: These data suggest that the novel POLAR genomic signature based on LRR biology can not only identify patients who have a low risk of LRR without adjuvant RT after BCS but who also would not benefit from RT, thus being prime candidates for RT omission.

Objective. The aim of this study was to prospectively determine the incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and define risk factors in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with zoledronic acid and/or denosumab. Study Design. In a prospective cohort study performed in Region Skane, Sweden, from January 1, 2012, until December 31, 2015, all patients with breast cancer who had radiographic evidence of bone metastases and were treated with zoledronic acid or denosumab were included and followed up until May 31, 2018. Results. Of the 242 patients, MRONJ developed in 16 (6.6%) during the 77 months of study. The incidence of MRONJ in patients treated with zoledronic acid was 4.1%, and in patients treated with denosumab, it was 13.6%. The risk of MRONJ was higher in patients on denosumab than in those treated with zoledronic acid (P = .011). Corticosteroid use was associated with a decreased risk of MRONJ (P = .008), and diabetes was associated with an increased risk of MRONJ (P = .02). Conclusions. The incidence of MRONJ is 13.6% (>3 times higher) in denosumab-treated patients with breast cancer compared with that in patients treated with zoledronic acid (4.1%). Corticosteroid use decreased the risk of MRONJ.