Plants display a remarkable regeneration capacity, which allows them to replace damaged or lost cells, tissues and organs, and thus recover from a broad spectrum of injuries1,2. Even lost stem cells can be regenerated from non-stem cells after competence acquisition, highlighting the enormous plasticity of plant cells. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this process are still poorly understood. In the root, the highly conserved microRNA miR396 and its targets, the GROWTH-REGULATING FACTORs (GRFs), control the transition from stem cells to proliferative cells. miR396 promotes stem cell activity by repressing and excluding the GRFs from the stem cell area. In turn, the GRFs promote cell division in the proliferation zone3. Here we show that the miR396-GRF regulatory module guides stem cell reconstitution after root tip excision, playing a dual role: while miR396 promotes competence, the GRFs control regeneration speed. Moreover, plants with ectopic miR396 expression have defined stem cell niches before the excision but do not reconstitute them afterwards, remaining in an open state despite continuing to grow. We propose that this phenomenon is caused by dispersed stem cell activity, which supports growth after root tip excision without reconstituting the organized and spatially restricted stem cell niche typical of Arabidopsis roots.

Growth-regulating factors (GRFs) belong to a family of transcription factors found in plants which display important roles in growth and development. GRF transcriptional activity is finely tuned by regulatory processes involving post-transcriptional repression exerted by microRNA miR396, and protein-protein interactions involving a family of co-transcriptional regulators known as GRF-interacting factors (GIFs). In this way, the activity of GRF target genes is modulated by a highly complex interplay between GRF/GIF isoform diversity and expression patterns along with miR396 and GIF gradients throughout plant tissues. At the protein level, GRFs are composed of two highly evolutionarily conserved domains known as QLQ and WRC and a less conserved C-terminal trans-activation domain. Whereas QLQ mediates GRF-GIF interaction by forming a complex with a conserved domain called SNH (by SYT N-terminal homology) found in GIFs' N-terminal region, the WRC has been proposed as a putative zinc finger domain responsible for target DNA recognition and nuclear import. However, the structural aspects governing GRF transcriptional activity and target recognition remain unknown. In this work, we applied bioinformatic and biophysical analysis to comprehensively characterize the structural features that modulate the biological function of this protein family with a focus on the WRC domain. We provide insights into the structure of the WRC domain in GRFs and explore the WRC features driving GRFs:DNA complex formation. These findings offer new insights into how WRC domains modulate the biological functions of GRFs, laying the groundwork for future studies on their structure-function relationship in gene regulation and development of plants.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are essential regulators of gene expression, defined by their unique biogenesis, which requires the precise excision of the small RNA from an imperfect fold-back precursor. Unlike their animal counterparts, plant miRNA precursors exhibit variations in sizes and shapes. Plant MIRNAs can undergo processing in a base-to-loop or loop-to-base direction, with DICER-LIKE1 (DCL1) releasing the miRNA after two cuts (two-step MIRNAs) or more (sequential MIRNAs). In this study, we demonstrate the critical role of the miRNA/miRNA* duplex region in the processing of miRNA precursors. We observed that endogenous MIRNAs frequently experience suboptimal processing in vivo due to mismatches in the miRNA/miRNA* duplex, a key region that fine-tunes miRNA levels. Enhancing the interaction energy of the miRNA/miRNA* duplex in two-step MIRNAs results in a substantial increase in miRNA levels. Conversely, sequential MIRNAs display distinct and specific requirements for the miRNA/miRNA* duplexes along their foldback structure. Our work establishes a connection between the miRNA/miRNA* structure and precursor processing mechanisms. Furthermore, we reveal a link between the biological function of miRNAs and the processing mechanism of their precursors with the evolution of plant miRNA/miRNA* duplex structures.

Plants rely on complex regulatory mechanisms to ensure proper growth and development. As plants are sessile organisms, these mechanisms must be flexible enough to adapt to changes in the environment. GROWTH-REGULATING FACTORS (GRFs) are plant-specific transcription factors that act as a central hub controlling plant growth and development, which offer promising biotechnological applications to enhance plant performance. Here, we analyze the complex molecular mechanisms that regulate GRFs activity, and how their natural and synthetic variants can impact on plant growth and development. We describe the biological roles of the GRFs and examine how they regulate gene expression and contribute to the control of organ growth and plant responses to a changing environment. This review focuses on the premise that unlocking the full biotechnological potential of GRFs requires a thorough understanding of the various regulatory layers governing GRF activity, the functional divergence among GRF family members, and the gene networks that they regulate.

The growth-regulating factor (GRF) family of transcriptional factors are involved in the control of leaf size and senescence, inflorescence and root growth, grain size, and plant regeneration. However, there is limited information about the genes regulated by these transcriptional factors, which are in turn responsible for their functions. Using a meta-analysis approach, we identified genes encoding Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) zinc-finger homeodomain (ZF-HD) transcriptional factors, as potential targets of the GRFs. We further showed that GRF3 binds to the promoter of one of the members of the ZF-HD family, HOMEOBOX PROTEIN 33 (HB33), and activates its transcription. Increased levels of HB33 led to different modifications in leaf cell number and size that were dependent on its expression levels. Furthermore, we found that expression of HB33 for an extended period during leaf development increased leaf longevity. To cope with the functional redundancy among ZF-HD family members, we generated a dominant repressor version of HB33, HB33-SRDX. Expression of HB33-SRDX from HB33 regulatory regions was seedling-lethal, revealing the importance of the ZF-HD family in plant development. Misexpression of HB33-SRDX in early leaf development caused a reduction in both cell size and number. Interestingly, the loss-of-function of HB33 in lines carrying a GRF3 allele insensitive to miR396 reverted the delay in leaf senescence characteristic of these plants. Our results revealed functions for ZF-HDs in leaf development and linked them to the GRF pathway.

Members of the GROWTH REGULATING FACTOR (GRF) family of transcription factors play key roles in the promotion of plant growth and development. Many GRFs are post-transcriptionally repressed by microRNA (miRNA) miR396, an evolutionarily conserved small RNA, which restricts their expression to proliferative tissue. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the GRF family in eudicot plants and found that in many species all the GRFs have a miR396-binding site. Yet, we also identified GRFs with mutations in the sequence recognized by miR396, suggesting a partial or complete release of their post-transcriptional repression. Interestingly, Brassicaceae species share a group of GRFs that lack miR396 regulation, including Arabidopsis GRF5 and GRF6. We show that instead of miR396-mediated post-transcriptional regulation, the spatiotemporal control of GRF5 is achieved through evolutionarily conserved promoter sequences, and that AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 2 (ARF2) binds to such conserved sequences to repress GRF5 expression. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the unchecked expression of GRF5 in arf2 mutants is responsible for the increased cell number of arf2 leaves. The results describe a switch in the repression mechanisms that control the expression of GRFs and mechanistically link the control of leaf growth by miR396, GRFs, and ARF2 transcription factors.

Gene expression is reconfigured rapidly during the cell cycle to execute the cellular functions specific to each phase. Studies conducted with synchronized plant cell suspension cultures have identified hundreds of genes with periodic expression patterns across the phases of the cell cycle, but these results may differ from expression occurring in the context of intact organs. Here, we describe the use of fluorescence-activated cell sorting to analyze the gene expression profile of G2/M cells in the growing root. To this end, we isolated cells expressing the early mitosis cell cycle marker CYCLINB1;1-GFP from Arabidopsis root tips. Transcriptome analysis of these cells allowed identification of hundreds of genes whose expression is reduced or enriched in G2/M cells, including many not previously reported from cell suspension cultures. From this dataset, we identified SCL28, a transcription factor belonging to the GRAS family, whose messenger RNA accumulates to the highest levels in G2/M and is regulated by MYB3R transcription factors. Functional analysis indicates that SCL28 promotes progression through G2/M and modulates the selection of cell division planes.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous small RNAs of ∼21 nt that regulate multiple biological pathways in multicellular organisms. They derive from longer transcripts that harbor an imperfect stem-loop structure. In plants, the ribonuclease type III DICER-LIKE1 assisted by accessory proteins cleaves the precursor to release the mature miRNA. Numerous studies highlight the role of the precursor secondary structure during plant miRNA biogenesis; however, little is known about the relevance of the precursor sequence. Here, we analyzed the sequence composition of plant miRNA primary transcripts and found specifically located sequence biases. We show that changes in the identity of specific nucleotides can increase or abolish miRNA biogenesis. Most conspicuously, our analysis revealed that the identity of the nucleotides at unpaired positions of the precursor plays a crucial role during miRNA biogenesis in Arabidopsis.

The potential of genome editing to improve the agronomic performance of crops is often limited by low plant regeneration efficiencies and few transformable genotypes. Here, we show that expression of a fusion protein combining wheat GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR 4 (GRF4) and its cofactor GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 1 (GIF1) substantially increases the efficiency and speed of regeneration in wheat, triticale and rice and increases the number of transformable wheat genotypes. GRF4-GIF1 transgenic plants were fertile and without obvious developmental defects. Moreover, GRF4-GIF1 induced efficient wheat regeneration in the absence of exogenous cytokinins, which facilitates selection of transgenic plants without selectable markers. We also combined GRF4-GIF1 with CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing and generated 30 edited wheat plants with disruptions in the gene Q (AP2L-A5). Finally, we show that a dicot GRF-GIF chimera improves regeneration efficiency in citrus, suggesting that this strategy can be applied to dicot crops.

Genome editing allows precise DNA manipulation, but its potential is limited in many crops by low regeneration efficiencies and few transformable genotypes. Here, we show that expression of a chimeric protein including wheat GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR 4 (GRF4) and its cofactor GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 1 (GIF1) dramatically increases the efficiency and speed of regeneration in wheat, triticale and rice and expands the number of transformable wheat genotypes. Moreover, GRF4-GIF1 induces efficient wheat regeneration in the absence of exogenous cytokinins, which facilitates selection of transgenic plants without selectable markers. By combining GRF4-GIF1 and CRISPR-Cas9 technologies, we were able to generate large numbers of edited wheat plants. The GRF4-GIF1 transgenic plants were fertile and without obvious developmental defects, likely due to post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms operating on GRF4 in adult tissues. Finally, we show that a dicot GRF-GIF chimera improves regeneration efficiency in citrus suggesting that this strategy can be expanded to dicot crops.

Seeds germinating underground display a specific developmental programme, termed skotomorphogenesis, to ensure survival of the emerging seedlings until they reach the light. They rapidly elongate the hypocotyl and maintain the cotyledons closed, forming a hook with the hypocotyl in order to protect apical meristematic cells from mechanical damage. Such crucial events for the fate of the seedling are tightly regulated and although some transcriptional regulators and phytohormones are known to be implicated in this regulation, we are still far from a complete understanding of these biological processes. Our work provides information on the diverse roles in skotomorphogenesis of the core components of microRNA biogenesis in Arabidopsis, HYL1, DCL1, and SE. We show that hypocotyl elongation is promoted by all these components, probably through the action of specific miRNAs. Hook development also depends on these proteins however, remarkably, HYL1 exerts its role in an opposite way to DCL1 and SE. Interestingly, we found that a specific HYL1 domain involved in protein-protein interaction is required for this function. Genetic evidences also point to the phosphorylation status of HYL1 as important for this function. We propose that HYL1 help maintain the hook closed during early skotomorphogenesis in a microprocessor-independent manner by repressing the activity of HY5, the transcriptional master regulator that triggers light responses. This work uncovers a previously unnoticed link between components of the miRNA biogenesis machinery, the skotomorphogenic growth, and hook development in Arabidopsis.

MicroRNAs are small RNA molecules with big impact in many eukaryotic biological processes. In plants, their role as regulators of important developmental programs such as leaf size and shape, flower organs or phase transitions, among others, have been evidenced by mutants in specific miRNAs and by mutants in components of their biogenesis. However, we are still far from understanding the scope of this regulatory system so other crucial developmental phases might be influenced by the microRNA pathway. Skotomorphogenesis is an essential developmental program that takes place after seeds germinate underground in order to display a proper response when seedlings reach the light. In this work, we found that the core components of microRNA pathway, DCL1, HYL1 and SERRATE, promote hypocotyl elongation during skotomorphogenesis. Hook unfolding, another characteristic phenotype displayed by dark-grown seedlings is also regulated by these proteins but, surprisingly, they act in different ways. Thus, HYL1 represses hook unfolding while DCL1 and SE promote it since the hooks of mutants on each component are more or less open than those of wild-type during skotomorphogenesis, respectively. Genetic and physiological analyses on HYL1 mutants provide evidence that repression of hook unfolding is carried out through the HYL1 protein-protein interaction domain. Furthermore, the data indicates that phosphorylated HYL1 is necessary for this function. Molecular and genetic analyses also suggest that HYL1 regulates the activity of the master photomorphogenic regulator HY5 in darkness to ensure a proper early skotomorphogenic growth. In summary, while our data show a role for miRNAs in darkness, it also suggests a microprocessor-independent role of HYL1 as a repressor of hook unfolding assigning a biological function to phosphorylated HYL1. This work uncovers a previously unnoticed link between components of the miRNA biogenesis machinery, the skotomorphogenic growth and hook development in Arabidopsis. Author summary Seeds germinating underground display a specific developmental program, termed skotomorphogenesis, to ensure survival of the emerging seedlings until they reach the light. They rapidly elongate the hypocotyl and maintain the cotyledons closed, forming a hook with the hypocotyl in order to protect apical meristematic cells from mechanical damage. Such crucial events for the fate of the seedling are tightly regulated and although some transcriptional regulators and phytohormones are known to be implicated in this regulation, we are still far from a complete understanding of these biological processes. Our work provides new information on the diverse roles in skotomorphogenesis of the core components of microRNA biogenesis in Arabidopsis, HYL1, SE, and DCL1. We show that hypocotyl elongation is promoted by all these components, probably through the action of specific miRNAs. Hook development is also controlled by these components although, remarkably, HYL1 exerts its role in an opposite way to DCL1 and SE. Interestingly, we found that a specific HYL1 domain involved protein-protein interaction is required for this function, instead of other regions of the protein with known roles in the biogenesis of miRNAs. We propose that phosphorylated HYL1 help to maintain the hook closed during early skotomorphogenesis by repressing the activity of HY5, the transcriptional master regulator that triggers light responses.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are major regulators of gene expression in multicellular organisms. Many of the evolutionarily conserved miRNAs in plants are encoded by small gene families. The miR159/miR319 family has six members of similar sequences sharing 17 nucleotides in . The members of this miRNA family regulate genes encoding TCP (EOSINTE BRANCHED1, YCLOIDEA and CF1/2) and MYB transcription factors. However, despite their sequence similarities, genetic evidence indicates that miR159 and miR319 fulfil different roles . Here, we confirm previous findings showing that genes are not targeted by miR159. Thus, specific small sequence differences between the miRNAs allow for the specific regulation of transcription factors by miR319 miRNAs.

Multicellular life relies on complex regulatory mechanisms ensuring proper growth and development. In plants, these mechanisms construct a body plan that is both reproducible, and highly flexible for adaptation to different environmental conditions. A crucial regulatory module - consisting of microRNA miR396, GROWTH REGULATING FACTORS (GRFs) and GRF-INTERACTING FACTORS (GIFs) - has been shown to control growth of multiple tissues and organs in a variety of species. Especially in the last few years, research has expanded our knowledge of miR396-GRF/GIF function to crops, where it affects agronomically important traits, and highlighted its role in coordinating growth with endogenous and environmental factors. Special properties make them iR396-GRF/GIF system highly efficient in growth regulation and a promising target for improving plant yield.

Global analysis revealed extensive uridylation and cytidylation at the 3’ end of plant microRNA precursors.

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small RNAs of 20-22 nt that regulate diverse biological pathways through the modulation of gene expression. miRNAs recognize target RNAs by base complementarity and guide them to degradation or translational arrest. They are transcribed as longer precursors with extensive secondary structures. In plants, these precursors are processed by a complex harboring DICER-LIKE1 (DCL1), which cuts on the precursor stem region to release the mature miRNA together with the miRNA*. In both plants and animals, the miRNA precursors contain spatial clues that determine the position of the miRNA along their sequences. DCL1 is assisted by several proteins, such as the double-stranded RNA binding protein, HYPONASTIC LEAVES1 (HYL1), and the zinc finger protein SERRATE (SE). The precise biogenesis of miRNAs is of utter importance since it determines the exact nucleotide sequence of the mature small RNAs and therefore the identity of the target genes. miRNA processing itself can be regulated and therefore can determine the final small RNA levels and activity. Here, we describe methods to analyze miRNA processing intermediates in plants. These approaches can be used in wild-type or mutant plants, as well as in plants grown under different conditions, allowing a molecular characterization of the miRNA biogenesis from the RNA precursor perspective.

SummaryAgrobacterium T‐DNA‐encoded 6B proteins cause remarkable growth effects in plants. Nicotiana otophora carries two cellular T‐DNAs with three slightly divergent 6b genes (TE‐1‐6b‐L, TE‐1‐6b‐R and TE‐2‐6b) originating from a natural transformation event. In Arabidopsis thaliana, expression of 2×35S:TE‐2‐6b, but not 2×35S:TE‐1‐6b‐L or 2×35S:TE‐1‐6b‐R, led to plants with crinkly leaves, which strongly resembled mutants of the miR319a/TCP module. This module is composed of MIR319A and five CIN‐like TCP (TEOSINTHE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA and PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN BINDING FACTOR) genes (TCP2, TCP3, TCP4, TCP10 and TCP24) targeted by miR319a. The CIN‐like TCP genes encode transcription factors and are required for cell division arrest at leaf margins during development. MIR319A overexpression causes excessive growth and crinkly leaves. TE‐2‐6b plants did not show increased miR319a levels, but the mRNA levels of the TCP4 target gene LOX2 were decreased, as in jaw‐D plants. Co‐expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP)‐tagged TCPs with native or red fluorescent protein (RFP)‐tagged TE‐6B proteins led to an increase in TCP protein levels and formation of numerous cytoplasmic dots containing 6B and TCP proteins. Yeast double‐hybrid experiments confirmed 6B/TCP binding and showed that TE‐1‐6B‐L and TE‐1‐6B‐R bind a smaller set of TCP proteins than TE‐2‐6B. A single nucleotide mutation in TE‐1‐6B‐R enlarged its TCP‐binding repertoire to that of TE‐2‐6B and caused a crinkly phenotype in Arabidopsis. Deletion analysis showed that TE‐2‐6B targets the TCP4 DNA‐binding domain and directly interferes with transcriptional activation. Taken together, these results provide detailed insights into the mechanism of action of the N. otophora TE‐encoded 6b genes.

Many microRNAs (miRNAs) are encoded by small gene families. In a third of all conserved Arabidopsis miRNA families, members vary at two or more nucleotide positions. We have focused on the related miR159 and miR319 families, which share sequence identity at 17 of 21 nucleotides, yet affect different developmental processes through distinct targets. MiR159 regulates MYB mRNAs, while miR319 predominantly acts on TCP mRNAs. In the case of miR319, MYB targeting plays at most a minor role because miR319 expression levels and domain limit its ability to affect MYB mRNAs. In contrast, in the case of miR159, the miRNA sequence prevents effective TCP targeting. We complement these observations by identifying nucleotide positions relevant for miRNA activity with mutants recovered from a suppressor screen. Together, our findings reveal that functional specialization of miR159 and miR319 is achieved through both expression and sequence differences.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are major post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression. Their biogenesis relies on the cleavage of longer precursors by a nuclear localized processing machinery. The evolutionary preference of plant miRNAs to silence transcription factors turned these small molecules into key actors during growth and adaptive responses. Furthermore, during their life cycle plants are subject to changes in the environmental conditions surrounding them. In order to face these changes, plants display unique adaptive capacities based on an enormous developmental plasticity, where miRNAs play central roles. Many individual miRNAs have been shown to modulate the plant response to different environmental cues and stresses. In the last few years, increasing evidence has shown that not only individual genes encoding miRNAs but also the miRNA pathway as a whole is subject to regulation in response to external stimulus. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge about the miRNA pathway. We dissect the pathway to analyze the events leading to the generation of these small RNAs and emphasize the regulation of core components of the miRNA biogenesis machinery.