Approximately 70–80% of breast cancers are estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), with 65% of these cases also being progesterone receptor-positive (ER+PR+). In most cases of ER+ advanced breast cancer, endocrine therapy (ET) serves as the first-line treatment, utilizing various drugs that inhibit ER signaling. These include tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM); fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD); and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), which block estrogen synthesis. However, intrinsic or acquired hormone resistance eventually develops, leading to disease progression. The combination of ET with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) has been shown to significantly increase progression-free survival (PFS) and, in some cases, overall survival (OS). CDK4/6is works by arresting the cell cycle in the G1 phase, preventing DNA synthesis, and enhancing the efficacy of ET. This review highlights the key mechanisms of resistance to ET, whether used alone or in combination with biological agents, as well as emerging therapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming resistance. Addressing ET resistance remains a work in progress, and in the near future, better patient selection for different therapeutic approaches is expected through the identification of more precise biological and genetic markers. In particular, liquid biopsy may provide a real-time portrait of the disease, offering insights into mechanisms driving ET resistance and cancer progression.

Metabolic reprogramming is a k`ey hallmark of tumors, developed in response to hypoxia and nutrient deficiency during tumor progression. In both cancer and immune cells, there is a metabolic shift from oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to aerobic glycolysis, also known as the Warburg effect, which then leads to lactate acidification, increased lipid synthesis, and glutaminolysis. This reprogramming facilitates tumor immune evasion and, within the tumor microenvironment (TME), cancer and immune cells collaborate to create a suppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). The growing interest in the metabolic reprogramming of the TME, particularly its significance in colorectal cancer (CRC)—one of the most prevalent cancers—has prompted us to explore this topic. CRC exhibits abnormal glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and increased lipid synthesis. Acidosis in CRC cells hampers the activity of anti-tumor immune cells and inhibits the phagocytosis of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), while nutrient deficiency promotes the development of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and M2-like macrophages. In CRC cells, activation of G-protein coupled receptor 81 (GPR81) signaling leads to overexpression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and reduces the antigen presentation capability of dendritic cells. Moreover, the genetic and epigenetic cell phenotype, along with the microbiota, significantly influence CRC metabolic reprogramming. Activating RAS mutations and overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) occur in approximately 50% and 80% of patients, respectively, stimulating glycolysis and increasing levels of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF-1α) and MYC proteins. Certain bacteria produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which activate CD8+ cells and genes involved in antigen processing and presentation, while other mechanisms support pro-tumor activities. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in selected CRC patients has shown promise, and the combination of these with drugs that inhibit aerobic glycolysis is currently being intensively researched to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy.

In ER+ breast cancer, usually seen as the low immunogenic type, the main mechanisms favouring the immune response or tumour growth and immune evasion in the tumour microenvironment (TME) have been examined. The principal implications of targeting the oestrogen-mediated pathways were also considered. Recent experimental findings point out that anti-oestrogens contribute to the reversion of the immunosuppressive TME. Moreover, some preliminary clinical data with the hormone-immunotherapy association in a metastatic setting support the notion that the reversion of immune suppression in TME is likely favoured by the G0-G1 state induced by anti-oestrogens. Following immune stimulation, the reverted immune suppression allows the boosting of the effector cells of the innate and adaptive immune response. This suggests that ER+ breast cancer is a molecular subtype where a successful active immune manipulation can be attained. If this is confirmed by a prospective multicentre trial, which is expected in light of the provided evidence, the proposed hormone immunotherapy can also be tested in the adjuvant setting. Furthermore, the different rationale suggests a synergistic activity of our proposed immunotherapy with the currently recommended regimen consisting of antioestrogens combined with cyclin kinase inhibitors. Overall, this lays the foundation for a shift in clinical practice within this most prevalent molecular subtype of breast cancer.

“Targeted therapy” or “precision medicine” is a therapeutic strategy launched over two decades ago. It relies on drugs that inhibit key molecular mechanisms/pathways or genetic/epigenetic alterations that promote different cancer hallmarks. Many clinical trials, sponsored by multinational drug companies, have been carried out. During this time, research has increasingly uncovered the complexity of advanced breast cancer disease. Despite high expectations, patients have seen limited benefits from these clinical trials. Commonly, only a minority of trials are successful, and the few approved drugs are costly. The spread of this expensive therapeutic strategy has constrained the resources available for alternative research. Meanwhile, due to the high cost/benefit ratio, other therapeutic strategies have been proposed by researchers over time, though they are often not pursued due to a focus on precision medicine. Notable among these are drug repurposing and counteracting micrometastatic disease. The former provides an obvious answer to expensive targeted therapies, while the latter represents a new field to which efforts have recently been devoted, offering a “way beyond” the current research.

Some main recent researches that have dissected tumor microenvironment (TME) by imaging mass cytometry (IMC) in different subtypes of primary breast cancer samples were considered. The many phenotypic variant, clusters of epithelial tumor and immune cells, their structural features as well as the main genetic aberrations, sub-clonal heterogeneity and their systematic classification also have been examined. Mutational evolution has been assessed in primary and metastatic breast cancer samples. Overall, based on these findings the current concept of precision medicine is questioned and challenged by alternative therapeutic strategies. In the two last decades, immunotherapy as powerful and harmless tool to fight cancer has received huge attention. Thus, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) composition, its prognostic role for clinical course as well as a novel definition of immunogenicity in breast cancer is proposed. Investigational clinical trials carried out by us and other findings suggest that G0-G1 state induced in endocrine-dependent metastatic breast cancer is more suitable for successful immune manipulation. Residual micro-metastatic disease seems to be another specific condition that can significantly favor the immune response in breast and other solid tumors.

SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic, the acute respiratory disease which, so far, has led to over 7 million deaths. There are several symptoms associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections which include neurological and psychiatric disorders, at least in the case of pre-Omicron variants. SARS-CoV-2 infection can also promote the onset of glioblastoma in patients without prior malignancies. In this study, we focused on the Envelope protein codified by the virus genome, which acts as viroporin and that is reported to be central for virus propagation. In particular, we characterized the electrophysiological profile of E-protein transfected U251 and HEK293 cells through the patch-clamp technique and FURA-2 measurements. Specifically, we observed an increase in the voltage-dependent (Kv) and calcium-dependent (KCa) potassium currents in HEK293 and U251 cell lines, respectively. Interestingly, in both cellular models, we observed a depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential in accordance with an alteration of U251 cell growth. We, therefore, investigated the transcriptional effect of E protein on the signaling pathways and found several gene alterations associated with apoptosis, cytokines and WNT pathways. The electrophysiological and transcriptional changes observed after E protein expression could explain the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on gliomagenesis.

AIMS:The identification of subjects at higher risk for incident heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (EF) suitable for more intensive preventive programmes remains challenging. We applied phenomapping to the DAVID-Berg population, comprising subjects with preclinical HF, aiming to refine HF risk stratification. METHODS:The DAVID-Berg study prospectively enrolled 596 asymptomatic outpatients with EF > 40% with hypertension, diabetes mellitus or known cardiovascular disease. In this cohort, we performed an unsupervised cluster analysis on 591 patients, including clinical, laboratory, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters. We tested the association between each cluster and a composite outcome of HF/death. RESULTS:The median age was 70 years, 55.5% were males and the median EF was 61.0%. Phenomapping provided three different clusters. Subjects in Cluster 3 were the oldest and had the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation, the lowest estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the highest N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and the largest left atrium. During a median follow-up of 5.7 years, 13.4% of subjects experienced HF/death events (N = 79). Compared with Clusters 1 and 2, Cluster 3 had the worst prognosis (log-rank test: Cluster 3 vs. 1 P < 0.001; Cluster 3 vs. 2 P = 0.008). Cluster 3 was associated with a risk of HF/death 2.5 times higher than Cluster 1 [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-4.90]. CONCLUSIONS:Based on phenomapping, older patients with lower kidney function and worse diastolic function might represent a subset of preclinical HF with EF > 40% who deserve more efforts to prevent clinical HF.

Introduction Actinic keratoses (AKs) are humans' most common keratinocyte-derived precancerous lesions. They can be observed predominantly in fair-skinned individuals on sun-exposed surfaces. Another name for AKs is solar keratosis. The primary risk factor for AKs is cumulative UV exposure from sunlight and/or tanning salons. AKs may present on a patient as a few detectable lesions. Clinically, they present as scaly erythema lesions with various pigmentations. Surgery treatment is the only approach that can definitively resolve the illness.Method The research aims to demonstrate the effectiveness of treating relapsing AKs through the use of factors present during organogenesis extracted from zebrafish caviar conveyed through a cryopass therapy device (cryolaser phoresis). These factors are peptides present during specific phases of organogenesis and have shown the capacity to reverse cancer and neurodegeneration processes through gene, transcriptional, translational, and post-translational regulation.Result We found that 90% of patients responded. The percentage of responding patients was 100% among females and 80% among men.Conclusion Our results confirm previous findings about the effectiveness of stem cell differentiation stage factors (SCDFs) in cancer and open new ways to integrate treatment.

Abstract Aims Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (S-ICD) therapy is expanding rapidly. However, there are few data on the S-ICD extraction procedure and subsequent patient management. The aim of this analysis was to describe the procedure, management, and outcome of S-ICD extractions in clinical practice. Methods and results We enrolled consecutive patients who required complete S-ICD extraction at 66 Italian centres. From 2013 to 2022, 2718 patients undergoing de novo implantation of an S-ICD were enrolled. Of these, 71 required complete S-ICD system extraction (17 owing to infection). The S-ICD system was successfully extracted in all patients, and no complications were reported; the median procedure duration was 40 (25th–75th percentile: 20–55) min. Simple manual traction was sufficient to remove the lead in 59 (84%) patients, in whom lead-dwelling time was shorter [20 (9–32) months vs. 30 (22–41) months; P = 0.032]. Hospitalization time was short in the case of both non-infectious [2 (1–2) days] and infectious indications [3 (1–6) days]. In the case of infection, no patients required post-extraction intravenous antibiotics, the median duration of any antibiotic therapy was 10 (10–14) days, and the re-implantation was performed during the same procedure in 29% of cases. No complications arose over a median of 21 months. Conclusion The S-ICD extraction was safe and easy to perform, with no complications. Simple traction of the lead was successful in most patients, but specific tools could be needed for systems implanted for a longer time. The peri- and post-procedural management of S-ICD extraction was free from complications and not burdensome for patients and healthcare system. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT02275637.

The human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is the only known human oncogenic retrovirus. HTLV-1 can cause a type of cancer called adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL). The virus is transmitted through the body fluids of infected individuals, primarily breast milk, blood, and semen. At least 5–10 million people in the world are infected with HTLV-1. In addition to ATL, HTLV-1 infection can also cause HTLV-I-associated myelopathy (HAM/TSP). ATL is characterized by a low viral expression and poor prognosis. The oncogenic mechanism triggered by HTLV-1 is extremely complex and the molecular pathways are not fully understood. However, viral regulatory proteins Tax and HTLV-1 bZIP factor (HBZ) have been shown to play key roles in the transformation of HTLV-1-infected T cells. Moreover, several studies have shown that the final fate of HTLV-1-infected transformed Tcell clones is the result of a complex interplay of HTLV-1 oncogenic protein expression with cellular transcription factors that subvert the cell cycle and disrupt regulated cell death, thereby exerting their transforming effects. This review provides updated information on the mechanisms underlying the transforming action of HTLV-1 and highlights potential therapeutic targets to combat ATL.

Abstract Aims In subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) recipients, the UNTOUCHED study demonstrated a very low inappropriate shock rate on programming a conditional zone between 200 and 250 bpm and a shock zone for arrhythmias >250 bpm. The extent to which this programming approach is adopted in clinical practice is still unknown, as is its impact on the rates of inappropriate and appropriate therapies. Methods and results We assessed ICD programming on implantation and during follow-up in a cohort of 1468 consecutive S-ICD recipients in 56 Italian centres. We also measured the occurrence of inappropriate and appropriate shocks during follow-up. On implantation, the median programmed conditional zone cut-off was set to 200 bpm (IQR: 200–220) and the shock zone cut-off was 230 bpm (IQR: 210–250). During follow-up, the conditional zone cut-off rate was not significantly changed, while the shock zone cut-off was changed in 622 (42%) patients and the median value increased to 250 bpm (IQR: 230–250) (P < 0.001). UNTOUCHED-like programming of detection cut-offs was adopted in 426 (29%) patients immediately after device implantation, and in 714 (49%, P < 0.001) at the last follow-up. UNTOUCHED-like programming was independently associated with fewer inappropriate shocks (hazard ratio 0.50, 95%CI 0.25–0.98, P = 0.044), and had no impact on appropriate and ineffective shocks. Conclusions In recent years, S-ICD implanting centres have increasingly programmed high arrhythmia detection cut-off rates, at the time of implantation in the case of new S-ICD recipients, and during follow-up in the case of pre-existing implants. This has contributed significantly to reducing the incidence of inappropriate shocks in clinical practice. Rordorf: Programming of the S-ICD Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT02275637

Background: Predicting an accessory pathway location is extremely important in pediatric patients. Aims: We designed a study to compare previously published algorithms by Arruda, Boersma, and Chiang. Methods: This multicenter study included patients who had undergone successful ablation of one accessory pathway. Analysis of resting 12-lead electrocardiograms was carried out. An aggregated prediction score was constructed on the basis of algorithm agreement, and a structured workflow approach was proposed. Results: The total population was 120 patients (mean age, 12.7 [+/- 3.6] years). The algorithm by Boersma had the highest accuracy (71.7%). The inter-rater agreement among the 3 reference algorithms, according to left-sided accessory pathway (AP) identification, was good between Boersma and Chiang (kappa = 0.611; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.468-0.753) but moderate between Arruda and Chiang and between Arruda and Boersma (kappa = 0.566; 95% CI, 0.419-0.713 and kappa = 0.582; 95% CI, 0.438-0.727, respectively). Regarding locations at risk of atrioventricular (AV) block, agreement was fair between Arruda and Chiang and between Boersma and Chiang (kappa = 0.358; 95% CI, 0.195-0.520 and kappa = 0.307; 95% CI, 0.192-0.422, respectively) but moderate between Arruda and Boersma (kappa = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.304-0.597). On applying a first-step diagnostic evaluation, when concordance was achieved, we were able to correctly identify left-sided or non-left-sided ablation sites in 96.4% (n = 80) of cases. When concordance was achieved, correct prediction of risk/no risk of AV block was achieved in 92.2% (n = 59) of cases. Conclusions: An aggregated prediction score based on 3 reference algorithms proved able to predict an accessory pathway location very precisely and could be used to plan safely invasive procedures.

Stefan Mundlos and colleagues report the identification of mutations in PYCR1 that cause autosomal recessive cutis laxa. PYCR1 encodes an enzyme involved in proline metabolism and localizes to mitochondria.

More than forty years ago, physicians started to implant cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), first in patients survived after a cardiac arrest [1]. This disruptive technology has now become the standard of care for primary and secondary prevention of sudden death in patients with heart disease [2]. Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a phenomenon not completely understood; its numbers are stable, even though lots of interventions are put in place to reduce its incidence: from pharmacological therapy to behavioral advice, to prompt emergency care access in different countries outside the hospital [3]. Coronary heart disease continues to be the most known and advocated cause of sudden cardiac death; nevertheless, a relevant proportion of cases of SCD occurs in patients without prior history of severe heart condition [3]. A relevant growth in ICD implants is expected in the world for the upcoming years, considering the high rate of implantation in high-income countries and substantial variability among utilization in different settings [4]. There are many different conditions that can result in ICD indication; however, the main reason for implant can be summarized as primary and secondary prevention, with the former responsible for majority of implants (from 60 to 79% of cases) [5,6]. During the last two decades, a relevant number of clinical trials (see Table 1) demonstrated the benefit of ICD therapy in secondary prevention and in primary prevention, too. The two main subgroups of patients investigated for primary prevention, on the basis of reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), were historically divided into ischemic and nonischemic heart diseases [7–9].

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with high recurrence rates, high incidence of distant metastases, and poor overall survival (OS). Taxane and anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (CT) is currently the main systemic treatment option for TNBC, while platinum-based chemotherapy showed promising results in the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings. An early arising of intrinsic or acquired CT resistance is common and represents the main hurdle for successful TNBC treatment. Numerous mechanisms were uncovered that can lead to the development of chemoresistance. These include cancer stem cells (CSCs) induction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, hypoxia and avoidance of apoptosis, single factors such as tyrosine kinase receptors (EGFR, IGFR1), a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10), and a few pathological molecular pathways. Some biomarkers capable of predicting resistance to specific chemotherapeutic agents were identified and are expected to be validated in future studies for a more accurate selection of drugs to be employed and for a more tailored approach, both in neoadjuvant and advanced settings. Recently, based on specific biomarkers, some therapies were tailored to TNBC subsets and became available in clinical practice: olaparib and talazoparib for BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers larotrectinib and entrectinib for neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusion carriers, and anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop2) antibody drug conjugate therapy for heavily pretreated metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Further therapies targeting some pathologic molecular pathways, apoptosis, miRNAS, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), and androgen receptor (AR) are under investigation. Among them, phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and EGFR inhibitors as well as antiandrogens showed promising results and are under evaluation in Phase II/III clinical trials. Emerging therapies allow to select specific antiblastics that alone or by integrating the conventional therapeutic approach may overcome/hinder chemoresistance.

Aim: We conducted a pilot study that combines immunotherapy (cyclic interleukin-2 interferon-beta sequence) and hormone therapy (HT) to overcome endocrine resistance in metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The final results of a 2:1 control-case retrospective observational study are here shown following 22 additional months of postoperative follow-up and 6 further controls. There were 95 controls and 42 cases in total. The 95 controls were ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent first-line HT with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) or fulvestrant. Twenty-eight of them (28.9%) also received biological drugs including cyclin kinase inhibitors (CKIs). The 42 cases were ER+ metastatic breast cancer patients who received interferon beta-interleukin-2 immunotherapy in addition to first-line HT. Selective estrogen receptor modulators/down-regulators (SERMs/SERDs) were used for HT in 39 (92.9%) of them and AIs in the remaining 3. Results: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the 42 studied patients who received hormone immunotherapy (HIT) than in the 95 controls (median time 33 vs. 18 months, P = 0.002, and 81 vs. 62 months, P = 0.019). In the analysis adjusted for disease-free interval (DFI), hormone receptor, HER2 status, visceral involvement, AIs, and biological therapy, the PFS and OS hazard ratio (HR) further increased in favor of the 42 cases (P = 0.004 and P = 0.044 respectively). In the same ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with both AIs and CKIs, a median PFS ranging from 25.3 to 28.18 months and a median OS of 37.5 months were observed. Conclusions: This study strongly suggests multi-center randomized clinical trials should be performed to enter our proposed immunotherapy into clinical practice.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer in women worldwide. Advances in the early diagnosis and treatment of cancer in the last decade have progressively decreased the cancer mortality rate, and in recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a relevant tool against cancer. HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are considered more immunogenic and suitable for this kind of treatment due to the higher rate of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. In TNBC, genetic aberrations further favor immunogenicity due to more neo-antigens in cancer cells. Methods: This review summarizes the principal ongoing conventional and investigational immunotherapies in breast cancer. Particularly, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their use alone or combined with DNA damage repair inhibitors (DDRis) are described. Then, the issue on immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies against HER-2 family receptors is updated. Other investigational immunotherapies include a new schedule based on the interferon beta-interleukin-2 sequence that was given in ER+ metastatic breast cancer patients concomitant with anti-estrogen therapy, which surprisingly showed promising results. Results: Based on the scientific literature and our own findings, the current evaluation of tumor immunogenicity and the conventional model of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) are questioned. Conclusions: A novel strategy based on additional prolonged adjuvant immunotherapy combined with hormone therapy or alternated with CT is proposed.