Pyroptosis is a form of programmed cell death characterized by the cleavage of gasdermin (GSDM) family proteins that form pores in the plasma membrane, cell rupture, and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In this study, we performed immunohistochemistry for cleaved GSDMD, GSDME-N-terminal, and GSDMC in two different cohorts of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and analyzed their prognostic and immune impact. The results showed frequent cleaved GSDMD (GSDMD-N-terminal) expression. Only cytoplasmic GSDMD-N-terminal expression correlated with significantly better patient survival in two cohorts. In contrast, GSDME was mainly expressed in the vascular endothelium, correlated with significantly adverse prognostic effect. Correlating with the multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) results, we found that cytoplasmic GSDMD-N-terminal expression was associated with increased CD38+ (activated) M1 macrophages in both cohorts, cognate interactions between live DLBCL cells and activated M1 macrophages (and T cells), and lower PD-1/PD-L1 expression in the analyzed cases. In contrast, T cell pyroptosis, lymphoma cell resistance to cell death, and phagocytosis by M2 macrophages were observed in cells with nuclear GSDMD-N-terminal expression. Bulk gene expression profiling and deconvolution analysis for patients with cytoplasmic GSDMD-N-terminal expression revealed downregulation of “Don’t eat me” signaling genes, upregulation of many RNA genes, decreased frequency of “Inflammatory” lymphoma microenvironment subtype, increased abundance of prognostically favorable cell states and ecotypes, and decreased abundance of T cell exhaustion state. In summary, this study showed distinct cellular and subcellular patterns of three gasdermin proteins and their associated immune response phenotypes and prognostic effects, with implications for novel therapeutic strategies for B-cell lymphoma.

Primary testicular (PT) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare and aggressive lymphoma with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. To identify prognostic biomarkers in PT-DLBCL, in this study we analyzed DNA and RNA samples of PT-DLBCL tumors from 206 patients using next-generation sequencing platforms and assays. Genetic alteration analysis found that multiple chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs), TP53 transcript mutations with high variant allele frequency, and MCD subtype had significantly adverse prognostic effects, whereas elevated microsatellite instability had a significantly favorable prognostic effect in PT-DLBCL. Targeted RNA-seq analysis identified a PTL gene expression signature by comparing PT-DLBCL with systemic DLBCL and revealed the heterogeneity within PT-DLBCL by unsupervised clustering, which classified PT-DLBCLs into a testicular lymphoma tumor (TLT) subtype and a microenvironment (ME) subtype. The TLT subtype featured upregulation of genes functioning in DNA damage response, DNA repair, chromatin remodeling, the cell cycle, and the nucleus, and was associated with significantly poorer patient survival and higher frequencies of MYD88 mutations, multiple CNVs, MCD subtype, bulk tumors, and elderly patients in the PT-DLBCL cohort. In contrast, the ME subtype distinctively featured upregulation of various signaling pathway genes involving the tumor microenvironment and downregulation of BTK and B-cell receptor signaling genes, and was associated with significantly better clinical outcome than the TLT subtype of PT-DLBCL independently of CNVs, MCD and MYD88 mutation and than systemic DLBCL. Moreover, genomic microRNA profiling analysis identified a PTL microRNA signature significantly differentially expressed between PT-DLBCL and systemic DLBCL patients and within the PT-DLBCL cohort, and PT-DLBCL patients with higher expression of 16 PTL microRNAs (14 are testicular tissue-specific) had significantly better survival. In summary, this study revealed the molecular heterogeneity in genetic abnormalities and expression profiles of coding genes and microRNAs within the PT-DLBCL entity, and identified significant prognostic biomarkers and PTL signatures.

Pyroptosis has emerged as a novel form of programmed cell death implicated in tumorigenesis and antitumor immunity. To gain knowledge on the role of pyroptosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we assessed expression of cleaved gasdermin D (GSDMD), GSDME, and GSDMC by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a large number of DLBCL specimens, and correlated the expression to patient survival and immune biomarkers quantified by multiplex fluorescent IHC, separately in two subcohorts treated by R-CHOP or CHOP chemotherapy. We found that cleaved GSDMD cytoplasmic expression was significantly associated with better survival of patients with DLBCL, increased CD38+ M1-like macrophages (CD68+CD163- or CD11c+), and higher CD38+ percentages in both two subcohorts, as well as lower PD-L1 expression in macrophages and PD-1 expression in T cells in the R-CHOP cohort (PD-1 and PD-L1 were not evaluated in the CHOP cohort). In contrast, GSDME was mainly expressed in endothelial cells, and showed significantly unfavorable prognostic effects and associations with higher CD31+ and CD3+ cell densities in both two subcohorts. In addition, GSDME+ and high GSDMC expression were associated with higher CD38+ cell densities (including CD38+ M1-like macrophages) and percentages in the R-CHOP cohort, whereas GSDME+ was associated with increased M2-like macrophages in the CHOP cohort. Together, these prognostic and correlative results indicate that gasdermins and pyroptosis have important roles in DLBCL. R01CA233490, Duke University startup fund Tumor Immunology: Cellular Responses and Tumor Microevironment (TIME)

INTRODUCTION:To improve inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval rates, an electronic health record prompt for scheduling retrieval before patient discharge was implemented. METHODS:This retrospective comparative cohort study was conducted in a single Midwestern tertiary care medical center. Adult patients with IVC filters placed for a medical (Medical subgroup) or trauma (Trauma subgroup) indication before and after protocol implementation and who had follow-up documented in the electronic health record were included. IVC filter retrieval attempt rates both overall and by indication for placement before and after protocol implementation were compared. RESULTS:Three hundred eighty-five patients met eligibility criteria: 223 before implementation (Before group) and 162 after implementation (After group). The attempted retrieval rate for the After group was 11.4% higher than the Before group (P = .012). Attempted retrieval rates in the Medical Before and After subgroups were 56.2% and 76.0%, respectively (P = .001). The Trauma subgroups' rates were similar to each other (P = .594). Time to retrieval attempt was significantly shorter in the Medical After subgroup than in the Medical Before subgroup (P = .018) but similar in the Trauma subgroups. CONCLUSIONS:Attempted retrieval rates were significantly higher in the After group and Medical After subgroup. Trauma subgroup rates were similar, likely because a previous intervention to increase retrieval in trauma patients was in place during the pre-implementation period of our study. Findings suggest that using an automated electronic health record-based prompt to facilitate IVC filter retrieval scheduling could greatly improve retrieval rates and patient safety.

7540 Background: The combination of a proteasome inhibitor (PI) with lenalidomide (R) and dex (d) has been a common initial therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM). We designed a randomized phase 3 trial to examine if carfilzomib (K), a next generation PI, improved progression free survival (PFS) compared with bortezomib (V) when either is combined with Rd for initial treatment of NDMM. Initial analysis at a median follow up of 15.3 months (mos) showed comparable PFS for both triplets. We present the long-term results of the trial with ~70 months median follow up. Methods: Patients (Pts) with NDMM, were randomized 1:1 to receive VRd or KRd for 36 weeks followed by a 2 nd randomization (1:1) to indefinite versus 2 yrs of R maintenance. Pts without del17p, t(14;16), t(14;20), plasma cell leukemia or high-risk GEP70 profile, were enrolled. VRd arm included V 1.3 mg/m 2 on days(d) 1, 4, 8, and 11 (d1, 8 for cycles 9-12), R 25 mg d1-14, and d 20 mg d1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 of a 3-week (wk) cycle for 12 cycles, while pts in the KRd arm received K 36 mg/m 2 d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 with R 25 mg daily on d1-21 and d 40 mg wkly, in 4 wk cycles for 9 cycles. Maintenance used 15 mg R d1-21 q4 wks. Results: The study accrued 1087 pts (VRd=542, KRd=545). Median age was 65y; baseline characteristics including intent to transplant were similar across the arms. Median induction duration (mos; IQR) was 7.2 (3.4-8.9) and 8.4 (5.1-9.1) for VRd and KRd, respectively; 59.8% in VRd and 45.3% in KRd did not proceed to Step 2. Median PFS (mos) was VRd=41.9 and KRd=44.6; HR = 0.89 (0.76-1.04). Toxicity data, PFS sensitivity analyses and OS probabilities are as in the table. Conclusions: In this randomized trial, with median follow up of nearly 6 years, KRd and VRd had comparable PFS and OS in an intent to treat analysis. While similar numbers proceeded to SCT in the 2 arms, more did so during induction in the VRd arm while more patients in the KRd arm went to SCT later. VRd remains a standard triplet induction regimen in standard and intermediate risk NDMM, and a suitable backbone for 4 drug combinations. Clinical trial information: NCT01863550 . N (%) VRd(n=527) KRd(n=526) SCT anytime 186 (34.3) 183 (33.6) SCT without Step 2 registration 146 112 Median Time to SCT (mos; range) 7.7 (3.5-83.9) 10.6 (3.7-70.6) Grade 3-4 Treatment-Related Toxicity 315 (59.8) 344 (65.4) Grade 5 Treatment-Related Toxicity 2 (0.4) 9 (1.7) Grade 5 All Events 11 (2.1) 20 (3.8) Survival outcomes HR Median (95% CI) Median (95% CI) PFS Primary: PD or death within 3 months of last evaluation as events 0.89(0.76-1.04) 41.9(35.7, 50.3) 44.6(38.2, 51.9) PFS Sensitivity: All deaths as events, 0.87(0.75-1.02) 39.5(34.9, 46.0) 42.8(37.4, 49.7) PFS Sensitivity: Censor at alternate Rx 0.83(0.69-0.99) 35.0(31.3, 42.6) 38.7(34.7, 49.0) PFS Sensitivity: Event at alternate Rx 0.84(0.73-0.97) 18.0(14.2, 23.0) 24.4(20.9, 27.9) Overall survival 0.92(0.75-1.12) 119(100, NE) 118(103-NE)

Primary bone diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is a rare variant of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma historically treated with induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radiation therapy (RT). It remains unknown whether RT confers additional benefit following rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) induction in patients with limited stage disease. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients treated between 2005 and 2019 using rituximab-based CIT regimens with or without consolidative RT to discern whether consolidative RT adds benefit in patients with stage I-II disease that could be encompassed in one radiation field. A total of 112 patients were included: 78 received CIT and radiation (RT group), and 34 received CIT alone (no RT group). The overall survival at 10 years was 77.9% in the RT group and 89.0% in the no RT group (P=0.42). The relapse-free survival at 10 years was 73.5% in the RT group and 80.3% in the no RT group (P=0.88). Neither improved overall survival nor relapse-free survival was associated with the addition of consolidative RT. Subgroup analysis of patients only achieving a partial response after CIT suggests that these patients may benefit from consolidative RT.

Abstract Introduction: MYC+BCL2+ double expression (DE) is a biomarker for poor prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), likely due to the cooperation between MYC and BCL2 oncoproteins in tumor cells. However, as generally MYC and BCL2 are separately assessed on two different slides by immunohistochemistry (IHC), MYC+ and BCL2+ results are from different cells. With the WHO-recommended cutoffs, ≥40% for MYC and ≥50% for BCL2 (sum < 100%), there is chance that the so-called DE comes from non-overlapping regions of the tumor (not single-cell DE). Moreover, tumor expression scores based on morphology assessment often vary among pathologists. In this study, we performed fluorescent multiplex IHC (fmIHC) using a MultiOmyxTM immunofluorescence platform (NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc.) to determine single-cell MYC and BCL2 co-expression for prognostic analysis in DLBCL. Patients and Methods: Co-expression of MYC, BCL2, and 11 immunophenotypic markers by fmIHC was digitally quantified for 547 patients with DLBCL. Percentage of cells with MYC/BCL2 double or single expression was calculated for various cell types. Prognostic analysis was performed for de novo DLBCL cases, including 108 patients treated CHOP chemotherapy, and 356 patients treated with rituximab (R)-CHOP. Results: First, although MYC and BCL2 were expressed in multiple cell types, the vast majority (>90%) of MYC+BCL2+ DE cells were lymphoma cells. Frequencies of MYC and BCL2 co-expression were consistent with random distribution of independent MYC/BCL2 expression in positive cases. The activated B-cell-like subtype compared with the germinal center B-cell-like subtype had a significantly higher mean percentage of MYC+BCL2+ DE, but not single BCL2 or MYC expression, in PAX5+ cells. Second, in both the R-CHOP and CHOP cohorts, high percentages of DE in PAX5+ cells and in all DAPI+ cells were associated with significantly poorer survival of DLBCL patients. Very high percentage of single BCL2 expression in PAX5+ cells was also associated with poorer survival, however, only in a small number of patients in both cohorts. Only in the R-CHOP cohort, high single MYC expression in PAX5+ cells (in a significant proportion of the cohort) was associated with significantly poorer overall survival. In the R-CHOP cohort, eight cases had MYC/BCL2 double hit by FISH, including 3 cases with MYC/IGH fusions (DE) and 5 cases with MYC/non-IGH rearrangements (only one DE). The exclusion of these double hit cases did not impact the significance of DE and single MYC+ expression. Summary: True MYC+BCL2+ double protein expression at the single cell level is predominantly in lymphoma cells, and associated with significantly poor survival of DLBCL patients. Our results suggest high cutoffs for common MYC/BCL2 IHC to identify true double expressor lymphoma. Citation Format: Zijun Yidan Xu-Monette, Yong Li, Qingyan Au, Harry Nunns, Wenyu Shi, Alexandar Tzankov, Carlo Visco, Govind Bhagat, Eric Hsi, Xiaoxian X. Zhao, Karen Dybkaer, April Chiu, Wayne Tam, Youli Zu, Fredrick B. Hagemeister, Andrew Song, Michele Pellegrino, Heounjeong Go, Maurilio Ponzoni, Andrés Ferreri, Michael B. Møller, Benjamin Parsons, J. Han van Krieken, Miguel A. Piris, Jane N. Winter, Mingzhi Zhang, Bing Xu, Ken H. Young. Single-cell double expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins by fluorescent multiplex IHC is mainly in lymphoma cells with significant prognostic impact in large B-cell lymphoma while suggesting high cutoffs for routine IHC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6418.

Deficient (d) DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is a biomarker predictive of better response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in solid tumors. dMMR can be caused by mutations in MMR genes or by protein inactivation, which can be detected by sequencing and immunohistochemistry, respectively. To investigate the role of dMMR in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), MMR gene mutations and expression of MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, and PMS2 proteins were evaluated by targeted next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry in a large cohort of DLBCL patients treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy, and correlated with the tumor immune microenvironment characteristics quantified by fluorescent multiplex immunohistochemistry and gene-expression profiling. The results showed that genetic dMMR was infrequent in DLBCL and was significantly associated with increased cancer gene mutations and favorable immune microenvironment, but not prognostic impact. Phenotypic dMMR was also infrequent, and MMR proteins were commonly expressed in DLBCL. However, intratumor heterogeneity existed, and increased DLBCL cells with phenotypic dMMR correlated with significantly increased T cells and PD-1+ T cells, higher average nearest neighbor distance between T cells and PAX5+ cells, upregulated immune gene signatures, LE4 and LE7 ecotypes and their underlying Ecotyper-defined cell states, suggesting the possibility that increased T cells targeted only tumor cell subsets with dMMR. Only in patients with MYC¯ DLBCL, high MSH6/PMS2 expression showed significant adverse prognostic effects. This study shows the immunologic and prognostic effects of genetic/phenotypic dMMR in DLBCL, and raises a question on whether DLBCL-infiltrating PD-1+ T cells target only tumor subclones, relevant for the efficacy of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in DLBCL.

ABSTRACT:Bispecific antibodies (BsAb) that target CD3 and CD20 represent a new milestone in the treatment of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. These drugs have demonstrated remarkable single-agent activity in patients with heavily pretreated disease, and 3 drugs have so far received regulatory approvals in various countries. However, BsAbs can potentially lead to severe toxicity associated with T-cell activation, particularly cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The anticipated widespread use of these off-the-shelf products poses challenges for implementation and highlights the need for guidance in anticipating, mitigating, and managing adverse events. In clinical trials, guidance for the evaluation and treatment of CRS and neurotoxicity associated with BsAb therapy has been modeled after algorithms originally created for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies and other immune effector therapies, yet notable differences in timing, quality, and severity exist between the toxicities of BsAbs and CAR T-cell therapies. We therefore convened an international panel of academic and community practice physicians, advanced practitioners, registered nurses, and pharmacists with experience using CD3×CD20 BsAbs in clinical trial and off-trial settings to provide comprehensive, consensus-based recommendations specific to the assessment and management of CD3×CD20 BsAb-related toxicities.

Supplementary Table S4 shows the characteristics of the patients used in the case cross-over analysis

CONCLUSIONS Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting the ATP-binding site of the BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein are effective therapeutics for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), patients often develop drug resistance due to ATP-site mutations that inhibit drug binding. TERN-701 is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of BCR::ABL1 that is designed to bind the allosteric myristoyl site on the kinase, circumventing resistance to active site mutations, with potential for synergistic combination with active site TKIs. Competition binding screens were used to assess the selectivity of TERN-701 on more than 450 targets spanning the human kinome. The potency of TERN-701 against the proliferation of wild type and mutant CML cell lines, as well as a panel of 102 cancer cell lines, was assessed using CellTiter-Glo®. Synergy between TERN-701 and active site TKIs was assessed in vitro with interactions quantified using Bliss, combination, and curve-shift analyses. Prospective mutagenesis experiments were conducted by treating BaF/3 cells engineered to overexpress the BCR::ABL1 kinase with various concentrations of both TERN-701 and the TKI imatinib, followed by observation of clonal outgrowth of treated cells over time. We have previously shown that TERN-701 is a potent inhibitor of native CML cell lines such as K562. Here, we show that TERN-701 inhibited cell proliferation in various clinically relevant mutant CML cell lines (including T315I) with IC 50s ranging from 5 to 26 nM and 70 to 1200 nM against active site and myristoyl site mutations, respectively. TERN-701 was highly selective for BCR::ABL1, with no appreciable activity (>50%) against >450 purified kinase targets. Against a panel of cancer cell lines, TERN-701 was more selective than the comparator allosteric BCR::ABL1 inhibitor asciminib while maintaining similar potency. In vitro combination studies previously revealed that TERN-701 works synergistically with multiple TKIs in the non-mutant K562 cell line. Here, expanded studies using KCL22-s and BCR::ABL1-T315I mutant cell lines identified strong synergistic interactions between TERN-701 and active site TKIs, including ponatinib and dasatinib. Furthermore, prospective mutagenesis studies showed that the combination of TERN-701 and imatinib resulted in greater inhibition of the outgrowth of resistant clones relative to either compound alone. TERN-701 is a potent and highly selective allosteric inhibitor of BCR::ABL1 that can act synergistically with active site TKIs in vitro, even against the T315I gatekeeper mutation that confers resistance to all approved active site TKIs except ponatinib, which has known safety liabilities. These data support the continued development of TERN-701 for the treatment of CML using both monotherapy and combination approaches.

Supplementary Figure S4 shows a validation of the predictive nature of Immunotherapy Response Score

Supplementary Methods S1 shows the additional methods and references supporting the main manuscript

Supplementary Figure S1 shows analytical validation of the gene expression component of Immunotherapy Response Score components vs. qRT-PCR

IRS is robust to self-reported race. A, Pie chart of self-reported race for all 24,463 patients in the SCMD with informative TMB and gene expression data needed to generate IRS regardless of treatment history (SCMD lock at the time of IRS development). The total number of patients in each racial group is shown. B, The percentage of TMB-H and IRS-H patients from the SCMD (n = 24,463 as in A stratified by self-reported race is plotted). Fisher exact test was used to test the differences in IRS-H (or TMB-H) between the White or Caucasian/European group and all other groups; groups where IRS-H (or TMB-H) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) versus the White or Caucasian group (potentially as a consequence of inappropriate filtering of germline variants in TMB determination for non-White or Caucasian groups) are indicated by *. Asian, Black or African American and Other groups were also considered together as non-European (blue). C, Further breakdown by TMB and IRS status and relevant tumor types. The percentage of IRS-H (bold hue) and TMB-H (light hue) stratified by White or Caucasian/European (red) and non-European (blue) self-reported race is plotted for the n = 6,138 total patients from A and B with one of the seven indicated primary tumor types (CRC = colorectal, EGC = esophagogastric, H&N = head and neck, Mel = melanoma, NSCLC = non–small cell lung carcinoma). The total number of European and non-European patients with each tumor type are indicated. D, Across eligible NCT03061305 patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy, we identified a validation cohort of all 575 patients not included in IRS discovery to assess the robustness of IRS (and the TMB component) to self-reported race. Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy rwPFS stratified by combined TMB and IRS status [TMB-H or IRS-H (TMB/IRS-H; black) vs. TMB-L and IRS-L (TMB/IRS-L; gray)] is shown (left) by unadjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis with the aHR [adjusted for age, sex assigned at birth, line of therapy, tumor type, anti-PD-(L)1 therapy type, inclusion in previous validation cohort, and self-reported race (non-European, unknown, or European)], 95% CI and P value for TMB/IRS status (TMB/IRS-H vs. TMB/IRS-L) shown. The number (n) of patients, events, and median rwPFS (with 95% CI) for each group are shown. E, Forest plot of rwPFS by IRS status in the cohort (all) and each self-reported racial group is shown. Significant associations are shown by filled in aHR estimates. F, Anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy rwPFS stratified by TMB/IRS status is shown by unadjusted Kaplan–Meier analysis for the non-European subgroup (as in the overall cohort).

Supplementary Table S10 shows the characteristics of the anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy self-reported race validation cohort and the non-European subset

Supplementary Table S1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with de novo DLBCL with dual MYC/TP53 aberrations Supplementary Table S2. Frequency of single or dual abnormal Myc protein, p53 protein, BCL2 protein, MYC gene, and TP53 gene in the studied patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP Supplementary Table S3. Prognostic factors by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis in DLBCL Supplementary Table S4. Gene expression signatures identified by comparing DLBCL patients with concurrent MYC-R Mut-TP53 or Mychigh Mut-TP53 alterations (double-positive) with DLBCL patients withSupplementary Table S5. Molecular, genetic and phenotypic status of 8 DLBCL/HGBCL cell lines by targeted next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry analysis none or the alterations (double-negative) Supplementary Figure S1. Morphologic and immunophenotypic features of DLBCL with MYC rearrangement (MYC-R) and TP53 mutation (Mut-TP53) dual-alterations and highgrade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) with MYC/BCL2 double-hit (DH) in representative patients. Supplementary Figure S2. Prognostic impact of p53 and Myc protein overexpression as single or double abnormalities in overall DLBCL and GCB/ABC subtypes. Supplementary Figure S3. Heatmap for gene expression signatures of MYC/TP53 dual alterations. Supplementary Figure S4. Representative figures of flow cytometric analysis indicating G2/M phase-cell cycle arrest by NCB057643 treatment for 24 hours in cells with MYC-R or Myc overexpression with Wt-TP53 (OCI-LY19) or Mut-TP53 (GR and TMD8). Supplementary Figure S5. Heatmap for significantly up- or downregulated proteins after INCB057643 treatment (5µM, 24 hours) in OCI-LY19 cells. Supplementary Figure S6. A MDM2 inhibitor DS3032b shows cytotoxic effects selectively in high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) with MYC/BCL2 double-hit (DH) and wild-type (Wt) TP53. Supplementary Figure S7. Combined DS3032b and INCB057643 treatment has no synergistic cytotoxicity in DLBCL cell lines with MYC aberrations and TP53 mutation (MutTP53). Supplementary Figure S8. INCB057643 treatment (1.25 µM) alone or in combination with ABT-199 (venetoclax, 6.25 mM) for 24 hours induced p21 expression in TMD8 cells, whereas had no effect on p53 (mutant) expression levels.

Supplementary Table S1 compares the intestinal tumor counts and percent of tumors progressing to cancer for mouse models with activating alterations in PIK3CA.

Supplementary Table S5 shows rates of rwPFS2/rwPFS1 in the case cross-over analysis

Supplementary Figure from Genetic Subtyping and Phenotypic Characterization of the Immune Microenvironment and MYC/BCL2 Double Expression Reveal Heterogeneity in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma