Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies is strongly supported yet poorly implemented in daily practice in hospitals. Analytical methods for the quantification of cytotoxic drugs are instead widely presented in the scientific literature, while the use of these therapeutics is expected to keep going for longer. There are two main issues hindering the implementation of TDM: turnaround time, which is incompatible with the dosage profiles of these drugs, and exposure surrogate marker, namely total area under the curve (AUC). Therefore, this perspective article aims to define the adjustment needed from current to efficient TDM practice for cytotoxics, namely point-of-care (POC) TDM. For real-time dose adjustment, which is required for chemotherapies, such POC TDM is only achievable with analytical methods that match the sensitivity and selectivity of current methods, such as chromatography, as well as model-informed precision dosing platforms to assist the oncologist with dose fine-tuning based on quantification results and targeted intervals.

BACKGROUND:Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is a drug traditionally used for the treatment of HIV that has been repurposed as a potential post-exposure prophylaxis agent against COVID-19 in the COronavirus Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (COPEP) study. The present analysis aims to evaluate LPV levels in individuals exposed to SARS-CoV-2 versus people living with HIV (PLWH) by developing a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model, while characterizing external and patient-related factors that might affect LPV exposure along with dose-response association.METHODS:We built a popPK model on 105 LPV concentrations measured in 105 HIV-negative COPEP individuals exposed to SARS-CoV-2, complemented with 170 LPV concentrations from 119 PLWH followed in our routine therapeutic drug-monitoring programme. Published LPV popPK models developed in PLWH and in COVID-19 patients were retrieved and validated in our study population by mean prediction error (MPE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The association between LPV model-predicted residual concentrations (Cmin) and the appearance of the COVID-19 infection in the COPEP participants was investigated.RESULTS:A one-compartment model with linear absorption and elimination best described LPV concentrations in both our analysis and in the majority of the identified studies. Globally, similar PK parameters were found in all PK models, and provided close MPEs (from -19.4% to 8.0%, with a RMSE of 3.4% to 49.5%). No statistically significant association between Cmin and the occurrence of a COVID-19 infection could be detected.CONCLUSION:Our analysis indicated that LPV circulating concentrations were similar between COPEP participants and PLWH, and that published popPK models described our data in a comparable way.

Background: Tenofovir alafenamide is gradually replacing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, both prodrugs of tenofovir, in HIV prevention and treatment. There is thus an interest in describing tenofovir pharmacokinetics (PK) and its variability in people living with HIV (PLWH) under tenofovir alafenamide in a real-life setting. Objectives: To characterize the usual range of tenofovir exposure in PLWH receiving tenofovir alafenamide, while assessing the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: We conducted a population PK analysis (NONMEM (R)) on 877 tenofovir and 100 tenofovir alafenamide concentrations measured in 569 PLWH. Model-based simulations allowed prediction of tenofovir trough concentrations (C-min) in patients having various levels of renal function. Results: Tenofovir PK was best described using a one-compartment model with linear absorption and elimination. Creatinine clearance (CLCR, estimated according to Cockcroft and Gault), age, ethnicity and potent P-glycoprotein inhibitors were statistically significantly associated with tenofovir clearance. However, only CLCR appeared clinically relevant. Model-based simulations revealed 294% and 515% increases of median tenofovir C-min in patients with CLCR of 15-29 mL/min (CKD stage 3), and less than 15 mL/min (stage 4), respectively, compared with normal renal function (CLCR = 90-149 mL/min). Conversely, patients with augmented renal function (CLCR > 149 mL/min) had a 36% decrease of median tenofovir C-min. Conclusions: Kidney function markedly affects circulating tenofovir exposure after tenofovir alafenamide administration in PLWH. However, considering its rapid uptake into target cells, we suggest only a cautious increase of tenofovir alafenamide dosage intervals to 2 or 3 days only in case of moderate or severe CKD, respectively.

Creatinine-based formulas for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are widely used to monitor kidney function, to grade chronic kidney disease, and to adjust drug dosages. Specific formulas have been developed for children. The quadratic formula described in this journal, which combines the height-to-creatinine ratio with gender and age, was shown to outperform the original and revised Schwartz formulas in children with various degrees of impaired kidney function.1 It also competes with the modified Schwartz-Lyon formula, the full-age spectrum with Q-height or Q-age extension formulas, the Lund-Malmö equation, and Léger's formula (see details in Supplementary Materials, Supplementary Methods, and Supplementary References).

SHCS#879 is an ongoing Switzerland-wide multicenter observational study conducted within the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) for the prospective follow-up of people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving long-acting injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine (LAI-CAB/RPV). All adults under LAI-CAB/RPV and part of SHCS are enrolled in the project. The study addresses an integrated strategy of treatment monitoring outside the stringent frame of controlled clinical trials, based on relevant patient characteristics, clinical factors, potential drug-drug interactions, and measurement of circulating blood concentrations. So far, 91 blood samples from 46 PLWH have been collected. Most individuals are less than 50 years old, with relatively few comorbidities and comedications. The observed concentrations are globally in accordance with the available values reported in the randomized clinical trials. Yet, low RPV concentrations not exceeding twice the reported protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration have been observed. Data available at present confirm a considerable between-patient variability overall. Based on the growing amount of PK data accumulated during this ongoing study, population pharmacokinetic analysis will characterize individual concentration-time profiles of LAI-CAB/RPV along with their variability in a real-life setting and their association with treatment response and tolerability, thus bringing key data for therapeutic monitoring and precision dosage adjustment of this novel long-acting therapy.

Azathioprine keeps an important place in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune hepatitis. This molecule has a narrow therapeutic margin, associated with a risk of toxicity, particularly hematological and hepatic. Its complex metabolism is subject to genetic polymorphisms that are reflected in the inter-individual variability observed in the response to treatment and its tolerance profile. Hence, its use requires a good knowledge of this molecule. Treatment is initiated after a preliminary workup, followed by a progressive titration of the dosage while closely monitoring possible toxicities. Monitoring of blood levels of metabolites (including active ones) helps guide personalized dose adjustment.L’azathioprine garde actuellement une place importante dans le traitement des maladies inflammatoires chroniques de l’intestin et de l’hépatite autoimmune. Il s’agit d’une molécule à marge thérapeutique étroite, associée à un risque de toxicité, notamment hématologique et hépatique. Son métabolisme complexe est influencé par des polymorphismes génétiques qui sont reflétés dans la variabilité interindividuelle observée dans la réponse au traitement et le profil de tolérance. Son utilisation nécessite donc une bonne connaissance de cette molécule. L’instauration du traitement se fait après un bilan préalable, puis une titration progressive des posologies, tout en surveillant étroitement les éventuelles toxicités. Le monitoring des concentrations sanguines des métabolites (notamment actifs) permet de guider l’adaptation personnalisée des posologies.

Objective: The correlation between treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and antiseizure medica-tion (ASM) drug load is a controversial topic. Previous studies used daily defined dosage (DDD) to mea-sure drug load. We aim to assess if ASM adjusted to body weight and plasma levels were associated with TEAE.Methods: We analyzed clinical visits of a trial on therapeutic drug monitoring in outpatients with epi-lepsy. TEAE, treatment, and its changes, as well as ASM plasma levels, were recorded at each visit. Each medication level was stratified according to its position in relation to its proposed reference range (below, in the lower half, upper half, or above).Results: We analyzed 424 visits (151 participants). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 84 (20%) visits. There was no significant difference when comparing visits with TEAE with those without TEAE in terms of ASM drug load (calculated with DDD), corrected for body weight, their changes since the last visit, as well as summed plasma levels compared to reference ranges.Significance: Actual drug load seems not to represent a major determinant of TEAE recorded during rou-tine visits, even when accounting thoroughly for the patient's exposure to the treatment. The use of struc-tured questionnaires and neuropsychometric tests may assess more accurately the potential consequences of drug loads.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Drugs modulating the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, namely ivacaftor, lumacaftor, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor, are currently revolutionizing the management of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), particularly those with at least one F508del variant (up to 85% of patients). These “caftor” drugs are mainly metabolized by cytochromes P450 3A, whose enzymatic activity is influenced by environmental factors, and are sensitive to inhibition and induction. Hence, CFTR modulators are characterized by an important interindividual pharmacokinetic variability and are also prone to drug–drug interactions. However, these CFTR modulators are given at standardized dosages, while they meet all criteria for a formal therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program that should be considered in cases of clinical toxicity, less-than-expected clinical response, drug or food interactions, distinct patient subgroups (i.e., pediatrics), and for monitoring short-term adherence. While the information on CFTR drug exposure–clinical response relationships is still limited, we review the current evidence of the potential interest in the TDM of caftor drugs in real-life settings.

OBJECTIVESImipenem is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent used in critically ill neonates after failure of first-line treatments. Few studies have described imipenem disposition in this population. The objectives of our study were: (i) to characterize imipenem population pharmacokinetics (PK) in a cohort of neonates; and (ii) to conduct model-based simulations to evaluate the performance of six different dosing regimens aiming at optimizing PK target attainment.METHODSA total of 173 plasma samples from 82 neonates were collected over 15 years at the Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. The majority of study subjects were preterm neonates with a median gestational age (GA) of 27 weeks (range: 24-41), a postnatal age (PNA) of 21 days (2-153) and a body weight (BW) of 1.16 kg (0.5-4.1). PK data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effect modelling (NONMEM).RESULTSA one-compartment model best characterized imipenem disposition. Population PK parameters estimates of CL and volume of distribution were 0.21 L/h and 0.73 L, with an interpatient variability (CV%) of 20.1% on CL in a representative neonate (GA 27 weeks, PNA 21 days, BW 1.16 kg, serum creatinine, SCr 46.6 μmol/L). GA and PNA exhibited the greatest impact on PK parameters, followed by SCr. These covariates explained 36% and 15% of interindividual variability in CL, respectively.Simulated regimens using a dose of 20-25 mg/kg every 6-12 h according to postnatal age led to the highest PTA (T>MIC over 100% of time).CONCLUSIONSDosing adjustment according to BW, GA and PNA optimizes imipenem exposure in neonates.

Abstract Ethosuximide, the first‐line therapy for childhood absence epilepsy, is currently formulated as a syrup (Zarontin®, Pfizer) with a bitter taste and high sugar content, poorly adapted to children, and a ketogenic diet. The collaborative European FP7 project KIEKIDS aimed at developing an innovative sugar‐free, tasteless formulation convenient for pediatric use. This dual Phase‐I study evaluated two granule formulations based on lipid multiparticulate (LMP) technology. Two panels of 6 healthy adult volunteers underwent a randomized, placebo‐controlled, partly blinded, 3‐way cross‐over trial, comparing ethosuximide granules A or B with placebo granules and syrup at single 10 mg/kg doses. Corresponding plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of ethosuximide were compared, along with palatability, safety, and tolerability. The LMP granule A proved suboptimal due to bitterness and adherence to beaker walls, while the optimized granule B revealed excellent palatability, similar to placebo granules, and low adherence to glass. The relative bioavailability of granules A versus syrup, based on dose‐normalized Cmax and AUC0–∞ was 93.7% [90% CI: 76.3–115.1] and 96.1% [91.0–101.5], respectively. For granules B it was 87.6% [81.6–94.0] and 92.5% [88.5–96.6], respectively, with slightly delayed tmax of 0.75 h [0.5–4.05] compared to syrup 0.5 h [0.3–0.8]. Tolerability visual analog scales revealed a trend for statistically non‐significant improvement versus syrup at peak (30 min) for transient dizziness (both granules), fatigue (granules A), and anxiety (granules B). The innovative ethosuximide granule formulation B achieves a suitable profile for pediatric use, being sugar‐free, tasteless, bioequivalent, and well‐tolerated while enabling precise adjustment to body weight.

Azathioprine keeps an important place in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and autoimmune hepatitis. This molecule has a narrow therapeutic margin, associated with a risk of toxicity, particularly hematological and hepatic. Its complex metabolism is subject to genetic polymorphisms that are reflected in the inter-individual variability observed in the response to treatment and its tolerance profile. Hence, its use requires a good knowledge of this molecule. Treatment is initiated after a preliminary workup, followed by a progressive titration of the dosage while closely monitoring possible toxicities. Monitoring of blood levels of metabolites (including active ones) helps guide personalized dose adjustment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Intravenous valproate (VPA) is an established treatment of status epilepticus (SE), but optimal loading dose was not fully assessed. We aimed at analyzing the correlation between VPA loading dose and subsequent plasma levels with clinical response in SE. METHODS:This was a retrospective study in one referral center of all consecutive VPA-naïve SE episodes treated with VPA between January 2013 and June 2019, in which total VPA trough plasma levels after intravenous loading dose were available. Response to VPA, defined as last antiseizure medication introduced before SE resolution (without the need for additional treatment), was correlated with VPA loading dose and trough level. Correlations were adjusted for other SE characteristics. RESULTS:Among 128 SE episodes, 53 (41%) responded to VPA. Median VPA loading dose was 25.2 mg/kg (range, 7-58 mg/kg). Loading doses and total plasma levels were not associated with the probability of response or mortality. Correcting for other possible confounders (number of previously tried treatment, demographics, SE severity) did not alter these findings. Only 3.8% of SE episodes that responded to VPA received >30 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS:A high loading dose (>30 mg/kg) is not associated with a greater response rate in patients with SE. Therefore, it seems to bring little benefit. If confirmed in further studies, a dosage of 25-30 mg/kg appears adequate in SE.

Objectives To describe the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of cefepime in non-critically ill adults and compare four different ways of dosing: conventional table-based; empirically adjusted following TDM; individualized based on a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model without TDM; and TDM-adjusted with a Bayesian approach integrating TDM and PopPK. Methods We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary centre to examine the current practice of TDM and to evaluate the potential for improvement by PopPK-based software individualization. The prediction of trough concentrations and the total daily doses (TDD) prescribed according to each approach were compared by calculating the mean logarithmic bias and the root mean squared error, complemented by linear regression and variance analysis. Results Among 168 trough concentrations in 119 patients (median: 12 mg/L), 38.6% of measurements exceeded 15 mg/L, the reported threshold for neurotoxicity. Nine patients developed neurotoxicity. The prediction performance of PopPK alone for trough concentrations was moderate, but clearly improved after integration of TDM. Accordingly, TDD were significantly lower for a priori PopPK-based dosage (mean: 2907 mg/24 h) compared with actual table-based dosage (4625 mg/24 h, P < 0.001). They were also lower for a posteriori dosage based on PopPK and TDM (3377 mg/24 h) compared with actual dosage after empirical TDM (4233 mg/24 h, P < 0.001), as model-based adjustment privileged more frequent administrations. Conclusions Our observations support routine TDM of cefepime to prevent overdosing and subsequent toxicity in the non-critically ill. Software-based individualization seems promising to optimize the benefits of TDM, but has little potential to replace it.

Introduction: Broad-spectrum beta-lactams are commonly prescribed for empirical or selective treatment of bacterial infections in children with malignancies. In the immunocompromised, appropriate concentration exposure is crucial to ensure antimicrobial efficacy. Augmented renal clearance (ARC) is increasingly recognized in this population, and raises concern for unmet concentration targets. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of meropenem and piperacillin exposure in our hospital's pediatric hematology-oncology patients.Materials and Methods: We compared trough levels of meropenem and piperacillin in a cohort of unselected pediatric hematology-oncology patients stratified based on their estimated renal function as decreased, normal or with ARC, and on their neutrophil count.Results: Thirty-two children provided a total of 51 meropenem and 76 piperacillin samples. On standard intermittent intravenous regimen, 67% of all trough plasma concentrations were below targeted concentrations. In neutropenic children with bacterial infection, all meropenem and 60% of piperacillin levels were below target. Nearly two-thirds of total samples came from children with ARC. In these patients, antimicrobial exposure was insufficient in 85% of cases (compared to 36% in the decreased or normal renal function groups), despite a dosage sometimes exceeding the maximum recommended daily dose. Under continuous infusion of piperacillin, only 8% of plasma levels were insufficient.Discussion: Intermittent administration of meropenem and piperacillin often fails to ensure sufficient concentration exposure in children treated for malignancies, even at maximal recommended daily dosage. This can in part be attributed to ARC. We recommend thorough assessment of renal function, resolute dosage adjustment, continuous infusion whenever possible and systematic therapeutic drug monitoring.

Purpose: The benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of newer generation antiseizure medications (ASM) has been little studied. A recent randomized study suggested that TDM at each medical visit did not bring a significant benefit, but the study did not investigate TDM in cases of treatment failure. Accordingly, we realized a post hoc analysis of this trial. Methods: We analyzed 282 TDMs in 136 patients. We compared TDM performed at visits after treatment failure versus without treatment failure, reporting the proportion of drug levels out of range and the prescriber’s adherence to dosage recommendations according to measured drug levels. Results: There was no statistical difference in terms of proportion of out of range plasma drug levels (47% vs 50%, p = 0.7) or adherence of prescribers to the clinical pharmacologists’ dosage recommendations (21% vs 30%, p=0.6) between visits after treatment failure and visits without treatment failure, respectively. Knowledge of prior drug levels did not modify the results. Conclusion: Systematic TDM at appointments following treatment failure showed similar results to TDM at visits without treatment failure. The prescribers’ adherence with dosage recommendations was low in both cases. It is not clear whether better prescriber adherence would improve patient outcome. Furthermore, the ability to detect poor patient compliance is limited in a planned outpatient appointment. The study setting does not reflect on the general usefulness of TDM.

OBJECTIVES:Contrary to older antiseizure medications (ASM), correlation between plasma levels and seizure freedom is not well defined for newer generation ASM. We assessed correlations between efficacy and newer generation ASM plasma levels in patients with epilepsy.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Plasma medication levels were measured over two years in consecutive patients taking lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, zonisamide, lacosamide, perampanel or pregabalin. Seizure freedom was defined as three times the longest inter-seizure pre-treatment interval, or at least one year. Each medication level was stratified according to its position in relation to its proposed reference range (below or in lower half vs upper half or above).RESULTS:168 patients on stable therapy were included. ASM plasma levels of seizure-free patients were lower than those with ongoing seizures; 45/48 (93.7%) were in the lower half or below the reference ranges, compared to 86/106 (81.1%; p = .004). Lamotrigine plasma levels were significantly lower in seizure-free patients (median 2.4 mg/L range 0.4-6.5 mg/L, none above 6.5 mg/L) compared with those with ongoing seizures (5 mg/L, 0.5-14.2 mg/L; p < .0001). Levetiracetam showed similar results (7.2 mg/L, 1.6-15.1 mg/L; none above 15.1 mg/L in seizure-free patients vs 16.4 mg/L, 0.6-47.7 mg/L; p = .005). Demographics, epilepsy type and polytherapy did not influence the results.CONCLUSIONS:Efficacy of newer generation ASMs seems to be reached at the lower part or at times even below the reference ranges in drug responsive patients; this could inform regarding titrations of these treatments.

Cytokine hemoadsorption might be beneficial in patients with sepsis. However, its effect on anti-infective agents' disposition remains largely unknown. We sought to determine the influence of hemoadsorption on the pharmacokinetics of common anti-infective agents. This is an interventional experimental study, conducted in 24 healthy pigs. Animals were randomly allocated to either hemoadsorption (cases) or sham extracorporeal circuit (controls) and to drug combinations (3 cases and 3 controls for each combination). Hemoadsorption was performed with CytoSorb (CytoSorbents Corporation, USA). We evaluated 17 drugs (clindamycin, fluconazole, linezolid, meropenem, piperacillin, anidulafungin, ganciclovir, clarithromycin, posaconazole, teicoplanin, tobramycin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, liposomal amphotericin B, flucloxacillin and cefepime). Repeated blood sampling from the extracorporeal circulation (adsorber inlet/outlet, sham circuit) was performed over six hours following administration. Total clearance and adsorber-specific clearance were computed. Hemoadsorption was associated with increased clearance of all study drugs, except ganciclovir. Its impact on total body clearance was considered as moderate for fluconazole (282%) and linezolid (115%), mild for liposomal amphotericin B (75%), posaconazole (32%) and teicoplanine (31%) and negligible for all other drugs. Hemoadsorber clearance declined over time, with even delayed desorption for beta-lactams. It was moderately correlated with drug's lipophilicity (p = 0.01; r 2 = 0.43). Hemoadsorption with CytoSorb appears to increase to a clinically significant extent the clearance of five among 17 tested anti-infectives. Studies in human patients are required to confirm the need for dosage adjustment of these agents.

The widespread use of highly active antiretroviral treatments has dramatically changed the prognosis of people living with HIV (PLWH). However, such treatments have to be taken lifelong raising issues regarding the maintenance of both therapeutic effectiveness and long-term tolerability. Recently approved or investigational antiretroviral drugs present considerable advantages, allowing once daily oral dosage along with activity against resistant variants (eg, bictegravir and doravirine) and also parenteral intramuscular administration that facilitates treatment adherence (eg, long-acting injectable formulations such as cabotegravir and rilpivirine). Still, there remains a risk of insufficient or exaggerated circulating exposure due to absorption issues, abnormal elimination, drug-drug interactions, and others. In this context, a multiplex ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) bioassay has been developed for the monitoring of plasma levels of bictegravir, cabotegravir, doravirine, and rilpivirine in PLWH. A simple and convenient protein precipitation was performed followed by direct injection of the supernatant into the UHPLC-MS/MS system. The four analytes were eluted in less than 3 minutes using a reversed-phase chromatography method coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry detection. This bioassay was fully validated following international guidelines and achieved good performances in terms of trueness (94.7%-107.5%), repeatability (2.6%-11%), and intermediate precision (3.0%-11.2%) over the clinically relevant concentration ranges (from 30 to 9000 ng/mL for bictegravir, cabotegravir, and doravirine and from 10 to 1800 ng/mL for rilpivirine). This sensitive, accurate, and rapid UHPLC-MS/MS assay is currently applied in our laboratory for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of the oral drugs bictegravir and doravirine and is also intended to be applied for the monitoring of cabotegravir/rilpivirine levels in plasma from PLWH receiving once monthly or every 2-month intramuscular injection of these long-acting antiretroviral drugs.