BackgroundIn adult patients receiving veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO), cardiovascular performance plays a critical role in determining oxygen delivery, organ perfusion and safe titration of extracorporeal support. Despite the increasing VV ECMO use, contemporary guidance on hemodynamic monitoring remains limited and largely experience-based. This scoping review aimed to map available basic and advanced monitoring approaches and to identify current evidence gaps.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception until September 2025, along with reference lists of relevant articles. We included studies of any design reporting techniques, targets, or protocols for hemodynamic monitoring during VV ECMO.ResultsOf 465 records screened, 106 met inclusion criteria. No protocolized, evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring protocol specific to VV ECMO was identified. The available evidence was heterogeneous and mostly derived from physiologic studies or single-center observational cohorts. Findings were narratively synthesized across three domains: basic bedside monitoring, diagnostic/prognostic tools and advanced assessment of cardiopulmonary interaction. Across studies, no monitoring strategy consistently reduced time-to-wean or mortality. Observational data suggested that care bundles and multidisciplinary approaches may reduce complications. However, the risk of bias limits causal inference.ConclusionsDespite the complex interaction between native cardiovascular function and extracorporeal circulation, VV ECMO lacks consensus on evidence-based hemodynamic monitoring pathways. A pragmatic core monitoring bundle with tiered triggers for escalation is necessary. Future priorities include implementation models based on multidisciplinary teams, specific training, standardized bundles, and multicenter studies aimed to define right ventricular-centered targets to improve safety and clinical decision-making.

BACKGROUND:Acute respiratory failure after cardiac surgery is an uncommon complication, affecting morbidity and mortality. In these patients, respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support may be beneficial, as it may help reduce pulmonary vasoconstriction and the impact of respiratory pressures on the heart. Nevertheless, literature reports of postcardiotomy veno-venous (V-V) ECMO use are sporadic. METHODS:This retrospective, multicenter cohort study analyzes data from the PELS-1 registry, focusing on adult patients who required V-V ECMO following cardiac surgery. PELS-1 was conducted across 34 cardiac surgery centers in 16 countries from 2000 to 2020. RESULTS:The study included 24 patients who received V-V ECMO over a total of 2163 patients requiring postocardiotomy extracorporeal support (1.1%). The median age was 64[50-69] years, and 16/24 (67%) were male. Median Euroscore II was 6.2[3.1-19.6]. Most patients required prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (208[110-350] min). V-V ECMO was initiated in the ICU in 21 patients (87.5%) after a median of 5 [2-12] days postoperatively. ECMO support rapidly normalized gas exchange and lactate levels. However, complications were frequent: bleeding (10/22, 45.5%), acute kidney injury (10/24, 41.7%), pneumonia (10/24, 41.7%), and arrhythmias (7/24, 29.2%) were the most frequent ones. In-hospital mortality was high, with only 21.7% discharged alive. One-year survival was 12.5%. CONCLUSIONS:Reported outcomes of patients receiving V-V ECMO after cardiac surgery are poor, despite effective correction of gas exchange. Early recognition of isolated respiratory failure and careful patient selection should be promoted. Further research is needed to optimize management in this high-risk population.

OBJECTIVE:Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often complicated by hemodynamic instability requiring pharmacological support. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is a well-established technique that contributes to improved outcomes in this population. However, the effects of VV ECMO on inotropic and vasoconstrictor requirements have never been addressed in a large case series. DESIGN:Observational study. SETTING:University hospital. PARTICIPANTS:Consecutive adult ARDS patients treated with VV ECMO. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:From June 2009 to October 2023, 118 ARDS patients received VV ECMO and had available baseline data. The median patient age was 57 years, 65% of patients were male, and 76% had ongoing inotropic and/or vasoconstrictor support. Two hours after ECMO implantation, 61% of patients showed hemodynamic improvement, as documented by the reduced need for catecholaminergic support or increased mean arterial pressure with identical inotropic and/or vasoconstrictor support. This percentage increased to 63% at 12 hours, 83% at 24 hours, and 85% at 48 hours. CONCLUSION:In the first 2 hours after VV ECMO implantation, hemodynamic improvement was observed in the majority of ARDS patients. This positive effect might therefore be considered in the decision-making process for VV ECMO implantation.

Objective: To evaluate if mechanical left ventricular unloading could reduce mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies published until December 20, 2023. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up. We used a Mantel-Haenszel random effects meta-analysis and reported the pooled results with a risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic review (CRD42024498665). Results: We identified two randomized controlled trials and 11 propensity score-matched studies, totaling 9,858 patients. Mechanical left ventricular unloading was significantly associated with reduced mortality at the longest follow-up (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94; P = 0.0001; moderate certainty of evidence), which was confirmed in studies using intra-aortic balloon pump. Benefits of mechanical unloading were also observed in terms of successful VA-ECMO weaning (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29; P = 0.02; low certainty of evidence) and favorable neurological outcome (two studies; RR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.62-3.69; P < 0.0001; low certainty of evidence), although we observed an increased incidence of major bleeding (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.59; P = 0.03; low certainty of evidence) and hemolysis (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.02; P = 0.01; moderate certainty of evidence). Conclusions: Among adult patients with cardiogenic shock treated with VA-ECMO, mechanical left ventricular unloading was associated with reduced mortality, which was confirmed in studies using intra-aortic balloon pump as an unloading device.

Objective Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is often complicated by hemodynamic instability requiring pharmacological support. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is a well-established technique, contributing to improved outcomes in this population. However, the effects of VV ECMO on inotropic and vasoconstrictor requirements have never been addressed in a large case series. Design Observational study. Setting University hospital. Participants Consecutive adult ARDS patients treated with VV ECMO. Measurements and main results From June 2009 to October 2023, 118 ARDS patients received VV ECMO and had available baseline data. Median patient age was 57 years, 65% of patients were male and 76% had ongoing inotropic and/or vasoconstrictor support. Two hours after ECMO implantation, 61% of the patients showed hemodynamic improvement as documented by reduced need for catecholaminergic support or increased mean arterial pressure with identical inotropic and/or vasoconstrictor support. This percentage increased to 63% at 12 hours, 83% at 24 hours, and 85% at 48 hours. Conclusion In the first two hours after VV ECMO implantation we observed hemodynamic improvement in the majority of ARDS patients. This positive effect might therefore be considered in the decision-making process for VV ECMO implantation.

The ProtekDuo dual-lumen cannula allows percutaneous support in right ventricular failure with or without gas exchange impairments. However, positioning of the device is resource demanding. The usual approach requires a fluoroscopy-equipped operating room, possibly limiting its wider and timely adoption. We report our initial experience with bedside, fluoroless ProtekDuo implantation under transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance in a tertiary care national referral center. Eight critically ill patients underwent bedside ProtekDuo placement for right ventricular dysfunction or acute respiratory distress syndrome with right ventricular failure. All procedures were completed successfully without procedural complications. Our findings demonstrate that bedside, TEE-guided, fluoroless ProtekDuo cannulation is feasible and safe, potentially expanding access to advanced mechanical circulatory support.

Severe rhabdomyolysis, characterized by extensive muscle breakdown and release of myoglobin and creatine kinase (CK), is a life-threatening condition often complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) and multi-organ failure (MOF). Even when conventional treatments such as fluid resuscitation and renal replacement therapy (RRT) are timely applied, severe cases remain challenging to manage. Among therapies available in this setting, hemadsorption with CytoSorb has the potential not only to treat rhabdomyolysis through removal of circulating molecules but also to limit or even prevent rhabdomyolysis-related renal failure and MOF. In this case series we present a preliminary experience with a novel use CytoSorb hemoadsorption therapy, which encompassed the use of two CytoSorb cartridges running in parallel, to enhance myoglobin and cytokine clearance. Clinical data from the three patients with severe rhabdomyolysis treated with dual concomitant CytoSorb treatments highlighted marked improvements in CK, renal, hepatic, and inflammatory markers, with possible remarkable impact in containing rhabdomyolysis-related organ failure and death. Further investigation is warranted to establish the opportunity of tailored protocols for critically ill patients.

Introduction: Growing evidence supports extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients, especially in experienced centres. We present characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients treated with ECPR in a high-volume cardiac arrest centre in the metropolitan area of Milan, Italy and determine prognostic factors.Methods: Refractory OHCA patients treated with ECPR between 2013 and 2022 at IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan had survival and neurological outcome assessed at hospital discharge.Results: Out of 307 consecutive OHCA patients treated with ECPR (95% witnessed, 66% shockable, low-flow 70 [IQR 58-81] minutes), 17% survived and 9.4% had favourable neurological outcome. Survival and favourable neurological outcome increased to 51% (OR = 8.7; 95% CI, 4.3-18) and 28% (OR = 6.3; 95% CI, 2.8-14) when initial rhythm was shockable and low-flow (time between CPR initiation and ROSC or ECMO flow) <= 60 minutes and decreased to 9.5% and 6.3% when low-flow exceeded 60 minutes (72% of patients). At multivariable analysis, shockable rhythm (aOR for survival = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.04-5.48), shorter low-flow (aOR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.94-0.97), intermittent ROSC (aOR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.6), and signs of life (aOR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5-8.7) were associated with better outcomes. Survival reached 10% after treating 104 patients (p for trend <0.001).Conclusions: Patients with initial shockable rhythm, intermittent ROSC, signs of life, and low-flow <60 minutes had higher success of ECPR for refractory OHCA. Favourable outcomes were possible beyond 60 minutes of low-flow, especially with concomitant favourable prognostic factors. Outcomes improved as the case-volume increased, supporting treatment in high-volume cardiac arrest centres.

AIMS:Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential useful tool to support clinical treatment of heart failure, including the setting of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Modern Impella pumps are equipped with advanced technology (SmartAssist), enabling real-time acquisition and display of data related to both pump performance and the patient's haemodynamic status. These data emerge as an 'ideal' source for data-driven AI applications to predict the clinical course of an ongoing therapeutic protocol. Yet, no evidence of effective application of AI tools in the setting of Impella support is available. On this background, we aimed at identifying possible future applications of AI-based tools in the setting of temporary MCS with an Impella device. METHODS:We explored the state of research and development at the intersection of AI and Impella support and derived future potential applications of AI in routine Impella clinical management. RESULTS:We identified different areas where the future implementation of AI tools may contribute to addressing important clinical challenges in the setting of Impella support, including (i) early identification of the best suited pathway of care according to patients' conditions at presentation and intention to treat, (ii) prediction of therapy outcomes according to different possible therapeutic actions, (iii) optimization of device implantation procedures and evaluation of proper pump position over the whole course of support and (iv) prevention and/or rationale management of haemocompatibility-related adverse events. For each of those areas, we discuss the potential advantages, challenges and implications of harnessing AI-driven insights in the setting of MCS with an Impella device. CONCLUSIONS:Temporary MCS with an Impella device has great potential to benefit from the integration of AI-based tools. Such tools may indeed translate into groundbreaking innovation supporting clinical decision-making and therapy regulation, in particular in complex scenarios such as the multidevice MCS strategy.

Implantation of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) poses specific challenges (small left ventricular size, acute infarct area, need for antithrombotic therapy, status Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 1 with impaired organ function and derangements in coagulation and inflammatory parameters) which may affect outcomes. We reviewed data of all AMI-CS patients who were implanted LVAD after Impella support at a referral center with the aim to analyze feasibility, timing, and outcomes of durable LVAD implantation after tMCS with Impella due to AMI-CS. Twenty-one patients were treated between 2013 and 2023: all were in Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) class D-E and INTERMACS 1-2 at presentation, median LV ejection fraction (EF) and LV end-diastolic diameter (EDD) were 15 (10-20)% and 57 (54-60) mm, respectively. Eleven patients (52%) were supported with Impella CP, seven with Impella 5.0 (33%), and three (14%) with Impella 2.5. Axillary cannulation was performed in nine patients (43%). Five patients (24%) had concomitant venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support. Median duration of Impella support was 12 (8-14) days. Overall, the use of Impella was characterized by low rate of complications and allowed successful bridge to durable LVAD in all patients, with 100% 30 day survival rate.

INTRODUCTION:COVID-19 pandemic changed the way medical research is published, possibly forever. As the need for rapidity led to the rise of preprint servers, the undeniable drop in the overall quality of scientific publications requires an in-depth review of all available evidence. The present manuscript aims to identify and summarize all treatments which have been reported to reduce mortality in randomized trials in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION:Independent investigators searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases to identify all randomized trials of any intervention influencing mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients up to August 18th, 2022. Articles were selected only when they fulfilled all the following: randomized trial design; dealing with any kind of interventions in adult hospitalized COVID-19 patients; and statistically significant reduction in mortality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS:We identified 28 interventions (42 manuscripts) reducing mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. About 60% of the studies (26/42) were multicentric, for a total of 1140 centers involved worldwide. Several of these studies were published in high-ranked, peer-reviewed journals. Interventions with randomized evidence of mortality reduction in hospitalized COVID-19 patients belonged to 5 domains: corticosteroids, immunomodulators, antimicrobials, supportive therapies, and other drugs. CONCLUSIONS:Many interventions have the potential to reduce mortality in COVID-19 hospitalized patients. The correct treatment of future pandemics relies on large, multicentric randomized clinical trials for further evaluation of these promising strategies.

Aims Impella 5.0 and 5.5 are promising low-invasive left ventricle (LV) temporary mechanical circulatory supports (tMCS) for cardiogenic shock due to LV mechanical unloading and are paired with powerful hemodynamic support. This study aimed to analyze data and destinies of patients supported with Impella 5.0/5.5 at a national referral center for cardiogenic shock and to assess the parameters associated with myocardial recovery and successful weaning.Methods A single-center observational study was conducted on all patients treated with Impella 5.0 or 5.5 from March 2018 to July 2023.Results A total of 59 patients underwent Impella 5.0/5.5 implantation due to profound cardiogenic shock, with acute myocardial infarction being the most frequent cause of shock (42 patients, 71%). The median duration of Impella support was 13 days (maximum duration of 52 days). Axillary cannulation was feasible in almost all patients, and 36% were mobilized during support. A total of 44 patients (75%) survived to the next therapy/recovery: 21 patients experienced recovery and 15 and 8 were bridged to long-term LVAD and heart transplantation, respectively. The global survival rate was 66%. The predictors of native heart recovery at multivariate analysis were the number of days on tMCS before upgrade to Impella 5.0/5.5 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.68 (0.51-9) p = 0.0068] and improvement of LVEF within the first 7-10 days of support [HR 4.72 (1.34-16.7), p = 0.016].Conclusions Transcatheter systems such as Impella 5.0/5.5 revolutionized the field of tMCS. Myocardial recovery is the primary clinical target. Its prognostication and promotion are key to ensure the most proficuous course for each patient from cardiogenic shock to long-term event-free survival.

Background and Objectives: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a proven therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cardiogenic shock (CS). Dual anti-platelet therapy (i.e., aspirin plus an oral P2Y12 inhibitor) is recommended in patients treated with PCI. However, CS patients present severe hemodynamic instability, deranged hemostatic balance, and the need for invasive mechanical circulatory support (MCS) alongside invasive procedures, resulting in an increased risk of both bleeding and thrombotic complications, leaving uncertainty about the best anti-thrombotic treatment. Recently, the parenteral short-acting P2Y12 inhibitor has been increasingly used in the acute cardiac care setting, mainly in light of its favourable pharmacokinetic profile and organ-independent metabolism. Materials and Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy outcomes (i.e., rates of major bleeding, occurrence of stent/any thrombosis, and hospital survival) of all existing original studies reporting on the intravenous administration of cangrelor in AMI-CS patients. Results: Ten studies (678 patients with CS) published between 2017 and 2023 were included in the present review: nine were observational and one had a randomized design. Percutaneous revascularization was performed in >80% of patients across the studies. Moreover, 26% of patients were treated with temporary MCS, and in all studies, concomitant systemic anticoagulation was performed. Cangrelor was administered intravenously at the dosage of 4 mcg/kg/min in 57% of patients, 0.75 mcg/kg/min in 37% of patients, and <0.75 mcg/kg/min in 6%. The pooled rate of major bleeding was 17% (11–23%, confidence interval [CI]), and the pooled rate of stent thrombosis and any thrombosis were 1% (0.3–2.3% CI) and 3% (0.4–7% CI), respectively. Pooled hospital survival was 66% (59–73% CI). Conclusions: Cangrelor administration in AMI-CS patients was feasible and safe with a low rate of thromboembolic complications. Haemorrhagic complications were more frequent than thrombotic events. Nevertheless, to date, the optimal dosage of cangrelor in this clinical context still remains not universally recognized.

Introduction: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) may improve survival in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) but also expand the donor pool as these patients often become eligible for organ donation. Our aim is to describe the impact of organ donation in OHCA patients treated with ECPR in a high-volume cardiac arrest centre. Methods: Rate of organ donation (primary outcome), organs harvested, a composite of patient survival with favourable neurological outcome or donation of >= 1 solid organ (ECPR benefit), and the potential total number of individuals benefiting from ECPR (survivors with favourable neurological outcome and potential recipients of one solid organ) were analysed among all-rhythms refractory OHCA patients treated with ECPR between January 2013-November 2022 at San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy. Results: Among 307 adults with refractory OHCA treated with ECPR (95% witnessed, 66% shockable, low-flow 70 [IQR 58-81] minutes), 256 (83%) died during hospital stay, 33% from brain death. Donation of at least one solid organ occurred in 58 (19%) patients, 53 (17%) after determination of brain death and 5 (1.6%) after determination of circulatory death, contributing a total of 167 solid organs (3.0 [IQR 2.5-4.0] organs/donor). Overall, 196 individuals (29 survivors with favourable neurological outcome and 167 potential recipients of 1 solid organ) possibly benefited from ECPR. ECPR benefit composite outcome was achieved in 87 (28%) patients. Solid organ donation decreased from 19% to 16% in patients with low-flow <60 min and to 11% with low-flow <60 min and initial shockable rhythm. Conclusions: When ECPR fails in patients with refractory OHCA, organ donation after brain or circulatory death can help a significant number of patients awaiting transplantation, enhancing the overall benefit of ECPR. ECPR selection criteria may affect the number of potential organ donors.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced treatment for acute severe respiratory failure. Patients on ECMO are frequently maintained sedated and immobilized until weaning from ECMO, first, and then from mechanical ventilation. Avoidance of sedation and invasive ventilation during ECMO may have potential advantages. We performed a systematic literature review to assess efficacy and safety of awake ECMO without invasive ventilation in patients with respiratory failure. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for studies reporting outcome of awake ECMO for adult patients with respiratory failure. STUDY SELECTION: We included all studies reporting outcome of awake ECMO in patients with respiratory failure. Studies on ECMO for cardiovascular failure, cardiac arrest, or perioperative support and studies on pediatric patients were excluded. Two investigators independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators abstracted data on study characteristics, rate of awake ECMO failure, and mortality. Primary outcome was rate of awake ECMO failure (need for intubation). Pooled estimates with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated. Subgroup analyses by setting were performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 57 studies (28 case reports) included data from 467 awake ECMO patients. The subgroup of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome showed a pooled estimate for awake ECMO failure of 39.3% (95% CI, 24.0–54.7%), while in patients bridged to lung transplantation, pooled estimate was 23.4% (95% CI, 13.3–33.5%). Longest follow-up mortality was 121 of 439 (pooled estimate, 28%; 95% CI, 22.3–33.6%). Mortality in patients who failed awake ECMO strategy was 43 of 74 (pooled estimate, 57.2%; 95% CI, 40.2–74.3%). Two cases of cannula self-removal were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Awake ECMO is feasible in selected patients, although the effect on outcome remains to be demonstrated. Mortality is almost 60% in patients who failed awake ECMO strategy.