This study aimed at evaluating the 7-year outcomes of 118 very preterm newborns (VPNs, gestational age = 26 ± 1.4 w) involved in a randomized controlled trial. They presented neonatal respiratory distress (RDS), requiring ventilation for 14 ± 2 days post-natal age (PNA). A repeated instillation of 200 mg/kg poractant alfa (SURF) did not improve early bronchopulmonary dysplasia, but the SURF infants needed less re-hospitalization than the controls for respiratory problems at 1- and 2-year PNA. There was no growth difference at 7.1 ± 0.3 years between 41 SURF infants and 36 controls (80% of the eligible children), and 7.9% SURF infants vs. 28.6% controls presented asthma (p = 0.021). The children underwent cognitive assessment (WISC IV) and pulmonary function testing (PFT), measuring their spirometry, lung volume, and airway resistance. The spirometry measures showed differences (p < 0.05) between the SURF infants and the controls (mean ± standard deviation (median z-score)) for FEV1 (L/s) (1.188 ± 0.690(−0.803) vs. 1.080 ± 0.243 (−1.446)); FEV1 after betamimetics (1.244 ± 0.183(−0.525) vs. 1.091 ± 0.20(−1.342)); FVC (L) (1.402 ± 0.217 (−0.406) vs. 1.265 ± 0.267 (−1.141)), and FVC after betamimetics (1.452 ± 0.237 (−0.241) vs. 1.279 ± 0.264 (−1.020)). PFT showed no differences in the volumes or airway resistance. The global IQ median (interquartile range) was 89 (82:99) vs. 89 (76:98), with 61% of the children >85 in both groups. Repeated surfactant treatment in VPNs presenting severe RDS led to the attenuation of early lung injuries, with an impact on long-term pulmonary sequelae, without differences in neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Objective To determine whether analgesic use for painful procedures performed in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) differs during nights and days and during each of the 6 h period of the day. Design Conducted as part of the prospective observational Epidemiology of Painful Procedures in Neonates study which was designed to collect in real time and around-the-clock bedside data on all painful or stressful procedures. Setting 13 NICUs and paediatric intensive care units in the Paris Region, France. Participants All 430 neonates admitted to the participating units during a 6-week period between September 2005 and January 2006. Data collection During the first 14 days of admission, data were collected on all painful procedures and analgesic therapy. The five most frequent procedures representing 38 012 of all 42 413 (90%) painful procedures were analysed. Intervention Observational study. Main outcome assessment We compared the use of specific analgesic for procedures performed during each of the 6 h period of a day: morning (7:00 to 12:59), afternoon, early night and late night and during daytime (morning+afternoon) and night-time (early night+late night). Results 7724 of 38 012 (20.3%) painful procedures were carried out with a specific analgesic treatment. For morning, afternoon, early night and late night, respectively, the use of analgesic was 25.8%, 18.9%, 18.3% and 18%. The relative reduction of analgesia was 18.3%, p<0.01, between daytime and night-time and 28.8%, p<0.001, between morning and the rest of the day. Parental presence, nurses on 8 h shifts and written protocols for analgesia were associated with a decrease in this difference. Conclusions The substantial differences in the use of analgesics around-the-clock may be questioned on quality of care grounds.

Objectives: To describe the frequency and nature of premedications used prior to neonatal endotracheal intubation; to confront observed practice with current recommendations; and to identify risk factors for the absence of premedication. Design, Setting, and Patients: Data concerning intubations were collected prospectively at the bedside as part of an observational study collecting around-the-clock data on all painful or stressful procedures performed in neonates during the first 14 days of their admission to 13 tertiary care units in the region of Paris, France, between 2005 and 2006. Intervention: Observational study. Measurements and Main Results: Specific premedication prior to endotracheal intubation was assessed. Ninety one intubations carried out on the same number of patients were analyzed. The specific premedicationrate was 56% and included mostly opioids (67%) and midazolam (53%). Compared with recent guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics, used premedications could be classified as “preferred” (12%), “acceptable” (18%), “not recommended” (27%), and “not described” (43%). In univariate analysis, infants without a specific premedication compared with others were younger at the time of intubation (median age: 0.7 vs. 2.0 days), displayed significantly more frequent spontaneous breathing at the time of intubation (31% vs. 12%) and a higher percentage of analgesia for all other painful procedures (median values: 16% vs. 6%). In multivariate analysis, no factor remained statistically significant. Conclusions: Premedication use prior to neonatal intubation was not systematically used and when used it was most frequently inconsistent with recent recommendations. No patient- or center-related independent risk factor for the absence of premedication was identified in this study.