Achieving a complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) is a major target in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), but CCgRs are rare. The mean CCgR rate is 13%, in a range of 5% to 33%. A collaborative study of 9 European Union countries has led to the collection of data on 317 patients who were first seen between 1983 and 1997 and achieved CCgRs with IFN-alpha alone or in combination with hydroxyurea. The median time to first CCgR was 19 months (95% CI, 17-21; range, 3-84 months). At last contact, 212 patients were still alive and in continuous CCgR; 105 patients had lost CCgR, but 53% of them were still alive and in chronic phase. IFN-alpha treatment was discontinued permanently in 23 cases for response loss, in 36 cases for chronic toxicity (15 are still in unmaintained continuous CCgR), and in 8 cases because it was believed that treatment was no longer necessary (7 of these 8 patients are still in unmaintained continuous CCgR). The 10-year survival rate from first CCgR is 72% (95% CI, 62%-82%) and is related to the risk profile. High-risk patients lost CCgR more frequently and more rapidly and none survived more than 10 years. Low-risk patients survived much longer (10-year survival probability 89% for Sokal low risk and 81% for Euro low risk). These data point out that a substantial long-term survival in CCgRs is restricted mainly to low-risk and possibly intermediate-risk patients and occurs significantly less often in high-risk patients.
A substantial minority of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) achieve a complete response (CR) to treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN), defined as the disappearance of Philadelphia chromosome-positive metaphases. Currently it is unclear how long IFN treatment should be continued for such patients. We used a competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to quantify levels of BCR-ABL transcripts in 297 peripheral blood specimens collected from 54 patients who had achieved CR with IFN. The median duration of observation was 1.9 years (range, 0.3-11.0 years). Total ABL transcripts were quantified as internal control and results were expressed as the ratio BCR-ABL/ABL. All 54 patients had molecular evidence of residual disease, although 3 patients were intermittently PCR negative. The median BCR-ABL/ABL ratio at the time of maximal response for each patient was 0.045% (range, 0%-3. 6%). During the period of observation 14 patients relapsed, 11 cytogenetically to chronic phase disease and 3 directly to blastic phase. The median ratio of BCR-ABL/ABL at maximal response was significantly higher in patients who relapsed than in those who remained in CR (0.49% versus 0.021%, P < 0.0001). Our findings show that the level of residual disease falls with time in complete responders to IFN, but molecular evidence of disease is rarely if ever eliminated. The actual level of minimal residual disease correlates with the probability of relapse. We suggest that for patients who reach CR, IFN should be continued at least until relatively low levels of residual leukemia are achieved. (Blood. 2000;95:62-66)
In the May 1, 1999 issue of Blood, Faderl et al1 discuss the possible clinical role of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis in the surveillance of residual disease in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Faderl et al1 raise questions regarding the significance of positive PCR reactions in patients who are in clinical and cytogenetic remission and express doubts about the possibility of using PCR analysis as a basis for therapy decisions. They indicate that a major drawback of current PCR studies is the lack of quantification of PCR data and that the short follow-up duration of published studies makes it difficult to interpret the results. The conclusions made are questionable in view of the fact that the investigators do not discuss any of the reports published by different groups on the monitoring of the dynamics of residual disease in CML patients by serial quantitative PCR analysis. 2-7 Numerous …
527 patients with CML were entered into the multicentre randomised MRC CML III study comparing IFN-alpha n1 to standard chemotherapy, either busulphan or hydroxyurea. Haematologic response to IFN as assessed by the level of control of the WCC predicted cytogenetic response to IFN. Cytogenetic response (< 80% Ph + ve) was seen in 22% of all patients randomised, 11% showing major or complete responses. Major cytogenetic response rate was 18% in Sokal low risk patients, 15% in intermediate risk patients but only 4% in high risk patients. Mantel Byar analyses allowing for time to response showed a survival advantage for cytogenetic responders compared to non-responders. In addition, cytogenetic non-responders to IFN did significantly better than chemotherapy-treated patients. Median survival for all patients was 61 months in the IFN treated groups and 41 months in the no-IFN group. For Ph + ve patients only, the median survival was 63 months compared to 43 months. Sub-group analysis comparing busulphan or hydroxyurea treatment in the IFN and no-IFN treatment arms showed a significant advantage for IFN-compared to busulphan, but no significant difference between IFN and hydroxyurea treated patients, although there was a trend favouring IFN. A proposed overview of all randomised trials comparing IFN to hydroxyurea should, by virture of larger numbers, enable a more accurate assessment of the probable benefit of IFN compared to hydroxyurea therapy.
Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) induces cytogenetic responses of variable degree in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). We sought to establish the relationship between BCR-ABL transcript numbers measured by competitive 2-step reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and cytogenetic status in CML patients treated with IFN-alpha. A total of 250 peripheral blood and 55 bone marrow samples with 127 Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) and 6 Ph-/BCR-ABL+ CML patients were investigated. Twenty-one patients were studied at diagnosis with IFN-alpha, 24 had a complete cytogenetic response, 21 a partial response, 12 a minor response, 26 no response, and 23 were unknown. Using nested RT-PCR, all 305 samples were positive for BCR-ABL transcripts. To standardize results for variability in RNA and cDNA quantity and quality, we quantified total ABL transcripts in each sample as internal control. The validity of ABL as internal control was shown by comparison with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase transcript levels in 145 samples. The median BCR-ABL transcript numbers (and BCR- ABL/ABL ratios expressed as percentages) were 400/micrograms RNA (O.04%) in complete responders, 20,500/micrograms RNA (7.1%) in partial responders, 170,000/micrograms RNA (21.0%) in minor responders, and 430,000/micrograms RNA (58.7%) in nonresponders (P < .001). The cytogenetic results correlated with the BCR-ABL transcript numbers (r = .82; P < .001) and BCR-ABL/ABL ratios (r = .84; P < .001). Grouping the ratios BCR-ABL/ABL as less than 2%, 2% to 14% and greater than 14% to compare with cytogenetic complete response, partial response, and minor/nonresponse, the concordance between the two methods was 82% (chi2 P< .0001). We conclude that quantitative PCR with internal controls is as sensitive and reliable method for monitoring patients on IFN-alpha and reduces the need for repeated marrow investigations.
Summary .A substantial minority of patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) achieve a complete response to treatment with interferon‐α (IFN‐α), defined as the disappearance of Philadelphia chromosome positive metaphases or, for patients who are Philadelphia chromosome negative but BCR‐ABL positive, the disappearance of the leukaemic clone as assayed by Southern blot. We have measured the levels of BCR‐ABL transcripts in 20 such patients by quantitative PCR. Results were standardized for both quality and quantity of cDNA by quantification of ABL as an internal control. All 20 patients had evidence of residual disease; the median number of transcripts was 750/μg RNA (range 10–22 000) and the median BCR‐ABL/ABL ratio was 0–17% (range 0–0008–3–6%). Our findings show that CML has not been eradicated in any patient and that the quantity of residual disease in complete responders may vary by as much as four orders of magnitude.
We describe four patients who developed severe thrombocytopenia which progressed to aplasia after the use of α‐interferon in maintenance therapy of chronic phase CML after busulphan induction. On reviewing over 400 patients in the MRC CML III trial we found that there is a risk of cytopenia developing after busulphan therapy and a lesser risk of cytopenias developing after α‐interferon therapy. If the therapies are given in a sequential fashion the risk of cytopenia developing appears to be additive, may be pronounced, and may lead to clinically significant problems. Hydroxyurea alone does not lead to sustained cytopenia. Care should be taken to ensure that counts are stable after the use of busulphan before starting α‐interferon as maintenance therapy.
We read with interest the recent report in Blood by Inokuchi et a1 correlating type of bcrlabl messenger RNA (mRNA) and platelet count in 57 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).'We have had the opportunity to study a large number of patients entered into a prospective randomized trial of interferon therapy in CML (MRC CML 111 Trial UK).Molecular studies have been performed to determine the genomic breakpoint site and, in a lesser number, the specific bcrlabl mRNA produced as a result of the translocation.This has been correlated with the platelet count at diagnosis and the results are given in Table 1.Table 1Agives the genomic data.For direct comparison, 5' breakpoints (zone 1 or 2) were compared with 3' breakpoints (zone 3,4, or 5 ) as per