BACKGROUND AND AIMS:Rituximab has been proposed as a potential treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), but formal evidence regarding its clinical effectiveness is weak. The CIDPRIT trial found no clinical benefit in comparison with placebo, but secondary analyses suggested some beneficial effect. Analysis of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) may provide evidence to support rituximab's effect on CIDP patients. METHODS:We performed a post hoc analysis of sNfL levels from the CIDPRIT trial participants. Blood samples were collected at baseline, month 6, and 12. sNfL was measured using Simoa technology. Geometric means and z-scores were compared across groups. Linear mixed-effects models and survival analyses were used to evaluate treatment effects and clinical correlations. RESULTS:33 participants were included (18 rituximab, 15 placebo). Baseline sNfL was significantly higher in the rituximab group (11.51 vs. 6.67 pg/mL, p = 0.019). While between-group differences over time were not statistically significant, rituximab-treated patients showed stable sNfL levels at month 6 and a slight decrease at month 12, contrasting with modest increases in the placebo group. Among rituximab-treated patients who remained clinically stable at month 12, sNfL showed a non-significant decline by 31%. No significant associations were found between baseline sNfL and clinical worsening. NfL levels correlated with neurophysiological parameters of axonal damage. INTERPRETATION:The analysis did not demonstrate biomarker-based evidence of rituximab efficacy in CIDP. However, observed trends suggest a possible biological effect in reducing axonal injury in a subset of patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of sNfL in treatment monitoring and patient stratification.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) often requires prolonged ongoing treatment to prevent worsening. The efficacy of rituximab in preventing worsening after the discontinuation of immunoglobulin therapy in patients with CIDP was assessed. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, conducted at seven Italian hospitals, CIDP patients under immunoglobulin therapy were assigned to receive either rituximab (1 g on Days 1, 15 and 180 +/- 7) or placebo. Both groups continued their regular immunoglobulin doses for 6 months post-intervention. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who worsened in any of the following three measures at Month 12, within 6 months after immunoglobulin discontinuation: a decrease of at least one point on the adjusted INCAT score, two points on the MRC sum score, or four points on the RODS centile score. Secondary end points included the proportion of patients deteriorating at Month 18 (within 12 months after immunoglobulin discontinuation), treatment cessation due to adverse events or voluntary reasons, and the time until deterioration after immunoglobulin discontinuation. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06325943) and EUDRACT (number 2017-005034-36), and is now complete. From April 2019 to March 2022, 39 patients were recruited; two withdrew consent. The remaining 37 patients were assigned to rituximab (n = 19) or placebo (n = 18). Median age was 53 (interquartile range 45-64), with 11 (30%) females. A similar proportion of patients in both the rituximab (12/19, 63.2%) and placebo (12/18, 66.6%) groups worsened at Month 12 [odds ratio (OR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-3.32]. No significant differences were noted at Month 18 (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.14-2.70), or in the mean scores of each scale at Months 6, 12 and 18. The median time to worsening was 5 months for rituximab and 2 months for placebo (Log-rank P = 0.4372). Treatment was suspended due to adverse events in one rituximab patient. In this study, rituximab was not more effective than placebo in preventing clinical deterioration following the discontinuation of immunoglobulin therapy in CIDP. Further studies might evaluate the efficacy of more frequent or earlier administration of rituximab.

Background and purposeThis study aimed to assess the diagnostic criteria, ancillary investigations and treatment response using real-life data in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients.MethodsClinical and laboratory data were collected from 110 patients enrolled in the Italian MMN database through a structured questionnaire. Twenty-six patients were excluded due to the unavailability of nerve conduction studies or the presence of clinical signs and symptoms and electrodiagnostic abnormalities inconsistent with the MMN diagnosis. Analyses were conducted on 73 patients with a confirmed MMN diagnosis and 11 patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria.ResultsThe European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria were variably applied. AUTHOR:When applying the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine criteria, an additional 17% of patients fulfilled the criteria for probable/definite diagnosis whilst a further 9.5% missed the diagnosis. In 17% of the patients only compound muscle action potential amplitude, but not area, was measured and subsequently recorded in the database by the treating physician. Additional investigations, including anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, supported the diagnosis in 46%-83% of the patients. Anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies and nerve ultrasound demonstrated the highest sensitivity. Additional tests were frequently performed outside the EFNS/PNS guideline recommendations.ConclusionsThis study provides insights into the real-world diagnostic and management strategies for MMN, highlighting the challenges in applying diagnostic criteria.

Background/Objectives: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune disease. Neuropathic pain (NP), related to peripheral inflammation, is among its earliest manifestations. This preliminary open-label investigation aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide (umPEA) in the management of NP. Methods: A total of 14 patients with CIDP, already undergoing immunoglobulin (Ig) therapy, were divided into two groups: Group A received umPEA 600 mg twice daily in addition to Ig for 60 days, followed by Ig alone until the end of the observation (180 days); Group B received Ig alone for 120 days and subsequently umPEA + Ig in the last 60 days of the study. Painful symptom intensity and quality of life were assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale, Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory, and Five Dimensions Health Questionnaire. The safety umPEA profile was evaluated. Results: UmPEA in addition to immunoglobulins allowed for a significant improvement over time in all NP symptoms intensity (p = 0.0007) and in patients’ quality of life (p = 0.0036). Conclusions: This study suggests umPEA as a safe and effective treatment in addition to immunoglobulins to improve NP, ameliorating the patient’s health status. These results highlight the importance of neuroinflammation modulation in the management of CIDP’s painful symptoms, drawing attention to umPEA’s potential use also in neuropathies of different etiologies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:This study was undertaken to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the 2010 European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) with those of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AAEM). METHODS:Sensitivity and specificity of the two sets of criteria were retrospectively evaluated in 53 patients with MMN and 280 controls with axonal peripheral neuropathy, inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Comparison of the utility of nerve conduction studies with different numbers of nerves examined was also assessed. RESULTS:The 2010 EFNS/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 47% for definite MMN and 57% for probable/definite MMN, whereas the AAEM criteria had a sensitivity of 28% for definite MMN and 53% for probable/definite MMN. The sensitivity of the AAEM criteria was higher when utilizing area compared to amplitude reduction to define conduction block. Using supportive criteria, the sensitivity of the 2010 EFNS/PNS criteria for probable/definite MMN increased to 64%, and an additional 36% patients fulfilled the criteria (possible MMN). Specificity values for definite and probable/definite MMN were slightly higher with the AAEM criteria (100%) compared to the EFNS/PNS criteria (98.5% and 97%). Extended nerve conduction studies yielded slightly increased diagnostic sensitivity for both sets of criteria without significantly affecting specificity. CONCLUSIONS:In our patient populations, the 2010 EFNS/PNS criteria demonstrated higher sensitivity but slightly lower specificity compared to the AAEM criteria. Extended nerve conduction studies are advised to achieve slightly higher sensitivity while maintaining very high specificity.

Background and purposeThere are different criteria for the diagnosis of different variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). The 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) guidelines provide specific clinical criteria for each CIDP variant even if their therapeutical impact has not been investigated.MethodsWe applied the clinical criteria for CIDP variants of the 2021 EAN/PNS guidelines to 369 patients included in the Italian CIDP database who fulfilled the 2021 EAN/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP.ResultsAccording to the 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria, 245 patients achieved a clinical diagnosis of typical CIDP or CIDP variant (66%). We identified 106 patients with typical CIDP (29%), 62 distal CIDP (17%), 28 multifocal or focal CIDP (7%), four sensory CIDP (1%), 27 sensory-predominant CIDP (7%), 10 motor CIDP (3%), and eight motor-predominant CIDP (2%). Patients with multifocal, distal, and sensory CIDP had milder impairment and symptoms. Patients with multifocal CIDP had less frequently reduced conduction velocity and prolonged F-wave latency and had lower levels of cerebrospinal fluid protein. Patients with distal CIDP more frequently had reduced distal compound muscle action potentials. Patients with motor CIDP did not improve after steroid therapy, whereas those with motor-predominant CIDP did. None of the patients with sensory CIDP responded to steroids, whereas most of those with sensory-predominant CIDP did.ConclusionsThe 2021 EAN/PNS criteria for CIDP allow a better characterization of CIDP variants, permitting their distinction from typical CIDP and more appropriate treatment for patients.

BackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy of rituximab in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) patients not responding to conventional immune therapies.MethodsAn open-label, prospective exploratory study was conducted with intravenous rituximab on 17 CIDP patients who had not responded to at least two first-line therapies. The primary endpoint was to determine the proportion of patients who showed improvement 6 months after rituximab therapy. The percentage of responders to rituximab, along with a 95% CI, was reported and compared with the 30% response rate after other immunosuppressive drugs previously documented in the literature.Results13 of the 17 treated patients (76.5%) showed improvement at 6 months (95% CI 50.1 to 93.2). Among the 14 patients who completed the 12-month follow-up (2 were lost to follow-up after showing improvement at months 8 and 10, and 1 deteriorated at 6 months), 13 (92.9%) demonstrated improvement at 12 months (95% CI 66.1 to 99.8). Nerve conduction parameters improved by at least 20% in two nerves in 6 out of 15 (40%) patients at 6 months and in 7 out of 13 (53.9%) at 12 months. None of the treated patients withdrew from the study due to side effects. There was a significant reduction of circulating CD19+ cells 15 days, 2, 6 and 12 months after treatment.ConclusionRituximab seems to be a safe therapy in most patients with CIDP not responding to conventional immune therapies. The high percentage of patients who improved in this study suggests a possible positive effect of rituximab which is worth investigating in future randomised controlled clinical trials.Trial registration numberNCT05877040.

The aim was to evaluate the risk of relapse after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) vaccination, and its safety and tolerability, in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies.

The therapeutic administration of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) offers various advantages over intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This narrative review examines and compares SCIg versus IVIg in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). SCIg is as effective as IVIg but is better tolerated and easier to administer, as intravenous access is not required. Furthermore, SCIg administration is more convenient and cost-effective than IVIg, enabling flexible treatment scheduling at home and improving patients' overall quality of life. The availability of highly concentrated immunoglobulin G (IgG) subcutaneous solutions, such as IgPro20, a 20% IgG solution stabilized with L-proline, allows for the administration of larger volumes in a single session, while the parallel development of new technological devices enables the delivery of higher doses over a shorter time. Based on the results of the PATH study, SCIg has become a well-established therapy in CIDP. In addition to discussing the advantages of SCIg, this review summarizes the evolution of SCIg by discussing all the relevant clinical studies which have considered its use in the treatment of CIDP.