This conclusion presents some closing thoughts on the key concepts discussed in the preceding chapters of this book. Class is not dead, but has been buried alive under the increasing weight of cultural politics. The specter of the rightist working class was the well-deserved byproduct of the theoretical narrow-mindedness of all those political sociologists who have been overly loyal to the class theory of politics. The book focuses on countries in which, judged from the electoral successes of new-rightist populist parties, right-authoritarian issues have become highly salient. It demonstrates that economic egalitarianism can no longer simply be equated with solidarity with the unemployed. Although Inglehart's influential analysis of the left-libertarian "silent revolution" and of "new politics" as essentially "left-libertarian politics" thus adequately represented the political climate in the 1960s and 1970s, the coexistence of …
Jaak Billiet合作论文数Centre for Sociological Research, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven2
Pierre Bourdieu合作论文数1peter l berger合作论文数1hansfried kellner合作论文数1
Andrea Volkens合作论文数1Peter Ester合作论文数1Terry Nichols Clark合作论文数1Eric Tanenbaum合作论文数1Daniel J. Levinson合作论文数1s torcuato合作论文数1andries van den broek合作论文数1Kendall L. Baker合作论文数1Gøsta Esping-Andersen合作论文数1kai hildebrandt合作论文数1Ulrich Beck合作论文数1
Paul R. Abramson合作论文数Department of Psychology, College of Life Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles1
Daniel A. Bell (贝淡宁)合作论文数Faculty of Law, The University of Hong Kong1
Paul Dekker合作论文数tilburg university1
Matthijs Kalmijn合作论文数Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute1
Russell J. Dalton合作论文数School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine1Ian Budge合作论文数1Brigitte Berger合作论文数1
Karen Cook合作论文数Department of Sociology, School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University1
John Goldthorpe合作论文数Nuffield College, University of Oxford;Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford1Hans-Dieter Klingemann合作论文数1Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim合作论文数1
Robert S. Erikson合作论文数Department of Political Science, Columbia University1Richard Madsen合作论文数1
Jacques A. Hagenaars合作论文数Department of Methodology, Tilburg University1
Paul M. De Graaf合作论文数Department of Sociology, Tilburg University1Wil Arts合作论文数Department of Economic Sociology and Psychology, Erasmus University1Paul Allen Beck合作论文数Department of Political Science, Texas Tech University1
Bram Steijn合作论文数Department of Public Administration;Erasmus University Rotterdam;Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam1
Nan Dirk de Graaf合作论文数Nuffield College, University of Oxford;Leverhulme Centre for Demographic Science, University of Oxford;Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality, Stanford University1
Jørgen Goul Andersen合作论文数CCWS - Centre for Comparative Welfare state Studies, Aalborg University1Steven M. Tipton合作论文数1Clem Brooks合作论文数1Mark Elchardus合作论文数1
Geoffrey Evans合作论文数Department of Politics and International Relations, Nuffield College, University Of Oxford1
Rob Eisinga合作论文数Department of Methodology and Statistics, Radboud University Nijmegen1William M. Sullivan合作论文数1
Seymour Martin Lipset合作论文数Stanford University;Hoover Institution;Harvard University;George Mason University1Derek J. Hearl合作论文数1
Karen A. Hegtvedt合作论文数1
Robert Neelly Bellah合作论文数Department of Sociology, University of California, Berkeley1Paul Nieuwbeerta合作论文数Department of Criminology, Leiden University1Judith Bara合作论文数1
Inge Sieben合作论文数1Hans-Georg Betz合作论文数Centre of German and European Studies, Canadian;York University;Canadian Centre of German and European Studies, York University1
