The article presents a longitudinal study which measured the positive and negative attitudes toward women executives in the U.S. for the 1975 to 1983 period. The Managerial Attitudes toward Women E...
A scale (MATWES) is presented providing reliability and some validity measures regarding managerial attitudes toward women executives. Methodology used demonstrates an empirical approach to scale development through the employment of a projective test for item generation and the use of a panel of women executives who served as Q-sorters to select the items. The use of the Scale as a research instrument and its value in minimizing researcher bias in its construction are discussed.
Personnel PsychologyVolume 24, Issue 1 p. 63-70 BIRTH ORDER, EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT, AND MANAGERIAL ATTAINMENT PETER DUBNO, PETER DUBNO New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorRICHARD D. FREEDMAN, RICHARD D. FREEDMAN New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this author PETER DUBNO, PETER DUBNO New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorRICHARD D. FREEDMAN, RICHARD D. FREEDMAN New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: March 1971 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1971.tb00359.xCitations: 6AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume24, Issue1March 1971Pages 63-70 RelatedInformation
The research reported here attempted to answer two questions. The first was to determine the relationship between the amount of education managers receive and their actual relative attainment in business organizations. There now seems little doubt that there is an important relationship: top managers are better educated than middle managers. Not only are they better educated than their subordinates now, but this is a trend that has existed throughout most of this century. it seems less likely in view of the finding that a positive relationship exists between the type of education managers receive at the undergraduate level and their actual attainment in business organizations, providing an answer to the second question. It may still be argued that the relationships are misleading since the form or education emphasized could be arbitrary rather than due to sound educational logic. However, such an argument would make the findings of this study more difficult to interpret. Most persons seem to advise arts and science backgrounds as superior to business school backgrounds. Yet there is a positive relationship between attendance at undergraduate business schools and executive attainment. The point remains, however, that undergraduate business schools have been capable of providing American business manager's with the intellectual tools they need and that their capacity to perform this role has increased over the past decades. The undergraduate business school appears to be accomplishing its educational mission. It seems to be relevant now and, by extrapolation, will become an even more important factor in the education of the manager of the future.
Personnel PsychologyVolume 22, Issue 3 p. 269-279 BIRTH ORDER, CONFORMITY, AND MANAGERIAL ACHIEVEMENT1 PETER DUBNO, PETER DUBNO New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorHRACH BEDROSIAN, HRACH BEDROSIAN New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorRICHARD FREEDMAN, RICHARD FREEDMAN New York University The authors wish to express their gratitude to Mr. Jeffrey Tischler for his assistance with the programming and computer operations necessary for the study.Search for more papers by this author PETER DUBNO, PETER DUBNO New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorHRACH BEDROSIAN, HRACH BEDROSIAN New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorRICHARD FREEDMAN, RICHARD FREEDMAN New York University The authors wish to express their gratitude to Mr. Jeffrey Tischler for his assistance with the programming and computer operations necessary for the study.Search for more papers by this author First published: September 1969 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1969.tb00332.xCitations: 7 1 This research was supported by a grant from the Office of Research, Schools of Business, New York University. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Altus, W. D. Birth Order and its Sequelae. Science, CLI (1966), 44–50. Asch, S. E. Studies of Independence and Conformity: I. A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs, LXX (1956), No. 9, (Whole No. 416). Becker, S. W., Lerner, M. J., and Carroll, Jean. Conformity as a Function of Birth Order and Type of Group Pressure: A Verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, III (1966), 242–244. Carrigan, W. C. and Julian, J. W. Sex and Birth Order Differences in Conformity as a Function of Need Affiliation Arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, III (1966), 479–482. Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. B. A Study of Normative and Informational Social Influences upon Individual Judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, LI (1955), 629–636. Parsons, T. Family Structure and Socialization of the Child." In T. Parsons and R. F. Bales (Editors), Family: Socialization and Interaction Process. Glencoe , Ill. : Free Press, 1955. Sampson, E. E. and Hancock, Francena T. An Examination of the Relationship Between Ordinal Position, Personality, and Conformity: An Extension, Replication, and Partial Verification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, V (1967), 398–407. Schachter, S. The Psychology of Affiliation. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1959. Sherif, M. A Study of Some Social Factors in Perception. Archives of Psychology (1935), NO. 187. The 500 Largest U. S. Industrial Corporations. Fortune, LXXIV (1965), 230–250. Warren, J. R. Birth Order and Social Behavior. Psychological Bulletin, LXV (1966), 38–49. Weiss, R. L. Some Determinants of Omitted Reinforcing Behavior: Listener Reinforcement and Birth Order. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, III (1966), 489–492. Whyte, W. H. The Organization Man. New Pork : Simon and Schuster, 1956. Wuebben, P. L. Honesty of Subjects and Birth Order. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, V (1967), 350–352. Citing Literature Volume22, Issue3September 1969Pages 269-279 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Personnel PsychologyVolume 21, Issue 3 p. 335-344 GROUP CONGRUENCY PATTERNS AND LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS1 PETER DUBNO, PETER DUBNO New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this author PETER DUBNO, PETER DUBNO New York UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: September 1968 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1968.tb02034.xCitations: 2 1 Portions of this paper were presented at the American Psychological Association Convention in New York City on September 5, 1966. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume21, Issue3September 1968Pages 335-344 RelatedInformation