The use of minipigs in preclinical safety testing of pharmaceuticals is considered an alternative to the more traditional dog and nonhuman primate (NHP) nonrodent species. Substantial evidence exists to suggest that the anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry of minipigs are similar enough to humans to consider them as valid nonrodent models for pharmaceutical safety testing. Since the utilization of minipigs was last assessed over 5 years ago, the Preclinical Safety Leadership Group (DruSafe) of the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development conducted this survey to provide an updated assessment of the utility, perceived value, and impediments to the use of minipigs in preclinical safety testing. Of the 32 participating members of DruSafe, 15 responded to the survey representing both large and small companies. Respondents indicated that the minipig has been utilized mostly for short-term safety assessment studies with dermal, oral, and parenteral routes of administration. Minipigs are widely accepted as appropriate models for cardiovascular assessments and have been used to a limited extent for reproductive toxicology testing. Overall responses indicated that safety testing for large molecules using this species is relatively low due to a lack of background data, reagents or biomarkers, concerns regarding immune system characterization and poor suitability for developmental toxicity assessments. Most companies utilized contract research organizations for definitive safety toxicity assessment studies. Conclusions of this survey indicate that minipig is an acceptable nonrodent species largely limited to studies using small molecules, primarily dermal products, and results are comparable to those reported 5 years ago.

Minipigs are increasingly being used as an alternative to dog or monkey in nonclinical safety testing of pharmaceuticals since they share similar anatomical and physiological characteristics to humans. Integrative assessment of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data sets of drug candidates from in silico, in vitro, and in vivo investigations form the basis for selecting the most relevant nonrodent species for toxicology studies. Developing anticancer therapeutics represents a special challenge for species selection due to their effects on multiple organ systems. The toxicological profile of anticancer drugs can be associated with steep dose–response curves, especially due to dose-limiting toxicity on the alimentary, hematopoietic, and immune systems. Selection of an appropriate species for toxicology studies is of importance to avoid an inappropriately low (without benefit for the late-stage cancer patient) or high clinical starting dose (with a risk of unexpected adverse reactions). Although the minipig has been the preferred species to develop drugs applied topically, it is only rarely used in anticancer drug development compared to dog and monkey. In this context, we discuss the potential of minipigs in anticancer drug development with examples of programs for oral and dermal administration, intravascular application in drug-eluting stents, and local chemotherapy (chemoembolization).

The pig was introduced more than 20 years ago in drug development following attempts of finding a species that shares better homology with human than the dog, based on biophysiological parameters. However, miniaturization, standardized breeding, and health status control were required before the pig could find a broader than niche application in pharmaceutical industry. During the years of experience with minipigs in pharmaceutical research and the science evolving rapidly, the selection of a nonrodent animal species for preclinical safety testing became primarily driven by pharmacological (target expression homologous function), pharmacokinetic, and biophysiological considerations. This offered a broad field of application for the minipig, besides the well-established use in dermal projects in all areas of drug development but also in novel approaches including genetically modified animals. In this article, we look at recent approaches and requirements in the optimal selection of a nonrodent model in pharmaceutical development and critically ask how good a choice the minipig offers for the scientist, how did the testing environment evolve, and what are the key requirements for a broader use of the minipig compared to the other well-established nonrodent species like dog or monkey.

Minipigs have been used for dermal drug development studies for decades, and they are currently more frequently considered as the second nonrodent species for pivotal nonclinical studies, in lieu of the dog or nonhuman primate, for compounds delivered via standard systemic routes of administration. Little is known about the tolerability of different excipients in minipigs; sharing knowledge of excipient tolerability and compositions previously used in nonclinical studies may avoid testing of inadequate formulations, thereby contributing to reduced animal usage. This article reviews vehicles employed in the Göttingen® minipig based on the combined experience from a number of pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations. The review includes vehicles tolerated for single or multiple dosing by the Göttingen minipig, some of which are not appropriate for administration to other common nonrodent species (e.g., dogs). By presenting these data for dermal, oral, subcutaneous, and intravenous routes of administration, studies to qualify these vehicles in minipigs can be minimized or avoided. Additionally, investigators may more frequently consider using the minipig in place of higher species if the tolerability of a vehicle in the minipig is known.

Objective:To report outcomes of pregnancies that occurred during the fingolimod clinical development program.Methods:Pregnancy outcomes from phase II, phase III, and phase IV clinical studies (with optional extensions) were reported by clinical trial investigators. Fingolimod exposure in utero was defined as fingolimod treatment at the time of conception or in the 6 weeks before conception.Results:As of October 31, 2011, 89 pregnancies were reported in completed or ongoing clinical studies, with 74 in fingolimod treatment arms. Of 66 pregnancies with in utero exposure to fingolimod, there were 28 live births, 9 spontaneous abortions, 24 elective abortions, 4 ongoing pregnancies, and 1 pregnancy with an unknown outcome (patient lost to follow-up). Two infants were born with malformations: 1 with congenital unilateral posteromedial bowing of the tibia and 1 with acrania. Elective abortions were performed for 1 case each of tetralogy of Fallot, spontaneous intrauterine death, and failure of fetal development. There were 5 cases (7.6%; 95% confidence interval 3%-17%) of abnormal fetal development in the 66 pregnancies that had in utero exposure to fingolimod. In all 5 cases, fetal exposure to the drug took place in the first trimester of pregnancy.Conclusions:The number of patients becoming pregnant during fingolimod therapy remains small and does not permit firm conclusions to be drawn about fetal safety of fingolimod in humans. Given the known risks of teratogenicity in animals and the present data, women of childbearing potential should use effective contraception during fingolimod therapy and for 2 months after discontinuation.

A novel series of alkoxyimino derivatives as S1P1 agonists were discovered through de novo design using FTY720 as the chemical starting point. Extensive structure-activity relationship studies led to the discovery of (E)-1-(4-(1-(((4-cyclohexyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)oxy)imino)ethyl)-2-ethylbenzyl)azetidine-3-carboxylic acid (32, BAF312, Siponimod), which has recently completed phase 2 clinical trials in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 9, 883–897 (2010) In figure 2, there were errors in the stereochemistry of the chemical structure of myriocin. The structure is correct in the online html and pdf versions, and is also provided here.

FTY720 (2-amino-2[2-(-4-octylphenyl)ethyl]propane-1,3-diol hydrochloride) is a new sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor agonist being developed for multiple sclerosis and prevention of solid organ transplant rejection. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed to predict the concentration of FTY720 in various organs of the body. Single oral and intravenous doses of FTY720 were administered to male Wistar rats, with blood and tissue sampling over 360 h analyzed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. A well stirred model (perfusion rate-limited) described FTY720 kinetics in heart, lungs, spleen, muscle, kidneys, bone, and liver, with a permeability rate-limited model being required for brain, thymus, and lymph nodes. Tissue-to-blood partition coefficients (RT) ranged from 4.69 (muscle) to 41.4 (lungs). In lymph nodes and spleen, major sites for FTY720-induced changes in sequestration of lymphocytes, RT values were 22.9 and 34.7, respectively. Permeability-surface area products for brain, thymus, and lymph nodes were 39.3, 122, and 176 ml/min. Intrinsic hepatic clearance was 23,145 l/h/kg for the free drug in blood (fub 0.000333); systemic clearance was 0.748 l/h/kg and terminal half-life was 23.4 h. The fraction orally absorbed was 71%. The model characterized well FTY720 disposition for this extensive dosing and tissue collection study in the rat. On scaling the model to dogs and humans, good agreement was found between the actual and predicted blood concentration-time profiles. More importantly, brain concentrations in dogs were well predicted from those of the rat. In absolute terms, the predictions were slightly lower than observed values, just under a 1.5-fold deviation, but the model accurately predicted the terminal elimination of FTY720 from the brain.

The approach to chronic toxicity testing over the past decade is reviewed and assessed in the light of developing ICH guidelines. The 1990's have seen a general acceptance that studies with a maximal duration of 6 months in rodents are all that is required for adequate safety assessment of developmental pharmaceutical agents. However, controversy has arisen concerning the most appropriate duration for chronic toxicity testing in non-rodents. Initial suggestions that 6 months duration was sufficient have been countered by findings noted in 12-month studies that were not seen in shorter-term studies. Retrospective analysis of available data eventually lead to a subsequent ICH recommendation that studies of 9 months duration would be now acceptable. However, until recently the FDA position on this recommendation was unclear and an analysis of industry practices since the ICH recommendation was made in 1997 has shown that the 9-month guideline is not widely applied. Recent clarification by the FDA will probably result in a continued but limited use of this alternative. An industry view on the future of chronic toxicology testing in rodents and non-rodents is presented.