Extraneous neuroscience information improves ratings of scientific explanations, and affects mock juror decisions in many studies, but others have yielded little to no effect. To establish the magnitude of this effect, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis using 60 experiments from 28 publications. We found a mild but highly significant effect, with substantial heterogeneity. Planned subgroup analyses revealed that within-subjects studies, where people can compare the same material with and without neuroscience, and those using text, have stronger effects than between-subjects designs, and studies using brain image stimuli. We serendipitously found that effect sizes were stronger on outcomes of evaluating satisfaction or metacomprehension, compared with jury verdicts or assessments of convincingness. In conclusion, there is more than one type of neuroscience explanations effect. Irrelevant neuroscience does have a seductive allure, especially on self-appraised satisfaction and understanding, and when presented as text.

The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations (SANE) is controversial. Irrelevant neuroscience information in the form of text or imagery has been found to improve ratings of quality of, and agreement with, scientific explanations, and to possibly affect jury decisions in court. On the other hand, several studies have yielded little to no effect. To establish the magnitude of this effect, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis on all studies that compared neuroscience to non-neuroscience information for impact on ratings or judgment, including mock juror decisions. This analysis used 60 experiments from 28 publications comprising 13,088 participants, and yielded a mild but highly significant effect of neuroscience information (Hedges’ g = .25, CI = [0.18, 0.31]). There was evidence of publication bias and heterogeneity (PI = [-0.22, 0.72], I2 = 87.2%). After removing outliers, we conducted planned subgroup analyses, which revealed that within-subjects studies, in which participants compare neuroscience to non-neuroscience, have significantly stronger effects than between-subjects designs, and studies using text yield a stronger average effect than those using brain images. We also serendipitously found that effect sizes were stronger in studies where participants evaluate satisfaction or metacomprehension, compared with jury verdicts or assessments of convincingness. Overall, the heterogeneity indicates there is more than one type of SANE effect, having more to do with stimuli used and outcomes assessed, than with participant characteristics, such as dualistic beliefs. Irrelevant neuroscience does appear to have a seductive allure, especially on self-appraised satisfaction and understanding, and when presented as text.

Divided attention may be more important than ever to comprehend, given ubiquitous distractors in modern living. In humans, concern has been expressed about the negative impact of distraction in education, the home, and the workplace. While acetylcholine supports divided attention, in part via muscarinic receptors, little is known about the specific muscarinic subtypes that may contribute. We designed a novel, high-response rate test of auditory sustained attention, in which rats complete variable-ratio runs on one of two levers, rather than emitting a single response. By doing this, we can present a secondary visual distractor task during some trials, for which a correct nosepoke response is reinforced with a more palatable food pellet. The nonspecific muscarinic antagonist scopolamine impaired performance, and slowed and reduced lever press activity. We then explored antagonists that preferentially block the M1 and M4 subtypes, because these receptors are potential therapeutic targets for cognitive enhancers. Telenzepine, an M1-preferring antagonist, impaired divided attention performance, but not performance of the attention task without distraction. Telenzepine also had fewer nonspecific effects than scopolamine. In contrast, the M4-preferring antagonist tropicamide had no effects. Analysis of overall behavior also indicated that accuracy in the main attention task decreased as a function of engagement with the distractor task. These results implicate the M1 receptor in divided attention.

Divided attention may be more important than ever to comprehend, given ubiquitous distractors in modern living. In humans, concern has been expressed about the negative impact of distraction in education, the home, and the workplace. While acetylcholine supports divided attention, in part via muscarinic receptors, little is known about the specific muscarinic subtypes that may contribute. We designed a novel, high-response rate test of auditory sustained attention, in which rats complete variable-ratio runs on one of two levers, rather than emitting a single response. By doing this, we can present a secondary visual distractor task during some trials, for which a correct nosepoke response is reinforced with a more palatable food pellet. The nonspecific muscarinic antagonist scopolamine impaired performance, and slowed and reduced lever press activity. We then explored antagonists that preferentially block the M1 and M4 subtypes, because these receptors are potential therapeutic targets for cognitive enhancers. Telenzepine, an M1-preferring antagonist, impaired divided attention performance, but not performance of the attention task without distraction. Telenzepine also had fewer nonspecific effects than scopolamine. In contrast, the M4-preferring antagonist tropicamide had no effects. Analysis of overall behavior also indicated that accuracy in the main attention task decreased as a function of engagement with the distractor task. These results implicate the M1 receptor in divided attention.

The serotonergic 5-HT1A receptor is known to be involved in both impulsivity and anxiety-related behavior. Although anxiety and impulsivity are different constructs, it has been shown that anxiogenesis can result in impulsiveness. It is therefore important to determine if the 5-HT1A receptor is involved in the commission of impulsive actions independent of its effects on anxiety. The 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.0125–0.1 mg/kg subcutaneous) increased impulsive action at low doses, but decreased it at higher doses, on the novel paced variable consecutive number with discriminative stimulus task (VCN). Neither the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY 100,635 (0.2–1.2 mg/kg subcutaneous), nor the noradrenergic antagonist and pharmacological stressor yohimbine (1–2 mg/kg intraperitoneal) altered measures of impulsivity. Stress induced by yohimbine was sufficient to produce anxiety-like behavior in the elevated zero maze, confirming that the VCN task is a selective assay of impulsive action that is not affected by anxiety. We hypothesize that the biphasic effect of 8-OH-DPAT is due to actions on presynaptic raphe 5-HT1A autoreceptors, and also postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors. These results suggest that this receptor mediates impulsive action and that this is not secondary to its role in anxiety.

RATIONALE:Cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonists hold therapeutic promise as appetite suppressants but have produced suicidal behaviors among a small subpopulation in clinical trials. Anatomical and pharmacological evidence implicate the 5HT1A serotonin receptor in suicide in humans and impulsivity in humans and animals.OBJECTIVE:The objective of the study is to assess whether 5HT1A blockade is necessary for CB1 ligands to produce impulsivity.METHODS:Sprague Dawley rats were administered the CB1 inverse agonist AM 251, the CB1 antagonist AM 6527, or the peripherally restricted antagonist AM 6545, with or without pretreatment with the 5HT1A antagonist WAY 100,635 (WAY) on the paced fixed consecutive number (FCN) task, which measures choice to terminate a chain of responses prematurely. As FCN is sensitive to changes in time perception, which have been demonstrated with CB1 blockade, a novel variable consecutive number task with discriminative stimulus (VCN-S D ) was also performed and proposed to be less sensitive to changes in timing.RESULTS:Pretreatment with WAY enabled mild but significant reductions in FCN accuracy for AM 251 and AM 6527. No effects were found for AM 6545. On the VCN-S D task, substantial impairments were found for the combination of WAY and AM 251.CONCLUSIONS:AM 251, but not the antagonists AM 6527 or AM 6545, produced impulsivity only following systemic 5HT1A blockade. Although preliminary, the results may indicate that disrupted serotonin signaling produces a vulnerability to undesirable effects of CB1 inverse agonists, which is not evident in the general population. Furthermore, neutral CB1 antagonists do not produce this effect and therefore may have greater safety.

Rimonabant is the first major cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist. Designed to antagonize the effects of cannabinoid agonists (like THC, the main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana), it has therapeutic promise reducing body weight, and inhibiting consumption of food and some drugs of abuse. Due to psychiatric side effects, it was deemed unsafe for medical use. However, it has led to numerous discoveries about the endogenous cannabinoid system, metabolism, cognition, and appetitive behavior, that may hold the key for future successful treatments.

Cannabinoid CB1 antagonists are widely known to reduce motivation for food, but it is not known whether they induce satiety or reduce reward value of food. It may therefore be necessary to compare effects of altered satiety and reward food value in the same appetitive task, and determine whether CB1 antagonism produces a behavior pattern similar to either, both, or neither. A fine-grained analysis of fixed-ratio 10 (FR10) responding for palatable food initially included number and duration of, and between, all lever presses and food tray entries in order to differentiate the pattern of suppression of prefeeding from that caused by reducing the reward value of the pellets with quinine. Discriminant function analysis then determined that these manipulations were best differentiated by effects on tray entries, pellet retrieval latencies, and time of the first response. At 0.5 mg/kg, AM 6527 produced similar effects to reducing reward value, but at 1.0 and 4.0 mg/kg, effects were more similar to those when animals were satiated. We conclude that AM 6527 both reduced reward value and enhanced satiety, but as dose increased, effects on satiety became much more prominent. These findings contribute to knowledge about the behavioral processes affected by CB1 antagonism.

Due to the ubiquity of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor throughout the nervous system, as well as the many potential therapeutic uses of CB1 agonist-based interventions, it is desirable to synthesize novel probes of the CB1 receptor. Here, the acute behavioral effects of systemic (i.p.) administration of the putative novel CB1 full agonist AM 4054 were tested in rats. In Experiment 1, a dose range (0.15625-1.25 mg/kg) of AM 4054 produced effects consistent with CB1 agonism in the cannabinoid tetrad of tasks in rats, including induction of analgesia, catalepsy, hypothermia, and locomotor suppression. These effects were reversed with the CB1-selective inverse agonist AM 251 in Experiment 2, indicating that AM 4054 produced CB1 receptor-mediated effects. Analysis of open-field activity indicated that the reduction in locomotion is more consistent with general motor slowing than anxiogenesis. AM 4054 (0.0625-0.5 mg/kg) also dose-dependently reduced fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) operant responding for food in Experiment 3, and microanalysis of the timing and rate of lever pressing indicated a pattern of suppression similar to other CB1 agonists. Minimum doses of AM 4054 (0.125-0.3125 mg/kg) required to produce significant effects in these behavioral assays were lower than those of many CB1 agonists. It is likely that AM 4054 is a potent pharmacological tool for assessment of cannabinoid receptor function.

The effects of cannabinoid CB1 agonists (including Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the main psychoactive component of marijuana) on attention are uncertain, with reports of impairments, no effects, and occasionally performance enhancements. To better understand these effects, we sought to uncover a role of changing online (within-session) strategy as a possible mediator of the effects of the novel, potent CB1 agonist AM 4054, on a model of sustained attention in male Sprague-Dawley rats. In this operant, two-choice reaction time (RT) task, AM 4054 decreased accuracy in an asymmetric manner; that is, performance was spared on one lever but impaired on the other. Furthermore, this pattern was enhanced by the outcome of the previous trial such that AM 4054 strengthened a win-stay strategy on the "preferred" lever and a lose-shift strategy on the "nonpreferred" lever. This pattern is often found in tests of expectancy; therefore, in a second experiment AM 4054 enhanced expectancy that we engendered by altering the probability of the two stimulus cues. Accuracy was impaired in reporting the less frequent cue, but only after two or more presentations of the more frequent cue. Taking the results of the experiments together, AM 4054 engendered expectancy by increasing the role of previous trial location and outcome on performance of future trials, diminishing stimulus control (and therefore, accuracy). This novel effect of CB1 receptor agonism may contribute to the deleterious effects of cannabinoids on attention.

CB1 antagonists, including rimonabant (SR 141716A), hold considerable therapeutic potential in the reduction of appetite and lipogenesis and in improving the metabolic profile of obese individuals and those with diabetes. However, rimonabant has not been approved in the USA because of its numerous side-effects, including depression and anxiety. Because of this, it is expected that fewer attempts will be made to introduce CB1 antagonists into the market. However, a 'second generation' of compounds has produced promising results in animal models in terms of these side-effects, and may pave the way toward new development and clinical testing of compounds that lack the side-effects of rimonabant. This new generation includes neutral CB1 antagonists, which likely have less intrinsic activity than clinically tested drugs, and peripherally restricted compounds. The current paper reviews the behavioral profile of rimonabant and related compounds, including a similarity in hypophagic effects with putative neutral antagonists and peripherally restricted antagonists. Emerging evidence of a lack of effects in models of nausea, anxiety, and depression is discussed. It is concluded that, with increasing emphasis on modeling the more troublesome side-effects of CB1 antagonists, safe, efficacious therapeutic targets may emerge. Further rigorous preclinical testing should be carried out.

CB1 antagonists, including rimonabant (SR 141716A), hold considerable therapeutic potential in the reduction of appetite and lipogenesis and in improving the metabolic profile of obese individuals and those with diabetes. However, rimonabant has not been approved in the USA because of its numerous side-effects, including depression and anxiety. Because of this, it is expected that fewer attempts will be made to introduce CB1 antagonists into the market. However, a 'second generation' of compounds has produced promising results in animal models in terms of these side-effects, and may pave the way toward new development and clinical testing of compounds that lack the side-effects of rimonabant. This new generation includes neutral CB1 antagonists, which likely have less intrinsic activity than clinically tested drugs, and peripherally restricted compounds. The current paper reviews the behavioral profile of rimonabant and related compounds, including a similarity in hypophagic effects with putative neutral antagonists and peripherally restricted antagonists. Emerging evidence of a lack of effects in models of nausea, anxiety, and depression is discussed. It is concluded that, with increasing emphasis on modeling the more troublesome side-effects of CB1 antagonists, safe, efficacious therapeutic targets may emerge. Further rigorous preclinical testing should be carried out. Behavioural Pharmacology 23:537-550 (c) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Overt similarities exist between the effects of systemic cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonists and dopamine (DA) antagonists on appetitive behavior. The present set of studies was undertaken to apply a fine-grained analysis of food-reinforced operant lever pressing in rats in order to compare the pattern of effects produced by administration of the CB1 inverse agonist AM 251 and those induced by the DA D1 antagonist SKF 83566, and the D2 antagonist raclopride. Three groups of rats were trained on a fixed-ratio 5 (FR5) schedule and administered these compounds over a range of doses expected to suppress responding. All three drugs produced a dose-related suppression of total lever pressing. In addition to main effects of dose, regression analyses were performed to determine which of several response timing- and rate-related variables correlated most strongly with overall responding in each group. It was found that total session time spent pausing from responding was significantly better at predicting responding in the AM 251 group, while both DA antagonists produced significantly stronger regression coefficients (versus AM 251) from fast responding measures. These results suggest that, while several similarities exist, CB1, D1, and D2 antagonists are not identical in their pattern of suppression of food-maintained lever pressing.

The metabolites of ethanol, acetaldehyde and acetate, are biologically active, and different effects may be produced depending upon the particular metabolite and the route of administration. These studies characterized the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) vs. intraventricular (ICV) administration of ethanol, acetaldehyde, and acetate administered to male Sprague-Dawley rats. Operant behavior was assessed by conducting a detailed temporal analysis of lever pressing with rats responding on a fixed ratio 5 schedule of food reinforcement. IP administration of all three drugs produced a rate-decreasing effect on the total number of responses. Acetaldehyde and acetate were much more potent than ethanol at reducing lever pressing. The interresponse time (IRT) distribution also was more potently altered by IP administration of ethanol metabolites than by ethanol itself. The total lever pressing and IRT distributions of ethanol- and acetaldehyde- treated rats were not significantly affected when these drugs were administered ICV, while acetate produced a marked suppression of fast responses and an increase in pausing. The metabolites of ethanol are more potent than ethanol itself in terms of altering patterns of lever pressing. Thus, the effects of ethanol administration could in part be due to the actions of its biologically active metabolites.

Cannabinoid CB1 inverse agonists such as rimonabant and AM 251 hold therapeutic promise as appetite suppressants, but the extent to which non-motivational factors contribute to their anorectic effects is not fully known. Examination of the behavioral satiety sequence (BSS) in rats, the orderly progression from eating to post-prandial grooming and then resting, has revealed that these compounds preserve the order of events but differ markedly from natural satiation. The most notable difference is that grooming (particularly scratching) is profoundly enhanced at anorectic doses, while eating and resting are diminished, raising the possibility that the anorectic effect is simply secondary to the grooming effect. In the current design, the neutral CB1 antagonist AM 4113, which has been found to lack some of the undesirable effects of AM 251, produced nearly identical effects on the BSS as AM 251. The possibility that competition from enhanced grooming could account for the anorectic effect of AM 4113 was examined by yoking the pattern of disruptions caused by grooming in the AM 4113-treated group to forced locomotion in a different group fed in a modified running wheel. This response competition did not significantly reduce food intake. It was concluded that AM 4113, a CB1 neutral antagonist, produces the same effects on the BSS as AM 251, but that response competition from enhanced grooming may not be a sufficient explanation for the anorectic effects of CB1 antagonists/inverse agonists.

Drugs that interfere with cannabinoid CB1 transmission suppress various food-motivated behaviors, and it has been suggested that such drugs could be useful as appetite suppressants. Biochemical studies indicate that most of these drugs assessed thus far have been CB1 inverse agonists, and although they have been shown to suppress food intake, they also appear to induce nausea and malaise. The present studies were undertaken to characterize the behavioral effects of AM4113, which is a CB1 neutral antagonist, and to examine whether this drug can reduce food-reinforced behaviors and feeding on diets with varying macronutrient compositions. Biochemical data demonstrated that AM4113 binds to CB1 receptors, but does not show inverse agonist properties (ie no effects on cyclic-AMP production). In tests of spontaneous locomotion and analgesia, AM4113 reversed the effects of the CB1 agonist AM411. AM4113 suppressed food-reinforced operant responding with rats responding on fixed ratio (FR) 1 and 5 schedules of reinforcement in a dose-dependent manner, and also suppressed feeding on high-fat, high-carbohydrate, and lab chow diets. However, in the same dose range that suppressed feeding, AM4113 did not induce conditioned gaping, which is a sign of nausea and food-related malaise in rats. These results suggest that AM4113 may decrease appetite by blocking endogenous cannabinoid tone, and that this drug may be less associated with nausea than CB1 inverse agonists.

Adenosine A(2A) receptors are involved in the regulation of several behavioral functions. Adenosine A(2A) antagonists exert antiparkinsonian effects in animal models, and adenosine A(2A) agonists suppress locomotion and impair various aspects of motor control. The present experiments were conducted to study the effects of low doses of the adenosine A(2A) agonist CGS 21680 on lever pressing, specific parameters of food intake, and sedation. In the first experiment, the effects of CGS 21680 on fixed ratio 5 lever pressing were assessed. In the second experiment, rats were tested in 30 min feeding sessions, and also were observed for drug-induced sedation using a sedation rating scale. CGS 21680 (0.025, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg IP) produced a dose related suppression of lever pressing, and also reduced the amount of food consumed. The feeding effect was largely dependent upon a slowing of the rate of feeding, and there was only a modest suppression of time spent feeding. Doses of CGS 21680 that suppressed lever pressing and feeding also were associated with sedation/drowsiness. In conjunction with other studies, the present results suggest that sedative effects may play an important role in some of the behavioral effects produced by systemic administration of adenosine A(2A) agonists.