From 1982 through 1996, 547 untreated advanced ovarian cancer patients were entered onto Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest (GONO) consecutive randomized trials including cisplatin-based chemotherapy. End points of analysis included the influence of age on prognosis, toxicity, clinical/surgical response rates, progression-free survival and survival. Of the entire study group, 116 patients were 65 years of age or older at diagnosis. WHO main toxicity (any grade) consisted of: emesis (93% of patients), myelotoxicity (leukopenia in 52%, anemia in 51% and thrombocytopenia in 17% of patients), nephrotoxicity in 13% of patients and neurotoxicity in 10% of patients. No significant difference in toxicity was evident between patients ≥ or <65 years. Refusal of CT and early (≤2 courses) interruption of CT due to toxicity were more frequent in elderly patients (3.4 vs. 1.4%; 3.4 vs. 0.7%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 71 months no difference was observed in survival and progression-free survival between younger and older patients. Cox multiple regression analysis of the entire study population demonstrated that age >65 years per se was not a negative prognostic factor.

Experimental data show that sequencing methotrexate (MTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may result in synergistic antitumor activity. Moreover, the effect of 5-FU is increased by folinic acid (FA), and finally, cyclophosphamide (CPA) produces an expansion of tumor growth fraction, suggesting an increased cytotoxic effect of cycle-specific drugs subsequently administered. Based on these premises, we have performed a Phase II study with CPA (600 mg/m2 i.v., day 1), MTX (200 mg/m2 1-h i.v. infusion, day 7), 5-FU (600 mg/m2 i.v., day 8), and FA (500 mg/m2 2-h i.v. infusion, day 8 plus 15 mg p.o. every 6 h on days 8 and 9) administered every 3 weeks. Thirty-six patients with metastatic breast cancer were admitted into the study. Median age was 52 years, and all but two patients were postmenopausal. Dominant sites of metastases were soft tissues in 10 patients, bones in 7 patients, and viscera in 19 patients. All patients were pretreated with chemo- and/or hormone therapy. Sixteen patients achieved an objective response (44.5%: 1 complete response and 15 partial responses), 8 had stable disease (SD) (22.2%), and 12 progressed (33.3%). Twenty-one patients had previously received conventional CMF in an adjuvant setting (15 patients) or for metastases (6 patients): 1 complete response (CR) and 7 partial responses (PR) were obtained in the first group and 1 in the second. Major toxic effects were hair loss (56.4%), nausea and vomiting (72%), mucositis (52.5%), and leukopenia (61%). A randomized study could be useful to assess the role of sequential CMF versus conventional CMF in metastatic breast cancer patients.