Background Rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) seemed favorable in several tumors, but clinical experience on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was scanty. This real-world study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus ICI for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC.Materials and Methods We retrospectively identified advanced ESCC patients who received anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting for evaluation of clinical outcomes and safety. Totally 110 ICI-pretreated patients, of which 89 (80.9%) received prior first- or second-line treatment, were included from September 9, 2019, to November 30, 2022. Most patients (63.6%) discontinued initial ICI due to disease progression.Results After rechallenge, median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.1 (95% CI, 8.6-13.7) and 5.6 (95% CI, 4.4-6.8) months, respectively; estimated OS and PFS rates at 12 months were 47.6% (95% CI, 36.8%-57.7%) and 21.4% (95% CI, 10.9%-34.2%), respectively. No complete response was reported and 21 (19.1%) patients attained partial response; the objective response rate was 19.1%. Fifty-five (50.0%) had stable disease for a disease control rate of 69.1%. Of the 21 responders, median duration of response was 6.4 months. Tendencies for longer OS were observed in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance of 0 (P = .056). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 10.0%.Conclusion Anlotinib plus ICI in the rechallenge setting was promising and resulted in encouraging benefits for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced ESCC. Our findings provided preliminary but unique evidence to help select ESCC patients benefiting from this strategy.Trial registration chictr.org.cn; number ChiCTR2300070777 This real-world study assessed the feasibility and safety of anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for patients with previously ICI-treated advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

8093 Background: SCLC is characterized by a high rate of proliferation and poor prognosis, and new therapies are urgently needed. B7-H3 is highly expressed in SCLC. HS-20093, a B7-H3-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced solid tumors in the dose escalation part of ARTEMIS-001 study (Jie Wang et al., JCO, 2023) (NCT05276609). Here, we present results on the efficacy and safety of the expansion doses in patients (pts) with SCLC from phase 1a/b. Methods: ARTEMIS-001 study consisted of dose escalation (1a) and expansion (1b) part. Pts were treated with doses of 1.0 to 16.0 mg/kg HS-20093 every 3 weeks in dose escalation, and were treated with doses at 8.0 mg/kg and 10.0 mg/kg randomly in dose expansion. Pts with SCLC were required to have received prior platinum-based standard therapy. B7-H3 expression was retrospectively evaluated by IHC. Results: As of data cutoff November 30 th 2023, a total of 56 pts with extensive stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) were enrolled and received ≥1 dose of HS-20093 with doses at 8.0 mg/kg (n=31) or 10.0 mg/kg (n=25). Median prior lines of therapy was 2.0 (range: 1-6). All pts received platinum plus etoposide and 73.2% (41/56) received immunotherapy. Safety profile was consistent with previous reports. The most common grade≥3 treatment-related adverse events (≧10%) were neutropenia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia. Out of 56 pts, 52 pts were efficacy evaluable (8.0 mg/kg: 31 pts; 10.0 mg/kg: 21 pts). HS-20093 showed encouraging efficacy in relapsed ES-SCLC (Table). Tumor shrinkage in target lesions occurred in 96.2% (50/52) pts with a post-baseline scan. Deep response defined as tumor shrinkage ≥50% was obtained in 44.2% (23/52) pts. Median overall survival has not yet reached. Responses were observed regardless of B7-H3 expression. Pharmacokinetic (PK) showed approximately dose-proportional increase in exposure with a half-life of 3-7 days. PK profiles of total antibody and ADC were similar and exposure to payload was considerably low. Conclusions: HS-20093 demonstrated promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in pts with previously-treated SCLC. Phase 3 study is planned to compare the efficacy and safety of HS-20093 with standard-of-care chemotherapy in relapsed SCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT05276609 . [Table: see text]

PURPOSE This phase 3 trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of capecitabine or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) with those of fluorouracil plus cisplatin (PF) in definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (DCRT) for inoperable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive two cycles of capecitabine, XELOX, or PF along with concurrent intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Patients in each arm were again randomly assigned to receive two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy or not. The primary end points were 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). RESULTS A total of 246 patients were randomly assigned into the capecitabine (n = 80), XELOX (n = 85), and PF (n = 81) arms. In capecitabine, XELOX, and PF arms, the 2-year OS rate was 75%, 66.7%, and 70.9% (capecitabine v PF: hazard ratio [HR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.61 to 1.35]; nominal P = .637; XELOX v PF: 0.86 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.27]; P = .444); the median OS was 40.9 (95% CI, 34.4 to 49.9), 41.9 (95% CI, 28.6 to 52.1), and 35.4 (95% CI, 30.4 to 45.4) months. The incidence of grade ≥3 AEs during the entire treatment was 28.8%, 36.5%, and 45.7%, respectively. Comparing the consolidation chemotherapy with the nonconsolidation chemotherapy groups, the median OS was 41.9 (95% CI, 34.6 to 52.8) versus 36.9 (95% CI, 28.5 to 44) months (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.99]; nominal P = .0403). CONCLUSION Capecitabine or XELOX did not significantly improve the 2-year OS rate over PF in DCRT for inoperable locally advanced ESCC. Capecitabine showed a lower incidence of grade ≥3 AEs than PF did.

Combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy can provide improved survival in advanced squamous nonsmall -cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without targetable gene alterations. 537 previously untreated patients with stage IIIB/IIIC or IV squamous NSCLC without targetable gene alterations were enrolled and randomized (2:1) to receive serplulimab 4.5 mg/kg or placebo, both in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, intravenously in 3 -week cycles. The primary endpoint of progression -free survival (PFS) was met at the first interim analysis. At the second interim analysis, PFS benefit was maintained in serplulimab-chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.67). At the final analysis, serplulimab-chemotherapy significantly improved median OS compared to placebo -chemotherapy (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.93; p = 0.010). Grade R3 serplulimab or placebo -related adverse events occurred in 126 (35.2%) and 58 (32.4%) patients, respectively. Our results demonstrate that adding serplulimab to chemotherapy significantly improves survival in advanced squamous NSCLC patients, with manageable safety.

BackgroundBleomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic with outstanding anti-tumor effects. A major adverse effect of bleomycin is lung fibrosis. However, the development of cataracts as a severe adverse effect has not been reported.Case summaryHerein, we describe the first case of cataract induced by bleomycin therapy in a 22-year-old male with testicular cancer. After surgical intervention and following five successive chemotherapy cycles of the BEP regimen, including bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin, the patient reported a gradual painless loss of vision, with substantial decline in visual ability, especially in the right eye. Following comprehensive eye examinations, a cataract was diagnosed. Eventually, the patient underwent phacoemulsification and received replacement of the intraocular lenses.ConclusionBleomycin can cause cataracts, which induces a significant loss of vision. Therefore, clinicians should observe early symptoms and properly adjust treatment to prevent aggravation of symptoms.

e16006 Background: Immunotherapy (ICI) demonstrated promising efficacy for patients with advanced ESCC in both second-line and first-line treatment clinically. Therefore, whether the patients might benefit from the PD-1 blockades-related regimens when they failed after the previous ICI remained to be identified and the feasibility of PD-1 blockades rechallenge in ESCC was warranted to be explored. As a novel oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for tumor angiogenesis and proliferation, anlotinib was an efficacious second-line monotherapy for ESCC in China and the combination of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades might be a promising strategy for patients with previously ICI treated advanced ESCC. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study was planned to include 110 patients with previously ICI treated advanced ESCC from 9 hospitals in China who were treated with anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice from July 2018 to November 2022 consecutively. The Outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: At the date of data-cutoff (May 12 2023), 110 eligible patients were available to be analyzed. Characteristics were as follows: median age of 64 years, male/female 74.5%/25.5%, ECOG PS 0/1/2 22.7%/75.5%/1.8%, clinical stage II/III/IV 0.9%/20.9%/78.2%. All the patients had received ICIs and 10.9% patients were treated with TKIs previously. 39.1% patients had received first-line therapy, 41.8% patients had received second-line, 19.1% patients had received third or above line previously. Prognostic outcomes exhibited that the median OS was 11.1 months (95%CI: 8.6-13.7), 12-month OS rate, 24-month OS rate were 47.6% and 30.8%, separately. Additionally, the median PFS was 5.6 months (95%CI: 4.4-6.8). In 110 patients, ORR was 19.1% (95%CI: 12.2%-27.7%), DCR 69.1% (95%CI: 59.6%-77.6%). Safety profile of anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades indicated that the treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were 89.1%. The most common TRAEs were anaemia (62.7%), hypothyroidism (25.5%), hypoalbuminemia (21.8%), lymphocytopenia (20%), leukopenia (19.1%). Conclusions: Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades demonstrated encouraging efficacy and tolerable adverse reactions among patients with advanced ESCC who had received immunotherapy previously and the feasibility of PD-1 blockades rechallenge in ESCC was promising to be elucidated. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2300070777.

Immunochemotherapy is the first-line standard for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Combining the regimen with anti-angiogenesis may improve efficacy. ETER701 was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial that investigated the efficacy and safety of benmelstobart (a novel programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor) with anlotinib (a multi-target anti-angiogenic small molecule) and standard chemotherapy in treatment-naive ES-SCLC. The ETER701 trial assessed two primary endpoints: Independent Review Committee-assessed progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Here the prespecified final progression-free survival and interim OS analysis is reported. Patients randomly received benmelstobart and anlotinib plus etoposide/carboplatin (EC; n = 246), placebo and anlotinib plus EC (n = 245) or double placebo plus EC ('EC alone'; n = 247), followed by matching maintenance therapy. Compared with EC alone, median OS was prolonged with benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC (19.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.61; P = 0.0002), while improvement of OS was not statistically significant with anlotinib plus EC (13.3 versus 11.9 months; hazard ratio 0.86; P = 0.1723). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 93.1%, 94.3% and 87.0% in the benmelstobart and anlotinib plus EC, anlotinib plus EC, and EC alone groups, respectively. This study of immunochemotherapy plus multi-target anti-angiogenesis as first-line treatment achieved a median OS greater than recorded in prior randomized studies in patients with ES-SCLC. The safety profile was assessed as tolerable and manageable. Our findings suggest that the addition of anti-angiogenesis therapy to immunochemotherapy may represent an efficacious and safe approach to the management of ES-SCLC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04234607. In this triple-arm, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, first-line treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with the anti-PD-L1 benmelstobart, tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib and chemotherapy (CT) showed improved survival outcomes compared with anlotinib and CT or CT alone.

Abstract Background: CHASE001 (NCT05544123), a prospective, non-interventional multicenter study exploring real-world treatment and referral behavior of Chinese county patients (pts) with HER2+ or HR+/HER2– breast cancer is ongoing since September 2022. A prespecified interim analysis (IA) on 750 HER2+ and HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (eBC) was reported at the ESMO Congress 2023. In the 2nd IA from CHASE001, adjuvant treatment selection for patients with HR+/HER2- eBC will be evaluated. Methods: The study was designed to enroll 2500 pts, including four cohorts (HER2+ eBC, HR+/HER2-eBC, HER2+ advanced BC, and HR+/HER2- aBC). In this IA, HR+/HER2- eBC pts after surgery were included. Descriptive statistics reported patient demographics, clinical and disease characteristics and treatment patterns. To investigate the factors associated with chemotherapy-free regimen, non-anthracycline chemotherapy regimen and ovarian function suppression (OFS), univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: At data cutoff (May 17, 2023), 697 HR+/HER2- eBC pts (median age 52 years, 45.77% pT2, 50.93% pN0, 56.10% G2) were included from 26 institutions in China county areas, 338 (48.49%) were premenopausal. 584 (83.79%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, with a few (47/584, 8.05%) initially developing their treatment plan at a higher level hospital (national or provincial tertiary hospital). AC-T (309/584, 52.91%) was the most commonly used regimen. 181 (30.99%) pts received non-anthracycline chemotherapy regimen (mainly TC), and pts with N0, age≥65 years and ki67 < 20% had the strongest association to this regimen (multivariate OR=0.082, 95%CI [0.037,0.179], OR=0.463, 95%CI [0.250,0.859], and OR=0.642, 95%CI [0.418,0.985], respectively). Interestingly, on univariate analysis pts initially diagnosed in a higher level hospital were significantly associated with non-anthracycline regimen (P=0.0109), however on multivariate analysis it was no longer significant. 483 pts received endocrine therapy, including 234 (48.45%) premenopausal pts. The most commonly used endocrine regimen for premenopausal pts was OFS/OFS+ (122/234, 52.14%) ,of which half (61, 50%) were prescribed OFS+TAM/TOR; followed by TAM/TOR monotherapy (69/234, 29.49%). The proportions of patients classified as low, intermediate, and high clinical risk for recurrence (investigator assessed)were 33.62%, 42.67% and 23.71%. The OFS rate were 39.74% in low, 61.62% in intermediate and 70.91% in high risk pts, respectively. Multivariable analyses found that high clinical risk, age < 45 years and ki67 < 20% were strongly associated with the use of OFS (OR=0.210, 95%CI [0.066,0.674], OR=0.327, 95%CI [0.165,0.649], and OR=0.405, 95%CI [0.194,0.845], respectively). For postmenopausal pts, AI monotherapy (84.74%) was the most commonly used endocrine regimen. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first real-world study evaluating the treatment patterns and referral behavior of BC pts in China counties. The 2nd IA results presented showed the current systemic adjuvant treatment preferences and influence factors from a large sample of HR+/HER2- eBC pts in China counties, which were generally consistent with China BC treatment guidelines. Table 1. Utilization of adjuvant systemic therapy regimens in 697 HR+/HER2− eBC pts, China counties AC-T: (dd)doxorubicin/epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, followed by (dd)paclitaxel/docetaxel; TC: paclitaxel/docetaxel, cyclophosphamide; AC: doxorubicin/epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; TAC: docetaxel, doxorubicin/epirubicin, cyclophosphamide; TAM: tamoxifen; OFS: ovarian function suppression; AI: aromatase inhibitors; TOR: toremifene; CDK4/6i: cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors; “Other” category includes various therapies used in <1% of patients each Citation Format: Yinghua Ji, Honglan Qu, Feidu Zhou, Juan Wang, Qianfu Wu, Guohua Dai, Mengyou Liu, Wenbo He, Wei Liang, Qiuli Meng, Yun Ren, Guoxiang Luo, Hongjian Wang, Hui Liu, Zien Qin, Yingguo Tian, Huali Tang, Hongmei Liu, Jun Luo, Zengfeng Yu, Guinv Hu, Jianzhi Gao, Xiang Tan, Yi Liu, Yuanjiang Zhang, Ming Wang, Min Zhang, Ping Lu. Adjuvant Treatment Selection for County-Level Patients with HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer in a Real-Life Setting in China [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-16-08.

364 Background: The optimal therapies for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have progressed after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are unclear. This phase II single-arm study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of re-challenge with camrelizumab plus apatinib in this population. Methods: This study enrolled patients with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC who had experienced prior progression on ICI treatment. Enrolled patients received camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every two weeks along with daily oral apatinib 250 mg. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), time to response (TOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 3- and 6-month PFS rates, 6-, 9- and 12-month OS rates, and safety. Results: From September 1, 2021, to March 29, 2023, 49 eligible patients were enrolled and given treatment. Among 38 treated patients who had at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement, the ORR and confirmed ORR were 36.8% (95% CI 21.8–54.0) and 13.2% (95% CI 4.4–28.1); the DCR was 89.5% (95% CI 75.2–97.1); the median DOR was 3.0 months; and the median TOR was 2.2 months. Among the 49 treated patients, the median PFS was 4.6 months (95% CI 3.8–6.5) and OS was 7.5 months (95% CI 5.5–13.6). Patients who were both PD-L1 positive and had responded to previous ICI therapy had the longest median PFS (5.7 months, 95% CI 3.9–not reached) and OS (9.6 months, 95% CI 7.5–not reached). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.7% of patients (17/49). Conclusions: This study showed promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile of camrelizumab plus apatinib for patients with advanced ESCC who had progressed after ICI therapy. The subset of patients who were both PD-L1 positive and had a prior ICI response seemed to benefit most. Clinical trial information: NCT03736863 .

BACKGROUND:With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), there remains an unmet need for options to address disease progression after prior ICIs. This single-arm phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of re-challenge with camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with advanced ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs. METHODS:This study enrolled patients aged 18-75 years with unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or distant metastatic ESCC who received prior ICIs. Patients received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and oral apatinib 250 mg daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS:Between September 1, 2021 and March 29, 2023, 49 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment. Among the 49 patients, the confirmed ORR was 10.2 % (95 % CI 3.4-22.2), the disease control rate (DCR) was 69.4 % (54.6-81.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.6 months (95 % CI 3.8-6.5) and overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (5.5-13.6). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17 patients (34.7 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS:This study showed that the confirmed ORR was modest and did not reach clinically meaningful improvement for patients with ESCC who were previously treated with ICIs, with a manageable safety profile.

Background: Tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, + chemotherapy (chemo) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival (OS) vs placebo + chemo, with a manageable safety profile, as a first line (1L) treatment for patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) at interim analysis of the phase 3 RATIONALE-306 study. We report data from the China subgroup analysis. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, global study, adults with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic ESCC, with no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease were enrolled regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status. Pts were randomized (1:1); stratified by region, prior definitive therapy, and investigator-chosen chemo (platinum + fluoropyrimidine or platinum + paclitaxel). Pts received tislelizumab (T) 200 mg intravenously + chemo (C) (Arm T+C) or placebo (P) + chemo (Arm P+C) once every three weeks; treatment continued until disease progression by investigator per RECIST v1.1, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was OS in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1, objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR), in addition to safety. Results: Of 649 pts in the overall population, 370 (57.0%) were enrolled from China. At data cutoff (Feb 28, 2022), the median study follow-up in the China subgroup (ITT population) was 15.8 months (mo) in Arm T+C (n=182) and 10.6 mo in Arm P+C (n=188). Longer OS (median OS 16.6 mo vs 11.2 mo; unstratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54, 0.89) and PFS (median PFS 8.3 mo vs 5.6 mo; unstratified HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45, 0.75) indicate survival benefit in Arm T+C vs P+C, respectively. Arm T+C had higher response rates and more durable responses than Arm P+C; ORR was 64.8% vs 44.1% (odds ratio 2.33 [95% CI 1.53, 3.55]) respectively, and median DoR was 7.4 mo (95% CI 5.6, 9.5) vs 5.7 mo (95% CI 4.3, 7.5), respectively. Similar proportions of pts in Arm T+C vs P+C had ≥1 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE; 98.8% vs 98.9%) and ≥grade 3 TRAEs (72.9% vs 73.4%). Serious TRAEs occurred in 27.6% vs 21.2% of pts in Arm T+C vs P+C, and TRAEs leading to death occurred in 2.9% vs 1.6% of pts, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 28.2% vs 17.4%, in Arm T+C vs P+C. Conclusions: In the China subgroup, 1L tislelizumab + chemo demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, ORR, and DoR vs placebo + chemo in pts with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a manageable safety profile, consistent with published results in the overall population. Acknowledgments: This study was sponsored by BeiGene, Ltd. Medical writing support, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Emma Ashman, BSc, of Ashfield MedComms, an Inizio company, and was funded by BeiGene, Ltd. Citation Format: Yongqian Shu, Yueyin Pan, Ping Lu, Yi Jiang, Jingdong Zhang, Xiaohong Wu, Yuanhu Yao, Lin Shen, Yi Ba, Zhiyong He, Yuxian Bai, Jianhua Chen, Guohua Yu, Yanyan Peng, Hongqian Wu, Lei Wang, Liyun Li, Jianming Xu. Randomized, global, phase 3 study of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306): China subgroup analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT076.

384 Background: CAP 02 study (NCT03736863) is a single-arm phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib (a VEGFR2 inhibitor) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Cohort 1 has been published recently, which enrolled patients who progressed after or were intolerant to first-line chemotherapy. The results showed an encouraging median overall survival (OS) of 15.8 months. Here, we reported the preliminary results of cohort 2. Methods: Cohort 2 enrolled unresectable locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC patients aged 18-75 years with ECOG performance status of 0-1 who had progression on or were intolerant to first-line immunochemotherapy. The disease should be controlled without progression for at least three months during the first-line treatment. Patients received camrelizumab (200 mg Q2W) and apatinib (250 mg QD) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal for other reasons. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, time to response, OS, 3/6-month PFS rates, 6/9/12-month OS rates, and safety. Results: At the data cutoff (Sep 21, 2022), 33 of the planned 40 patients with an average of 68 years old had been enrolled, including 24 (73%) males and 24 (73%) patients with an ECOG PS score of 1. Twenty-one patients (64%) were previously treated with camrelizumab combined chemotherapy and 12 with other immunochemotherapy. Among the 17 evaluable patients, seven had the best overall response of partial response and nine with stable disease; the ORR was 41%. A total of 22 patients (67%) had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with 12 patients (36%) with grade≥3. The most common TRAEs included white blood cell count decreased (11 patients, 33%), hypokalaemia (9, 27%), and alanine aminotransferase increased (8, 24%). Conclusions: Current results suggested the preliminary efficacy of second-line camrelizumab plus apatinib in patients with immunochemotherapy-treated advanced ESCC, with an acceptable safety profile. The study enrollment is ongoing, and further survival and safety data will be reported in the future. Clinical trial information: NCT03736863 .

Introduction: In CameL phase 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03134872), addition of camrelizumab to first-line chemotherapy significantly improved the progression-free survival in patients with stages IIIB to IV nonsquamous NSCLC. Here, we present outcomes after a minimum followup of 43.9 months since last patient randomization.Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to 4 to 6 cycles of camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed or chemotherapy alone every 3 weeks, followed by maintenance camrelizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed only (n = 205 and 207, respectively). Total camrelizumab exposure was up to 2 years.Results: As of January 31, 2022, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy exhibited substantially improved overall survival over chemotherapy alone (median, 27.1 versus 19.8 mo; hazard ratio = 0.72 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.92]). In the chemotherapy-alone group, 95 patients (45.9%) crossed over to camrelizumab monotherapy. After adjustment for crossover, the survival benefit with camre-lizumab plus chemotherapy was more pronounced (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.55 [95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.71]). In camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group, 33 patients completed 2 years of camrelizumab. Objective response rate was 97.0%, with ongoing responses in 17 of the 32 responses (53.1%), and 93.9% (31 of 33) of the patients were alive at data cutoff. Safety profiles were consistent with the previous report, and no obvious evi-dence of cumulative toxicity was found with long exposure to camrelizumab.Conclusions: Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and peme-trexed provides long-term survival benefit over chemo-therapy, with manageable toxicity and remarkable and durable response in patients receiving 2 years of camreli-zumab, further supporting camrelizumab combination as first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.& COPY; 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Exosomal programmed cell-death ligand 1 (ePD-L1) can influence immune inhibition and dysfunction. We were dedicated to unearthing the relation between ePD-L1 in blood and pathological characteristics as well as PD-L1 in tumor tissues. We recruited 65 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for exosome extraction and detected the blood ePD-L1 expression in these patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Besides, the correlation between blood ePD-L1 and patients' pathological characteristics was also analyzed. The expression of PD-L1 in tumor tissues was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and its correlation with blood ePD-L1 expression level was analyzed by Spearman correlation coefficient. No significant correlation was observed in PD-L1 expression levels between blood-derived exosome and tumor tissue. Altogether, high blood ePD-L1 expression was relevant to NSCLC progression, while no such relevance to PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue.

e16052 Background: Immunotherapy, particularly with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, has shown therapeutic efficacy in various malignancies. Compared with chemotherapy, anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy improved the median overall survival in advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer. The combination of an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody with an angiogenesis inhibitor has shown efficacy in many cancers which including esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors as chemo-free therapy during the treatment of esophageal cancer in the real world setting. Methods: This prospective, multicenter real-world study (NCT04966611) evaluated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in the chemo-free therapy setting for advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer patients (pts). Primary endpoint was evaluation of PFS (progression-free survival), and secondary endpoints included ORR (objective response rate), DCR (disease control rate) and OS (overall survival). The response to treatment was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1. In addition, adverse events were evaluated by CTCAE v5.0. Results: Between May 2020 and Dec 2021, 50 pts were enrolled. 45 comprised the evaluable population. In the full analysis set, 44 had squamous cell and 1 patient had adenocarcinoma histology. 29 (64.4%) of 45 pts were male. 10 (22.2%) had an ECOG performance status of 0, 32 (71.1%) status of 1 and 3 (6.7%) status of 2. Twenty (44.4%) pts had distant metastases and 29(64.4%) pts had comorbidities. 15 pts had previously used anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody or vascular targeting drugs, of which 5 cases had combined the two drugs. Among all evaluable pts, 5(11.1%) pts received first-line, 27(60.0%) second-line and 13(28.9%) third & above line therapy. Among all pts, 1 patient achieved complete response (CR), 16 pts partial response (PR), 25 pts stable disease (SD), illustrating an ORR of 37.8% and a DCR of 93.3%. In the first line therapy, ORR was 60.0%, DCR was 100%.In the second line therapy, ORR was 37.0%, DCR was 96.3%. In the third & above line, ORR with 30.8%, DCR with 84.6% was observed. Median PFS was not reached. Treatment related adverse events (trAEs) were reported in 24 pts(53.3%). No patient had grade 3 or more trAEs. Conclusions: Anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors in chemo-free therapy for advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer was active and showed excellent tumor response and was generally well tolerated. Further investigation is required in a larger real-world cohort to validate the benefit of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in esophageal cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04966611.

320 Background: Anti-PD-1 mAb treatment has been shown to be effective in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Anlotinib has been approved in China as a second-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer because of its good tolerance and efficacy. In the treatment of esophageal cancer, antiangiogenic target therapy combined with immunotherapy has been preliminarily recognized internationally. The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitors in second-line or later therapy during the treatment of esophageal cancer in the real world setting.(A LOT-EC3, NCT04966611). Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter real-world study. The esophageal cancer patients who received anlotinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitors in second-line or later therapy were enrolled. The primary endpoint was PFS (progression-free survival), and secondary endpoints were ORR (objective response rate), DCR (disease control rate) and OS (overall survival). The response to treatment was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.1. In addition, adverse events were evaluated by CTCAE v5.0. Results: From Jul 2020 to Sep 2021, 40 patients with a median age of 65.5 (range: 48̃81) were enrolled, in which the metastasis of more than 1 organ occurred in 62.5% of the 40 patients; the metastasis of more than 2 organs occurred in 37.5% (15 patients). 26 (65.0%) and 14 (35.0%) patients received anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors as second line and third & above line therapy, respectively. Among all patients, 1 patient achieved complete response (CR), 11 patients partial response (PR), 23 patients stable disease (SD), illustrating an ORR of 30.0% and a DCR of 87.5%. In the second line therapy, ORR was 30.8 %, DCR was 92.3%. In the third & above line, ORR with 28.6%, DCR with 78.6% was observed. Median PFS was not reached. For all the 40 patients, 27 of which were treated with Camrelizumab, 10 were treated with Sintilimab, other 3 patients were treated with other kinds of PD-1 inhibitors. There was no significant difference in DCR between different PD-1 inhibitors. Treatment related adverse events (trAEs) occurred in 22 (55%) patients. 4 patients had grade 3 or more trAEs. No patient died due to trAE. Conclusions: Anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors is found to be a reasonable option in second-line or later therapy for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. To our best knowledge, this is the first summarized real-world study on anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors in advanced esophageal cancer. The treatment effects are similar to the outcomes in comparable clinical trials, which support the further recommendation of anlotinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04966611.

Lack of effective targeted therapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) underscores the urgent need for identifying new treatment approaches for this challenging disease. We sought to assess the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy for first-line treatment in patients with metastatic ESCC. In this randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II clinical trial, patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel-cisplatin (TP) (paclitaxel [175 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 of every 3-week cycle] and cisplatin [75 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 of every 3-week cycle]) and TP plus cetuximab (CTP) (cetuximab, 400 mg/m(2) v. on day 1 of week 1, followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly), respectively. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on 89 tumor samples for biomarker exploration. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 22.6 months, median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8-7.0) in patients administered CTP versus 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.0-5.3) in the TP group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40-0.93; p = 0.02). Median overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.9-13.1) in the CTP group and 10.5 months (95% CI: 9.0-13.2) in the TP arm (HR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.67 1.44; p = 0.91). The most common reported greater than or equal to grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (35.2% versus 22.4%) and leukopenia (25.4% versus 13.2%). In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification tumors (15.7%), PFS was improved with CTP compared with TP treatment (HR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.98; p = 0.018). First-line CTP significantly improves PFS, with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic ESCC.

Abstract Background Currently, there are no randomized trials on the effect of antiangiogenic therapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The following study investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced ESCC who were previously treated with chemotherapy. Methods This randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind phase 2 trial (NCT02649361) was conducted in 13 Chinese hospitals. Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic ESCC who were previously treated with chemotherapy, and were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral anlotinib 12 mg or placebo on days 1–14 (repeated every 21 days). The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Results One hundred and sixty‐five patients were randomly assigned to the anlotinib (n = 110) or the placebo (n = 55) arm. Median PFS was 3.02 months (95% CI 2.63–3.65) in the anlotinib group and 1.41 months (95% CI 1.38–1.41) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.46 [95% CI 0.32–0.66]; p < 0.001). The most common treatment‐related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were hypertension (17 [16%] patients), decreased appetite (6 [6%] patients), and hyponatremia (4 [4%] patients) in the anlotinib group and decreased appetite (2 [4%] patients) in the placebo group. Three (3%) deaths in the anlotinib group were considered as drug related, while there were no treatment‐related deaths in the placebo group. Conclusions The use of anlotinib in previously treated, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC patients significantly improved PFS compared with placebo. Our findings suggest that antiangiogenesis might be an important therapeutic target in advanced ESCC. Clinical Trials Registration Study of Anlotinib in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ALTER1102), NCT02649361.

Background: GLS-010, a novel engineered fully human immunoglobin G4 monoclonal antibody, can specially block the PD-1/PD-L1/2 axis and reactivate the antitumor immunity. Aim: This phase Ia/Ib study was carried out to evaluate the safety, recommended phase II dose (R2PD), and primary antitumor effects of GLS-010 in patients with advanced, refractory lymphoma and solid tumors. Methods: In phase Ia study, patients with refractory solid tumors and lymphoma enrolled and received GLS-010 at a dose of 1, 4, or 10 mg/kg Q2W; 240 mg Q3W or Q2W. The primary objective was to assess the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). In phase Ib study, doses were expanded in 9 specific tumors to ensure the R2PD and explore the efficacy. Tumor mutation burden level and PD-L1 expression were also assessed with whole-exome sequencing and immunohistochemistry (SP263), respectively. Results: Up to April 18, 2020, a total of 289 patients (n = 24, phase Ia; n = 265, phase Ib) were enrolled. DLT was not observed in phase Ia part. The T-1/2, CLss, and V-d were similar among all dose groups and different tumors. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia, leukopenia, elevated alanine aminotransaminase/asparate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and elevated bilirubin. And hypothyroidism was the most common immune-related adverse event (irAE). The incidence of grade >= 3 TEAE was 39.8%, while grade >= 3 irAE was only 4.5%. Based on safety studies, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and preclinical data, 240-mg Q2W was recommended as the expansion dose. The overall objective response rate was 23.6%, with 10 patients achieving complete response. Patients with a high PD-L1 expression level (31.3% Versus. 13.7%, p = 0.012) or t-issue tumor mutation burden level (31.3% Versus. 5.6%, p = 0.009) showed a significantly better response. Conclusion: GLS-010 showed acceptable safety profile and favorable clinical response. The dose of 240 mg Q2W was an optimal recommended dose as monotherapy. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.