This study investigates retrospectively the incidence, risk factors and mortality of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in adult orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Among 1206 OLT recipients at a single institution, 37 developed a PTLD. The incidence of PTLD was highest during the first 18 months and relatively constant thereafter with cumulative incidence of 1.1% at 18 months and 4.7% at 15 years. The risk of PTLD was approximately 10% to 15% of the risk of death without PTLD. During the first 4 years following OLT, PTLD were predominantly related to EBV, while afterward most PTLD were EBV negative. Significant risk factors for PTLD in OLT recipients were transplantation for acute fulminant hepatitis during the first 18 months following OLT (HR=2.6, p=0.007), and rejection therapy with high-dose steroids (HR=4.5, p=0.049) and OKT3 (HR=3.9, p=0.016) during the previous year. Therapy with high-dose steroids or OKT3 (HR=3.6, p=0.0071) were also significant risk factors for PTLD-associated mortality. OLT recipients remain at risk for PTLD years after transplantation. The strong association of PTLD with rejection therapy and the worse post-PTLD prognosis among recipients of rejection therapy indicate the need to balance the risk of immunosuppression against the risk of PTLD following rejection treatment.

Background and aims: A consensus has been reached that liver donor allocation should be based primarily on liver disease severity and that waiting time should not be a major determining factor. Our aim was to assess the capability of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to correctly rank potential liver recipients according to their severity of liver disease and mortality risk on the OPTN liver waiting list. Methods: The MELD model predicts liver disease severity based on scrum creatinine, serum total bilirubin, and INR and has been shown to be useful in predicting mortality in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. In this study, we prospectively applied the MELD score to estimate 3-month mortality to 3437 adult liver transplant candidates with chronic liver disease who were added to the OPTN waiting list at 2A or 2B status between November, 1999, and December, 2001. Results: In this study cohort with chronic liver disease, 412 (12%) died during the 3-month follow-up period. Waiting fist mortality increased directly in proportion to the listing MELD score. Patients having a MELD score < 9 experienced a 1.9% mortality, whereas patients having a MELD score > or =40 had a mortality rate of 71.3%. Using the c-statistic with 3-month mortality as the end point, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the MELD score was 0.83 compared with 0.76 for the Child-Turcoffe-Pugh (CTP) score (P < 0.001). Conclusions: These data suggest that the MELD score is able to accurately predict 3-month mortality among patients with chronic liver disease on the liver waiting list and can be applied for allocation of donor livers.

BACKGROUND & AIMS A consensus has been reached that liver donor allocation should be based primarily on liver disease severity and that waiting time should not be a major determining factor. Our aim was to assess the capability of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to correctly rank potential liver recipients according to their severity of liver disease and mortality risk on the OPTN liver waiting list. METHODS The MELD model predicts liver disease severity based on serum creatinine, serum total bilirubin, and INR and has been shown to be useful in predicting mortality in patients with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. In this study, we prospectively applied the MELD score to estimate 3-month mortality to 3437 adult liver transplant candidates with chronic liver disease who were added to the OPTN waiting list at 2A or 2B status between November, 1999, and December, 2001. RESULTS In this study cohort with chronic liver disease, 412 (12%) died during the 3-month follow-up period. Waiting list mortality increased directly in proportion to the listing MELD score. Patients having a MELD score <9 experienced a 1.9% mortality, whereas patients having a MELD score > or =40 had a mortality rate of 71.3%. Using the c-statistic with 3-month mortality as the end point, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the MELD score was 0.83 compared with 0.76 for the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that the MELD score is able to accurately predict 3-month mortality among patients with chronic liver disease on the liver waiting list and can be applied for allocation of donor livers.

had abnormal AP. A higher prev'alence of HB disease was seen in CF patients 18years (65% vs 35%; p age 18 (p = 009). Liver biopsy data were avadable for 9 CF patients, 3 had cirrhosis, Conclusions: Abnormal fiver chemistries in CF are common though most CF patiems lack cliincal evidence of liver disease. Frequent hospitalization at a younger age is associated with HB disease. By linear model, risk of hver involvement decreases significantly by 2% per annum. The severe complications ot fibrostsr aIv rare and HB disease rarely develops beyond the age of 18.

In 1998, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued the final rule,1 in which the principles of organ allocation were defined, to govern the operation of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN). This rule included the following guidelines for organ allocation: (1) organs should be allocated to transplant candidates in the order of medical urgency; (2) the role of waiting times should be minimized, and (3) attempts should be made to avoid futile transplants and to promote efficient use of our scarce donor organs. The consensus opinion to minimize waiting time was based on 2 recent reports that analyzed the impact of waiting time on survival of liver patients on the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) waiting list: one from the Institute of Medicine2 and a second report from Freeman et al.3 Both studies concluded that waiting time did not correlate with death on the waiting list and therefore should be de-emphasized in developing a new allocation algorithm. The challenge put forth by this conclusion was to create an allocation policy that made the most effective use of organs especially by making them available, whenever feasible, to the most medically urgent patients who are appropriate candidates for transplantation. This challenge was accepted by the UNOS Liver and Intestinal Committee, whose task it was to (1) make an assessment of the current allocation policy including the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, (2) evaluate a number of previously published survival models that were developed to estimate survival of patients with end-stage liver disease, and (3) develop a new disease severity index to be utilized to allocate liver donor organs in the future. After careful deliberation and extensive input from transplant hepatologists and surgeons, a number of guidelines were established for creating an index of disease severity to estimate survival in patients with chronic liver disease. By consensus, it was determined that such a disease severity index should rely on a few, readily available, objective variables that would be generally applicable to a heterogeneous group of patients with end-stage liver disease, to determine the risk of dying. Finally, the severity index should be clinically and statistically validated and be able to predict the probability of death in groups of patients with chronic liver disease who are demographically diverse and of varying etiology and disease severity. There was agreement among the committee that such a new index should not be introduced without careful prospective evaluation of the potential impact that such a model may have on the gravely ill patients awaiting liver transplant.

The prolonged waiting time caused by the lack of donor livers leads to an increasing number of terminally ill patients waiting for lifesaving liver transplantation. To rescue these patients, transplant programs are accepting donor organs from the expanded donor pool, using donors of increasingly older age, as well as from the pediatric age group, often despite significant mismatch in liver size. We investigated the outcome of 102 consecutive liver transplantations using pediatric donor livers in adult recipients. One‐year graft survival using donors aged 12 years or younger (group 1, n = 14) and donors aged 12 to 18 years (group 2, n = 88) was compared. In addition, risk factors for graft loss and vascular complications were analyzed. The 1‐year graft survival rate in adult transplant recipients in group 1 was 64.3% compared with 87.5% in those in group 2 (P = .015). The main cause of graft loss was arterial complications, occurring in 5 of 16 transplant recipients (31.3%). Major risk factors for graft loss and vascular complications were related to the size of the donor: age, height and weight, body surface area of donor and recipient, and warm ischemic time. We conclude that the outcome of small pediatric donor livers in adult recipients is poor, mainly because of the increased incidence of arterial complications. When a pediatric donor is used in an adult recipient, ischemic time should be kept to a minimum and anticoagulative therapy should be administered in the immediate postoperative period to avoid arterial complications. However, because small pediatric donors are the only source of lifesaving organs for the infant recipient, the use of small pediatric donor livers in adults should be avoided.

The effect of an aprotinin infusion on blood and blood product transfusion during adult primary orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) was investigated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Sixty-three patients were enrolled; 33 patients were administered an aprotinin regimen of a 1,000,000-KIU loading dose, followed by a 250,000-KIU/h infusion during surgery, and 30 patients were administered equivalent volumes of normal saline. Red blood cell (RBC) and blood product transfusion intraoperatively and for the first 24 hours postoperatively was by protocol. Intraoperative coagulation testing and thromboelastography (TEG; Hemoscope Corp, Skokie, IL) were performed. Intraoperative RBC transfusion was significantly less in the aprotinin group versus controls: median, 5 units (interquartile range [IQR], 3 to 9 units) versus 7 units (IQR, 5 to 16 units; P = .0016). No significant differences were found for intraoperative blood product transfusion or transfusion of RBCs or blood products in the 24-hour postoperative period. No significant differences were observed in intraoperative coagulation testing or TEG parameters. We conclude that aprotinin infusion reduces RBC transfusion requirements in OLT.

At Mayo Medical Center (Rochester, MN), surveillance rectal (and other-site) cultures have been routinely collected from liver transplant recipients as part of a selective bowel decontamination program. Beginning in 1995, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) colonization and infection were identified in Mayo Clinic liver and kidney transplant patients through our surveillance cultures. The purpose of this study is to describe the natural history of VRE colonization in this patient population. Fifty-two patients with VRE colonization (predominantly with a single vanB clone) were identified from September 1995 through December 1997. Five hundred ninety cultures were reviewed for this study (mean, 11.3 cultures/patient). The median time from initial VRE colonization to the last surveillance culture obtained was 306 days (range, 1 to 1,393 days). VRE infection was documented in 6 patients (11.3%). Eighteen patients (35%) met the criteria for clearance of VRE colonization, defined as VRE-negative rectal culture results on at least 3 consecutive occasions greater than 1 week apart. However, VRE was detected on subsequent surveillance cultures from 2 of these patients (11% relapse rate). Of the remaining 34 patients, 16 remained colonized with VRE and 18 did not meet the definition for clearance of VRE colonization because of incomplete follow-up. This study documents that VRE colonization usually persists for months to years in liver and kidney transplant patients.

Hypertension developing after liver transplantation during immunosuppression with cyclosporine A. reflects an unusual hemodynamic transition from peripheral vasodilation to systemic and renal vasoconstriction. Although dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers are often administered for their efficacy in promoting vasodilation, some liver transplant recipients report marked symptomatic intolerance to these agents. In the present study we examined systemic and renal responses to isradipine using systemic (thoracic bioimpedance) and renal hemodynamic measurements in 15 liver transplant recipients studied at the time of initial diagnosis of posttransplant hypertension and after 3 months of treatment. Circadian blood pressure patterns were examined by overnight ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before and during antihypertensive therapy. During isradipine administration, blood pressure decreased from 151 +/- 3/91 +/- 2 to 130 +/- 3/81 +/- 2 mm Hg (P < .01) without change in renal blood flow (406 +/- 43 to 425 +/- 52 mL/min/1.73m(2), P = NS) or renal vascular resistance index (25,674 +/- 3312 to 20,520 +/- 2311 dynes . sec . cm(-5)/m(2), P = NS). Pre-treatment differences in systemic vascular tone persisted during treatment and predicted the tendency for symptomatic tachycardia and flushing, predominantly in those with hyperdynamic circulations. Twice daily dosing of isradipine was associated with partial and significant restoration of the nocturnal decrease in blood pressure (systolic blood pressure decreased 5.5%, normal 13%), usually absent early after transplantation. Our results demonstrate the ability of hemodynamic measurements to predict the symptomatic response to antihypertensive therapy in the posttransplant setting. Am J Hypertens 2000;13:231-239 (C) 2000 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.

BACKGROUND:We studied the economic impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and its effective reduction with antiviral prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients.METHOD:Analysis of institutional charge data accumulated during a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing oral acyclovir 800 mg four times daily for 120 days (ACV) and intravenous ganciclovir 5 mg/kg every 12 h for 14 days followed by ACV for 106 days (GCV) was performed.RESULTS:Liver transplant recipients who developed CMV disease had significantly higher charges (median: $148,300) than those who developed asymptomatic CMV infection ($119,600) or experienced no CMV infection ($114,100) (P<0.01). A multiple linear regression analysis indicated that CMV disease is associated with a 49% increase in charges, independent of other factors influencing increased hospitalization charges. In CMV-seronegative patients who received a CMV-seropositive donor organ, GCV prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in charges, as compared to ACV prophylaxis ($113,900 vs. $153,300, respectively; P=0.02).CONCLUSIONS:CMV disease is an independent risk factor for increased resource utilization associated with liver transplantation. The use of an effective prophylactic antiviral regimen provides savings in health care resources, particularly in patients at high risk for developing CMV disease.

In the setting of moderate to severe pulmonary artery hypertension, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) may be complicated by pulmonary hemodynamic instability and cardiopulmonary mortality. We retrospectively studied the relationship between cardiopulmonary-related mortality and initial (untreated) pre-OLT pulmonary hemodynamics in 43 patients with portopulmonary hypertension who underwent attempted OLT. Thirty-six patients were reported in 18 peer-reviewed studies, and 7 patients underwent OLT at our institution since 1996. Transplantation procedure outcome, mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and transpulmonary gradient (TPG) are summarized. Overall mortality was reported in 15 of 43 patients (35%). Fourteen of the 15 deaths (93%) were primarily related to cardiopulmonary dysfunction. Two deaths were intraoperative, 8 deaths occurred during the transplantation hospitalization, and 4 patients died of cardiopulmonary deterioration posthospitalization. In 4 patients, the transplantation procedure could not be successfully completed. Cardiopulmonary mortality was associated with greater pre-OLT MPAP (49 +/- 14 v 36 +/- 7 mm Hg; P <.005), PVR (441 +/- 173 v 261 +/- 156 dynes.s.cm(-5); P <.005), and TPG (37 +/- 13 v 22 +/- 10 mm Hg; P <.005). MPAP of 50 mm Hg or greater was associated with 100% cardiopulmonary mortality. In patients with an MPAP of 35 to less than 50 mm Hg and PVR of 250 dynes.s.cm(-5) or greater, the mortality rate was 50%. No mortality was reported in patients with a pre-OLT MPAP less than 35 mm Hg or TPG less than 15 mm Hg. Cardiopulmonary-related mortality in OLT patients with portopulmonary hypertension was frequent and associated with significantly increased pre-OLT MPAP, PVR, and TPG compared with survivors. Treated or untreated, we recommend intraoperative cancellation or advise against proceeding to OLT for an MPAP of 50 mm Hg or greater. Patients with an MPAP of 35 to less than 50 mm Hg and PVR of 250 dynes.s.cm(-5) or greater appear to be at high risk for cardiopulmonary-related mortality after OLT. A prospective study is needed to define optimal pretransplantation treatments and pulmonary hemodynamic criteria that minimize OLT mortality associated with portopulmonary hypertension.

Taler, Sandra J.1; Textor, Stephen C.1; Schwartz, Lora L.1; Canzanello, Vincent J.1; Wiesner, Russell H.2; Krom, Ruud A.F.3 Author Information

The Mayo natural history model has been used widely as a tool to estimate prognosis in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), particularly liver transplant candidates. We present an abbreviated model in which a tabular method is used to approximate the risk score, which may be incorporated in the minimal listing criteria for liver transplant candidates. Data used in the development and validation of the original Mayo model were derived from 418 patients with well-characterized PBC. To construct an abbreviated risk score in a format similar to that of Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, 1 to 3 cut-off criteria were determined for each variable, namely age (0 point for <38, 1 for 38 to 62 and 2 for >/=63 years), bilirubin (0 point for <1, 1 for 1 to 1.7, 2 for 1.7 to 6.4, and 3 for >6.4 mg/dL), albumin (0 point for >4.1, 1 for 2.8 to 4.1, and 2 for <2.8 g/dL), prothrombin time (1 point for normal and 2 for prolonged) and edema (0 point for absent and 1 for present). The intervals between these criteria were chosen in a way to enable a meaningful classification of patients according to their risk for death. This score is highly correlated with the original risk score (r = 0.93; P <.01). The Kaplan-Meier estimate at 1 year was 90.6% in patients with a score of 6. The abbreviated risk score is a convenient method to quickly estimate the risk score in patients with PBC. An abbreviated score of 6 may be consistent with the current minimal listing criteria in liver transplant candidates.

Liver TransplantationVolume 6, Issue 1 p. 1-2 From The EditorsFree Access The changing of the guard: A new editorial team Russell H. Wiesner M.D., Russell H. Wiesner M.D. EditorSearch for more papers by this authorRuud A. F. Krom M.D.,Ph.D., Ruud A. F. Krom M.D.,Ph.D. EditorSearch for more papers by this author Russell H. Wiesner M.D., Russell H. Wiesner M.D. EditorSearch for more papers by this authorRuud A. F. Krom M.D.,Ph.D., Ruud A. F. Krom M.D.,Ph.D. EditorSearch for more papers by this author First published: 30 December 2003 https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.500060107AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume6, Issue1January 2000Pages 1-2 RelatedInformation

142 Background: Non-anastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) result from microcirculatory insufficiency or direct destruction of bile ducts. Human leukocyte associated antigen (HLA) disparity may lead to an immune response resulting in endothelial and biliary epithelial damage. Aim: To determine the relationship between NAS after OLT and HLA antigen disparity. Methods: After exclusion of patients with other causes for biliary strictures (ABO incompatibility, pediatric recipients, arterial complications, prolonged ischemic time (≥ 11 hr) and patients with short graft survival (< 21 days), 394 consecutive patients with primary OLT's since 7/17/1988 (UW-era) were studied. In 80 patients, the diagnosis was primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), leaving 314 patients with other indications (Non-PSC). NAS was diagnosed by cholangiography using indwelling biliary tubes, by ERCP or PTC. Results: The incidence of NAS in the Non-PSC group was 5.7% (18/314) and in the PSC group was 16.3% (13/80) (p<0.002). In the Non-PSC group, the incidence of NAS in patients with a partial/complete HLA-DR match was found to be significantly different compared to patients with a complete HLA-DR mismatch (0.8% vs. 10.7%, p<0.0001), while no difference in NAS was found with HLA A, B, DRw, DQ matching. (Table)TableIn PSC patients, HLA match had no effect on the incidence of NAS. Conclusions: In Non-PSC patients, a partial or complete HLA-DR match diminishes the risk of NAS after OLT. These data suggest that immunological mechanisms may play a role in the pathogenesis of NAS after OLT.