BACKGROUND: Acute subdural hematoma represents an important cause of disability and mortality. Its surgical treatment takes advantage of two surgical procedures: craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy, nevertheless the effectiveness of one procedure rather than the other is still debated. This study was conducted to identify which of the surgical procedures could provide better neurological outcome after traumatic acute subdural hematoma; as a secondary endpoint, the study tries to settle preoperative prognostic factors useful to identify the most appropriate surgical technique for every specific patient and kind of trauma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy between January 2010 and July 2017 at the Department of Neurosurgery of Umberto I Hospital in Rome. Ninety-four patients were selected and reviewing clinical records, preoperative and postoperative's data were collected (e.g., GCS, mechanism of trauma, CT findings, mortality rate, neurological outcome at discharge, mRS at 12 months). Data were analyzed using x2 test and the F test. The multivariate analysis was performed using a stepwise logistic regression. The analysis was carried out using SPSS software and a P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In 94 patients, 46.8% underwent decompressive craniectomy and 53.2% underwent craniotomy. The mortality rate was (53.2%); it was shown to be related to a GCS 8 (P=0.033) and to age 60 years old (P=0.0001). Decompressive craniectomy was performed most frequently for high energy trauma (P=0.006); the mean GCS at admission was 7.91 for decompressive craniectomy and 9.64 for craniotomy (P=0.05). Patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy and survived surgery showed a better neurological outcome compared to those who underwent craniotomy (P=0.009). The evaluation of mRS after 12 months did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In case of high energy trauma and GCS<8 different neurosurgeons decided to perform most frequently decompressive craniectomy rather than craniotomy. Furthermore, even if not related to survival rate, decompressive craniectomy showed a better neurological outcome especially in patients with GCS<8 at admission. In conclusion, even if prospective studies are required, these results depict the current attitude about the choice between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. (Cite this article as: Ruggeri AG, Cappelletti M, Tempestilli M, Fazzolari B, Delfini R. Surgical management of acute subdural hematoma: a comparison between decompressive craniectomy and craniotomy on patients treated from 2010 to the present in a single center. J Neurosurg Sci 2022;66:22-7.

OBJECT:The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of surgery for different cervicomedullary lesions on symptomatic pattern expression and postoperative outcome. We focused on specific outcome features of the early and late postoperative assessments. The former relies on surgery-related transient and permanent morbidity and feasibility of radicality in eloquent areas, whereas the latter on long-term course in lower grade tumors and benign tumorlike lesions (cavernomas, etc.). MATERIAL AND METHODS:We retrospectively analyzed 28 cases of intramedullary tumors of the cervicomedullary junction surgically treated at our institution between 1990 and 2018. All cases were stratified for gender, histology, macroscopic appearance, location, surgical approach, and presence of a plane of dissection (POD). Mean follow-up was 5.6 years and it was performed via periodic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional assessments (Karnofsky Performance Scale [KPS] and modified McCormick [MC] grading system). RESULTS:In all, 78.5% were low-grade tumors (or benign lesions) and 21.5% were high-grade tumors. Sixty-one percent underwent median suboccipital approach, 18% a posterolateral approach, and 21% a posterior cervical approach. Gross total resection was achieved in 54% of cases, near-total resection (>90%) in 14%, and subtotal resection (50-90%) in 32% of cases. Early postoperative morbidity was 25%, but late functional evaluation in 79% of the patients showed KPS > 70 and MC grade I; only 21% of cases showed KPS < 70 and MC grades II and III at late follow-up. Mean overall survival was 7 years in low-grade tumors or cavernomas and 11.7 months in high-grade tumors. Progression-free survival at the end of follow-up was 71% (evaluated mainly on low-grade tumors). CONCLUSIONS:The surgical goal should be to achieve maximal cytoreduction and minimal postoperative neurologic damage. Functional outcome is influenced by the presence of a POD, radicality, histology, preoperative status, and employment of advanced neuroimaging planning and intraoperative monitoring.

Background One important problem in treatment of ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) is surgical timing. The aim of the study was to understand which parameters affect surgical timing and outcomes the most. Materials and Methods Between January 2010 and December 2018, 25 patients underwent surgery for a ruptured bAVM at our institute. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) score was used to evaluate hemorrhage severity, while Spetzler-Martin scale for AVM architecture. We divided patients in two groups: “early surgery” and “delayed surgery.” The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) evaluated the outcomes. Results Eleven patients were in the “early surgery” group: age 38 ± 18 years, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 7.64 ± 2.86, ICH score 2.82 ± 0.71, hematoma volume 45.55 ± 23.21 mL. Infratentorial origin of hemorrhage was found in 27.3% cases; AVM grades were I to II in 82%, III in 9%, and IV in 9% cases. Outcome at 3 months was favorable in 36.4% cases and in 54.5% after 1 year. Fourteen patients were in the “delayed surgery” group: age 41 ± 16 years, GCS 13.21 ± 2.39, ICH score 1.14 ± 0.81, hematoma volume 29.89 ± 21.33 mL. Infratentorial origin of hemorrhage was found in 14.2% cases; AVM grades were I to II in 50% and III in 50%. Outcome at 3 months was favorable in 78.6% cases and in 92.8% after 1 year. Conclusions The early outcome is influenced more by the ICH score, while the delayed outcome by Spetzler-Martin grading. These results suggest that it is better to perform surgery after a rest period, away from the hemorrhage when possible. Moreover, this study suggests how in young patient with a high ICH score and a low AVM grade, early surgery seems to be a valid and feasible therapeutic strategy.

OBJECTIVE: The endoscopic technique is in many cases the technique of choice for the removal of pituitary adenomas. Extended endoscopic approaches make it possible to remove lesions with suprasellar and parasellar extension and fibrous consistency. We identify some characteristics that might point to the adoption of an expanded approach in the preoperative phase. METHODS: We considered 66 consecutive cases treated for pituitary macroadenomas. All patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography, as well as postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. From the analysis of surgical reports and preoperative radiologic investigations, we extracted data related to size, extension, morphologic characteristics, consistency, and type of approach used (sellar or expanded). The degree of removal was judged to be total, near total, subtotal, or partial. RESULTS: The data showed that in some cases it is possible to assume in advance that there is a need for an expanded endoscopic approach. The features that led to an extended approach for extracapsular dissection of the lesion were the size of the tumor; an hourglass/dumbbell shape; lateral extension to the suprasellar carotid artery; Knosp degree 3 or 4; contrast enhancement heterogeneity; intratumoral hemorrhage, erosion, or discontinuity of the sellar floor; and increased sellar depth, which predicts increased thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to predict the consistency of pituitary adenomas allows the surgeon to design a surgical procedure tailored to the patient. This approach has advantages concerning the extent of resection and allows a radical strategy with a single surgical procedure to be pursued.

BACKGROUND:Chiari malformations (CM) represent a group of anomalies characterized by descent of the cerebellar tonsils or vermis into the cervical spinal canal. These malformations can be associated with abnormalities such as hydrocephalus, spina bifida, hydromyelia, syringomyelia, curvature of the spine (kyphosis and scoliosis) and tethered cord syndrome. Hereditary syndromes and other disorders that affect growth and bone formation-such as craniosynostosis, Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and Klippel-Feil syndrome-can also be associated with CM.METHODS:The literature concerning treatment is large, and an extensive range of therapeutic protocols have been described. The literature is inclined in favour of surgery; however, there is controversy over when to perform surgery and which procedure is most appropriate. Lately, the indications for stabilization have been under discussion.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:In this paper we review the literature and discuss the historical background, anatomical forms, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, relationships with other diseases and diagnostic procedures for these abnormalities.

Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak still represents the main limitation of endonasal endoscopic surgery. The aim of the study is to classify the risk of postoperative leak and to propose a decision-making protocol to be applied in the preoperative phase based on radiological data and on intraoperative findings to obtain the best closure.One hundred fifty-two patients were treated in our institution; these patients were divided into 2 groups because from January 2013 the closure technique was standardized adopting a preoperative decision-making protocol. The Postoperative CSF leak Risk Classification (PCRC) was estimated taking into account the size of the lesion, the extent of the osteodural defect, and the presence of intraoperative CSF leak (iCSF-L). The closure techniques were classified into 3 types according to PCRC estimation (A, B, and C).The incidence of the use of a nasoseptal flap is significantly increased in the second group 80.3% versus 19.8% of the first group and the difference was statistically significant P < 0.0001. The incidence of postoperative CSF leak (pCSF-L) in the first group was 9.3%. The incidence of postoperative pCSF-L in the second group was 1.5%. An analysis of the pCSF-L rate in the 2 groups showed a statistically significant difference P = 0.04.The type of closure programmed was effective in almost all patients, allowing to avoid the possibility of a CSF leak. Our protocol showed a significant total reduction in the incidence of CSF leak, but especially in that subgroup of patients where a leak is usually unexpected.

BACKGROUND: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are increasingly identified and are an important health-care burden: in the past they were commonly treated by surgical clipping, but nowadays endovascular coil embolization is increasingly employed as an alternative. METHODS: The Unruptured Aneurysms Italian Study (UAIS) is a multicentric cooperative prospective study aimed to delineate the "State of the Art" of UIAs treatment in Italy. 51 Italian Neurosurgical and Neuroradiological Units, representatives of all 20 Italian regions are involved in the Study. RESULTS: DAIS started on June 2003 and ended on July 2007. 1138 patients were collected by that date, but 181 were ruled-out due to severe violation of the protocol: 957 had complete data and could be statistically evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: UAIS demonstrates that the treatment of UAs, as performed in Italy as a Nation, is effective in improving long-term outcome vs. natural history, particularly in aneurysms larger than 7 mm.

Background Anterior communicating artery (AComA) aneurysms are the most frequent intracranial aneurysms. They have a high risk of rupture, morbidity, and mortality following rupture. Surgical treatment is complex because of their deep location, proximity to the perforators, and their different projections and relations with the parent vessels. This retrospective study reports our experience in the surgical management of AComA aneurysms, describing how the microsurgical strategy is influenced by their projection and size, the orientation of the AComA complex, and the location and caliber of the parent vessels. Methods We reviewed all the patients treated surgically at our institution from September 1995 to March 2015 for ruptured and unruptured AComA aneurysms. Operative reports, neuroimages, and intraoperative videos were analyzed, and the surgical technique was examined. Illustrative cases are also included. Results A complete documentation was available for 223 (75.3%) of the 296 treated patients. Medium-size (55.1%) and superiorly projecting (31.8%) aneurysms were the most represented; 158 patients (70.9%) had different A1 diameters. A left- or right-sided pterional approach was performed in 85 patients (38.1%) and 138 patients (61.9%), respectively. A complete occlusion was documented in 185 patients (83%). Conclusions Posterior and superior projections are the most complex to deal with because of the difficult dissection of the perforators and the contralateral A2, respectively. Approaching from the side of the dominant A1 ensures a prompt proximal control. Searching preoperatively for an eventual rotation of the AComA complex and for the location of the A2s can be very helpful for intraoperative orientation.

BACKGROUND:To evaluate the results of surgery for vertebral involvement in multiple myeloma (MM) following the introduction of the new chemotherapy in 2006.METHODS:Retrospective cohort study evaluating the patients with MM vertebral lesions from January 2006 to January 2014. Outcomes were based upon participation in ODI and EQ-5D. Statistical interpretation of the data was performed with SPSS version 19 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).RESULTS:One hundred twenty patients affected by MM were potentially eligible for recruitment. About 1/3 patients needed an operation for vertebral involvement. The disability was mainly related to the number of vertebrae affected by MM. No difference in disability and quality of life was observed between operated and non-operated patients, according to age, levels, and follow-up. The operated patients with a Thoracic location reported lower disability and higher quality of life than non-operated patients. Non-operated patients with one or two vertebrae affected reported lower levels of quality of life.CONCLUSIONS:When a spinal column involvement occurs, the probability of undergoing surgery is about 40%. Operated patients show a moderate disability and the increased tendency is related to the number of vertebrae involved. The quality of life is middle in average and middle-high in patients operated for thoracic lesions. Nowadays the spinal surgeon must have a perspective view about MM vertebral lesions, evaluating the stability of the spine, the presence of deformity, the risk of vertebral fractures and the presence of drug resistant pain, that deteriorate the disability and the quality of life related to the underlying disease.

Purpose: The recurrence of a lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common cause of poor outcome following lumbar discectomy. The aim of this study was to assess a potential relationship between the incidence of recurrent LDH and the surgical technique used. Furthermore, we tried to define the best surgical technique for the treatment of recurrent LDH to limit subsequent recurrences. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 979 consecutive patients treated for LDH. A multivariate analysis tried to identify a possible correlation between (1) the surgical technique used to treat the primary LDH and its recurrence; (2) technique used to treat the recurrence of LDH and the second recurrence; and (3) incidence of recurrence and clinical outcome. Data were analyzed with the Pearson's Chi-square test for its significance. Results: In 582 cases (59.4%), a discectomy was performed, while in 381 (40.6%), a herniectomy was undertaken. In 16 cases, a procedure marked as “other” was performed. Among all patients, 110 (11.2%) had a recurrence. Recurrent LDH was observed in 55 patients following discectomy (9.45%), in 45 following herniectomy (11.8%), and in 10 (62.5%) following other surgery. Our data showed that 90.5% of discectomies and 88.2% of the herniectomies had a good clinical outcome, whereas other surgeries presented a recurrence rate of 62.5% (Pearson's χ2 < 0.001). No statistical differences were observed between discectomy or herniectomy, for the treatment of the recurrence, and the incidence for the second recurrences (P > 0.05). A significant statistical correlation emerged between the use of other techniques and the incidence for the second recurrences (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The recurrence of an LDH is one of the most feared complications following surgery. Although the standard discectomy has been considered more protective toward the recurrence compared to herniectomy, our data suggest that there is no significant correlation between the surgical technique and the risk of LDH recurrence.

Since the introduction of endoscopic surgery for the treatment of skull base lesions, one of the main issues has been the CSF leak. The implementation of efficient reconstructive techniques has reduced the post-operative CSF leak rate. However, none of the techniques for closure has proved to be totally effective in preventing CSF leakage. We propose a possible solution to this problem. Two patients underwent surgery for suprasellar meningioma via an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach and subsequently presented post-operative CSF leakage. They were treated via injections of autologous fibrin glue at the patients' bedside. The autologous fibrin glue was obtained using the automated Vivostat (R) system, that prepares 5 ml of autologous fibrin sealant from 120 ml of the patient's own blood. In both patients, we obtained the permanent closure of the small defects and the interruption of the leakage. The application of autologous fibrin glue made it possible to successfully treat these two cases of postoperative CSF leak without the need of a second operation. The advantage of using autologous fibrin glue is probably related to the high biological activity of such material in promoting a faster healing, it might be a solution in selected cases.

BACKGROUND:This is a retrospective study on 18 patients affected by thoraco-lumbar junction burst fractures (TLJBF) A3 or A4 at computed tomography (CT) scan who referred to our hospital. To assess the surgical results in terms of pain and quality of life in a series of neurologically intact patients affected by TLJBF who underwent surgery after 3-4 months from the injury. In literature there is controversy if pain could be an indication for surgery in TLJBF and series of patients conservatively managed with success have been reported.METHODS:A retrospective study on 18 patients is reported. Patients included in this series were neurologically intact and affected by a TLJBF A3 or A4 at CT scan, the height of the burst vertebral body was >50%, spinal canal invasion was <30% and kyphosis deformity <30 degrees. Pain and quality of life were evaluated using graphic rating scale (GRS) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores on admission, at the clinical follow-up and in post-surgical period.RESULTS:Comparing pre- and post-operative EQ-5D, the scores had a statistically significant decrease after the operation (P<0.001) [pre-surgery EQ-5D was 2.60 (SD =0.67), post-surgery EQ-5D was 1.37 (SD =0.41)]. Also analyzing the EQ5D-VAS scores, the t-test revealed that surgery (P<0.01) improved the quality of life with statistically significance (EQ5D-VAS pre =43.89, SD =12.43 and EQ5D-VAS post =73.33, SD =10.84). Analyzing pre- and post-surgical GRS scores, the pain decreased significantly with the maximum mean difference among the 2nd and 3rd month before surgery and at 12 months after surgery (respectively D =5.444, P<0.001 and D =5.167, P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS:Conservatively managed patients affected by TLJBF require a strict clinical follow-up since pain sometimes is present in the following months and it affects the quality of life. Surgery should be considered for these cases.

BACKGROUND: Ependymoma accounts for 3%-9% of all neuroepithelial tumors. Giant cell ependymoma (GCE) is a rare and distinct variant, with only 22 cases described in the literature. The 2007 World Health Organization classification first acknowledged this rare subtype. The cytologic features of GCE include the presence of pleomorphic giant cells with several cellular atypias, which at intraoperative frozen diagnosis may appear to be high-grade glial lesions. Despite its apparently malignant histology, GCE seems to be a neoplasm with a relatively good prognosis. Extended tumor removal is the gold standard without adjuvant treatment. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe the first case, to our knowledge, of GCE situated at the cervicomedullary junction in a 62-year-old patient. Surgery was performed with combined intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials. Intraoperative frozen diagnosis revealed a high-grade glial neoplasm; however, gross total resection was achieved. The definitive diagnosis was GCE. At follow-up evaluation 11 years after surgery, the patient did not present with any tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: As the intraoperative diagnosis can be misleading, whenever a cleavage plane is recognized, it is essential to perform a gross total resection with the aid of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring, to improve prognosis and neurologic outcome. Data reported in the literature show that prognosis is mainly influenced by grade of resection.

The treatment of vertebral instability has evolved over the years with the aim of searching and developing the most effective and less invasive procedure to reduce and to neutralize dynamically the metameric hypermobility; pedicle screw fixation (PSF) has been widely employed to reach vertebral fixation and fusion and still remains the “gold standard” technique [1, 2]. PSF is associated with well-known risks [3, 4] such as increased rates of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, fracture of the pedicles during screw insertion, transient/permanent injury to nervous structures, and deep wound infections. Furthermore, as a result of muscle dissection and long operative times, some disadvantages can be evident, such as postoperative back pain and long postoperative recovery time [5]. There are risks of exposure to ionizing radiations for the surgeon and the whole operating room staff, other than for the patient, due to the use of fluoroscopic guidance for the implantation of pedicle screws (PS) [4, 6]. The muscle dissection related to surgical exposure leaded to the development of minimally invasive procedures, at the cost of increased exposure to ionizing radiations. This has led to the development of a lot of different devices, some of them used indiscriminately in recent years but with questionable long-term results. In this context, a major role was played by interspinous devices, generally used in degenerative lumbar spine disease. Interspinous posterior device (IPD) is a term used to identify a relatively recent group of implants employed in the treatment of lumbar spinal degenerative disease. This kind of device is classified as part of the group of the dynamic stabilization systems of the spine. The concept of dynamic stabilization has been actually replaced by the principle of dynamic neutralization of the hypermobility, with the intention of clarifying that the primary aim of this kind of systems is not the preservation of the movement but the dynamic neutralization of the segmental hypermobility, which is at the base of the pathological condition. The surgical indications for the implantation of an IPD are the spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication, assuming that its function is the enlargement of the neural foramen and the decompression of the roots forming the cauda equina in the central part of the vertebral canal. Recently, it has been noticed that those devices have significant problems in terms of clinical follow-up, since the action exercising on the vertebral body has an appreciable effect on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine. This is why in the last few years new devices have been introduced, the so-called interspinous anchors (IA) or interspinous fusion devices (IFD). Those differ from the IPD as their aim is the fusion of the spinous processes on which they are anchored, and therefore the target is spinal stabilization by arthrodesis and not the dynamic neutralization of the hypermovement. The question that requires response is: are those devices able to replace arthrodesis with plates and screws in lumbar instability?