Brain age estimated by machine learning from T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (T1w MRIs) can reveal how brain disorders alter brain aging and can help in the early detection of such disorders. A fundamental step is to build an accurate age estimator from healthy brain MRIs. We focus on this step, and propose a framework to improve the accuracy, generality, and interpretation of age estimation in healthy brain MRIs. For accuracy, we used one of the largest sample sizes ( N = 16,705). For each subject, our proposed algorithm first explicitly splits the T1w image, which has been commonly treated as a single-channel 3D image in other studies, into two 3D image channels representing contrast and morphometry information. We further proposed a "fusion-with-attention" deep learning convolutional neural network (FiA-Net) to learn how to best fuse the contrast and morphometry image channels. FiA-Net recognizes varying contributions across image channels at different brain anatomy and different feature layers. In contrast, multi-channel fusion does not exist for brain age estimation, and is mostly attention free in other medical image analysis tasks (e.g., image synthesis, or segmentation), where treating channels equally may not be optimal. For generality, we used lifespan data 0-97 years of age for real-world utility; and we thoroughly tested FiA-Net for multi-site and multi-scanner generality by two phases of cross-validations in discovery and replication data, compared to most other studies with only one phase of cross-validation. For interpretation, we directly measured each artificial neuron's correlation with the chronological age, compared to other studies looking at the saliency of features where salient features may or may not predict age. Overall, FiA-Net achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.00 years and Pearson correlation r = 0 . 9840 with known chronological ages in healthy brain MRIs 0-97 years of age, comparing favorably with state-of-the-art algorithms and studies for accuracy and generality across sites and datasets. We also provided interpretations on how different artificial neurons and real neuroanatomy contribute to the age estimation. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Stroke is an uncommon but an important and under-recognized cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Strokes may be due to either brain ischemia or intracranial hemorrhage. Common symptoms of pediatric acute stroke include headache, vomiting, focal weakness, numbness, visual disturbance, seizures, and altered consciousness. Most children presenting with an acute neurologic deficit do not have an acute stroke, but have symptoms due to stroke mimics which include complicated migraine, seizures with postictal paralysis, and Bell palsy. Because of frequency of stroke mimics, in children and the common lack of specificity in symptoms, the diagnosis of a true stroke may be delayed. There are a relatively large number of potential causes of stroke mimic and true stroke. Consequently, imaging plays a critical role in the assessment of children with possible stroke and especially in children who present with acute onset of stroke symptoms. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Lymphatic malformations are benign hamartomatous tumors present at birth but usually diagnosed in early childhood. We report a case of prenatal diagnosis of an isolated unilateral retrobulbar lymphatic malformation with fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This was first detected at 27 weeks' gestational age. Postnatal ocular examinations at 4 days and 5 weeks of age showed no signs of optic nerve compromise. Postnatal MRI at 18 days of age showed slight increase in size of the lesion, and no intracranial vascular malformations were detected.
Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. The majority of accidental pediatric head trauma is minor and sustained without intracranial injury. Well-validated pediatric-specific clinical decision guidelines should be used to identify very low-risk children who can safely forgo imaging. In those who require acute imaging, CT is considered the first-line imaging modality for suspected intracranial injury because of the short duration of the examination and its high sensitivity for acute hemorrhage. MRI can accurately detect traumatic complications, but often necessitates sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment. There is a paucity of literature regarding vascular injuries in pediatric blunt head trauma and imaging is typically guided by clinical suspicion. Advanced imaging techniques have the potential to identify changes that are not seen by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Background Faster and motion robust magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences are desirable in pediatric brain MRI as they can help reduce the need for monitored anesthesia care, which is a costly and limited resource that carries medical risks. Objective To evaluate the diagnostic equivalency of commercially available accelerated motion robust MR sequences relative to standard sequences. Materials and methods This was an institutional review board-approved prospective study. Subjects underwent a clinical brain MRI using conventional multiplanar images at 3 Tesla followed by fast axial T2 and FLAIR (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) sequences optimized for an approximately 50% reduction in acquisition time. Conventional and fast images from each subject were reviewed by two blinded pediatric neuroradiologists. The readers evaluated the presence of 12 findings. Intra-observer agreement was estimated for fast versus conventional sequences. For each set of sequences, interobserver agreement calculations and chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences between fast and conventional acquisitions. An independent third reader reviewed the intra-observer discrepancies and adjudicated them as being more conspicuous on fast sequence, conventional sequence or the equivalent. The readers also were asked to rate motion artifacts with a previously validated score. Results Images from 77 children (mean age: 11.3 years) were analyzed. Intra-observer agreement (fast versus conventional) ranged between 89.2% and 92.3%. Interobserver agreement ranged between 86.1% and 88.4%. Interobserver agreement was significantly higher for conventional FLAIR relative to fast FLAIR for small (<5 mm) foci of T2 in the white matter. Otherwise, interobserver agreement was not different between the fast and conventional sequences. For awake subjects, fast sequences had significantly fewer artifacts ( P <0.05). Conclusion Conventional T2 and FLAIR sequences can be optimized to shorten acquisition while maintaining diagnostic equivalency. These faster sequences were also less susceptible to motion artifacts.
Brain age prediction based on children's brain MRI is an important biomarker for brain health and brain development analysis. In this paper, we consider the 3D brain MRI volume as a sequence of 2D images and propose a new framework using the recurrent neural network for brain age estimation. The proposed method is named as 2D-ResNet18+Long short-term memory (LSTM), which consists of four parts: 2D ResNet18 for feature extraction on 2D images, a pooling layer for feature reduction over the sequences, an LSTM layer, and a final regression layer. We apply the proposed method on a public multisite NIH-PD dataset and evaluate generalization on a second multisite dataset, which shows that the proposed 2D-ResNet18+LSTM method provides better results than traditional 3D based neural network for brain age estimation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Imaging CBF is important for managing pediatric moyamoya. Traditional arterial spin-labeling MR imaging detects delayed transit thorough diseased arteries but is inaccurate for measuring perfusion because of these delays. Velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling is insensitive to transit delay and well-suited for imaging Moyamoya perfusion. This study assesses the accuracy of a combined velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling and traditional pulsed arterial spin-labeling CBF approach in pediatric moyamoya, with comparison to blood flow patterns on conventional angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Twenty-two neurologically stable pediatric patients with moyamoya and 5 asymptomatic siblings without frank moyamoya were imaged with velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling, pulsed arterial spin-labeling, and DSA (patients). Qualitative comparison was performed, followed by a systematic comparison using ASPECTS-based scoring. Quantitative pulsed arterial spin-labeling CBF and velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling CBF for the middle cerebral artery, anterior cerebral artery, and posterior cerebral artery territories were also compared. RESULTS:Qualitatively, velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling perfusion maps reflect the DSA parenchymal phase, regardless of postinjection timing. Conversely, pulsed arterial spin-labeling maps reflect the DSA appearance at postinjection times closer to the arterial spin-labeling postlabeling delay, regardless of vascular phase. ASPECTS comparison showed excellent agreement (88%, κ = 0.77, P < .001) between arterial spin-labeling and DSA, suggesting velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling and pulsed arterial spin-labeling capture key perfusion and transit delay information, respectively. CBF coefficient of variation, a marker of perfusion variability, was similar for velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling in patient regions of delayed-but-preserved perfusion compared to healthy asymptomatic sibling regions (coefficient of variation = 0.30 versus 0.26, respectively, Δcoefficient of variation = 0.04), but it was significantly different for pulsed arterial spin-labeling (coefficient of variation = 0.64 versus 0.34, Δcoefficient of variation = 0.30, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:Velocity-selective arterial spin-labeling offers a powerful approach to image perfusion in pediatric moyamoya due to transit delay insensitivity. Coupled with pulsed arterial spin-labeling for transit delay information, a volumetric MR imaging approach capturing key DSA information is introduced.
Choosing the appropriate imaging in children with accidental traumatic spine injuries can be challenging because the recommendations based on scientific evidence at this time differ from those applied in adults. This differentiation is due in part to differences in anatomy and physiology of the developing spine. This publication uses scientific evidence and a panel of pediatric experts to summarize best current imaging practices for children with accidental spine trauma. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Scoliosis is frequently encountered in childhood, with prevalence of 2%. The majority is idiopathic, without vertebral segmentation anomaly, dysraphism, neuromuscular abnormality, skeletal dysplasia, tumor, or infection. As a complement to clinical assessment, radiography is the primary imaging modality used to classify scoliosis and subsequently monitor its progression and response to treatment. MRI is utilized selectively to assess for neural axis abnormalities in those at higher risk, including those with congenital scoliosis, early onset idiopathic scoliosis, and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with certain risk factors. CT, although not routinely employed in the initial evaluation of scoliosis, may have a select role in characterizing the bone anomalies of congenital scoliosis and in perioperative planning.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Purpose To integrate markerless head motion tracking with prospectively corrected neuroanatomical MRI sequences and to investigate high‐frequency motion correction during imaging echo trains. Methods A commercial 3D surface tracking system, which estimates head motion by registering point cloud reconstructions of the face, was used to adapt the imaging FOV based on head movement during MPRAGE and T 2 SPACE (3D variable flip‐angle turbo spin‐echo) sequences. The FOV position and orientation were updated every 6 lines of k‐space (< 50 ms) to enable “within‐echo‐train” prospective motion correction (PMC). Comparisons were made with scans using “before‐echo‐train” PMC, in which the FOV was updated only once per TR, before the start of each echo train (ET). Continuous‐motion experiments with phantoms and in vivo were used to compare these high‐frequency and low‐frequency correction strategies. MPRAGE images were processed with FreeSurfer to compare estimates of brain structure volumes and cortical thickness in scans with different PMC. Results The median absolute pose differences between markerless tracking and MR image registration were 0.07/0.26/0.15 mm for x/y/z translation and 0.06º/0.02º/0.12° for rotation about x/y/z. The PMC with markerless tracking substantially reduced motion artifacts. The continuous‐motion experiments showed that within‐ET PMC, which minimizes FOV encoding errors during ETs that last over 1 second, reduces artifacts compared with before‐ET PMC. T 2 SPACE was found to be more sensitive to motion during ETs than MPRAGE. FreeSurfer morphometry estimates from within‐ET PMC MPRAGE images were the most accurate. Conclusion Markerless head tracking can be used for PMC, and high‐frequency within‐ET PMC can reduce sensitivity to motion during long imaging ETs.
Sinusitis is common in children that usually resolves spontaneously. Imaging is not part of the standard of care for initial diagnosis, however may be necessary in cases with persistent or chronic sinusitis to guide surgical intervention, or to rule out intracranial and vascular complications of sinusitis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the leading imaging modalities. In this article, appropriateness in use of imaging modalities are discussed under common/clinically relevant scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
In the context of health care, risk assessment is the identification, evaluation and estimation of risk related to a particular clinical situation or intervention compared to accepted medical practice standards. The goal of risk assessment is to determine an acceptable level of risk for a given clinical treatment or intervention in association with the provided clinical circumstances for a patient or group of patients. In spite of the inherent challenges related to risk assessment in pediatric cross-sectional imaging, the potential risks of ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia in the pediatric population are thought to be quite small. Nevertheless both issues continue to be topics of discussion concerning risk and generate significant anxiety and concern for patients, parents and practicing pediatricians. Recent advances in CT technology allow for more rapid imaging with substantially lower radiation exposures, obviating the need for anesthesia for many indications and potentially mitigating concerns related to radiation exposure. In this review, we compare and contrast the potential risks of CT without anesthesia against the potential risks of MRI with anesthesia, and discuss the implications of this analysis on exam selection, providing specific examples related to neuroblastoma surveillance imaging.
Headaches in children are not uncommon and have various causes. Proper neuroimaging of these children is very specific to the headache type. Care must be taken to choose and perform the most appropriate initial imaging examination in order to maximize the ability to properly determine the cause with minimum risk to the child. This evidence-based report discusses the different headache types in children and provides appropriate guidelines for imaging these children. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Objective: Report a novel mutation in the ATP1A2 gene in a patient with cognitive delay, febrile seizures, and recurrent hemiparesis with associated transient neuroimaging abnormalities. Background: Conditions causing transient, lateralized neurologic symptoms include stroke/transient ischemic attack, postictal state, alternating hemiplegia of childhood, and hemiplegic migraine, among others. Hemiplegic migraine, a migraine with aura including reversible motor weakness and often associated transient sensory, visual, or speech symptoms, is a rare migraine variant with mean onset in the second decade of life.1 Neuroimaging can show cerebral vasoconstriction or vasodilation and regional perfusion changes during attacks, but classically normalizes between attacks.2 Some familial and sporadic cases have been linked to mutations in genes involved in ion transportation, including ATP1A2, CACNA1A, and SCN1A. ATP1A2 encodes a sodium-potassium ATPase, and its mutations exhibit significant phenotypic heterogeneity but have been associated with hemiplegic migraine and seizures.3,4 Design/Methods: Case study of a patient evaluated at our tertiary medical center. Results: The patient was a 5-year-old right-handed boy with a history of language delay, complex febrile seizures, abnormal electroencephalography (EEG), and transient left-sided weakness. Family history was unremarkable. He presented with acute onset right-sided weakness, expressive aphasia, and dysarthria, without headache. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed to rule-out stroke showed decreased left hemisphere perfusion without restricted diffusion, asymmetric venous prominence on susceptibility-weighted imaging, and pruning of the left hemispheric peripheral arteries on MR angiography. Symptoms resolved within two hours, though the next day left-sided visuospatial neglect transiently developed. Repeat MRI while asymptomatic was normal. The patient was found to have a novel mutation (c.1091C>G) in the ATP1A2 gene predicted to alter the protein’s phosphorylation site. Parental testing is pending. Conclusions: This case identifies a novel, potentially pathogenic mutation of the ATP1A2 gene corresponding to a phenotype of a rare migraine variant and contributes to our evolving understanding of migraine molecular genetics and pathophysiology. Study Supported by: Disclosure: Dr. Stredny has nothing to disclose. Dr. Winden has nothing to disclose. Dr. Danehy has nothing to disclose. Dr. Robertson has nothing to disclose. Dr. Trenor has nothing to disclose. Dr. Rivkin has nothing to disclose. Dr. Lehman has nothing to disclose. Dr. Bernson-Leung has nothing to disclose.
In this paper we present a web-based software solution to the problem of implementing real-time collaborative neuroimage visualization. In both clinical and research settings, simple and powerful access to imaging technologies across multiple devices is becoming increasingly useful. Prior technical solutions have used a server-side rendering and push-to-client model wherein only the server has the full image dataset. We propose a rich client solution in which each client has all the data and uses the Google Drive Realtime API for state synchronization. We have developed a small set of reusable client-side object-oriented JavaScript modules that make use of the XTK toolkit, a popular open-source JavaScript library also developed by our team, for the in-browser rendering and visualization of brain image volumes. Efficient realtime communication among the remote instances is achieved by using just a small JSON object, comprising a representation of the XTK image renderers' state, as the Google Drive Realtime collaborative data model. The developed open-source JavaScript modules have already been instantiated in a web-app called MedView, a distributed collaborative neuroimage visualization application that is delivered to the users over the web without requiring the installation of any extra software or browser plugin. This responsive application allows multiple physically distant physicians or researchers to cooperate in real time to reach a diagnosis or scientific conclusion. It also serves as a proof of concept for the capabilities of the presented technological solution.
Children who present with acute transient focal neurologic symptoms raise concern for stroke or transient ischemic attack. We present a series of 16 children who presented with transient focal neurologic symptoms that raised concern for acute stroke but who had no evidence of infarction and had unilateral, potentially reversible imaging features on vascular and perfusion-sensitive brain MR imaging. Patients were examined with routine brain MR imaging, MRA, perfusion-sensitive sequences, and DWI. Fourteen (88%) children had lateralized MRA evidence of arterial tree pruning without occlusion, all had negative DWI findings, and all showed evidence of hemispheric hypoperfusion by susceptibility-weighted imaging or arterial spin-labeling perfusion imaging at presentation. These findings normalized following resolution of symptoms in all children who had follow-up imaging (6/16, 38%). The use of MR imaging with perfusion-sensitive sequences, DWI, and MRA can help to rapidly distinguish children with conditions mimicking stroke from those with acute stroke.
Pediatric patients requiring transfer to a dedicated children’s hospital from an outside institution may undergo CT imaging as part of their evaluation. Whether this imaging is performed prior to or after transfer has been shown to impact the radiation dose imparted to the patient. Other quality variables could also be affected by the pediatric experience and expertise of the scanning institution.
Children who present with transient neurologic symptoms raise concern for stroke as the underlying etiology. The rapid differentiation of stroke mimic from stroke in order to determine eligibility for hyperacute stroke treatment constitutes a unique and important diagnostic challenge in children. We used perfusion, diffusion, and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) imaging to identify key imaging findings that together indicated a stroke mimic. We present a case series of 17 children who had transient neurologic symptoms and had MRA, perfusion, and diffusion weighted imaging in the acute period. The children ranged in age from 2 to 17 years of age. Among 17 children, 13 (76%) had headache at presentation. Thirteen (76%) children had focal MRA evidence of arterial pruning without occlusion, all had negative diffusion weighted imaging, and all showed evidence of hemispheric decreased perfusion by susceptibility-weighted imaging and/or arterial spin label perfusion imaging. Thirteen of 17 had left sided imaging findings. In all children who had repeat imaging (6/17;35%) these findings had reversed. No patient met clinical criteria for familial hemiplegic migraine. Only 6 (35%) had recurrence of transient neurologic symptoms since initial presentation; none had stroke. Use of combined MR imaging to include perfusion, diffusion and angiography can help to distinguish rapidly children who present with stroke mimics whose symptoms are likely to be transient and who do not require hyperacute stroke treatment.
Recent political and economic factors have contributed to a meaningful change in the way that quality in health care, and by extension value, are viewed. While quality is often evaluated on the basis of subjective criteria, pay-for-performance programs that link reimbursement to various measures of quality require use of objective and quantifiable measures. This evolution to value-based payment was accelerated by the 2015 passage of the Medicare Access and CHIP (Children’s Health Insurance Program) Reauthorization Act (MACRA). While many of the drivers of these changes are rooted in federal policy and programs such as Medicare and aimed at adult patients, the practice of pediatrics and pediatric radiology will be increasingly impacted. This article addresses issues related to the use of quantitative measures to evaluate the quality of services provided by the pediatric radiology department or sub-specialty section, particularly as seen from the viewpoint of a payer that may be considering ways to link payment to performance. The paper concludes by suggesting a metric categorization strategy to frame future work on the subject.